| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 114 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31281) |
(31282-32804) |
(32805-50680) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | letri3 11301 | Trichotomy law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | leloe 11302 | 'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than' or 'equals'. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | eqlelt 11303 | Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltle 11304 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | leltne 11305 | 'Less than or equal to' implies 'less than' is not 'equals'. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lelttr 11306 | Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | leltletr 11307 | Transitive law, weaker form of lelttr 11306. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltletr 11308 | Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltleletr 11309 | Transitive law, weaker form of ltletr 11308. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | letr 11310 | Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnr 11311 | 'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | leid 11312 | 'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltne 11313 | 'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsym 11314 | 'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsym2 11315 | 'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | letric 11316 | Trichotomy law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltlen 11317 | 'Less than' expressed in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | eqle 11318 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eqled 11319 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltadd2 11320 | Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ne0gt0 11321 | A nonzero nonnegative number is positive. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lecasei 11322 | Ordering elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | lelttric 11323 | Trichotomy law. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltlecasei 11324 | Ordering elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ltnri 11325 | 'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | eqlei 11326 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eqlei2 11327 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gtneii 11328 | 'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ltneii 11329 | 'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | lttri2i 11330 | Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lttri3i 11331 | Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | letri3i 11332 | Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | leloei 11333 | 'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltleni 11334 | 'Less than' expressed in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsymi 11335 | 'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lenlti 11336 | 'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltnlei 11337 | 'Less than' in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltlei 11338 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltleii 11339 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | ltnei 11340 | 'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | letrii 11341 | Trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lttri 11342 | 'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lelttri 11343 | 'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ltletri 11344 | 'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | letri 11345 | 'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | le2tri3i 11346 | Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltadd2i 11347 | Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0i 11348 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0ii 11349 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltnrd 11350 | 'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gtned 11351 | 'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltned 11352 | 'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ne0gt0d 11353 | A nonzero nonnegative number is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lttrid 11354 | Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lttri2d 11355 | Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lttri3d 11356 | Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lttri4d 11357 | Trichotomy law for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | letri3d 11358 | Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | leloed 11359 | 'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | eqleltd 11360 | Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltlend 11361 | 'Less than' expressed in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lenltd 11362 | 'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnled 11363 | 'Less than' in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltled 11364 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsymd 11365 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nltled 11366 | 'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lensymd 11367 | 'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | letrid 11368 | Trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | leltned 11369 | 'Less than or equal to' implies 'less than' is not 'equals'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | leneltd 11370 | 'Less than or equal to' and 'not equals' implies 'less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0d 11371 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltadd2d 11372 | Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | letrd 11373 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lelttrd 11374 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ltadd2dd 11375 | Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltletrd 11376 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than', 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lttrd 11377 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lelttrdi 11378 | If a number is less than another number, and the other number is less than or equal to a third number, the first number is less than the third number. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dedekind 11379* | The Dedekind cut theorem. This theorem, which may be used to replace ax-pre-sup 11184 with appropriate adjustments, states that, if 𝐴 completely preceeds 𝐵, then there is some number separating the two of them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 < 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | dedekindle 11380* | The Dedekind cut theorem, with the hypothesis weakened to only require non-strict less than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | mul12 11381 | Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | mul32 11382 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul31 11383 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mul4 11384 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | mul4r 11385 | Rearrangement of 4 factors: swap the right factors in the factors of a product of two products. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐷) · (𝐶 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | muladd11 11386 | A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | 1p1times 11387 | Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) · 𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | peano2cn 11388 | A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12251. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | peano2re 11389 | A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12251. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | readdcan 11390 | Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | 00id 11391 | 0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | mul02lem1 11392 | Lemma for mul02 11394. If any real does not produce 0 when multiplied by 0, then any complex is equal to double itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (0 · 𝐴) ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 = (𝐵 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul02lem2 11393 | Lemma for mul02 11394. Zero times a real is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul02 11394 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul01 11395 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addrid 11396 | 0 is an additive identity. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cnegex 11397* | Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | cnegex2 11398* | Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addlid 11399 | 0 is a left identity for addition. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was discovered that it was dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcan 11400 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |