P. 167 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16601-16700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bezoutlem4 16601*	Lemma for bezout 16602. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = inf(𝑀, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	bezout 16602*	Bézout's identity: For any integers 𝐴 and 𝐵, there are integers 𝑥, 𝑦 such that (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 · 𝑥 + 𝐵 · 𝑦. This is Metamath 100 proof #60. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦)))
Theorem	dvdsgcd 16603	An integer which divides each of two others also divides their gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsgcdb 16604	Biconditional form of dvdsgcd 16603. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	dfgcd2 16605*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐷 = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ↔ (0 ≤ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐷 ∥ 𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ℤ ((𝑒 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑒 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝑒 ∥ 𝐷))))
Theorem	gcdass 16606	Associative law for gcd operator. Theorem 1.4(b) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑁 gcd 𝑀) gcd 𝑃) = (𝑁 gcd (𝑀 gcd 𝑃)))
Theorem	mulgcd 16607	Distribute multiplication by a nonnegative integer over gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) gcd (𝐾 · 𝑁)) = (𝐾 · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	absmulgcd 16608	Distribute absolute value of multiplication over gcd. Theorem 1.4(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) gcd (𝐾 · 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝐾 · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))))
Theorem	mulgcdr 16609	Reverse distribution law for the gcd operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) gcd (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) · 𝐶))
Theorem	gcddiv 16610	Division law for GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐶 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∥ 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) / 𝐶) = ((𝐴 / 𝐶) gcd (𝐵 / 𝐶)))
Theorem	gcdzeq 16611	A positive integer 𝐴 is equal to its gcd with an integer 𝐵 if and only if 𝐴 divides 𝐵. Generalization of gcdeq 16612. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵))
Theorem	gcdeq 16612	𝐴 is equal to its gcd with 𝐵 if and only if 𝐴 divides 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵))
Theorem	dvdssqim 16613	Unidirectional form of dvdssq 16626. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2)))
Theorem	dvdsexpim 16614	If two numbers are divisible, so are their nonnegative exponents. Similar to dvdssqim 16613 for nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 → (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsmulgcd 16615	A divisibility equivalent for odmulg 19627. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 · (𝐶 gcd 𝐴))))
Theorem	rpmulgcd 16616	If 𝐾 and 𝑀 are relatively prime, then the GCD of 𝐾 and 𝑀 · 𝑁 is the GCD of 𝐾 and 𝑁. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) → (𝐾 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = (𝐾 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	rplpwr 16617	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd 𝐵) = 1))
Theorem	rprpwr 16618	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴 and 𝐵↑𝑁. Originally a subproof of rppwr 16619. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → (𝐴 gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1))
Theorem	rppwr 16619	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1))
Theorem	nn0rppwr 16620	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. rppwr 16619 extended to nonnegative integers. Less general than rpexp12i 16784. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1))
Theorem	sqgcd 16621	Square distributes over gcd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁)↑2) = ((𝑀↑2) gcd (𝑁↑2)))
Theorem	expgcd 16622	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. sqgcd 16621 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	nn0expgcd 16623	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. nn0gcdsq 16812 extended to nonnegative exponents. expgcd 16622 extended to nonnegative bases. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	zexpgcd 16624	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. zgcdsq 16813 extended to nonnegative exponents. nn0expgcd 16623 extended to integer bases by symmetry. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdssqlem 16625	Lemma for dvdssq 16626. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2)))
Theorem	dvdssq 16626	Two numbers are divisible iff their squares are. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2)))
Theorem	bezoutr 16627	Partial converse to bezout 16602. Existence of a linear combination does not set the GCD, but it does upper bound it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ)) → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ∥ ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌)))
Theorem	bezoutr1 16628	Converse of bezout 16602 for when the greater common divisor is one (sufficient condition for relative primality). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌)) = 1 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1))
6.1.9  Algorithms
Theorem	nn0seqcvgd 16629*	A strictly-decreasing nonnegative integer sequence with initial term 𝑁 reaches zero by the 𝑁 th term. Deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝐹‘0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≠ 0 → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) < (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑁) = 0)
Theorem	seq1st 16630	A sequence whose iteration function ignores the second argument is only affected by the first point of the initial value function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), {⟨𝑀, 𝐴⟩}))
Theorem	algr0 16631	The value of the algorithm iterator 𝑅 at 0 is the initial state 𝐴. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅‘𝑀) = 𝐴)
Theorem	algrf 16632	An algorithm is a step function 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 on a state space 𝑆. An algorithm acts on an initial state 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 by iteratively applying 𝐹 to give 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) and so on. An algorithm is said to halt if a fixed point of 𝐹 is reached after a finite number of iterations. The algorithm iterator 𝑅:ℕ0⟶𝑆 "runs" the algorithm 𝐹 so that (𝑅‘𝑘) is the state after 𝑘 iterations of 𝐹 on the initial state 𝐴. Domain and codomain of the algorithm iterator 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅:𝑍⟶𝑆)
Theorem	algrp1 16633	The value of the algorithm iterator 𝑅 at (𝐾 + 1). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝑅‘(𝐾 + 1)) = (𝐹‘(𝑅‘𝐾)))
Theorem	alginv 16634*	If 𝐼 is an invariant of 𝐹, then its value is unchanged after any number of iterations of 𝐹. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐼‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐼‘(𝑅‘𝐾)) = (𝐼‘(𝑅‘0)))
Theorem	algcvg 16635*	One way to prove that an algorithm halts is to construct a countdown function 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0 whose value is guaranteed to decrease for each iteration of 𝐹 until it reaches 0. That is, if 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 is not a fixed point of 𝐹, then (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) < (𝐶‘𝑋). If 𝐶 is a countdown function for algorithm 𝐹, the sequence (𝐶‘(𝑅‘𝑘)) reaches 0 after at most 𝑁 steps, where 𝑁 is the value of 𝐶 for the initial state 𝐴. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) < (𝐶‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐶‘(𝑅‘𝑁)) = 0)
Theorem	algcvgblem 16636	Lemma for algcvgb 16637. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑁 ≠ 0 → 𝑁 < 𝑀) ↔ ((𝑀 ≠ 0 → 𝑁 < 𝑀) ∧ (𝑀 = 0 → 𝑁 = 0))))
Theorem	algcvgb 16637	Two ways of expressing that 𝐶 is a countdown function for algorithm 𝐹. The first is used in these theorems. The second states the condition more intuitively as a conjunction: if the countdown function's value is currently nonzero, it must decrease at the next step; if it has reached zero, it must remain zero at the next step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 → (((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) < (𝐶‘𝑋)) ↔ (((𝐶‘𝑋) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) < (𝐶‘𝑋)) ∧ ((𝐶‘𝑋) = 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 0))))
Theorem	algcvga 16638*	The countdown function 𝐶 remains 0 after 𝑁 steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) < (𝐶‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) → (𝐶‘(𝑅‘𝐾)) = 0))
Theorem	algfx 16639*	If 𝐹 reaches a fixed point when the countdown function 𝐶 reaches 0, 𝐹 remains fixed after 𝑁 steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) < (𝐶‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘𝑧) = 0 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) → (𝑅‘𝐾) = (𝑅‘𝑁)))
6.1.10  Euclid's Algorithm
Theorem	eucalgval2 16640*	The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm on an ordered pair. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑀𝐸𝑁) = if(𝑁 = 0, ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩, ⟨𝑁, (𝑀 mod 𝑁)⟩))
Theorem	eucalgval 16641*	Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 16646 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))
Theorem	eucalgf 16642*	Domain and codomain of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸:(ℕ0 × ℕ0)⟶(ℕ0 × ℕ0)
Theorem	eucalginv 16643*	The invariant of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm is the gcd operator applied to the state. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → ( gcd ‘(𝐸‘𝑋)) = ( gcd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	eucalglt 16644*	The second member of the state decreases with each iteration of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → ((2nd ‘(𝐸‘𝑋)) ≠ 0 → (2nd ‘(𝐸‘𝑋)) < (2nd ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	eucalgcvga 16645*	Once Euclid's Algorithm halts after 𝑁 steps, the second element of the state remains 0 . (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐸 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (2nd ‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) → (2nd ‘(𝑅‘𝐾)) = 0))
Theorem	eucalg 16646*	Euclid's Algorithm computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. Theorem 1.15 in [ApostolNT] p. 20. Upon halting, the first member of the final state (𝑅‘𝑁) is equal to the gcd of the values comprising the input state ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩. This is Metamath 100 proof #69 (greatest common divisor algorithm). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐸 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (1st ‘(𝑅‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
6.1.11  The least common multiple According to Wikipedia ("Least common multiple", 27-Aug-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple): "In arithmetic and number theory, the least common multiple, lowest common multiple, or smallest common multiple of two integers a and b, usually denoted by lcm(a, b), is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both a and b. Since division of integers by zero is undefined, this definition has meaning only if a and b are both different from zero. However, some authors define lcm(a,0) as 0 for all a, which is the result of taking the lcm to be the least upper bound in the lattice of divisibility. ... The lcm of more than two integers is also well-defined: it is the smallest positive integer hat is divisible by each of them." In this section, an operation calculating the least common multiple of two integers (df-lcm 16649) as well as a function mapping a set of integers to their least common multiple (df-lcmf 16650) are provided. Both definitions are valid for all integers, including negative integers and 0, obeying the above mentioned convention. It is shown by lcmfpr 16686 that the two definitions are compatible.
Syntax	clcm 16647	Extend the definition of a class to include the least common multiple operator.
class lcm
Syntax	clcmf 16648	Extend the definition of a class to include the least common multiple function.
class lcm
Definition	df-lcm 16649*	Define the lcm operator. For example, (6 lcm 9) = 18 (ex-lcm 30787). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ lcm = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
Definition	df-lcmf 16650*	Define the lcm function on a set of integers. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ lcm = (𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 ℤ ↦ if(0 ∈ 𝑧, 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑧 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	lcmval 16651*	Value of the lcm operator. (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) is the least common multiple of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If either 𝑀 or 𝑁 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 16554 and gcdval 16555. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	lcmcom 16652	The lcm operator is commutative. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑁 lcm 𝑀))
Theorem	lcm0val 16653	The value, by convention, of the lcm operator when either operand is 0. (Use lcmcom 16652 for a left-hand 0.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 0) = 0)
Theorem	lcmn0val 16654*	The value of the lcm operator when both operands are nonzero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	lcmcllem 16655*	Lemma for lcmn0cl 16656 and dvdslcm 16657. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)})
Theorem	lcmn0cl 16656	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	dvdslcm 16657	The lcm of two integers is divisible by each of them. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∧ 𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)))
Theorem	lcmledvds 16658	A positive integer which both operands of the lcm operator divide bounds it. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ≤ 𝐾))
Theorem	lcmeq0 16659	The lcm of two integers is zero iff either is zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)))
Theorem	lcmcl 16660	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	gcddvdslcm 16661	The greatest common divisor of two numbers divides their least common multiple. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁))
Theorem	lcmneg 16662	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm -𝑁) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁))
Theorem	neglcm 16663	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁))
Theorem	lcmabs 16664	The lcm of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) lcm (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁))
Theorem	lcmgcdlem 16665	Lemma for lcmgcd 16666 and lcmdvds 16667. Prove them for positive 𝑀, 𝑁, and 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝑀 · 𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾)))
Theorem	lcmgcd 16666	The product of two numbers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the absolute value of the product of the two numbers. In particular, that absolute value is the least common multiple of two coprime numbers, for which (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1. Multiple methods exist for proving this, and it is often proven either as a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic 1arith 16988 or of Bézout's identity bezout 16602; see e.g., https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM 16602 and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/470827 16602. This proof uses the latter to first confirm it for positive integers 𝑀 and 𝑁 (the "Second Proof" in the above Stack Exchange page), then shows that implies it for all nonzero integer inputs, then finally uses lcm0val 16653 to show it applies when either or both inputs are zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	lcmdvds 16667	The lcm of two integers divides any integer the two divide. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾))
Theorem	lcmid 16668	The lcm of an integer and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 𝑀) = (abs‘𝑀))
Theorem	lcm1 16669	The lcm of an integer and 1 is the absolute value of the integer. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 1) = (abs‘𝑀))
Theorem	lcmgcdnn 16670	The product of two positive integers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the product of the two integers. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	lcmgcdeq 16671	Two integers' absolute values are equal iff their least common multiple and greatest common divisor are equal. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ↔ (abs‘𝑀) = (abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	lcmdvdsb 16672	Biconditional form of lcmdvds 16667. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) ↔ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾))
Theorem	lcmass 16673	Associative law for lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑁 lcm 𝑀) lcm 𝑃) = (𝑁 lcm (𝑀 lcm 𝑃)))
Theorem	3lcm2e6woprm 16674	The least common multiple of three and two is six. In contrast to 3lcm2e6 16792, this proof does not use the property of 2 and 3 being prime, therefore it is much longer. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (3 lcm 2) = 6
Theorem	6lcm4e12 16675	The least common multiple of six and four is twelve. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (6 lcm 4) = ;12
Theorem	absproddvds 16676*	The absolute value of the product of the elements of a finite subset of the integers is divisible by each element of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (abs‘∏𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑃)
Theorem	absprodnn 16677*	The absolute value of the product of the elements of a finite subset of the integers not containing 0 is a poitive integer. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (abs‘∏𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∉ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	fissn0dvds 16678*	For each finite subset of the integers not containing 0 there is a positive integer which is divisible by each element of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛)
Theorem	fissn0dvdsn0 16679*	For each finite subset of the integers not containing 0 there is a positive integer which is divisible by each element of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍) → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	lcmfval 16680*	Value of the lcm function. (lcm‘𝑍) is the least common multiple of the integers contained in the finite subset of integers 𝑍. If at least one of the elements of 𝑍 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by AV, 21-Apr-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin) → (lcm‘𝑍) = if(0 ∈ 𝑍, 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	lcmf0val 16681	The value, by convention, of the least common multiple for a set containing 0 is 0. (Contributed by AV, 21-Apr-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 0 ∈ 𝑍) → (lcm‘𝑍) = 0)
Theorem	lcmfn0val 16682*	The value of the lcm function for a set without 0. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍) → (lcm‘𝑍) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	lcmfnnval 16683*	The value of the lcm function for a subset of the positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin) → (lcm‘𝑍) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	lcmfcllem 16684*	Lemma for lcmfn0cl 16685 and dvdslcmf 16690. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍) → (lcm‘𝑍) ∈ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑛})
Theorem	lcmfn0cl 16685	Closure of the lcm function. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍) → (lcm‘𝑍) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	lcmfpr 16686	The value of the lcm function for an unordered pair is the value of the lcm operator for both elements. (Contributed by AV, 22-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (lcm‘{𝑀, 𝑁}) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁))
Theorem	lcmfcl 16687	Closure of the lcm function. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin) → (lcm‘𝑍) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	lcmfnncl 16688	Closure of the lcm function. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin) → (lcm‘𝑍) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	lcmfeq0b 16689	The least common multiple of a set of integers is 0 iff at least one of its element is 0. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin) → ((lcm‘𝑍) = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ 𝑍))
Theorem	dvdslcmf 16690*	The least common multiple of a set of integers is divisible by each of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 22-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ∥ (lcm‘𝑍))
Theorem	lcmfledvds 16691*	A positive integer which is divisible by all elements of a set of integers bounds the least common multiple of the set. (Contributed by AV, 22-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍) → ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝐾) → (lcm‘𝑍) ≤ 𝐾))
Theorem	lcmf 16692*	Characterization of the least common multiple of a set of integers (without 0): A positiven integer is the least common multiple of a set of integers iff it divides each of the elements of the set and every integer which divides each of the elements of the set is greater than or equal to this integer. (Contributed by AV, 22-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑍 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ Fin ∧ 0 ∉ 𝑍)) → (𝐾 = (lcm‘𝑍) ↔ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑘))))
Theorem	lcmf0 16693	The least common multiple of the empty set is 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (lcm‘∅) = 1
Theorem	lcmfsn 16694	The least common multiple of a singleton is its absolute value. (Contributed by AV, 22-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (lcm‘{𝑀}) = (abs‘𝑀))
Theorem	lcmftp 16695	The least common multiple of a triple of integers is the least common multiple of the third integer and the least common multiple of the first two integers. Although there would be a shorter proof using lcmfunsn 16703, this explicit proof (not based on induction) should be kept. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (lcm‘{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) = ((𝐴 lcm 𝐵) lcm 𝐶))
Theorem	lcmfunsnlem1 16696*	Lemma for lcmfdvds 16701 and lcmfunsnlem 16700 (Induction step part 1). (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ ℤ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑦 𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → (lcm‘𝑦) ∥ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘𝑦) lcm 𝑛))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℤ (∀𝑚 ∈ (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧})𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → (lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑧})) ∥ 𝑘))
Theorem	lcmfunsnlem2lem1 16697*	Lemma 1 for lcmfunsnlem2 16699. (Contributed by AV, 26-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (((0 ∉ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑛 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ ℤ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑦 𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → (lcm‘𝑦) ∥ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘𝑦) lcm 𝑛))))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ (∀𝑖 ∈ ((𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) ∪ {𝑛})𝑖 ∥ 𝑘 → ((lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑧})) lcm 𝑛) ≤ 𝑘))
Theorem	lcmfunsnlem2lem2 16698*	Lemma 2 for lcmfunsnlem2 16699. (Contributed by AV, 26-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (((0 ∉ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑛 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ ℤ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑦 𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → (lcm‘𝑦) ∥ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘𝑦) lcm 𝑛))))) → (lcm‘((𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑧})) lcm 𝑛))
Theorem	lcmfunsnlem2 16699*	Lemma for lcmfunsn 16703 and lcmfunsnlem 16700 (Induction step part 2). (Contributed by AV, 26-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ ℤ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑦 𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → (lcm‘𝑦) ∥ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘𝑦) lcm 𝑛))) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (lcm‘((𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘(𝑦 ∪ {𝑧})) lcm 𝑛))
Theorem	lcmfunsnlem 16700*	Lemma for lcmfdvds 16701 and lcmfunsn 16703. These two theorems must be proven simultaneously by induction on the cardinality of a finite set 𝑌, because they depend on each other. This can be seen by the two parts lcmfunsnlem1 16696 and lcmfunsnlem2 16699 of the induction step, each of them using both induction hypotheses. (Contributed by AV, 26-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑌 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ Fin) → (∀𝑘 ∈ ℤ (∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑌 𝑚 ∥ 𝑘 → (lcm‘𝑌) ∥ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (lcm‘(𝑌 ∪ {𝑛})) = ((lcm‘𝑌) lcm 𝑛)))