P. 424 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42301-42400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mzpmul 42301	The pointwise product of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpmulmpt 42304. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpconstmpt 42302*	A constant function expressed in maps-to notation is polynomial. This theorem and the several that follow (mzpaddmpt 42303, mzpmulmpt 42304, mzpnegmpt 42306, mzpsubmpt 42305, mzpexpmpt 42307) can be used to build proofs that functions which are "manifestly polynomial", in the sense of being a maps-to containing constants, projections, and simple arithmetic operations, are actually polynomial functions. There is no mzpprojmpt because mzpproj 42299 is already expressed using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐶) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpaddmpt 42303*	Sum of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpadd 42300. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 + 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpmulmpt 42304*	Product of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpmulmpt 42304. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpsubmpt 42305*	The difference of two polynomial functions is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpnegmpt 42306*	Negation of a polynomial function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ -𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpexpmpt 42307*	Raise a polynomial function to a (fixed) exponent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴↑𝐷)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpindd 42308*	"Structural" induction to prove properties of all polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ℤ) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜎)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑓}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑓)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑓 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → 𝜌)
Theorem	mzpmfp 42309	Relationship between multivariate Z-polynomials and general multivariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (mzPoly‘𝐼) = ran (𝐼 eval ℤring)
Theorem	mzpsubst 42310*	Substituting polynomials for the variables of a polynomial results in a polynomial. 𝐺 is expected to depend on 𝑦 and provide the polynomials which are being substituted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝐺 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐺‘𝑥)))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzprename 42311*	Simplified version of mzpsubst 42310 to simply relabel variables in a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝑅:𝑉⟶𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∘ 𝑅))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpresrename 42312*	A polynomial is a polynomial over all larger index sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑉))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpcompact2lem 42313*	Lemma for mzpcompact2 42314. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
Theorem	mzpcompact2 42314*	Polynomials are finitary objects and can only reference a finite number of variables, even if the index set is infinite. Thus, every polynomial can be expressed as a (uniquely minimal, although we do not prove that) polynomial on a finite number of variables, which is then extended by adding an arbitrary set of ignored variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
21.31.9  Miscellanea for Diophantine sets 1
Theorem	coeq0i 42315	coeq0 6261 but without explicitly introducing domain and range symbols. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐵:𝐸⟶𝐹 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐹) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	fzsplit1nn0 42316	Split a finite 1-based set of integers in the middle, allowing either end to be empty ((1...0)). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (1...𝐵) = ((1...𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 + 1)...𝐵)))
21.31.10  Diophantine sets 1: definitions
Syntax	cdioph 42317	Extend class notation to include the family of Diophantine sets.
class Dioph
Definition	df-dioph 42318*	A Diophantine set is a set of positive integers which is a projection of the zero set of some polynomial. This definition somewhat awkwardly mixes ℤ (via mzPoly) and ℕ0 (to define the zero sets); the former could be avoided by considering coincidence sets of ℕ0 polynomials at the cost of requiring two, and the second is driven by consistency with our mu-recursive functions and the requirements of the Davis-Putnam-Robinson-Matiyasevich proof. Both are avoidable at a complexity cost. In particular, it is a consequence of 4sq 16936 that implicitly restricting variables to ℕ0 adds no expressive power over allowing them to range over ℤ. While this definition stipulates a specific index set for the polynomials, there is actually flexibility here, see eldioph2b 42325. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ Dioph = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ran (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑛), 𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘)) ↦ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑛)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophb 42319*	Initial expression of Diophantine property of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘))𝐷 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph 42320*	Condition for a set to be Diophantine (unpacking existential quantifier). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝐾))) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophrw 42321*	Renaming and adding unused witness variables does not change the Diophantine set coded by a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀:𝑇–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑀 ↾ 𝑂) = ( I ↾ 𝑂)) → {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑆) ↦ (𝑃‘(𝑑 ∘ 𝑀)))‘𝑏) = 0)} = {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑇)(𝑎 = (𝑐 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑐) = 0)})
Theorem	eldioph2lem1 42322*	Lemma for eldioph2 42324. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑒 ∈ V (𝑒:(1...𝑑)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑒 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁))))
Theorem	eldioph2lem2 42323*	Lemma for eldioph2 42324. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ∧ ((1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑐(𝑐:(1...𝐴)–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑐 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁))))
Theorem	eldioph2 42324*	Construct a Diophantine set from a polynomial with witness variables drawn from any set whatsoever, via mzpcompact2 42314. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eldioph2b 42325*	While Diophantine sets were defined to have a finite number of witness variables consequtively following the observable variables, this is not necessary; they can equivalently be taken to use any witness set (𝑆 ∖ (1...𝑁)). For instance, in diophin 42334 we use this to take the two input sets to have disjoint witness sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆)) → (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophelnn0 42326	Remove antecedent on 𝐵 from Diophantine set constructors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eldioph3b 42327*	Define Diophantine sets in terms of polynomials with variables indexed by ℕ. This avoids a quantifier over the number of witness variables and will be easier to use than eldiophb 42319 in most cases. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph3 42328*	Inference version of eldioph3b 42327 with quantifier expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.31.11  Diophantine sets 2 miscellanea
Theorem	ellz1 42329	Membership in a lower set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℤ → (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 1))) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)))
Theorem	lzunuz 42330	The union of a lower set of integers and an upper set of integers which abut or overlap is all of the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐴 + 1)) → ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐴 + 1))) ∪ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) = ℤ)
Theorem	fz1eqin 42331	Express a one-based finite range as the intersection of lower integers with ℕ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (1...𝑁) = ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∩ ℕ))
Theorem	lzenom 42332	Lower integers are countably infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ≈ ω)
Theorem	elmapresaunres2 42333	fresaunres2 6769 transposed to mappings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐺 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐺)
21.31.12  Diophantine sets 2: union and intersection. Monotone Boolean algebra
Theorem	diophin 42334	If two sets are Diophantine, so is their intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophun 42335	If two sets are Diophantine, so is their union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eldiophss 42336	Diophantine sets are sets of tuples of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)))
21.31.13  Diophantine sets 3: construction
Theorem	diophrex 42337*	Projecting a Diophantine set by removing a coordinate results in a Diophantine set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁))} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eq0rabdioph 42338*	This is the first of a number of theorems which allow sets to be proven Diophantine by syntactic induction, and models the correspondence between Diophantine sets and monotone existential first-order logic. This first theorem shows that the zero set of an implicit polynomial is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eqrabdioph 42339*	Diophantine set builder for equality of polynomial expressions. Note that the two expressions need not be nonnegative; only variables are so constrained. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	0dioph 42340	The null set is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → ∅ ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴))
Theorem	vdioph 42341	The "universal" set (as large as possible given eldiophss 42336) is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴))
Theorem	anrabdioph 42342*	Diophantine set builder for conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	orrabdioph 42343*	Diophantine set builder for disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3anrabdioph 42344*	Diophantine set builder for ternary conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3orrabdioph 42345*	Diophantine set builder for ternary disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.31.14  Diophantine sets 4 miscellanea
Theorem	2sbcrex 42346*	Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcrexgOLD 42347*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 18-Aug-2018. Use sbcrex 3865 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	2sbcrexOLD 42348*	Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7462 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc2rex 42349*	Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc2rexgOLD 42350*	Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7462 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
Theorem	sbc4rex 42351*	Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc4rexgOLD 42352*	Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7462 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcrot3 42353*	Rotate a sequence of three explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcrot5 42354*	Rotate a sequence of five explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbccomieg 42355*	Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
21.31.15  Diophantine sets 4: Quantification
Theorem	rexrabdioph 42356*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantification. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = (𝑡‘𝑀) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = (𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	rexfrabdioph 42357*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	2rexfrabdioph 42358*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐿)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐿)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3rexfrabdioph 42359*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐾)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	4rexfrabdioph 42360*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, four variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐽)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐽)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	6rexfrabdioph 42361*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, six variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐻)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐻)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	7rexfrabdioph 42362*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, seven variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐻 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐺)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝][(𝑡‘𝐺) / 𝑞]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐺)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.31.16  Diophantine sets 5: Arithmetic sets
Theorem	rabdiophlem1 42363*	Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Convert polynomial-ness of an expression into a constraint suitable for ralimi 3072. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) → ∀𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁))𝐴 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	rabdiophlem2 42364*	Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Reuse a polynomial expression under a new quantifier. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑀)) ↦ ⦋(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢⦌𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑀)))
Theorem	elnn0rabdioph 42365*	Diophantine set builder for nonnegativity constraints. The first builder which uses a witness variable internally; an expression is nonnegative if there is a nonnegative integer equal to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	rexzrexnn0 42366*	Rewrite an existential quantification restricted to integers into an existential quantification restricted to naturals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	lerabdioph 42367*	Diophantine set builder for the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eluzrabdioph 42368*	Diophantine set builder for membership in a fixed upper set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	elnnrabdioph 42369*	Diophantine set builder for positivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	ltrabdioph 42370*	Diophantine set builder for the strict less than relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 < 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	nerabdioph 42371*	Diophantine set builder for inequality. This not quite trivial theorem touches on something important; Diophantine sets are not closed under negation, but they contain an important subclass that is, namely the recursive sets. With this theorem and De Morgan's laws, all quantifier-free formulas can be negated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsrabdioph 42372*	Divisibility is a Diophantine relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.31.17  Diophantine sets 6: reusability. renumbering of variables
Theorem	eldioph4b 42373*	Membership in Dioph expressed using a quantified union to add witness variables instead of a restriction to remove them. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin    &   ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑝‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0}))
Theorem	eldioph4i 42374*	Forward-only version of eldioph4b 42373. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin    &   ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑃‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophren 42375*	Change variables in a Diophantine set, using class notation. This allows already proved Diophantine sets to be reused in contexts with more variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝑁)⟶(1...𝑀)) → {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ (𝑎 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝑆} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀))
Theorem	rabrenfdioph 42376*	Change variable numbers in a Diophantine class abstraction using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝐴)⟶(1...𝐵) ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)) ∣ [(𝑏 ∘ 𝐹) / 𝑎]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵))
Theorem	rabren3dioph 42377*	Change variable numbers in a 3-variable Diophantine class abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑎‘1) = (𝑏‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑎‘2) = (𝑏‘𝑌) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = (𝑏‘𝑍)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ (1...𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ (1...𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ (1...𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘3)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.31.18  Pigeonhole Principle and cardinality helpers
Theorem	fphpd 42378*	Pigeonhole principle expressed with implicit substitution. If the range is smaller than the domain, two inputs must be mapped to the same output. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	fphpdo 42379*	Pigeonhole principle for sets of real numbers with implicit output reordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	ctbnfien 42380	An infinite subset of a countable set is countable, without using choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ≈ ω ∧ 𝑌 ≈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑌)
Theorem	fiphp3d 42381*	Infinite pigeonhole principle for partitioning an infinite set between finitely many buckets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐷 = 𝑦} ≈ ℕ)
21.31.19  A non-closed set of reals is infinite
Theorem	rencldnfilem 42382*	Lemma for rencldnfi 42383. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	rencldnfi 42383*	A set of real numbers which comes arbitrarily close to some target yet excludes it is infinite. The work is done in rencldnfilem 42382 using infima; this theorem removes the requirement that A be nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
21.31.20  Lagrange's rational approximation theorem
Theorem	irrapxlem1 42384*	Lemma for irrapx1 42390. Divides the unit interval into 𝐵 half-open sections and using the pigeonhole principle fphpdo 42379 finds two multiples of 𝐴 in the same section mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1))) = (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1)))))
Theorem	irrapxlem2 42385*	Lemma for irrapx1 42390. Two multiples in the same bucket means they are very close mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1) − ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1))) < (1 / 𝐵)))
Theorem	irrapxlem3 42386*	Lemma for irrapx1 42390. By subtraction, there is a multiple very close to an integer. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (1...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / 𝐵))
Theorem	irrapxlem4 42387*	Lemma for irrapx1 42390. Eliminate ranges, use positivity of the input to force positivity of the output by increasing 𝐵 as needed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / if(𝑥 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑥)))
Theorem	irrapxlem5 42388*	Lemma for irrapx1 42390. Switching to real intervals and fraction syntax. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℚ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2)))
Theorem	irrapxlem6 42389*	Lemma for irrapx1 42390. Explicit description of a non-closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵)
Theorem	irrapx1 42390*	Dirichlet's approximation theorem. Every positive irrational number has infinitely many rational approximations which are closer than the inverse squares of their reduced denominators. Lemma 61 in [vandenDries] p. 42. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∖ ℚ) → {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} ≈ ℕ)
21.31.21  Pell equations 1: A nontrivial solution always exists
Theorem	pellexlem1 42391	Lemma for pellex 42397. Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm lower bound. This begins Dirichlet's proof of the Pell equation solution existence; the proof here follows theorem 62 of [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) ≠ 0)
Theorem	pellexlem2 42392	Lemma for pellex 42397. Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm upper bound. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝐵) − (√‘𝐷))) < (𝐵↑-2)) → (abs‘((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷))))
Theorem	pellexlem3 42393*	Lemma for pellex 42397. To each good rational approximation of (√‘𝐷), there exists a near-solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − (√‘𝐷))) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2))} ≼ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))})
Theorem	pellexlem4 42394*	Lemma for pellex 42397. Invoking irrapx1 42390, we have infinitely many near-solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))} ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	pellexlem5 42395*	Lemma for pellex 42397. Invoking fiphp3d 42381, we have infinitely many near-solutions for some specific norm. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≠ 0 ∧ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) = 𝑥)} ≈ ℕ))
Theorem	pellexlem6 42396*	Lemma for pellex 42397. Doing a field division between near solutions get us to norm 1, and the modularity constraint ensures we still have an integer. Returning NN guarantees that we are not returning the trivial solution (1,0). We are not explicitly defining the Pell-field, Pell-ring, and Pell-norm explicitly because after this construction is done we will never use them. This is mostly basic algebraic number theory and could be simplified if a generic framework for that were in place. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐸↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐹↑2))) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 mod (abs‘𝐶)) = (𝐸 mod (abs‘𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 mod (abs‘𝐶)) = (𝐹 mod (abs‘𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑏↑2))) = 1)
Theorem	pellex 42397*	Every Pell equation has a nontrivial solution. Theorem 62 in [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑦↑2))) = 1)
21.31.22  Pell equations 2: Algebraic number theory of the solution set
Syntax	csquarenn 42398	Extend class notation to include the set of square positive integers.
class ◻NN
Syntax	cpell1qr 42399	Extend class notation to include the class of quadrant-1 Pell solutions.
class Pell1QR
Syntax	cpell1234qr 42400	Extend class notation to include the class of any-quadrant Pell solutions.
class Pell1234QR