P. 114 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 11301-11400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mulgt0i 11301	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt0ii 11302	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnrd 11303	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴)
Theorem	gtned 11304	'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltned 11305	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	ne0gt0d 11306	A nonzero nonnegative number is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	lttrid 11307	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	lttri2d 11308	Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	lttri3d 11309	Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	lttri4d 11310	Trichotomy law for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	letri3d 11311	Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	leloed 11312	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	eqleltd 11313	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltlend 11314	'Less than' expressed in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)))
Theorem	lenltd 11315	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ltnled 11316	'Less than' in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltled 11317	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnsymd 11318	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nltled 11319	'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	lensymd 11320	'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	letrid 11321	Trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	leltned 11322	'Less than or equal to' implies 'less than' is not 'equals'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	leneltd 11323	'Less than or equal to' and 'not equals' implies 'less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
Theorem	mulgt0d 11324	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	ltadd2d 11325	Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	letrd 11326	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttrd 11327	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	ltadd2dd 11328	Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))
Theorem	ltletrd 11329	Transitive law deduction for 'less than', 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lttrd 11330	Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttrdi 11331	If a number is less than another number, and the other number is less than or equal to a third number, the first number is less than the third number. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	dedekind 11332*	The Dedekind cut theorem. This theorem, which may be used to replace ax-pre-sup 11137 with appropriate adjustments, states that, if 𝐴 completely preceeds 𝐵, then there is some number separating the two of them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 < 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	dedekindle 11333*	The Dedekind cut theorem, with the hypothesis weakened to only require non-strict less than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦))
5.2.5  Initial properties of the complex numbers
Theorem	mul12 11334	Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	mul32 11335	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵))
Theorem	mul31 11336	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	mul4 11337	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)))
Theorem	mul4r 11338	Rearrangement of 4 factors: swap the right factors in the factors of a product of two products. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐷) · (𝐶 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	muladd11 11339	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵))))
Theorem	1p1times 11340	Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) · 𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴))
Theorem	peano2cn 11341	A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12208. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2re 11342	A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12208. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	readdcan 11343	Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	00id 11344	0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
Theorem	mul02lem1 11345	Lemma for mul02 11347. If any real does not produce 0 when multiplied by 0, then any complex is equal to double itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (0 · 𝐴) ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 = (𝐵 + 𝐵))
Theorem	mul02lem2 11346	Lemma for mul02 11347. Zero times a real is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	mul02 11347	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	mul01 11348	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	addrid 11349	0 is an additive identity. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnegex 11350*	Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	cnegex2 11351*	Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	addlid 11352	0 is a left identity for addition. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was discovered that it was dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcan 11353	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addcan2 11354	Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addcom 11355	Addition commutes. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	addridi 11356	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴
Theorem	addlidi 11357	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	mul02i 11358	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 · 𝐴) = 0
Theorem	mul01i 11359	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 0) = 0
Theorem	addcomi 11360	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)
Theorem	addcomli 11361	Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	addcani 11362	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	addcan2i 11363	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mul12i 11364	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))
Theorem	mul32i 11365	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)
Theorem	mul4i 11366	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	mul02d 11367	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	mul01d 11368	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	addridd 11369	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addlidd 11370	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcomd 11371	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	addcand 11372	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addcan2d 11373	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addcanad 11374	Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcand 11372. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	addcan2ad 11375	Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcan2d 11373. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	addneintrd 11376	Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 11374. Consequence of addcand 11372. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≠ (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	addneintr2d 11377	Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 11375. Consequence of addcan2d 11373. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≠ (𝐵 + 𝐶))
Theorem	mul12d 11378	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	mul32d 11379	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵))
Theorem	mul31d 11380	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	mul4d 11381	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)))
Theorem	muladd11r 11382	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1))
Theorem	comraddd 11383	Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵))
Theorem	comraddi 11384	Commute RHS addition. See addcomli 11361 to commute addition on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵)
Theorem	ltaddneg 11385	Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐴) < 𝐵))
Theorem	ltaddnegr 11386	Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐵))
5.3  Real and complex numbers - basic operations
5.3.1  Addition
Theorem	add12 11387	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	add32 11388	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add32r 11389	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add4 11390	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)))
Theorem	add42 11391	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	add12i 11392	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	add32i 11393	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)
Theorem	add4i 11394	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))
Theorem	add42i 11395	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))
Theorem	add12d 11396	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	add32d 11397	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add4d 11398	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)))
Theorem	add42d 11399	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)))
5.3.2  Subtraction
Syntax	cmin 11400	Extend class notation to include subtraction.
class −