Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42301-42400 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|
| Statement |
|---|
| |
| Theorem | uun2131p1 42301 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uunTT1 42302 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑)
→ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunTT1p1 42303 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤)
→ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunTT1p2 42304 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ ⊤)
→ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT11 42305 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT11p1 42306 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT11p2 42307 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12 42308 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p1 42309 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p2 42310 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p3 42311 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p4 42312 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p5 42313 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun111 42314 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | 3anidm12p1 42315 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
3anidm12 1417 denotes the deduction which would have been
named uun112 if
it did not pre-exist in set.mm. This second permutation's name is based
on this pre-existing name. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | 3anidm12p2 42316 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123 42317 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p1 42318 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p2 42319 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p3 42320 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p4 42321 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2221 42322 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Dec-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2221p1 42323 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2221p2 42324 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impdirp1 42325 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
Commuted version of 3impdir 1349. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impcombi 42326 |
A 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deduction. (Contributed by Alan
Sare, 25-Sep-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| 20.36.6 Theorems proved using Virtual
Deduction
|
| |
| Theorem | trsspwALT 42327 |
Virtual deduction proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 5192. A
transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof corresponds
to the virtual deduction proof of dftr4 5192 without accumulating results.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Apr-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trsspwALT2 42328 |
Virtual deduction proof of trsspwALT 42327. This proof is the same as the
proof of trsspwALT 42327 except each virtual deduction symbol is
replaced by
its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A transitive class is a
subset of its power class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trsspwALT3 42329 |
Short predicate calculus proof of the left-to-right implication of
dftr4 5192. A transitive class is a subset of its power
class. This
proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the
proof of trsspwALT2 42328, which is the virtual deduction proof trsspwALT 42327
without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwtr 42330 |
Virtual deduction proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 5192. A
class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof
corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 42330 without
accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwtrALT 42331 |
Virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 42330. This proof is the same as the
proof of sspwtr 42330 except each virtual deduction symbol is
replaced by
its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A class which is a
subclass of its power class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwtrALT2 42332 |
Short predicate calculus proof of the right-to-left implication of
dftr4 5192. A class which is a subclass of its power
class is transitive.
This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to
the proof of sspwtrALT 42331, which is the virtual deduction proof sspwtr 42330
without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | pwtrVD 42333 |
Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5362; see pwtrrVD 42334 for the converse.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | pwtrrVD 42334 |
Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5362; see pwtrVD 42333 for the converse.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (Tr 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT 42335 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html
is a
Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into
the Metamath proof of suctrALT 42335 using completeusersproof, which is
verified by the Metamath program. The proof of
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html 42335 is a
form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction
proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6334 for the original
proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare,
12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | snssiALTVD 42336 |
Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 42337. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snssiALT 42337 |
If a class is an element of another class, then its singleton is a
subclass of that other class. Alternate proof of snssi 4738. This
theorem was automatically generated from snssiALTVD 42336 using a
translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snsslVD 42338 |
Virtual deduction proof of snssl 42339. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snssl 42339 |
If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's
element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the
right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 4716.
The proof of
this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 42338 using a tools
command file, translateMWO.cmd, by translating the proof into its
non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan
Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snelpwrVD 42340 |
Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 5354. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | unipwrVD 42341 |
Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 42342. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | unipwr 42342 |
A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is
the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 5360. The proof of this theorem
was automatically generated from unipwrVD 42341 using a tools command file ,
translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual
deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2VD 42343 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 42344. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2 42344 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstr 3925, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem
6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was
automatically generated from
sstrALT2VD 42343 using the command file
translate_without_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the
automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof
which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly
contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof
contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the
minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2VD 42345 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 42346. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2 42346 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctr 6334. The sucessor of a transitive class
is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the virtual
deduction proof suctrALT2VD 42345 using the tools command file
translate_without_overwriting_minimize_excluding_duplicates.cmd .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elex2VD 42347* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex2 3443. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elex22VD 42348* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex22 3444. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqsbc2VD 42349* |
Virtual deduction proof of eqsbc2 3781. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | zfregs2VD 42350* |
Virtual deduction proof of zfregs2 9422. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | tpid3gVD 42351 |
Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 4705. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem1VD 42352* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem1 9300. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem2VD 42353* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 9301. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lpVD 42354 |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 9302. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| 20.36.7 Theorems proved using Virtual Deduction
with mmj2 assistance
|
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2VD 42355 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 500. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
| | qed:3,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))
|
The proof of simplbi2 500 was automatically derived from it.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | 3ornot23VD 42356 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 42018. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑
∧ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 5:3,4,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:2,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:5,6,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi1rVD 42357 |
Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 42019. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 8:7,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 9:1,8,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)) )
| | 12:6,11,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | bitr3VD 42358 |
Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 352. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑
↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜓
↔ 𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 4:3,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜑
↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
→ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3orbi123VD 42359 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 42020. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧
(𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 5:2,3,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:5,4,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 7:?: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏))
| | 8:6,7,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂) ↔
(𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒
↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨
𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃
∨ 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbc3orgVD 42360 |
Virtual deduction proof of the analogue of sbcor 3764 with three disjuncts.
The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 32:3: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)
↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 33:1,32,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1,33,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:5,7,?: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 19.21a3con13vVD 42361* |
Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 42042. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑
∧ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:2,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:2,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 6:1,4,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜑 )
| | 7:3,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:5,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 9:7,6,8,?: e222 42145 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 11:10:in2 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:11:in1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbirVD 42362 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbir 41987. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:1,2,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e32 42267 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbiriVD 42363 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 807. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:2,1,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e21 42239 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 7:4,6,?: e32 42267 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | rspsbc2VD 42364* |
Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 42043. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 4:1,3,?: e13 42257 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4,?: e13 42257 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 6:2,5,?: e23 42264 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpVD 42365 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1356. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 5:4,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 8:7,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 10:2,9,?: e01 42200 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
| | qed:6,11,?: e00 42277 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomVD 42366 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 41988. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜏
↔ 𝜃))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 8:7,2,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)))
| | qed:5,9,?: e00 42277 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomiVD 42367 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 41989. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcoreleleqVD 42368* |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 42044. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈
𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 =
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) )
| | 5:2,3,4,?: e111 42183 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 7:5,6: e11 42197 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbra2VD 42369* |
Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 3154. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 3:1,2,?: e00 42277 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 5:4,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | qed:3,5,?: e00 42277 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | tratrbVD 42370* |
Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 42045. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 7:5,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 8:2,7,4,?: e121 42165 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:2,6,8,?: e122 42162 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 11:6,7,10,?: e223 42144 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 14:12,13,?: e20 42236 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 16:7,15,?: e23 42264 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 17:6,16,?: e23 42264 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 20:18,19,?: e20 42236 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 21:3,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21,9,4,?: e121 42165 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝑥 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:22,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 24:4,23,?: e12 42233 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) )
| | 25:14,20,24,?: e222 42145 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 27:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨
𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 28:27,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
→ ∀𝑦(Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 29:28,26: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 30:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 31:30,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥(Tr 𝐴
∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 32:31,29: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 33:32,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | qed:33: | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | al2imVD 42371 |
Virtual deduction proof of al2im 1818. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜒))
| | 4:2,3,?: e10 42203 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
→ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | syl5impVD 42372 |
Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 42021. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 42136 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓
→ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜓) )
| | 4:3,2,?: e21 42239 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 42140 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | idiVD 42373 |
Virtual deduction proof of idiALT 41986. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝜑
| | qed:1,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ 𝜑
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 |
| |
| Theorem | ancomstVD 42374 |
Closed form of ancoms 458. The following user's proof is completed by
invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all
remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 42281 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))
|
The proof of ancomst 464 is derived automatically from it.
(Contributed by
Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssralv2VD 42375* |
Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3983
for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 42040 is ssralv2VD 42375 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 42375.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 4:3,2: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ ∀𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)
| | 14:12,13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | qed:16: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ordelordALTVD 42376 |
An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 6273 using
the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 9308. dford2 is a
weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it
need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the
Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 42046 is ordelordALTVD 42376
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
ordelordALTVD 42376 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program "MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (Ord 𝐴
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐴 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 6:4,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 7:6,6,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 15:14,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 16:4,15,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | 17:16,7: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐵 )
| | qed:17: | ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomVD 42377 |
If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union
of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 4084 is equncomVD 42377 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 42377.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomiVD 42378 |
Inference form of equncom 4084. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4085 is equncomiVD 42378 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 42378.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
| | qed:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALTVD 42379 |
A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 6330.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof
completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 42380 is sucidALTVD 42379
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
sucidALTVD 42379. This proof illustrates that
completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any
User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step
is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification
theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm.
completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a
conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each
step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction.
The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or
deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and
deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in
set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction
of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem
or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has
not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or
deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction,
then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or
deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a
semantic variation of the definition (axiom)
suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}), which unifies with df-suc 6257, a
reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or
deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another
theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection
that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter
theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction Ord 𝐴
infers ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) is a
semantic variation of the theorem (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))), which unifies with
the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 9308.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALT 42380 |
A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived
from sucidALTVD 42379 using translate_without_overwriting.cmd and
minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidVD 42381 |
A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools
program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sucid 6330 is sucidVD 42381 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sucidVD 42381.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | imbi12VD 42382 |
Implication form of imbi12i 350. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 346 is imbi12VD 42382 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 42382.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜃) )
| | 9:2,8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | imbi13VD 42383 |
Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The
following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 42029
is imbi13VD 42383 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from imbi13VD 42383.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂)) )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂)))) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcim2gVD 42384 |
Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication.
Similar to sbcimg 3762.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcim2g 42047 is sbcim2gVD 42384 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcim2gVD 42384.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)
↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒))) )
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcbiVD 42385 |
Implication form of sbcbii 3772.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcbi 42048 is sbcbiVD 42385 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcbiVD 42385.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | trsbcVD 42386* |
Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a
class variable for the setvar variable of the transitivity predicate.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trsbc 42049 is trsbcVD 42386 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from trsbcVD 42386.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 5:1,2,3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 →
([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) )
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 20:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 22:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | 24:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 26:1,25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 27:23,26: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | qed:27: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | truniALTVD 42387* |
The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
truniALT 42050 is truniALTVD 42387 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from truniALTVD 42387.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 8:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:1,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:3,7,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 16:5,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥
▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∪ 𝐴 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ee33VD 42388 |
Non-virtual deduction form of e33 42243.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
ee33 42030 is ee33VD 42388 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from ee33VD 42388.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
| | h3:: | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | 6:2,5: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓
→ (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜂)))))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALTVD 42389* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual
deduction proof of trintALT 42390.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trintALT 42390 is trintALTVD 42389 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 42389.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 9:7,1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:7,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:10,3,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞(𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∩ 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALT 42390* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise
5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 42390 is an alternate proof of trint 5203.
trintALT 42390 is trintALTVD 42389 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 42389 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program
"MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | undif3VD 42391 |
The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual
deduction proof of undif3 4221.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
undif3 4221 is undif3VD 42391 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from undif3VD 42391.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥
∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 7:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧
(¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 12:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 13:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 14:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 17:9,16: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
→ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 18:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 21:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 23:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 27:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 33:22,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 34:28,32: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
→ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 36:: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 37:36,35: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 38:17,37: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐴))
| | 40:39: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 41:: | ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥
∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 42:40,41: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴))
| | 43:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
))
| | 44:43,42: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)
) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 45:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 46:45,44: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 47:4,38: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 48:46,47: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴
∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 49:48: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈
((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | qed:49: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶
∖ 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcssgVD 42392 |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4451.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcssg 4451 is sbcssgVD 42392 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcssgVD 42392.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
| | 110:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈
𝐷))
| | 12:1,110: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀
𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbingVD 42393 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbin 4370.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbin 4370 is csbingVD 42393 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbingVD 42393.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)
}
| | 20:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝐷)}
| | 30:1,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 3:1,30: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 13:5,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = {
𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem5VD 42394* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 42051.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem5 42051 is onfrALTlem5VD 42394 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 42394.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) = ∅)
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 7:2: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 11:7,10: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅)
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
| | 15:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅))
| | 16:15,14: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
≠ ∅))
| | 17:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = (
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 19:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦) = ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 21:17,20: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 22:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌
∅)
| | 23:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ = ∅
| | 24:21,23: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 26:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ 𝑦 ∈
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 27:25,26: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 28:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
/ 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 29:27,28: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 32:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅
))
| | 33:31,32: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅)
| | 34:2: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (
𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅)
| | 36:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦
(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔
∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 38:2,37: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅))
| | 39:35,38: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 40:16,39: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 41:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) /
𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:40,41: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢
([(𝑎 ∩
𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem4VD 42395* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem4 42052.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem4 42052 is onfrALTlem4VD 42395 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem4VD 42395.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ ⦋
𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅)
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥)
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 = 𝑎
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥) = (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅ = ∅
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 12:11,10: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅))
| | qed:13,12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem3VD 42396* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem3 42053.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem3 42053 is onfrALTlem3VD 42396 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem3VD 42396.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We 𝑥 )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E Fr (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑏((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 13:12,8: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)(
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ )
| | 20:17,19: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ≠ ∅) )
| | qed:16,20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2comtVD 42397 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2comt 501.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
simplbi2comt 501 is simplbi2comtVD 42397 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from simplbi2comtVD 42397.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ (
𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒
) → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜑)) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem2VD 42398* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem2 42055.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem2 42055 is onfrALTlem2VD 42398 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem2VD 42398.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 7:4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Tr 𝑥 )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 14:10,12,13: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 31:28,30: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem1VD 42399* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem1 42057.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem1 42057 is onfrALTlem1VD 42399 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem1VD 42399.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅
) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(
𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTVD 42400 |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALT 42058.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALT 42058 is onfrALTVD 42400 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTVD 42400.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
(¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅)
| | 6:5,4,3: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
→ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ≠
∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ⊆
On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ≠
∅ )
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈
𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦
∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | qed:16: | ⊢ E Fr On
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ E Fr
On |
Home
Hilbert Space Explorer
Users' Mathboxes