P. 354 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35301-35400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bnj1421 35301*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1444 35302*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜌 → ∀𝑦𝜌)
Theorem	bnj1445 35303*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜎 → ∀𝑑𝜎)
Theorem	bnj1446 35304*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑑(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1447 35305*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑦(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1448 35306*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑓(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1449 35307*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁 → ∀𝑓𝜁)
Theorem	bnj1442 35308*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1450 35309*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1423 35310*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1452 35311*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1466 35312*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑓 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1467 35313*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑑 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1463 35314*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1489 35315*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj1491 35316*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
Theorem	bnj1312 35317*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e., a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1493 35318*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1497 35319*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
Theorem	bnj1498 35320*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35321. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
21.4.5  Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3
Theorem	bnj60 35321*	Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1514 35322*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35327. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))
Theorem	bnj1518 35323*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35327. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑑𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1519 35324*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35327. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) → ∀𝑑(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1520 35325*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35327. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) → ∀𝑓(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1501 35326*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35327. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝑓 = 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
21.4.6  Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3
Theorem	bnj1500 35327*	Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1525 35328*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35331. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1529 35329*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35331. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑦, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1523 35330*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35331. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
21.4.7  Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3
Theorem	bnj1522 35331*	Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
21.5  Mathbox for BTernaryTau
21.5.1  First-order logic
21.5.1.1  Auxiliary axiom schemes
Theorem	nfan1c 35332	Variant of nfan 1918 and commuted form of nfan1 2234. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)
Theorem	cbvex1v 35333*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	dvelimalcased 35334*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	dvelimalcasei 35335*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimalcased 35334. See axsepg2 35400 for an example of its use. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ∀𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜒
Theorem	dvelimexcased 35336*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	dvelimexcasei 35337*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimexcased 35336. See axnulg 35405 for an example of its use. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ∃𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜒
21.5.2  ZF set theory
Theorem	exdifsn 35338	There exists an element in a class excluding a singleton if and only if there exists an element in the original class not equal to the singleton element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	srcmpltd 35339	If a statement is true for every element of a class and for every element of its complement relative to a second class, then it is true for every element in the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	prsrcmpltd 35340	If a statement is true for all pairs of elements of a class, all pairs of elements of its complement relative to a second class, and all pairs with one element in each, then it is true for all pairs of elements of the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓))
Theorem	axnulALT2 35341*	Alternate proof of axnul 5254, proved from propositional calculus, ax-gen 1814, ax-4 1828, ax-6 1986, and ax-rep 5226. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Mar-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	dff15 35342*	A one-to-one function in terms of different arguments never having the same function value. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)))
Theorem	f1resveqaeq 35343	If a function restricted to a class is one-to-one, then for any two elements of the class, the values of the function at those elements are equal only if the two elements are the same element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	f1resrcmplf1dlem 35344	Lemma for f1resrcmplf1d 35345. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐷)) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	f1resrcmplf1d 35345	If a function's restriction to a subclass of its domain and its restriction to the relative complement of that subclass are both one-to-one, and if the ranges of those two restrictions are disjoint, then the function is itself one-to-one. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶):𝐶–1-1→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶)):(𝐴 ∖ 𝐶)–1-1→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶))) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	funen1cnv 35346	If a function is equinumerous to ordinal 1, then its converse is also a function. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ≈ 1o) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	ordprcon 35347	If an ordinal class is not a set, then it must be the proper class of all ordinals. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V) → 𝐴 = On)
Theorem	xoromon 35348	ω is either an ordinal set or the proper class of all ordinal sets, but not both. This is a stronger version of omon 7854. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (ω ∈ On ⊻ ω = On)
Theorem	fissorduni 35349	The union (supremum) of a finite set of ordinals less than a nonzero ordinal class is an element of that ordinal class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ordtypeon 35350	A proper class with a set-like well-ordering is isomorphic to the proper class of all ordinal numbers. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Jun-2026.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (On, 𝐴))
Theorem	fnrelpredd 35351*	A function that preserves a relation also preserves predecessors. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 16-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Pred(𝑆, (𝐹 “ 𝐶), (𝐹‘𝐷)) = (𝐹 “ Pred(𝑅, 𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	cardpred 35352	The cardinality function preserves predecessors. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → Pred( E , (card “ 𝐴), (card‘𝐵)) = (card “ Pred( ≺ , 𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	nummin 35353*	Every nonempty class of numerable sets has a minimal element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ dom card ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Pred( ≺ , 𝐴, 𝑥) = ∅)
Theorem	r11 35354	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at 1o. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘1o) = 1o
Theorem	r12 35355	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at 2o. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘2o) = 2o
Theorem	r1wf 35356	Each stage in the cumulative hierarchy is well-founded. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
Theorem	elwf 35357	An element of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	r1elcl 35358	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under membership. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))
Theorem	rankval2b 35359*	Value of an alternate definition of the rank function. Definition of [BellMachover] p. 478. This variant of rankval2 9773 does not use Regularity, and so requires the assumption that 𝐴 is in the range of 𝑅1. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝑥)})
Theorem	rankval4b 35360*	The rank of a set is the supremum of the successors of the ranks of its members. Exercise 9.1 of [Jech] p. 72. Also a special case of Theorem 7V(b) of [Enderton] p. 204. This variant of rankval4 9822 does not use Regularity, and so requires the assumption that 𝐴 is in the range of 𝑅1. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc (rank‘𝑥))
Theorem	rankfilimbi 35361*	If all elements in a finite well-founded set have a rank less than a limit ordinal, then the rank of that set is also less than the limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Lim 𝐵)) → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	rankfilimb 35362*	The rank of a finite well-founded set is less than a limit ordinal iff the ranks of all of its elements are less than that limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	r1filimi 35363*	If all elements in a finite set appear in the cumulative hierarchy prior to a limit ordinal, then that set also appears in the cumulative hierarchy prior to the limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ 𝐵) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	r1filim 35364*	A finite set appears in the cumulative hierarchy prior to a limit ordinal iff all of its elements appear in the cumulative hierarchy prior to that limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	r1omfi 35365	Hereditarily finite sets are finite sets. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ Fin
Theorem	r1omhf 35366*	A set is hereditarily finite iff it is finite and all of its elements are hereditarily finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω)))
Theorem	r1ssel 35367	A set is a subset of the value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function iff it is an element of the value at the successor. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	axnulALT3 35368*	Alternate proof of axnul 5254, proved from propositional calculus, ax-gen 1814, ax-4 1828, ax-5 1929, and ax-inf2 9593. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	axprALT2 35369*	Alternate proof of axpr 5383, proved from predicate calculus, ax-rep 5226, and ax-inf2 9593. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Mar-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Theorem	r1omfv 35370	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at ω. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘ω) = ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω)
Theorem	trssfir1om 35371	If every element in a transitive class is finite, then every element is also hereditarily finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω))
Theorem	r1omhfb 35372*	The class of all hereditarily finite sets is the only class with the property that all sets are members of it iff they are finite and all of their elements are members of it. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐻 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)))
21.5.2.1  Finitism
Theorem	prcinf 35373*	Any proper class is literally infinite, in the sense that it contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. This proof holds regardless of whether the Axiom of Infinity is accepted or negated. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝑛))
Theorem	fineqvrep 35374*	If all sets are finite, then the Axiom of Replacement becomes redundant. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (Fin = V → (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))
Theorem	fineqvpow 35375*	If all sets are finite, then the Axiom of Power Sets becomes redundant. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (Fin = V → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	fineqvac 35376	If all sets are finite, then the Axiom of Choice becomes redundant. For a shorter proof using ax-rep 5226 and ax-pow 5321, see fineqvacALT 35377. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (Fin = V → CHOICE)
Theorem	fineqvacALT 35377	Shorter proof of fineqvac 35376 using ax-rep 5226 and ax-pow 5321. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fin = V → CHOICE)
Theorem	fineqvomon 35378	If all sets are finite, then the class of all natural numbers equals the proper class of all ordinal numbers. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (Fin = V → ω = On)
Theorem	fineqvomonb 35379	All sets are finite iff all ordinal sets are finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (Fin = V ↔ ω = On)
Theorem	omprcomonb 35380	The class of all finite ordinals is a proper class iff all ordinal sets are finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (¬ ω ∈ V ↔ ω = On)
Theorem	fineqvnttrclselem1 35381*	Lemma for fineqvnttrclse 35384. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) → ∪ {𝑑 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴 +o 𝑑) = 𝐵} ∈ ω)
Theorem	fineqvnttrclselem2 35382*	Lemma for fineqvnttrclse 35384. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ suc suc 𝑁 ↦ ∪ {𝑑 ∈ On ∣ (𝑣 +o 𝑑) = 𝐵})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ suc suc 𝑁) → (𝐴 +o (𝐹‘𝐴)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	fineqvnttrclselem3 35383*	Lemma for fineqvnttrclse 35384. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ω    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ suc suc 𝑁 ↦ ∪ {𝑑 ∈ On ∣ (𝑣 +o 𝑑) = 𝐵})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑁(𝐹‘𝑎)𝑅(𝐹‘suc 𝑎))
Theorem	fineqvnttrclse 35384*	A counterexample demonstrating that ttrclse 9679 does not hold when all sets are finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ω    ⇒   ⊢ (Fin = V → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ¬ t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Se 𝐴))
Theorem	fineqvinfep 35385*	A counterexample demonstrating that tz9.1 9681 does not hold when all sets are finite and an infinite descending ∈-chain exists. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Feb-2026.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {(𝐹‘∅)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fin = V ∧ 𝐹:ω–1-1→V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → ¬ ∃𝑦(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦))
21.5.2.2  Introduce ax-regs
Axiom	ax-regs 35386*	A strong version of the Axiom of Regularity. It states that if there exists a set with property 𝜑, then there must exist a set with property 𝜑 such that none of its elements have property 𝜑. This axiom can be derived from the axioms of ZF set theory as shown in axregs 35399, but this derivation relies on ax-inf2 9593 and is thus not possible in a finitist context. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	axreg 35387*	Derivation of ax-reg 9537 from ax-regs 35386 and Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. This demonstrates the sense in which ax-regs 35386 is a stronger version of ax-reg 9537. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
Theorem	axregscl 35388*	A version of ax-regs 35386 with a class variable instead of a wff variable. Axiom D in Gödel, The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory (1940), p. 6. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	axregszf 35389*	Derivation of zfregs 9684 using ax-regs 35386. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	setindregs 35390*	Set (epsilon) induction. This version of setind 9699 replaces zfregs 9684 with axregszf 35389. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	setinds2regs 35391*	Principle of set induction (or E-induction). If a property passes from all elements of 𝑥 to 𝑥 itself, then it holds for all 𝑥. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	noinfepfnregs 35392*	There are no infinite descending ∈-chains, proven using ax-regs 35386. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn ω → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ∉ (𝐹‘𝑥))
Theorem	noinfepregs 35393*	There are no infinite descending ∈-chains, proven using ax-regs 35386. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ∉ (𝐹‘𝑥)
Theorem	tz9.1regs 35394*	Every set has a transitive closure (the smallest transitive extension). This version of tz9.1 9681 depends on ax-regs 35386 instead of ax-reg 9537 and ax-inf2 9593. This suggests a possible answer to the third question posed in tz9.1 9681, namely that the missing property is that countably infinite classes must obey regularity. In ZF set theory we can prove this by showing that countably infinite classes are sets and thus ax-reg 9537 applies to them directly, but in a finitist context it seems that an axiom like ax-regs 35386 is required since countably infinite classes are proper classes. A related candidate for the missing property is the non-existence of infinite descending ∈-chains, proven as noinfep 9612 using ax-reg 9537 and ax-inf2 9593 and as noinfepregs 35393 using ax-regs 35386. If all sets are finite, then the existence of such a chain implies there is a set which does not have a transitive closure, as shown in fineqvinfep 35385. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Dec-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))
Theorem	unir1regs 35395	The cumulative hierarchy of sets covers the universe. This version of unir1 9768 replaces setind 9699 with setindregs 35390. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) = V
Theorem	trssfir1omregs 35396	If every element in a transitive class is finite, then every element is also hereditarily finite. This version of trssfir1om 35371 replaces setinds2 9703 with setinds2regs 35391. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω))
Theorem	r1omhfbregs 35397*	The class of all hereditarily finite sets is the only class with the property that all sets are members of it iff they are finite and all of their elements are members of it. This version of r1omhfb 35372 replaces setinds2 9703 with setinds2regs 35391 and trssfir1om 35371 with trssfir1omregs 35396. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐻 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)))
Theorem	fineqvr1ombregs 35398	All sets are finite iff all sets are hereditarily finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (Fin = V ↔ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) = V)
21.5.2.3  Derive ax-regs
Theorem	axregs 35399*	Derivation of ax-regs 35386 from the axioms of ZF set theory. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))))
21.5.2.4  ZFC axioms with reduced distinct variable conditions
Theorem	axsepg2 35400*	A generalization of ax-sep 5245 in which 𝑥 and 𝑧 need not be distinct. This theorem scheme bundles ax-sep 5245 with the degenerate instance ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) which is satisfied by the existence of the empty set. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-May-2026.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))