P. 354 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35301-35400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cvmliftphtlem 35301*	Lemma for cvmliftpht 35302. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐻 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (II Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (II Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐺(PHtpy‘𝐽)𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((II ×t II) Cn 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0𝐴0) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑀(PHtpy‘𝐶)𝑁))
Theorem	cvmliftpht 35302*	If 𝐺 and 𝐻 are path-homotopic, then their lifts 𝑀 and 𝑁 are also path-homotopic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (℩𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐻 ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺( ≃ph‘𝐽)𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀( ≃ph‘𝐶)𝑁)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem1 35303*	Lemma for cvmlift3 35312. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘0) = 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘0) = 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘1) = (𝑁‘1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑀) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem2 35304*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌) → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem3 35305*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑌⟶𝐵)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem4 35306*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌) → ((𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem5 35307*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) = 𝐺)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem6 35308*	Lemma for cvmlift3 35312. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑄‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑅‘1) = (𝐻‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (II Cn (𝐾 ↾t 𝑀)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑁‘1) = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = (𝐻‘𝑋)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑍) ∈ 𝑊)
Theorem	cvmlift3lem7 35309*	Lemma for cvmlift3 35312. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑆‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ↾t 𝑀) ∈ PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ((𝐾 CnP 𝐶)‘𝑋))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem8 35310*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶))
Theorem	cvmlift3lem9 35311*	Lemma for cvmlift2 35300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑓 ∈ (II Cn 𝐾)((𝑓‘0) = 𝑂 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = 𝑥 ∧ ((℩𝑔 ∈ (II Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑔) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ (𝑔‘0) = 𝑃))‘1) = 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (∪ 𝑠 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 (∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑠 ∖ {𝑐})(𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝑐) ∈ ((𝐶 ↾t 𝑐)Homeo(𝐽 ↾t 𝑘))))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑂) = 𝑃))
Theorem	cvmlift3 35312*	A general version of cvmlift 35283. If 𝐾 is simply connected and weakly locally path-connected, then there is a unique lift of functions on 𝐾 which commutes with the covering map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 CovMap 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ SConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑛-Locally PConn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 Cn 𝐶)((𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) = 𝐺 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑂) = 𝑃))
21.6.9  Normal numbers
Theorem	snmlff 35313*	The function 𝐹 from snmlval 35315 is a mapping from positive integers to real numbers in the range [0, 1]. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶(0[,]1)
Theorem	snmlfval 35314*	The function 𝐹 from snmlval 35315 maps 𝑁 to the relative density of 𝐵 in the first 𝑁 digits of the digit string of 𝐴 in base 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) = ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑁))
Theorem	snmlval 35315*	The property "𝐴 is simply normal in base 𝑅". A number is simply normal if each digit 0 ≤ 𝑏 < 𝑅 occurs in the base- 𝑅 digit string of 𝐴 with frequency 1 / 𝑅 (which is consistent with the expectation in an infinite random string of numbers selected from 0...𝑅 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑟 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑟 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝑥 · (𝑟↑𝑘)) mod 𝑟)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑟)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑅 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑅)))
Theorem	snmlflim 35316*	If 𝐴 is simply normal, then the function 𝐹 of relative density of 𝐵 in the digit string converges to 1 / 𝑅, i.e. the set of occurrences of 𝐵 in the digit string has natural density 1 / 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑟 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (0...(𝑟 − 1))(𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝑥 · (𝑟↑𝑘)) mod 𝑟)) = 𝑏}) / 𝑛)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑟)})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((♯‘{𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑛) ∣ (⌊‘((𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) mod 𝑅)) = 𝐵}) / 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...(𝑅 − 1))) → 𝐹 ⇝ (1 / 𝑅))
21.6.10  Godel-sets of formulas - part 1
Syntax	cgoe 35317	The Godel-set of membership.
class ∈𝑔
Syntax	cgna 35318	The Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke.
class ⊼𝑔
Syntax	cgol 35319	The Godel-set of universal quantification. (Note that this is not a wff.)
class ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈
Syntax	csat 35320	The satisfaction function.
class Sat
Syntax	cfmla 35321	The formula set predicate.
class Fmla
Syntax	csate 35322	The ∈-satisfaction function.
class Sat∈
Syntax	cprv 35323	The "proves" relation.
class ⊧
Definition	df-goel 35324	Define the Godel-set of membership. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑁, 𝑃⟩ correspond to vN and vP , so (∅∈𝑔1o) actually means v0 ∈ v1 , not 0 ∈ 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∈𝑔 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω × ω) ↦ ⟨∅, 𝑥⟩)
Definition	df-gona 35325	Define the Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑈, 𝑉⟩ are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ⊼𝑔 = (𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ↦ ⟨1o, 𝑥⟩)
Definition	df-goal 35326	Define the Godel-set of universal quantification. Here 𝑁 ∈ ω corresponds to vN , and 𝑈 represents another formula, and this expression is [∀𝑥𝜑] = ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈 where 𝑥 is the 𝑁-th variable, 𝑈 = [𝜑] is the code for 𝜑. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∀𝑔𝑁𝑈 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑁, 𝑈⟩⟩
Definition	df-sat 35327*	Define the satisfaction predicate. This recursive construction builds up a function over wff codes (see satff 35394) and simultaneously defines the set of assignments to all variables from 𝑀 that makes the coded wff true in the model 𝑀, where ∈ is interpreted as the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. The interpretation of the statement 𝑆 ∈ (((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛)‘𝑈) is that for the model ⟨𝑀, 𝐸⟩, 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀 is a valuation of the variables (v0 = (𝑆‘∅), v1 = (𝑆‘1o), etc.) and 𝑈 is a code for a wff using ∈ , ⊼ , ∀ that is true under the assignment 𝑆. The function is defined by finite recursion; ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) only operates on wffs of depth at most 𝑛 ∈ ω, and ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) operates on all wffs. The coding scheme for the wffs is defined so that vi ∈ vj is coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩, (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) is coded as ⟨1o, ⟨𝜑, 𝜓⟩⟩, and ∀ vi 𝜑 is coded as ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝜑⟩⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Sat = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑚 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑚 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑚 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑚 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝑒(𝑎‘𝑗)})}) ↾ suc ω))
Definition	df-sate 35328*	A simplified version of the satisfaction predicate, using the standard membership relation and eliminating the extra variable 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢))
Definition	df-fmla 35329	Define the predicate which defines the set of valid Godel formulas. The parameter 𝑛 defines the maximum height of the formulas: the set (Fmla‘∅) is all formulas of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (which in our coding scheme is the set ({∅} × (ω × ω)); see df-sat 35327 for the full coding scheme), see fmla0 35366, and each extra level adds to the complexity of the formulas in (Fmla‘𝑛), see fmlasuc 35370. Remark: it is sufficient to have atomic formulas of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 only, because equations (formulas of the form 𝑥 = 𝑦), which are required as (atomic) formulas, can be introduced as a defined notion in terms of ∈𝑔, see df-goeq 35428. (Fmla‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω(Fmla‘𝑛) is the set of all valid formulas, see fmla 35365. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Fmla = (𝑛 ∈ suc ω ↦ dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
Definition	df-prv 35330*	Define the "proves" relation on a set. A wff is true in a model 𝑀 if for every valuation 𝑠 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω), the interpretation of the wff using the membership relation on 𝑀 is true. Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the empty "model" 𝑀 = ∅, since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model. Statement prv0 35414 shows that our definition yields ∅⊧𝑈 for all formulas, though of course the formula ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ⊧ = {⟨𝑚, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑚 Sat∈ 𝑢) = (𝑚 ↑m ω)}
Theorem	goel 35331	A "Godel-set of membership". The variables are identified by their indices (which are natural numbers), and the membership vi ∈ vj is coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) = ⟨∅, ⟨𝐼, 𝐽⟩⟩)
Theorem	goelel3xp 35332	A "Godel-set of membership" is a member of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 16-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) ∈ (ω × (ω × ω)))
Theorem	goeleq12bg 35333	Two "Godel-set of membership" codes for two variables are equal iff the two corresponding variables are equal. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω)) → ((𝐼∈𝑔𝐽) = (𝑀∈𝑔𝑁) ↔ (𝐼 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝐽 = 𝑁)))
Theorem	gonafv 35334	The "Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND" for two formulas 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by AV, 16-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴⊼𝑔𝐵) = ⟨1o, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩⟩)
Theorem	goaleq12d 35335	Equality of the "Godel-set of universal quantification". (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔𝑀𝐴 = ∀𝑔𝑁𝐵)
Theorem	gonanegoal 35336	The Godel-set for the Sheffer stroke NAND is not equal to the Godel-set of universal quantification. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ≠ ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢
Theorem	satf 35337*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat 𝐸) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})}) ↾ suc ω))
Theorem	satfsucom 35338*	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at an element of the successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ suc ω) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfn 35339	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 is a function over suc ω. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat 𝐸) Fn suc ω)
Theorem	satom 35340*	The satisfaction predicate for wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at omega (ω). (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛))
Theorem	satfvsucom 35341*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ suc ω) → (𝑆‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfv0 35342*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆‘∅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)})})
Theorem	satfvsuclem1 35343*	Lemma 1 for satfvsuc 35345. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)})) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satfvsuclem2 35344*	Lemma 2 for satfvsuc 35345. (Contributed by AV, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satfvsuc 35345*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 10-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))}))
Theorem	satfv1lem 35346*	Lemma for satfv1 35347. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑁, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑁}))) ∈ {𝑏 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑏‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑏‘𝐽)}} = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 if-(𝐼 = 𝑁, if-(𝐽 = 𝑁, 𝑧𝐸𝑧, 𝑧𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽)), if-(𝐽 = 𝑁, (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸𝑧, (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽)))})
Theorem	satfv1 35347*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes of height 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆‘1o) = ((𝑆‘∅) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω (∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑙 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ((𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)⊼𝑔(𝑘∈𝑔𝑙)) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (¬ (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗) ∨ ¬ (𝑎‘𝑘)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑙))}) ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑛(𝑖∈𝑔𝑗) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 if-(𝑖 = 𝑛, if-(𝑗 = 𝑛, 𝑧𝐸𝑧, 𝑧𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)), if-(𝑗 = 𝑛, (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸𝑧, (𝑎‘𝑖)𝐸(𝑎‘𝑗)))}))}))
Theorem	satfsschain 35348	The binary relation of a satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes is an increasing chain (with respect to inclusion). (Contributed by AV, 15-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑆‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝑆‘𝐴)))
Theorem	satfvsucsuc 35349*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes of height (𝑁 + 1), expressed by the minimally necessary satisfaction predicates as function over wff codes of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝑆‘suc suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))}))
Theorem	satfbrsuc 35350*	The binary relation of a satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑆‘𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)) → (𝐴(𝑆‘suc 𝑁)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑃𝐵 ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝐵 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝐴 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)})))))
Theorem	satfrel 35351	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a natural number is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → Rel ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
Theorem	satfdmlem 35352*	Lemma for satfdm 35353. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ω) ∧ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌) = dom ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)) → (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑌)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)(∃𝑏 ∈ ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑌)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑎)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑏)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑎))))
Theorem	satfdm 35353*	The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes does not depend on the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑌)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑁 Sat 𝐹)‘𝑛))
Theorem	satfrnmapom 35354	The range of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is a subset of the power set of all mappings from the natural numbers into the model 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ran ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))
Theorem	satfv0fun 35355	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at ∅ is a function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅))
Theorem	satf0 35356*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (∅ Sat ∅) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))}) ↾ suc ω)
Theorem	satf0sucom 35357*	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at a successor of ω. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁) = (rec((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))})), {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))})‘𝑁))
Theorem	satf00 35358*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘∅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))}
Theorem	satf0suclem 35359*	Lemma for satf0suc 35360, sat1el2xp 35363 and fmlasuc0 35368. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 = 𝐶))} ∈ V)
Theorem	satf0suc 35360*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (∅ Sat ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) = ((𝑆‘𝑁) ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 = ∅ ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢)))}))
Theorem	satf0op 35361*	An element of a value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation expressed as ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (∅ Sat ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑋 = ⟨𝑥, ∅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑥, ∅⟩ ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁))))
Theorem	satf0n0 35362	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model and the empty binary relation does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∅ ∉ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
Theorem	sat1el2xp 35363*	The first component of an element of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation is a member of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∀𝑤 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)∃𝑎∃𝑏(1st ‘𝑤) ∈ (ω × (𝑎 × 𝑏)))
Theorem	fmlafv 35364	The valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁 is the domain of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmla 35365	The set of all valid Godel formulas. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘ω) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (Fmla‘𝑛)
Theorem	fmla0 35366*	The valid Godel formulas of height 0 is the set of all formulas of the form vi ∈ vj ("Godel-set of membership") coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)}
Theorem	fmla0xp 35367	The valid Godel formulas of height 0 is the set of all formulas of the form vi ∈ vj ("Godel-set of membership") coded as ⟨∅, ⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = ({∅} × (ω × ω))
Theorem	fmlasuc0 35368*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) = ((Fmla‘𝑁) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢))}))
Theorem	fmlafvel 35369	A class is a valid Godel formula of height 𝑁 iff it is the first component of a member of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the empty model with an empty binary relation at 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 19-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ↔ ⟨𝐹, ∅⟩ ∈ ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	fmlasuc 35370*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1), expressed by the valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) = ((Fmla‘𝑁) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢)}))
Theorem	fmla1 35371*	The valid Godel formulas of height 1 is the set of all formulas of the form (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) and ∀𝑔𝑘𝑎 with atoms 𝑎, 𝑏 of the form 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (Fmla‘1o) = (({∅} × (ω × ω)) ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (∃𝑙 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ((𝑖∈𝑔𝑗)⊼𝑔(𝑘∈𝑔𝑙)) ∨ 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑘(𝑖∈𝑔𝑗))})
Theorem	isfmlasuc 35372*	The characterization of a Godel formula of height at least 1. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)𝐹 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝐹 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢))))
Theorem	fmlasssuc 35373	The Godel formulas of height 𝑁 are a subset of the Godel formulas of height 𝑁 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) ⊆ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁))
Theorem	fmlaomn0 35374	The empty set is not a Godel formula of any height. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ∅ ∉ (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmlan0 35375	The empty set is not a Godel formula. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ (Fmla‘ω)
Theorem	gonan0 35376	The "Godel-set of NAND" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴⊼𝑔𝐵) ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	goaln0 35377*	The "Godel-set of universal quantification" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	gonarlem 35378*	Lemma for gonar 35379 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (((𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁))) → ((𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁)))))
Theorem	gonar 35379*	If the "Godel-set of NAND" applied to classes is a Godel formula, the classes are also Godel formulas. Remark: The reverse is not valid for 𝐴 or 𝐵 being of the same height as the "Godel-set of NAND". (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑎⊼𝑔𝑏) ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)))
Theorem	goalrlem 35380*	Lemma for goalr 35381 (induction step). (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ((∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)) → (∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁))))
Theorem	goalr 35381*	If the "Godel-set of universal quantification" applied to a class is a Godel formula, the class is also a Godel formula. Remark: The reverse is not valid for 𝐴 being of the same height as the "Godel-set of universal quantification". (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∀𝑔𝑖𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)) → 𝑎 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	fmla0disjsuc 35382*	The set of valid Godel formulas of height 0 is disjoint with the formulas constructed from Godel-sets for the Sheffer stroke NAND and Godel-set of universal quantification. (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fmla‘∅) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢)}) = ∅
Theorem	fmlasucdisj 35383*	The valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1) is disjoint with the difference ((Fmla‘suc suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)), expressed by formulas constructed from Godel-sets for the Sheffer stroke NAND and Godel-set of universal quantification based on the valid Godel formulas of height (𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by AV, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (Fmla‘suc 𝑁)𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω 𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖𝑢) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((Fmla‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (Fmla‘𝑁))𝑥 = (𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satfdmfmla 35384	The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))
Theorem	satffunlem 35385	Lemma for satffunlem1lem1 35386 and satffunlem2lem1 35388. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((Fun 𝑍 ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑍)) ∧ (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑠)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑟)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑠) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑟)))) ∧ (𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑤 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣))))) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)
Theorem	satffunlem1lem1 35386*	Lemma for satffunlem1 35391. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) → Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑘⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))})
Theorem	satffunlem1lem2 35387*	Lemma 2 for satffunlem1 35391. (Contributed by AV, 23-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅) ∩ dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅)(∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘∅)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑗⟩} ∪ (𝑓 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satffunlem2lem1 35388*	Lemma 1 for satffunlem2 35392. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∧ (𝑆‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)) → Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))})
Theorem	dmopab3rexdif 35389*	The domain of an ordered pair class abstraction with three nested restricted existential quantifiers with differences. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈) → dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐷)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)(∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = 𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 ∖ 𝑆)𝑥 = 𝐴)})
Theorem	satffunlem2lem2 35390*	Lemma 2 for satffunlem2 35392. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑀 ↑m ω) ∖ ((2nd ‘𝑢) ∩ (2nd ‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ({⟨𝑖, 𝑧⟩} ∪ (𝑎 ↾ (ω ∖ {𝑖}))) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑢)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) ∧ Fun (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)) → (dom (𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∩ dom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (∃𝑢 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑆‘suc 𝑁)(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ ω (𝑥 = ∀𝑔𝑖(1st ‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) ∨ ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝑆‘𝑁)∃𝑣 ∈ ((𝑆‘suc 𝑁) ∖ (𝑆‘𝑁))(𝑥 = ((1st ‘𝑢)⊼𝑔(1st ‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴))}) = ∅)
Theorem	satffunlem1 35391	Lemma 1 for satffun 35393: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘suc ∅))
Theorem	satffunlem2 35392	Lemma 2 for satffun 35393: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → (Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘suc 𝑁) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘suc suc 𝑁)))
Theorem	satffun 35393	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes at a natural number is a function. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → Fun ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
Theorem	satff 35394	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁):(Fmla‘𝑁)⟶𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))
Theorem	satfun 35395	The satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω):(Fmla‘ω)⟶𝒫 (𝑀 ↑m ω))
Theorem	satfvel 35396	An element of the value of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 and the binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 at the code 𝑈 for a wff using ∈ , ⊼ , ∀ is a valuation 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀 of the variables (v0 = (𝑆‘∅), v1 = (𝑆‘1o), etc.) so that 𝑈 is true under the assignment 𝑆. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀)
Theorem	satfv0fvfmla0 35397*	The value of the satisfaction predicate as function over a wff code at ∅. (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 Sat 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)) → ((𝑆‘∅)‘𝑋) = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘(1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑋)))𝐸(𝑎‘(2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑋)))})
Theorem	satefv 35398	The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 at the code 𝑈. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
Theorem	sate0 35399	The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
Theorem	satef 35400	The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀)