P. 354 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35301-35400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cvmlift2lem5 35301*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:((0[,]1) × (0[,]1))⟶𝐵)
Theorem	cvmlift2lem6 35302*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (0[,]1)) → (𝐾 ↾ ({𝑋} × (0[,]1))) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t ({𝑋} × (0[,]1))) Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem7 35303*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐾) = 𝐺)
Theorem	cvmlift2lem8 35304*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (0[,]1)) → (𝑋𝐾0) = (𝐻‘𝑋))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem9 35305*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐺𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ II)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ II)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (II ↾t 𝑈) ∈ Conn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (II ↾t 𝑉) ∈ Conn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 × 𝑉) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ↾ (𝑈 × {𝑍})) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑈 × {𝑍})) Cn 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑋𝐾𝑌) ∈ 𝑏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ↾ (𝑈 × 𝑉)) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑈 × 𝑉)) Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem10 35306*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (0[,]1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑢 ∈ II ∃𝑣 ∈ II (𝑋 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐾 ↾ (𝑢 × {𝑤})) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑢 × {𝑤})) Cn 𝐶) → (𝐾 ↾ (𝑢 × 𝑣)) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑢 × 𝑣)) Cn 𝐶))))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem11 35307*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ((0[,]1) × (0[,]1)) ∣ 𝐾 ∈ (((II ×t II) CnP 𝐶)‘𝑧)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ II)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ II)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐾 ↾ (𝑈 × {𝑤})) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑈 × {𝑤})) Cn 𝐶) → (𝐾 ↾ (𝑈 × 𝑉)) ∈ (((II ×t II) ↾t (𝑈 × 𝑉)) Cn 𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑈 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑀 → (𝑈 × {𝑍}) ⊆ 𝑀))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem12 35308*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ((0[,]1) × (0[,]1)) ∣ 𝐾 ∈ (((II ×t II) CnP 𝐶)‘𝑧)}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑎 ∈ (0[,]1) ∣ ((0[,]1) × {𝑎}) ⊆ 𝑀}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑟, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((nei‘II)‘{𝑟})((𝑢 × {𝑎}) ⊆ 𝑀 ↔ (𝑢 × {𝑡}) ⊆ 𝑀))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift2lem13 35309*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑧𝐺0)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1), 𝑦 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ ((℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = (𝑧 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ (𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ∧ (𝑓‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑥)))‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑔 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = 𝐺 ∧ (0𝑔0) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmlift2 35310*	A two-dimensional version of cvmlift 35293. There is a unique lift of functions on the unit square II ×t II which commutes with the covering map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (0𝐺0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (0𝑓0) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmliftphtlem 35311*	Lemma for cvmliftpht 35312. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐻 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (II Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (II Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐺(PHtpy‘𝐽)𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0𝐴0) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑀(PHtpy‘𝐶)𝑁))
Theorem	cvmliftpht 35312*	If 𝐺 and 𝐻 are path-homotopic, then their lifts 𝑀 and 𝑁 are also path-homotopic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐻 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺( ≃ph‘𝐽)𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀( ≃ph‘𝐶)𝑁)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem1 35313*	Lemma for cvmlift3 35322. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘0) = 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘0) = 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘1) = (𝑁‘1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑀) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem2 35314*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌) → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem3 35315*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑌⟶𝐵)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem4 35316*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌) → ((𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem5 35317*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) = 𝐺)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem6 35318*	Lemma for cvmlift3 35322. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑄‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑅‘1) = (𝐻‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (II Cn (𝐾 ↾t 𝑀)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑁‘1) = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑋)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑍) ∈ 𝑊)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem7 35319*	Lemma for cvmlift3 35322. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ↾t 𝑀) ∈ PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ((𝐾 CnP 𝐶)‘𝑋))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem8 35320*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem9 35321*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35310. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑂) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmlift3 35322*	A general version of cvmlift 35293. If 𝐾 is simply connected and weakly locally path-connected, then there is a unique lift of functions on 𝐾 which commutes with the covering map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑂) = 𝑃))
21.6.9  Normal numbers
Theorem	snmlff 35323*	The function 𝐹 from snmlval 35325 is a mapping from positive integers to real numbers in the range [0, 1]. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶(0[,]1)
Theorem	snmlfval 35324*	The function 𝐹 from snmlval 35325 maps 𝑁 to the relative density of 𝐵 in the first 𝑁 digits of the digit string of 𝐴 in base 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) = ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑁))
Theorem	snmlval 35325*	The property "𝐴 is simply normal in base 𝑅". A number is simply normal if each digit 0 ≤ 𝑏 < 𝑅 occurs in the base- 𝑅 digit string of 𝐴 with frequency 1 / 𝑅 (which is consistent with the expectation in an infinite random string of numbers selected from 0...𝑅 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑟 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑟 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝑥 · (𝑟↑𝑘)) mod 𝑟)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑟)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑅 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑅)))
Theorem	snmlflim 35326*	If 𝐴 is simply normal, then the function 𝐹 of relative density of 𝐵 in the digit string converges to 1 / 𝑅, i.e. the set of occurrences of 𝐵 in the digit string has natural density 1 / 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑟 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑟 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝑥 · (𝑟↑𝑘)) mod 𝑟)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑟)})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...(𝑅 − 1))) → 𝐹 ⇝ (1 / 𝑅))
21.6.10  Godel-sets of formulas - part 1
Syntax	cgoe 35327	The Godel-set of membership.
class ∈𝑔
Syntax	cgna 35328	The Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke.
class ⊼𝑔
Syntax	cgol 35329	The Godel-set of universal quantification. (Note that this is not a wff.)
class ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈
Syntax	csat 35330	The satisfaction function.
class Sat
Syntax	cfmla 35331	The formula set predicate.
class Fmla
Syntax	csate 35332	The ∈-satisfaction function.
class Sat∈
Syntax	cprv 35333	The "proves" relation.
class ⊧
Definition	df-goel 35334	Define the Godel-set of membership. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑁, 𝑃⟩ correspond to vN and vP , so (∅∈𝑔1o) actually means v0 ∈ v1 , not 0 ∈ 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∈𝑔 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω × ω) ↦ ⟨∅, 𝑥⟩)
Definition	df-gona 35335	Define the Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑈, 𝑉⟩ are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ⊼𝑔 = (𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ↦ ⟨1o, 𝑥⟩)
Definition	df-goal 35336	Define the Godel-set of universal quantification. Here 𝑁 ∈ ω corresponds to vN , and 𝑈 represents another formula, and this expression is [∀𝑥𝜑] = ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈 where 𝑥 is the 𝑁-th variable, 𝑈 = [𝜑] is the code for 𝜑. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑁, 𝑈⟩⟩
Definition	df-sat 35337*	Define the satisfaction predicate. This recursive construction builds up a function over wff codes (see satff 35404) and simultaneously defines the set of assignments to all variables from 𝑀 that makes the coded wff true in the model 𝑀, where ∈ is interpreted as the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. The interpretation of the statement 𝑆 ∈ (((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛)‘𝑈) is that for the model ⟨𝑀, 𝐸⟩, 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀 is a valuation of the variables (v0 = (𝑆‘∅), v1 = (𝑆‘1o), etc.) and 𝑈 is a code for a wff using ∈ , ⊼ , ∀ that is true under the assignment 𝑆. The function is defined by finite recursion; ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) only operates on wffs of depth at most 𝑛 ∈ ω, and ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) operates on all wffs. The coding scheme for the wffs is defined so that vi ∈ vj is coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩, (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) is coded as ⟨1o, ⟨𝜑, 𝜓⟩⟩, and ∀ vi 𝜑 is coded as ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝜑⟩⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Sat = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑚 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑚 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑚 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑚 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝑒(𝑎‘𝑗)})}) ↾ suc ω))
Definition	df-sate 35338*	A simplified version of the satisfaction predicate, using the standard membership relation and eliminating the extra variable 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢))
Definition	df-fmla 35339	Define the predicate which defines the set of valid Godel formulas. The parameter 𝑛 defines the maximum height of the formulas: the set (Fmla‘∅) is all formulas of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (which in our coding scheme is the set ({∅} × (ω × ω)); see df-sat 35337 for the full coding scheme), see fmla0 35376, and each extra level adds to the complexity of the formulas in (Fmla‘𝑛), see fmlasuc 35380. Remark: it is sufficient to have atomic formulas of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 only, because equations (formulas of the form 𝑥 = 𝑦), which are required as (atomic) formulas, can be introduced as a defined notion in terms of ∈𝑔, see df-goeq 35438. (Fmla‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω(Fmla‘𝑛) is the set of all valid formulas, see fmla 35375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Fmla = (𝑛 ∈ suc ω ↦ dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
Definition	df-prv 35340*	Define the "proves" relation on a set. A wff is true in a model 𝑀 if for every valuation 𝑠 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω), the interpretation of the wff using the membership relation on 𝑀 is true. Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the empty "model" 𝑀 = ∅, since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model. Statement prv0 35424 shows that our definition yields ∅⊧𝑈 for all formulas, though of course the formula ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ⊧ = {⟨𝑚, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑚 Sat∈ 𝑢) = (𝑚 ↑m ω)}
Theorem	goel 35341	A "Godel-set of membership". The variables are identified by their indices (which are natural numbers), and the membership vi ∈ vj is coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) = ⟨∅, ⟨𝐼, 𝐽⟩⟩)
Theorem	goelel3xp 35342	A "Godel-set of membership" is a member of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 16-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) ∈ (ω × (ω × ω)))
Theorem	goeleq12bg 35343	Two "Godel-set of membership" codes for two variables are equal iff the two corresponding variables are equal. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω)) → ((𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) = (𝑀∈𝑔𝑁) ↔ (𝐼 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝐽 = 𝑁)))
Theorem	gonafv 35344	The "Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND" for two formulas 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by AV, 16-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴⊼𝑔𝐵) = ⟨1o, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩⟩)
Theorem	goaleq12d 35345	Equality of the "Godel-set of universal quantification". (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔𝑀𝐴 = ∀𝑔𝑁𝐵)
Theorem	gonanegoal 35346	The Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND is not equal to the Godel-set of universal quantification. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ≠ ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢
Theorem	satf 35347*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat 𝐸) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})}) ↾ suc ω))
Theorem	satfsucom 35348*	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at an element of the successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ suc ω) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfn 35349	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 is a function over suc ω. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat 𝐸) Fn suc ω)
Theorem	satom 35350*	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at omega (ω). (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛))
Theorem	satfvsucom 35351*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ suc ω) → (𝑆‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfv0 35352*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆‘∅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})
Theorem	satfvsuclem1 35353*	Lemma 1 for satfvsuc 35355. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)})) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satfvsuclem2 35354*	Lemma 2 for satfvsuc 35355. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satfvsuc 35355*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 10-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))}))
Theorem	satfv1lem 35356*	Lemma for satfv1 35357. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑁, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑁}))) ∈ {𝑏 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑏‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑏‘𝐽)}} = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 if-(𝐼 = 𝑁, if-(𝐽 = 𝑁, 𝑧𝐸𝑧, 𝑧𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽)), if-(𝐽 = 𝑁, (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸𝑧, (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽)))})
Theorem	satfv1 35357*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes of height 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆‘1o) = ((𝑆‘∅) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑙 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ((𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)⊼𝑔(𝑘∈𝑔𝑙)) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (¬ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗) ∨ ¬ (𝑎‘𝑘)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑙))}) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑛(𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 if-(𝑖 = 𝑛, if-(𝑗 = 𝑛, 𝑧𝐸𝑧, 𝑧𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)), if-(𝑗 = 𝑛, (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸𝑧, (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)))}))}))
Theorem	satfsschain 35358	The binary relation of a satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes is an increasing chain (with respect to inclusion). (Contributed by AV, 15-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑆‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝑆‘𝐴)))
Theorem	satfvsucsuc 35359*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes of height (𝑁 + 1), expressed by the minimally necessary satisfaction predicates as function over wff codes of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝑆‘suc suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))}))
Theorem	satfbrsuc 35360*	The binary relation of a satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑆‘𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)) → (𝐴(𝑆‘suc 𝑁)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑃𝐵 ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝐵 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝐴 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)})))))
Theorem	satfrel 35361	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a natural number is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → Rel ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfdmlem 35362*	Lemma for satfdm 35363. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ω) ∧ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌) = dom ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)) → (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)(∃𝑏 ∈ ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑎)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑏)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑎))))
Theorem	satfdm 35363*	The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes does not depend on the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑌)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑛))
Theorem	satfrnmapom 35364	The range of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is a subset of the power set of all mappings from the natural numbers into the model 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ran ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))
Theorem	satfv0fun 35365	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at ∅ is a function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅))
Theorem	satf0 35366*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (∅ Sat ∅) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))}) ↾ suc ω)
Theorem	satf0sucom 35367*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at a successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satf00 35368*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘∅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))}
Theorem	satf0suclem 35369*	Lemma for satf0suc 35370, sat1el2xp 35373 and fmlasuc0 35378. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 = 𝐶))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satf0suc 35370*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (∅ Sat ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))}))
Theorem	satf0op 35371*	An element of a value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation expressed as ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (∅ Sat ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑋 = ⟨𝑥, ∅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑥, ∅⟩ ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁))))
Theorem	satf0n0 35372	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∅ ∉ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
Theorem	sat1el2xp 35373*	The first component of an element of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation is a member of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∀𝑤 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)∃𝑎∃𝑏(1st ‘𝑤) ∈ (ω × (𝑎 × 𝑏)))
Theorem	fmlafv 35374	The valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁 is the domain of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmla 35375	The set of all valid Godel formulas. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (Fmla‘𝑛)
Theorem	fmla0 35376*	The valid Godel formulas of height 0 is the set of all formulas of the form vi ∈ vj ("Godel-set of membership") coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)}
Theorem	fmla0xp 35377	The valid Godel formulas of height 0 is the set of all formulas of the form vi ∈ vj ("Godel-set of membership") coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = ({∅} × (ω × ω))
Theorem	fmlasuc0 35378*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) = ((Fmla‘𝑁) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢))}))
Theorem	fmlafvel 35379	A class is a valid Godel formula of height 𝑁 iff it is the first component of a member of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ↔ ⟨𝐹, ∅⟩ ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	fmlasuc 35380*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1), expressed by the valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) = ((Fmla‘𝑁) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢)}))
Theorem	fmla1 35381*	The valid Godel formulas of height 1 is the set of all formulas of the form (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) and ∀𝑔𝑘𝑎 with atoms 𝑎, 𝑏 of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘1o) = (({∅} × (ω × ω)) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (∃𝑙 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ((𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)⊼𝑔(𝑘∈𝑔𝑙)) ∨ 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑘(𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))})
Theorem	isfmlasuc 35382*	The characterization of a Godel formula of height at least 1. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)𝐹 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝐹 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢))))
Theorem	fmlasssuc 35383	The Godel formulas of height 𝑁 are a subset of the Godel formulas of height 𝑁 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) ⊆ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁))
Theorem	fmlaomn0 35384	The empty set is not a Godel formula of any height. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∅ ∉ (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmlan0 35385	The empty set is not a Godel formula. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ (Fmla‘ω)
Theorem	gonan0 35386	The "Godel-set of NAND" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴⊼𝑔𝐵) ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	goaln0 35387*	The "Godel-set of universal quantification" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	gonarlem 35388*	Lemma for gonar 35389 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (((𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁))) → ((𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁)))))
Theorem	gonar 35389*	If the "Godel-set of NAND" applied to classes is a Godel formula, the classes are also Godel formulas. Remark: The reverse is not valid for 𝐴 or 𝐵 being of the same height as the "Godel-set of NAND". (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)))
Theorem	goalrlem 35390*	Lemma for goalr 35391 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ((∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)) → (∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁))))
Theorem	goalr 35391*	If the "Godel-set of universal quantification" applied to a class is a Godel formula, the class is also a Godel formula. Remark: The reverse is not valid for 𝐴 being of the same height as the "Godel-set of universal quantification". (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmla0disjsuc 35392*	The set of valid Godel formulas of height 0 is disjoint with the formulas constructed from Godel-sets for the Sheffer stroke NAND and Godel-set of universal quantification. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fmla‘∅) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢)}) = ∅
Theorem	fmlasucdisj 35393*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1) is disjoint with the difference ((Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)), expressed by formulas constructed from Godel-sets for the Sheffer stroke NAND and Godel-set of universal quantification based on the valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘𝑁))𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satfdmfmla 35394	The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	satffunlem 35395	Lemma for satffunlem1lem1 35396 and satffunlem2lem1 35398. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((Fun 𝑍 ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑍)) ∧ (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑠)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑟)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑠) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑟)))) ∧ (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑤 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣))))) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)
Theorem	satffunlem1lem1 35396*	Lemma for satffunlem1 35401. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) → Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑘⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})
Theorem	satffunlem1lem2 35397*	Lemma 2 for satffunlem1 35401. (Contributed by AV, 23-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅) ∩ dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satffunlem2lem1 35398*	Lemma 1 for satffunlem2 35402. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∧ (𝑆‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)) → Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))})
Theorem	dmopab3rexdif 35399*	The domain of an ordered pair class abstraction with three nested restricted existential quantifiers with differences. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈) → dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐷)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = 𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)𝑥 = 𝐴)})
Theorem	satffunlem2lem2 35400*	Lemma 2 for satffunlem2 35402. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) ∧ Fun (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)) → (dom (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∩ dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))}) = ∅)