Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 128 of 470) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29567) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29568-31090) |
Users' Mathboxes
(31091-46927) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | eluz 12701 | Membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | uzid 12702 | Membership of the least member in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | uzidd 12703 | Membership of the least member in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | uzn0 12704 | The upper integers are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ran ℤ≥ → 𝑀 ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | uztrn 12705 | Transitive law for sets of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | uztrn2 12706 | Transitive law for sets of upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | uzneg 12707 | Contraposition law for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → -𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘-𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | uzssz 12708 | An upper set of integers is a subset of all integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ ℤ | ||
Theorem | uzssre 12709 | An upper set of integers is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ ℝ | ||
Theorem | uzss 12710 | Subset relationship for two sets of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | uztric 12711 | Totality of the ordering relation on integers, stated in terms of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∨ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | uz11 12712 | The upper integers function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ↔ 𝑀 = 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | eluzp1m1 12713 | Membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | eluzp1l 12714 | Strict ordering implied by membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑀 < 𝑁) | ||
Theorem | eluzp1p1 12715 | Membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | eluzaddi 12716 | Membership in a later upper set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Nov-2007.) |
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | eluzsubi 12717 | Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Nov-2007.) |
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)) → (𝑁 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | eluzadd 12718 | Membership in a later upper set of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | eluzsub 12719 | Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾))) → (𝑁 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | subeluzsub 12720 | Membership of a difference in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → (𝑀 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | uzm1 12721 | Choices for an element of an upper interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 = 𝑀 ∨ (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | uznn0sub 12722 | The nonnegative difference of integers is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 − 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | uzin 12723 | Intersection of two upper intervals of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = (ℤ≥‘if(𝑀 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | uzp1 12724 | Choices for an element of an upper interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1)))) | ||
Theorem | nn0uz 12725 | Nonnegative integers expressed as an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ ℕ0 = (ℤ≥‘0) | ||
Theorem | nnuz 12726 | Positive integers expressed as an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ ℕ = (ℤ≥‘1) | ||
Theorem | elnnuz 12727 | A positive integer expressed as a member of an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1)) | ||
Theorem | elnn0uz 12728 | A nonnegative integer expressed as a member an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)) | ||
Theorem | eluz2nn 12729 | An integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Nov-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | eluz4eluz2 12730 | An integer greater than or equal to 4 is an integer greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) | ||
Theorem | eluz4nn 12731 | An integer greater than or equal to 4 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | eluzge2nn0 12732 | If an integer is greater than or equal to 2, then it is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | eluz2n0 12733 | An integer greater than or equal to 2 is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | uzuzle23 12734 | An integer in the upper set of integers starting at 3 is element of the upper set of integers starting at 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) | ||
Theorem | eluzge3nn 12735 | If an integer is greater than 3, then it is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | uz3m2nn 12736 | An integer greater than or equal to 3 decreased by 2 is a positive integer, analogous to uz2m1nn 12768. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 − 2) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | 1eluzge0 12737 | 1 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0) | ||
Theorem | 2eluzge0 12738 | 2 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0) | ||
Theorem | 2eluzge1 12739 | 2 is an integer greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1) | ||
Theorem | uznnssnn 12740 | The upper integers starting from a natural are a subset of the naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | raluz 12741* | Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | raluz2 12742* | Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | rexuz 12743* | Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | rexuz2 12744* | Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | 2rexuz 12745* | Double existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2005.) |
⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑚 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | peano2uz 12746 | Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | peano2uzs 12747 | Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | peano2uzr 12748 | Reversed second Peano axiom for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | uzaddcl 12749 | Addition closure law for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | nn0pzuz 12750 | The sum of a nonnegative integer and an integer is an integer greater than or equal to that integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝑍) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | uzind4 12751* | Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | uzind4ALT 12752* | Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the basis and the induction step. Either uzind4 12751 or uzind4ALT 12752 may be used; see comment for nnind 12096. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | uzind4s 12753* | Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | uzind4s2 12754* | Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. Use this instead of uzind4s 12753 when 𝑗 and 𝑘 must be distinct in [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑗]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑘 / 𝑗]𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑗]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | uzind4i 12755* | Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. This is a stronger version of uzind4 12751 assuming that 𝜓 holds unconditionally. Notice that 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) implies that the lower bound 𝑀 is an integer (𝑀 ∈ ℤ, see eluzel2 12692). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | uzwo 12756* | Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘) | ||
Theorem | uzwo2 12757* | Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃!𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘) | ||
Theorem | nnwo 12758* | Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. Theorem I.37 (well-ordering principle) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | nnwof 12759* | Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. This version allows 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be present in 𝐴 as long as they are effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | nnwos 12760* | Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element (schema form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | indstr 12761* | Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | eluznn0 12762 | Membership in a nonnegative upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | eluznn 12763 | Membership in a positive upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ. (Contributed by JJ, 1-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | eluz2b1 12764 | Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | eluz2gt1 12765 | An integer greater than or equal to 2 is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 1 < 𝑁) | ||
Theorem | eluz2b2 12766 | Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | eluz2b3 12767 | Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 1)) | ||
Theorem | uz2m1nn 12768 | One less than an integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | 1nuz2 12769 | 1 is not in (ℤ≥‘2). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) | ||
Theorem | elnn1uz2 12770 | A positive integer is either 1 or greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))) | ||
Theorem | uz2mulcl 12771 | Closure of multiplication of integers greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) | ||
Theorem | indstr2 12772* | Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). The first two hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | uzinfi 12773 | Extract the lower bound of an upper set of integers as its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ inf((ℤ≥‘𝑀), ℝ, < ) = 𝑀 | ||
Theorem | nninf 12774 | The infimum of the set of positive integers is one. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ inf(ℕ, ℝ, < ) = 1 | ||
Theorem | nn0inf 12775 | The infimum of the set of nonnegative integers is zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ inf(ℕ0, ℝ, < ) = 0 | ||
Theorem | infssuzle 12776 | The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers is less than or equal to all members of the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infssuzcl 12777 | The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers belongs to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | ublbneg 12778* | The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | eqreznegel 12779* | Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℤ → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | supminf 12780* | The supremum of a bounded-above set of reals is the negation of the infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) ( Revised by AV, 13-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | lbzbi 12781* | If a set of reals is bounded below, it is bounded below by an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | zsupss 12782* | Any nonempty bounded subset of integers has a supremum in the set. (The proof does not use ax-pre-sup 11054.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | suprzcl2 12783* | The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is a member of the set. (This version of suprzcl 12505 avoids ax-pre-sup 11054.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | suprzub 12784* | The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is greater than any member of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | uzsupss 12785* | Any bounded subset of an upper set of integers has a supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | nn01to3 12786 | A (nonnegative) integer between 1 and 3 must be 1, 2 or 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 3) → (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = 2 ∨ 𝑁 = 3)) | ||
Theorem | nn0ge2m1nnALT 12787 | Alternate proof of nn0ge2m1nn 12407: If a nonnegative integer is greater than or equal to two, the integer decreased by 1 is a positive integer. This version is proved using eluz2 12693, a theorem for upper sets of integers, which are defined later than the positive and nonnegative integers. This proof is, however, much shorter than the proof of nn0ge2m1nn 12407. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Aug-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ 𝑁) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | uzwo3 12788* | Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. This generalization of uzwo2 12757 allows the lower bound 𝐵 to be any real number. See also nnwo 12758 and nnwos 12760. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | zmin 12789* | There is a unique smallest integer greater than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | zmax 12790* | There is a unique largest integer less than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | zbtwnre 12791* | There is a unique integer between a real number and the number plus one. Exercise 5 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐴 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | rebtwnz 12792* | There is a unique greatest integer less than or equal to a real number. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝑥 + 1))) | ||
Syntax | cq 12793 | Extend class notation to include the class of rationals. |
class ℚ | ||
Definition | df-q 12794 | Define the set of rational numbers. Based on definition of rationals in [Apostol] p. 22. See elq 12795 for the relation "is rational". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) |
⊢ ℚ = ( / “ (ℤ × ℕ)) | ||
Theorem | elq 12795* | Membership in the set of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | qmulz 12796* | If 𝐴 is rational, then some integer multiple of it is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) ∈ ℤ) | ||
Theorem | znq 12797 | The ratio of an integer and a positive integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ) | ||
Theorem | qre 12798 | A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | zq 12799 | An integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 23-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) | ||
Theorem | qred 12800 | A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |