![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 185 of 437) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28347) |
![]() (28348-29872) |
![]() (29873-43657) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | sylow1lem5 18401* | Lemma for sylow1 18402. Using Lagrange's theorem and the orbit-stabilizer theorem, show that there is a subgroup with size exactly 𝑃↑𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃↑𝑁) ∥ (♯‘𝑋)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ (♯‘𝑠) = (𝑃↑𝑁)} & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑔 ⊕ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝑢 ⊕ 𝐵) = 𝐵} & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt (♯‘[𝐵] ∼ )) ≤ ((𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)) − 𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)(♯‘ℎ) = (𝑃↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | sylow1 18402* | Sylow's first theorem. If 𝑃↑𝑁 is a prime power that divides the cardinality of 𝐺, then 𝐺 has a supgroup with size 𝑃↑𝑁. This is part of Metamath 100 proof #72. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃↑𝑁) ∥ (♯‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)(♯‘𝑔) = (𝑃↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | odcau 18403* | Cauchy's theorem for the order of an element in a group. A finite group whose order divides a prime 𝑃 contains an element of order 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (od‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (♯‘𝑋)) → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑂‘𝑔) = 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | pgpfi 18404* | The converse to pgpfi1 18394. A finite group is a 𝑃-group iff it has size some power of 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → (𝑃 pGrp 𝐺 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (♯‘𝑋) = (𝑃↑𝑛)))) | ||
Theorem | pgpfi2 18405 | Alternate version of pgpfi 18404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → (𝑃 pGrp 𝐺 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (♯‘𝑋) = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))))) | ||
Theorem | pgphash 18406 | The order of a p-group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 pGrp 𝐺 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → (♯‘𝑋) = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))) | ||
Theorem | isslw 18407* | The property of being a Sylow subgroup. A Sylow 𝑃-subgroup is a 𝑃-group which has no proper supersets that are also 𝑃-groups. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)((𝐻 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ 𝑃 pGrp (𝐺 ↾s 𝑘)) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝑘))) | ||
Theorem | slwprm 18408 | Reverse closure for the first argument of a Sylow 𝑃-subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) | ||
Theorem | slwsubg 18409 | A Sylow 𝑃-subgroup is a subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) → 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | slwispgp 18410 | Defining property of a Sylow 𝑃-subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → ((𝐻 ⊆ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 pGrp 𝑆) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | slwpss 18411 | A proper superset of a Sylow subgroup is not a 𝑃-group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐻 ⊊ 𝐾) → ¬ 𝑃 pGrp 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | slwpgp 18412 | A Sylow 𝑃-subgroup is a 𝑃-group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) → 𝑃 pGrp 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | pgpssslw 18413* | Every 𝑃-subgroup is contained in a Sylow 𝑃-subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∣ (𝑃 pGrp (𝐺 ↾s 𝑦) ∧ 𝐻 ⊆ 𝑦)} ↦ (♯‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 pGrp 𝑆) → ∃𝑘 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)𝐻 ⊆ 𝑘) | ||
Theorem | slwn0 18414 | Every finite group contains a Sylow 𝑃-subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | subgslw 18415 | A Sylow subgroup that is contained in a larger subgroup is also Sylow with respect to the subgroup. (The converse need not be true.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | sylow2alem1 18416* | Lemma for sylow2a 18418. An equivalence class of fixed points is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ ∈ (𝐺 GrpAct 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 pGrp 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ 𝑍 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∣ ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑋 (ℎ ⊕ 𝑢) = 𝑢} & ⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑔 ⊕ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑍) → [𝐴] ∼ = {𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | sylow2alem2 18417* | Lemma for sylow2a 18418. All the orbits which are not for fixed points have size ∣ 𝐺 ∣ / ∣ 𝐺𝑥 ∣ (where 𝐺𝑥 is the stabilizer subgroup) and thus are powers of 𝑃. And since they are all nontrivial (because any orbit which is a singleton is a fixed point), they all divide 𝑃, and so does the sum of all of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ ∈ (𝐺 GrpAct 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 pGrp 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ 𝑍 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∣ ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑋 (ℎ ⊕ 𝑢) = 𝑢} & ⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑔 ⊕ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ Σ𝑧 ∈ ((𝑌 / ∼ ) ∖ 𝒫 𝑍)(♯‘𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | sylow2a 18418* | A named lemma of Sylow's second and third theorems. If 𝐺 is a finite 𝑃-group that acts on the finite set 𝑌, then the set 𝑍 of all points of 𝑌 fixed by every element of 𝐺 has cardinality equivalent to the cardinality of 𝑌, mod 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ ∈ (𝐺 GrpAct 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 pGrp 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ 𝑍 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∣ ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑋 (ℎ ⊕ 𝑢) = 𝑢} & ⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑔 ⊕ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ ((♯‘𝑌) − (♯‘𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | sylow2blem1 18419* | Lemma for sylow2b 18422. Evaluate the group action on a left coset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝐾) & ⊢ · = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑋 / ∼ ) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵 · [𝐶] ∼ ) = [(𝐵 + 𝐶)] ∼ ) | ||
Theorem | sylow2blem2 18420* | Lemma for sylow2b 18422. Left multiplication in a subgroup 𝐻 is a group action on the set of all left cosets of 𝐾. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝐾) & ⊢ · = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑋 / ∼ ) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · ∈ ((𝐺 ↾s 𝐻) GrpAct (𝑋 / ∼ ))) | ||
Theorem | sylow2blem3 18421* | Sylow's second theorem. Putting together the results of sylow2a 18418 and the orbit-stabilizer theorem to show that 𝑃 does not divide the set of all fixed points under the group action, we get that there is a fixed point of the group action, so that there is some 𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 with ℎ𝑔𝐾 = 𝑔𝐾 for all ℎ ∈ 𝐻. This implies that invg(𝑔)ℎ𝑔 ∈ 𝐾, so ℎ is in the conjugated subgroup 𝑔𝐾invg(𝑔). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝐾) & ⊢ · = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑋 / ∼ ) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 pGrp (𝐺 ↾s 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐾) = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 𝐻 ⊆ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ ((𝑔 + 𝑥) − 𝑔))) | ||
Theorem | sylow2b 18422* | Sylow's second theorem. Any 𝑃-group 𝐻 is a subgroup of a conjugated 𝑃-group 𝐾 of order 𝑃↑𝑛 ∥ (♯‘𝑋) with 𝑛 maximal. This is usually stated under the assumption that 𝐾 is a Sylow subgroup, but we use a slightly different definition, whose equivalence to this one requires this theorem. This is part of Metamath 100 proof #72. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 pGrp (𝐺 ↾s 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐾) = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 𝐻 ⊆ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ ((𝑔 + 𝑥) − 𝑔))) | ||
Theorem | slwhash 18423 | A sylow subgroup has cardinality equal to the maximum power of 𝑃 dividing the group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐻) = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))) | ||
Theorem | fislw 18424 | The sylow subgroups of a finite group are exactly the groups which have cardinality equal to the maximum power of 𝑃 dividing the group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↔ (𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝐻) = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))))) | ||
Theorem | sylow2 18425* | Sylow's second theorem. See also sylow2b 18422 for the "hard" part of the proof. Any two Sylow 𝑃-subgroups are conjugate to one another, and hence the same size, namely 𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt ∣ 𝑋 ∣ ) (see fislw 18424). This is part of Metamath 100 proof #72. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 𝐻 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ ((𝑔 + 𝑥) − 𝑔))) | ||
Theorem | sylow3lem1 18426* | Lemma for sylow3 18432, first part. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) − 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ ∈ (𝐺 GrpAct (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | sylow3lem2 18427* | Lemma for sylow3 18432, first part. The stabilizer of a given Sylow subgroup 𝐾 in the group action ⊕ acting on all of 𝐺 is the normalizer NG(K). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝑢 ⊕ 𝐾) = 𝐾} & ⊢ 𝑁 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐾 ↔ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∈ 𝐾)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = 𝑁) | ||
Theorem | sylow3lem3 18428* | Lemma for sylow3 18432, first part. The number of Sylow subgroups is the same as the index (number of cosets) of the normalizer of the Sylow subgroup 𝐾. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝑢 ⊕ 𝐾) = 𝐾} & ⊢ 𝑁 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐾 ↔ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∈ 𝐾)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) = (♯‘(𝑋 / (𝐺 ~QG 𝑁)))) | ||
Theorem | sylow3lem4 18429* | Lemma for sylow3 18432, first part. The number of Sylow subgroups is a divisor of the size of 𝐺 reduced by the size of a Sylow subgroup of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝑢 ⊕ 𝐾) = 𝐾} & ⊢ 𝑁 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐾 ↔ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∈ 𝐾)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) ∥ ((♯‘𝑋) / (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋))))) | ||
Theorem | sylow3lem5 18430* | Lemma for sylow3 18432, second part. Reduce the group action of sylow3lem1 18426 to a given Sylow subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) − 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ ∈ ((𝐺 ↾s 𝐾) GrpAct (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | sylow3lem6 18431* | Lemma for sylow3 18432, second part. Using the lemma sylow2a 18418, show that the number of sylow subgroups is equivalent mod 𝑃 to the number of fixed points under the group action. But 𝐾 is the unique element of the set of Sylow subgroups that is fixed under the group action, so there is exactly one fixed point and so ((♯‘(𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) mod 𝑃) = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 pSyl 𝐺) ↦ ran (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑠 ↔ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑠)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((♯‘(𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) mod 𝑃) = 1) | ||
Theorem | sylow3 18432 | Sylow's third theorem. The number of Sylow subgroups is a divisor of ∣ 𝐺 ∣ / 𝑑, where 𝑑 is the common order of a Sylow subgroup, and is equivalent to 1 mod 𝑃. This is part of Metamath 100 proof #72. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘(𝑃 pSyl 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∥ ((♯‘𝑋) / (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt (♯‘𝑋)))) ∧ (𝑁 mod 𝑃) = 1)) | ||
Syntax | clsm 18433 | Extend class notation with subgroup sum. |
class LSSum | ||
Syntax | cpj1 18434 | Extend class notation with left projection. |
class proj1 | ||
Definition | df-lsm 18435* | Define subgroup sum (inner direct product of subgroups). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ LSSum = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝑤)𝑦)))) | ||
Definition | df-pj1 18436* | Define the left projection function, which takes two subgroups 𝑡, 𝑢 with trivial intersection and returns a function mapping the elements of the subgroup sum 𝑡 + 𝑢 to their projections onto 𝑡. (The other projection function can be obtained by swapping the roles of 𝑡 and 𝑢.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ proj1 = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤), 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ↦ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑡(LSSum‘𝑤)𝑢) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 𝑧 = (𝑥(+g‘𝑤)𝑦))))) | ||
Theorem | lsmfval 18437* | The subgroup sum function (for a group or vector space). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ⊕ = (𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵, 𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑡, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | lsmvalx 18438* | Subspace sum value (for a group or vector space). Extended domain version of lsmval 18447. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | lsmelvalx 18439* | Subspace sum membership (for a group or vector space). Extended domain version of lsmelval 18448. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑦 + 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | lsmelvalix 18440 | Subspace sum membership (for a group or vector space). (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | oppglsm 18441 | The subspace sum operation in the opposite group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppg‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇(LSSum‘𝑂)𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | lsmssv 18442 | Subgroup sum is a subset of the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | lsmless1x 18443 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑅 ⊕ 𝑈) ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmless2x 18444 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑅 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmub1x 18445 | Subgroup sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmub2x 18446 | Subgroup sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmval 18447* | Subgroup sum value (for a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | lsmelval 18448* | Subgroup sum membership (for a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑦 + 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | lsmelvali 18449 | Subgroup sum membership (for a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmelvalm 18450* | Subgroup sum membership analogue of lsmelval 18448 using vector subtraction. TODO: any way to shorten proof? (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑦 − 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | lsmelvalmi 18451 | Membership of vector subtraction in subgroup sum. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmsubm 18452 | The sum of two commuting submonoids is a submonoid. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | lsmsubg 18453 | The sum of two commuting subgroups is a subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | lsmcom2 18454 | Subgroup sum commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lsmub1 18455 | Subgroup sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmub2 18456 | Subgroup sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmunss 18457 | Union of subgroups is a subset of subgroup sum. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑇 ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmless1 18458 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈) ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmless2 18459 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmless12 18460 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈)) → (𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmidm 18461 | Subgroup sum is idempotent. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lsmlub 18462 | The least upper bound property of subgroup sum. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) ↔ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmss1 18463 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lsmss1b 18464 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmss2 18465 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | lsmss2b 18466 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lsmass 18467 | Subgroup sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → ((𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑅 ⊕ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lsm01 18468 | Subgroup sum with the zero subgroup. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → (𝑋 ⊕ { 0 }) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | lsm02 18469 | Subgroup sum with the zero subgroup. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → ({ 0 } ⊕ 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | subglsm 18470 | The subgroup sum evaluated within a subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSSum‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑇𝐴𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lssnle 18471 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than". (chnlei 28916 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lsmmod 18472 | The modular law holds for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑆 ⊕ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmmod2 18473 | Modular law dual for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsmpropd 18474* | If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same subspace structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (LSSum‘𝐾) = (LSSum‘𝐿)) | ||
Theorem | cntzrecd 18475 | Commute the "subgroups commute" predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lsmcntz 18476 | The "subgroups commute" predicate applied to a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | lsmcntzr 18477 | The "subgroups commute" predicate applied to a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj 18478 | Disjointness from a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj2 18479 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj3 18480 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisjr 18481 | Disjointness from a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj2r 18482 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈) ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj3r 18483 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj2a 18484 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑇 ∩ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj2b 18485 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈) ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj3a 18486 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
Theorem | lsmdisj3b 18487 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
Theorem | subgdisj1 18488 | Vectors belonging to disjoint commuting subgroups are uniquely determined by their sum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | subgdisj2 18489 | Vectors belonging to disjoint commuting subgroups are uniquely determined by their sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | subgdisjb 18490 | Vectors belonging to disjoint commuting subgroups are uniquely determined by their sum. Analogous to opth 5176, this theorem shows a way of representing a pair of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | pj1fval 18491* | The left projection function (for a direct product of group subspaces). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇𝑃𝑈) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 𝑧 = (𝑥 + 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | pj1val 18492* | The left projection function (for a direct product of group subspaces). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) → ((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑥 + 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | pj1eu 18493* | Uniqueness of a left projection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑥 + 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | pj1f 18494 | The left projection function maps a direct subspace sum onto the left factor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝑃𝑈):(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)⟶𝑇) | ||
Theorem | pj2f 18495 | The right projection function maps a direct subspace sum onto the right factor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈𝑃𝑇):(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)⟶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | pj1id 18496 | Any element of a direct subspace sum can be decomposed into projections onto the left and right factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) → 𝑋 = (((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) + ((𝑈𝑃𝑇)‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | pj1eq 18497 | Any element of a direct subspace sum can be decomposed uniquely into projections onto the left and right factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ (((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑈𝑃𝑇)‘𝑋) = 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | pj1lid 18498 | The left projection function is the identity on the left subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | pj1rid 18499 | The left projection function is the zero operator on the right subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | pj1ghm 18500 | The left projection function is a group homomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝑃𝑈) ∈ ((𝐺 ↾s (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) GrpHom 𝐺)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |