P. 354 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35301-35400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hashrepr 35301*	Develop the number of representations of an integer 𝑀 as a sum of nonnegative integers in set 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑀)) = Σ𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘𝑆)𝑀)∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)(((𝟭‘ℕ)‘𝐴)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)))
Theorem	reprpmtf1o 35302*	Transposing 0 and 𝑋 maps representations with a condition on the first index to transpositions with the same condition on the index 𝑋. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (0..^𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑀) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ 𝐵}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = {𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑀) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(𝑋 = 0, ( I ↾ (0..^𝑆)), ((pmTrsp‘(0..^𝑆))‘{𝑋, 0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑐 ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑂)
Theorem	reprdifc 35303*	Express the representations as a sum of integers in a difference of sets using conditions on each of the indices. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑀) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑀) ∖ (𝐵(repr‘𝑆)𝑀)) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (0..^𝑆)𝐶)
Theorem	chpvalz 35304*	Value of the second Chebyshev function, or summatory of the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ψ‘𝑁) = Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑛))
Theorem	chtvalz 35305*	Value of the Chebyshev function for integers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (θ‘𝑁) = Σ𝑛 ∈ ((1...𝑁) ∩ ℙ)(log‘𝑛))
Theorem	breprexplema 35306*	Lemma for breprexp 35309 (induction step for weighted sums over representations). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ ((𝑆 + 1) · 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (0..^(𝑆 + 1))) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐿‘𝑥)‘𝑦) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘(𝑆 + 1))𝑀)∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^(𝑆 + 1))((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) = Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑆)(𝑀 − 𝑏))(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) · ((𝐿‘𝑆)‘𝑏)))
Theorem	breprexplemb 35307	Lemma for breprexp 35309 (closure). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (0..^𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿‘𝑋)‘𝑌) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	breprexplemc 35308*	Lemma for breprexp 35309 (induction step). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 + 1) ≤ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑇)Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐿‘𝑎)‘𝑏) · (𝑍↑𝑏)) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑇 · 𝑁))Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑇)𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑇)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) · (𝑍↑𝑚)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^(𝑇 + 1))Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐿‘𝑎)‘𝑏) · (𝑍↑𝑏)) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...((𝑇 + 1) · 𝑁))Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘(𝑇 + 1))𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^(𝑇 + 1))((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) · (𝑍↑𝑚)))
Theorem	breprexp 35309*	Express the 𝑆 th power of the finite series in terms of the number of representations of integers 𝑚 as sums of 𝑆 terms. This is a general formulation which allows logarithmic weighting of the sums (see https://mathoverflow.net/questions/253246) and a mix of different smoothing functions taken into account in 𝐿. See breprexpnat 35310 for the simple case presented in the proposition of [Nathanson] p. 123. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐿‘𝑎)‘𝑏) · (𝑍↑𝑏)) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑆 · 𝑁))Σ𝑐 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑆)𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)) · (𝑍↑𝑚)))
Theorem	breprexpnat 35310*	Express the 𝑆 th power of the finite series in terms of the number of representations of integers 𝑚 as sums of 𝑆 terms of elements of 𝐴, bounded by 𝑁. Proposition of [Nathanson] p. 123. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = Σ𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (1...𝑁))(𝑍↑𝑏)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (♯‘((𝐴 ∩ (1...𝑁))(repr‘𝑆)𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃↑𝑆) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑆 · 𝑁))(𝑅 · (𝑍↑𝑚)))
21.4.27.2  Vinogradov Trigonometric Sums and the Circle Method
Syntax	cvts 35311	The Vinogradov trigonometric sums.
class vts
Definition	df-vts 35312*	Define the Vinogradov trigonometric sums. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2021.)
⊢ vts = (𝑙 ∈ (ℂ ↑m ℕ), 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑎 ∈ (1...𝑛)((𝑙‘𝑎) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (𝑎 · 𝑥))))))
Theorem	vtsval 35313*	Value of the Vinogradov trigonometric sums. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿vts𝑁)‘𝑋) = Σ𝑎 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐿‘𝑎) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (𝑎 · 𝑋)))))
Theorem	vtscl 35314	Closure of the Vinogradov trigonometric sums. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿vts𝑁)‘𝑋) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	vtsprod 35315*	Express the Vinogradov trigonometric sums to the power of 𝑆 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)(((𝐿‘𝑎)vts𝑁)‘𝑋) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑆 · 𝑁))Σ𝑐 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑆)𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (𝑚 · 𝑋)))))
Theorem	circlemeth 35316*	The Hardy, Littlewood and Ramanujan Circle Method, in a generic form, with different weighting / smoothing functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘𝑆)𝑁)∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)) = ∫(0(,)1)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)(((𝐿‘𝑎)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)
Theorem	circlemethnat 35317*	The Hardy, Littlewood and Ramanujan Circle Method, Chapter 5.1 of [Nathanson] p. 123. This expresses 𝑅, the number of different ways a nonnegative integer 𝑁 can be represented as the sum of at most 𝑆 integers in the set 𝐴 as an integral of Vinogradov trigonometric sums. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (♯‘(𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((((𝟭‘ℕ)‘𝐴)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 = ∫(0(,)1)((𝐹↑𝑆) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥
Theorem	circlevma 35318*	The Circle Method, where the Vinogradov sums are weighted using the von Mangoldt function, as it appears as proposition 1.1 of [Helfgott] p. 5. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁)((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) = ∫(0(,)1)((((Λvts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑3) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)
Theorem	circlemethhgt 35319*	The circle method, where the Vinogradov sums are weighted using the Von Mangoldt function and smoothed using functions 𝐻 and 𝐾. Statement 7.49 of [Helfgott] p. 69. At this point there is no further constraint on the smoothing functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁)(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) = ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)
21.4.27.3  The Ternary Goldbach Conjecture: Final Statement
Axiom	ax-hgt749 35320*	Statement 7.49 of [Helfgott] p. 70. For a sufficiently big odd 𝑁, this postulates the existence of smoothing functions ℎ (eta star) and 𝑘 (eta plus) such that the lower bound for the circle integral is big enough. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} ((;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑛 → ∃ℎ ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)∃𝑘 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)(∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑘‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (ℎ‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14) ∧ ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑛↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · ℎ)vts𝑛)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝑘)vts𝑛)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑛 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥))
Axiom	ax-ros335 35321	Theorem 12. of [RosserSchoenfeld] p. 71. Theorem chpo1ubb 27814 states that the ψ function is bounded by a linear term; this axiom postulates an upper bound for that linear term. This is stated as an axiom until a formal proof can be provided. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) < ((1._0_3_8_83) · 𝑥)
Axiom	ax-ros336 35322	Theorem 13. of [RosserSchoenfeld] p. 71. Theorem chpchtlim 27812 states that the ψ and θ function are asymtotic to each other; this axiom postulates an upper bound for their difference. This is stated as an axiom until a formal proof can be provided. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ((ψ‘𝑥) − (θ‘𝑥)) < ((1._4_2_62) · (√‘𝑥))
Theorem	hgt750lemc 35323*	An upper bound to the summatory function of the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑗) < ((1._0_3_8_83) · 𝑁))
Theorem	hgt750lemd 35324*	An upper bound to the summatory function of the von Mangoldt function on non-primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ (((1...𝑁) ∖ ℙ) ∪ {2})(Λ‘𝑖) < ((1._4_2_63) · (√‘𝑁)))
Theorem	hgt749d 35325*	A deduction version of ax-hgt749 35320. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)∃𝑘 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)(∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑘‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (ℎ‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14) ∧ ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · ℎ)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝑘)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥))
Theorem	logdivsqrle 35326	Conditions for ((log x ) / ( sqrt 𝑥)) to be decreasing. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp‘2) ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log‘𝐵) / (√‘𝐵)) ≤ ((log‘𝐴) / (√‘𝐴)))
Theorem	hgt750lem 35327	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 35338. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) → ((7._3_48) · ((log‘𝑁) / (√‘𝑁))) < (0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48))
Theorem	hgt750lem2 35328	Decimal multiplication galore! (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (3 · ((((1._0_7_9_9_55)↑2) · (1._4_14)) · ((1._4_2_63) · (1._0_3_8_83)))) < (7._3_48)
Theorem	hgt750lemf 35329*	Lemma for the statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘0) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘1) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘2) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 (((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) ≤ (((𝑃↑2) · 𝑄) · Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2))))))
Theorem	hgt750lemg 35330*	Lemma for the statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. Applying a permutation 𝑇 to the three factors of a product does not change the result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝑐 ∘ 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(0..^3)–1-1-onto→(0..^3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:(0..^3)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘0)) · ((𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘1)) · (𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘2)))) = ((𝐿‘(𝑁‘0)) · ((𝐿‘(𝑁‘1)) · (𝐿‘(𝑁‘2)))))
Theorem	oddprm2 35331*	Two ways to write the set of odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    ⇒   ⊢ (ℙ ∖ {2}) = (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)
Theorem	hgt750lemb 35332*	An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) ≤ ((log‘𝑁) · (Σ𝑖 ∈ (((1...𝑁) ∖ ℙ) ∪ {2})(Λ‘𝑖) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑗))))
Theorem	hgt750lema 35333*	An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑑 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘𝑎) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)} ↦ (𝑑 ∘ if(𝑎 = 0, ( I ↾ (0..^3)), ((pmTrsp‘(0..^3))‘{𝑎, 0}))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ ((ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∖ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) ≤ (3 · Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2))))))
Theorem	hgt750leme 35334*	An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ ((ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∖ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) ≤ (((7._3_48) · ((log‘𝑁) / (√‘𝑁))) · (𝑁↑2)))
Theorem	tgoldbachgnn 35335*	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 35338. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	tgoldbachgtde 35336*	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 35338. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < Σ𝑛 ∈ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtda 35337*	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 35338. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · ( -𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtd 35338*	Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)))
Theorem	tgoldbachgt 35339*	Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺))
21.4.28  Elementary Geometry
21.4.28.1  Two-dimensional geometry This definition has been superseded by DimTarskiG≥ and is no longer needed in the main part of set.mm. It is only kept here for reference.
Syntax	cstrkg2d 35340	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the planarity axioms.
class TarskiG2D
Definition	df-trkg2d 35341*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axiom, Axiom A8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12, and the upper dimension axiom, Axiom A9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13, for dimension 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ TarskiG2D = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((((𝑥𝑑𝑢) = (𝑥𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑢) = (𝑦𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑧𝑑𝑢) = (𝑧𝑑𝑣)) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))))}
Theorem	istrkg2d 35342*	Property of fulfilling dimension 2 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((((𝑥 − 𝑢) = (𝑥 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑢) = (𝑦 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑧 − 𝑢) = (𝑧 − 𝑣)) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))))))
Theorem	axtglowdim2ALTV 35343*	Alternate version of axtglowdim2 28938. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)))
Theorem	axtgupdim2ALTV 35344	Alternate version of axtgupdim2 28939. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑈) = (𝑋 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑈) = (𝑌 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑈) = (𝑍 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
21.4.28.2  Morley's Miracle
Theorem	cgranbtwn 35345	Null angle implies betweenness. (Contributed by SS, 4-Jun-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝐹) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝐷)))
Theorem	btwnlng13 35346	If 𝑍 is between 𝑋 and 𝑌, or 𝑌 is between 𝑋 and 𝑍, then 𝑍 lies on the line 𝑋𝑌. (Contributed by SS, 4-Jun-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	morleylemrneab 35347	Lemma for morley . (Contributed by TA and SS, 4-Jun-2026.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrA‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝑄”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑄𝐴𝑅”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑅𝐴𝐵”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑄𝐴𝑅”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑅”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑅𝐵𝑃”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑃𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑅𝐵𝑃”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝑃”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑃𝐶𝑄”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑄𝐶𝐴”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝑃𝐶𝑄”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))
21.4.28.3  Outer Five Segment (not used, no need to move to main)
Syntax	cafs 35348	Declare the syntax for the outer five segment configuration.
class AFS
Definition	df-afs 35349*	The outer five segment configuration is an abbreviation for the conditions of the Five Segment Axiom (axtg5seg 28933). See df-ofs 36841. Definition 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)
⊢ AFS = (𝑔 ∈ TarskiG ↦ {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / ℎ][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑒 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩⟩ ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎ℎ𝑏) = (𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∧ (𝑏ℎ𝑐) = (𝑦ℎ𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎ℎ𝑑) = (𝑥ℎ𝑤) ∧ (𝑏ℎ𝑑) = (𝑦ℎ𝑤))))})
Theorem	afsval 35350*	Value of the AFS relation for a given geometry structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (AFS‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑒 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩⟩ ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑐) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎 − 𝑏) = (𝑥 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝑏 − 𝑐) = (𝑦 − 𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎 − 𝑑) = (𝑥 − 𝑤) ∧ (𝑏 − 𝑑) = (𝑦 − 𝑤))))})
Theorem	brafs 35351	Binary relation form of the outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (AFS‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩𝑂⟨⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩, ⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩⟩ ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝑌 − 𝑍)) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐷) = (𝑋 − 𝑊) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝑊)))))
Theorem	tg5segofs 35352	Rephrase axtg5seg 28933 using the outer five segment predicate. Theorem 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (AFS‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩𝑂⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐻, 𝐼⟩⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) = (𝐻 − 𝐼))
21.4.29  LeftPad Project See https://github.com/tirix/lets-prove-leftpad.
Syntax	clpad 35353	Extend class notation with the leftpad function.
class leftpad
Definition	df-lpad 35354*	Define the leftpad function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ leftpad = (𝑐 ∈ V, 𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑙 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((0..^(𝑙 − (♯‘𝑤))) × {𝑐}) ++ 𝑤)))
Theorem	lpadval 35355	Value of the leftpad function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿) = (((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) ++ 𝑊))
Theorem	lpadlem1 35356	Lemma for the leftpad theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) ∈ Word 𝑆)
Theorem	lpadlem3 35357	Lemma for lpadlen1 35358. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) = ∅)
Theorem	lpadlen1 35358	Length of a left-padded word, in the case the length of the given word 𝑊 is at least the desired length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = (♯‘𝑊))
Theorem	lpadlem2 35359	Lemma for the leftpad theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑊) ≤ 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶})) = (𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	lpadlen2 35360	Length of a left-padded word, in the case the given word 𝑊 is shorter than the desired length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑊) ≤ 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = 𝐿)
Theorem	lpadmax 35361	Length of a left-padded word, in the general case, expressed with an if statement. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = if(𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊), (♯‘𝑊), 𝐿))
Theorem	lpadleft 35362	The contents of prefix of a left-padded word is always the letter 𝐶. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)‘𝑁) = 𝐶)
Theorem	lpadright 35363	The suffix of a left-padded word the original word 𝑊. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = if(𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊), 0, (𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)‘(𝑁 + 𝑀)) = (𝑊‘𝑁))
21.5  Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim Note: On 4-Sep-2016 and after, 745 unused theorems were deleted from this mathbox, and 359 theorems used only once or twice were merged into their referencing theorems. The originals can be recovered from set.mm versions prior to this date.
Syntax	w-bnj17 35364	Extend wff notation with the 4-way conjunction. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)
Definition	df-bnj17 35365	Define the 4-way conjunction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))
Syntax	c-bnj14 35366	Extend class notation with the function giving: the class of all elements of 𝐴 that are "smaller" than 𝑋 according to 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.)
class pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-bnj14 35367*	Define the function giving: the class of all elements of 𝐴 that are "smaller" than 𝑋 according to 𝑅. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋}
Syntax	w-bnj13 35368	Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff 𝑅 Se 𝐴
Definition	df-bnj13 35369*	Define the following predicate: 𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Syntax	w-bnj15 35370	Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝑅 is both well-founded and set-like on 𝐴. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴
Definition	df-bnj15 35371	Define the following predicate: 𝑅 is both well-founded and set-like on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴))
Syntax	c-bnj18 35372	Extend class notation with the function giving: the transitive closure of 𝑋 in 𝐴 by 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.)
class trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-bnj18 35373*	Define the function giving: the transitive closure of 𝑋 in 𝐴 by 𝑅. This definition has been designed for facilitating verification that it is eliminable and that the $d restrictions are sound and complete. For a more readable definition see bnj882 35603. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑓 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}∪ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑖)
Syntax	w-bnj19 35374	Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝐵 is transitive for 𝐴 and 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-bnj19 35375*	Define the following predicate: 𝐵 is transitive for 𝐴 and 𝑅. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ( TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵)
21.5.1  First-order logic and set theory
Theorem	bnj170 35376	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bnj240 35377	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜒′)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓′ ∧ 𝜒′))
Theorem	bnj248 35378	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj250 35379	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj251 35380	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
Theorem	bnj252 35381	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj253 35382	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj255 35383	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj256 35384	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj257 35385	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj258 35386	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj268 35387	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj290 35388	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj291 35389	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj312 35390	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj334 35391	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj345 35392	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj422 35393	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj432 35394	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	bnj446 35395	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bnj23 35396*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑦 → [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	bnj31 35397	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)
Theorem	bnj62 35398*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj89 35399*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑦]∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥[𝑍 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	bnj90 35400*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑌 / 𝑥]𝑧 Fn 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 𝑌)