| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 114 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30998) |
(30999-32521) |
(32522-50127) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dedekind 11301* | The Dedekind cut theorem. This theorem, which may be used to replace ax-pre-sup 11109 with appropriate adjustments, states that, if 𝐴 completely preceeds 𝐵, then there is some number separating the two of them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 < 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | dedekindle 11302* | The Dedekind cut theorem, with the hypothesis weakened to only require non-strict less than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | mul12 11303 | Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | mul32 11304 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul31 11305 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mul4 11306 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | mul4r 11307 | Rearrangement of 4 factors: swap the right factors in the factors of a product of two products. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐷) · (𝐶 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | muladd11 11308 | A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | 1p1times 11309 | Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) · 𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | peano2cn 11310 | A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12162. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | peano2re 11311 | A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12162. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | readdcan 11312 | Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | 00id 11313 | 0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | mul02lem1 11314 | Lemma for mul02 11316. If any real does not produce 0 when multiplied by 0, then any complex is equal to double itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (0 · 𝐴) ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 = (𝐵 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul02lem2 11315 | Lemma for mul02 11316. Zero times a real is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul02 11316 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul01 11317 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addrid 11318 | 0 is an additive identity. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cnegex 11319* | Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | cnegex2 11320* | Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addlid 11321 | 0 is a left identity for addition. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was discovered that it was dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcan 11322 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2 11323 | Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addcom 11324 | Addition commutes. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | addridi 11325 | 0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | addlidi 11326 | 0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | mul02i 11327 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (0 · 𝐴) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | mul01i 11328 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | addcomi 11329 | Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcomli 11330 | Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | addcani 11331 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2i 11332 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mul12i 11333 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mul32i 11334 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mul4i 11335 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | mul02d 11336 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul01d 11337 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 0) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addridd 11338 | 0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addlidd 11339 | 0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcomd 11340 | Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | addcand 11341 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2d 11342 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addcanad 11343 | Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcand 11341. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2ad 11344 | Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcan2d 11342. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | addneintrd 11345 | Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 11343. Consequence of addcand 11341. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≠ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addneintr2d 11346 | Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 11344. Consequence of addcan2d 11342. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≠ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mul12d 11347 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | mul32d 11348 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul31d 11349 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mul4d 11350 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | muladd11r 11351 | A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1)) | ||
| Theorem | comraddd 11352 | Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | comraddi 11353 | Commute RHS addition. See addcomli 11330 to commute addition on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddneg 11354 | Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐴) < 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddnegr 11355 | Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add12 11356 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | add32 11357 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add32r 11358 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add4 11359 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | add42 11360 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | add12i 11361 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | add32i 11362 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | add4i 11363 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | add42i 11364 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add12d 11365 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | add32d 11366 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add4d 11367 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | add42d 11368 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Syntax | cmin 11369 | Extend class notation to include subtraction. |
| class − | ||
| Syntax | cneg 11370 | Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol - is not a class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used. Note: We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction cmin 11369 (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the syntax definition co 7361, if we used the same symbol then "( − 𝐴 − 𝐵) " could mean either "− 𝐴 " minus "𝐵", or it could represent the (meaningless) operation of classes "− " and "− 𝐵 " connected with "operation" "𝐴". On the other hand, "(-𝐴 − 𝐵) " is unambiguous. |
| class -𝐴 | ||
| Definition | df-sub 11371* | Define subtraction. Theorem subval 11376 shows its value (and describes how this definition works), Theorem subaddi 11473 relates it to addition, and Theorems subcli 11462 and resubcli 11448 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥)) | ||
| Definition | df-neg 11372 | Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. See cneg 11370 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ -𝐴 = (0 − 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 0cnALT 11373 | Alternate proof of 0cn 11129 which does not reference ax-1cn 11089. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | 0cnALT2 11374 | Alternate proof of 0cnALT 11373 which is shorter, but depends on ax-8 2116, ax-13 2377, ax-sep 5242, ax-nul 5252, ax-pow 5311, ax-pr 5378, ax-un 7683, and every complex number axiom except ax-pre-mulgt0 11108 and ax-pre-sup 11109. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | negeu 11375* | Existential uniqueness of negatives. Theorem I.2 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | subval 11376* | Value of subtraction, which is the (unique) element 𝑥 such that 𝐵 + 𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | negeq 11377 | Equality theorem for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → -𝐴 = -𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | negeqi 11378 | Equality inference for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ -𝐴 = -𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | negeqd 11379 | Equality deduction for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 = -𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfnegd 11380 | Deduction version of nfneg 11381. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥-𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nfneg 11381 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥-𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | csbnegg 11382 | Move class substitution in and out of the negative of a number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌-𝐵 = -⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | negex 11383 | A negative is a set. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ -𝐴 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | subcl 11384 | Closure law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | negcl 11385 | Closure law for negative. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → -𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | negicn 11386 | -i is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ -i ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | subf 11387 | Subtraction is an operation on the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ − :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
| Theorem | subadd 11388 | Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | subadd2 11389 | Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐵) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | subsub23 11390 | Swap subtrahend and result of subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pncan 11391 | Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pncan2 11392 | Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pncan3 11393 | Subtraction and addition of equals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2005.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐴)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | npcan 11394 | Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addsubass 11395 | Associative-type law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | addsub 11396 | Law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2001.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) = ((𝐴 − 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | subadd23 11397 | Commutative/associative law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐶 − 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | addsub12 11398 | Commutative/associative law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | 2addsub 11399 | Law for subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) − 𝐷) = (((𝐴 + 𝐶) − 𝐷) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addsubeq4 11400 | Relation between sums and differences. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐵 − 𝐷))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |