P. 131 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 13001-13100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eluz2n0 13001	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ≠ 0)
Theorem	uz3m2nn 13002	An integer greater than or equal to 3 decreased by 2 is a positive integer, analogous to uz2m1nn 13031. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 − 2) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	uznnssnn 13003	The upper integers starting from a natural are a subset of the naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ ℕ)
Theorem	raluz 13004*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	raluz2 13005*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz 13006*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz2 13007*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2rexuz 13008*	Double existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑚 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	peano2uz 13009	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	peano2uzs 13010	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	peano2uzr 13011	Reversed second Peano axiom for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzaddcl 13012	Addition closure law for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	nn0pzuz 13013	The sum of a nonnegative integer and an integer is an integer greater than or equal to that integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝑍) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑍))
Theorem	uzind4 13014*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4ALT 13015*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the basis and the induction step. Either uzind4 13014 or uzind4ALT 13015 may be used; see comment for nnind 12334. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4s 13016*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4s2 13017*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. Use this instead of uzind4s 13016 when 𝑗 and 𝑘 must be distinct in [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑗]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑘 / 𝑗]𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑗]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4i 13018*	Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. This is a stronger version of uzind4 13014 assuming that 𝜓 holds unconditionally. Notice that 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) implies that the lower bound 𝑀 is an integer (𝑀 ∈ ℤ, see eluzel2 12951). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzwo 13019*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
Theorem	uzwo2 13020*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃!𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
Theorem	nnwo 13021*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. Theorem I.37 (well-ordering principle) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	nnwof 13022*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. This version allows 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be present in 𝐴 as long as they are effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	nnwos 13023*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element (schema form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
Theorem	indstr 13024*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	eluznn0 13025	Membership in a nonnegative upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluznn 13026	Membership in a positive upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ. (Contributed by JJ, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz2b1 13027	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2gt1 13028	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 1 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz2b2 13029	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2b3 13030	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 1))
Theorem	uz2m1nn 13031	One less than an integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1nuz2 13032	1 is not in (ℤ≥‘2). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)
Theorem	elnn1uz2 13033	A positive integer is either 1 or greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)))
Theorem	uz2mulcl 13034	Closure of multiplication of integers greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	indstr2 13035*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). The first two hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	uzinfi 13036	Extract the lower bound of an upper set of integers as its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ inf((ℤ≥‘𝑀), ℝ, < ) = 𝑀
Theorem	nninf 13037	The infimum of the set of positive integers is one. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(ℕ, ℝ, < ) = 1
Theorem	nn0inf 13038	The infimum of the set of nonnegative integers is zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(ℕ0, ℝ, < ) = 0
Theorem	infssuzle 13039	The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers is less than or equal to all members of the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infssuzcl 13040	The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers belongs to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	ublbneg 13041*	The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	eqreznegel 13042*	Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℤ → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	supminf 13043*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of reals is the negation of the infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) ( Revised by AV, 13-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	lbzbi 13044*	If a set of reals is bounded below, it is bounded below by an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	zsupss 13045*	Any nonempty bounded subset of integers has a supremum in the set. (The proof does not use ax-pre-sup 11259.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	suprzcl2 13046*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is a member of the set. (This version of suprzcl 12760 avoids ax-pre-sup 11259.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	suprzub 13047*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is greater than any member of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	uzsupss 13048*	Any bounded subset of an upper set of integers has a supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	nn01to3 13049	A (nonnegative) integer between 1 and 3 must be 1, 2 or 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 3) → (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = 2 ∨ 𝑁 = 3))
Theorem	nn0ge2m1nnALT 13050	Alternate proof of nn0ge2m1nn 12657: If a nonnegative integer is greater than or equal to two, the integer decreased by 1 is a positive integer. This version is proved using eluz2 12952, a theorem for upper sets of integers, which are defined later than the positive and nonnegative integers. This proof is, however, much shorter than the proof of nn0ge2m1nn 12657. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Aug-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ 𝑁) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.12  Well-ordering principle for bounded-below sets of integers
Theorem	uzwo3 13051*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. This generalization of uzwo2 13020 allows the lower bound 𝐵 to be any real number. See also nnwo 13021 and nnwos 13023. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	zmin 13052*	There is a unique smallest integer greater than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
Theorem	zmax 13053*	There is a unique largest integer less than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	zbtwnre 13054*	There is a unique integer between a real number and the number plus one. Exercise 5 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐴 + 1)))
Theorem	rebtwnz 13055*	There is a unique greatest integer less than or equal to a real number. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝑥 + 1)))
5.4.13  Rational numbers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cq 13056	Extend class notation to include the class of rationals.
class ℚ
Definition	df-q 13057	Define the set of rational numbers. Based on definition of rationals in [Apostol] p. 22. See elq 13058 for the relation "is rational". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ = ( / “ (ℤ × ℕ))
Theorem	elq 13058*	Membership in the set of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
Theorem	qmulz 13059*	If 𝐴 is rational, then some integer multiple of it is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	znq 13060	The ratio of an integer and a positive integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qre 13061	A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	zq 13062	An integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 23-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qred 13063	A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	zssq 13064	The integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℤ ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	nn0ssq 13065	The nonnegative integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ℕ0 ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	nnssq 13066	The positive integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	qssre 13067	The rationals are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	qsscn 13068	The rationals are a subset of the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	qex 13069	The set of rational numbers exists. See also qexALT 13072. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Theorem	nnq 13070	A positive integer is rational. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qcn 13071	A rational number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	qexALT 13072	Alternate proof of qex 13069. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Theorem	1q 13073	The number 1 is rational. (Contributed by SN, 30-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℚ
Theorem	qaddcl 13074	Closure of addition of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qnegcl 13075	Closure law for the negative of a rational. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → -𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qmulcl 13076	Closure of multiplication of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qsubcl 13077	Closure of subtraction of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qreccl 13078	Closure of reciprocal of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qdivcl 13079	Closure of division of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qrevaddcl 13080	Reverse closure law for addition of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℚ → ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℚ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ))
Theorem	nnrecq 13081	The reciprocal of a positive integer is rational. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	irradd 13082	The sum of an irrational number and a rational number is irrational. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	irrmul 13083	The product of an irrational with a nonzero rational is irrational. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	elpq 13084*	A positive rational is the quotient of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
Theorem	elpqb 13085*	A class is a positive rational iff it is the quotient of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
5.4.14  Existence of the set of complex numbers
Theorem	rpnnen1lem2 13086*	Lemma for rpnnen1 13092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem1 13087*	Lemma for rpnnen1 13092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (ℚ ↑m ℕ))
Theorem	rpnnen1lem3 13088*	Lemma for rpnnen1 13092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ran (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem4 13089*	Lemma for rpnnen1 13092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem5 13090*	Lemma for rpnnen1 13092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) = 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem6 13091*	Lemma for rpnnen1 13092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 15-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ ≼ (ℚ ↑m ℕ)
Theorem	rpnnen1 13092	One half of rpnnen 16375, where we show an injection from the real numbers to sequences of rational numbers. Specifically, we map a real number 𝑥 to the sequence (𝐹‘𝑥):ℕ⟶ℚ (see rpnnen1lem6 13091) such that ((𝐹‘𝑥)‘𝑘) is the largest rational number with denominator 𝑘 that is strictly less than 𝑥. In this manner, we get a monotonically increasing sequence that converges to 𝑥, and since each sequence converges to a unique real number, this mapping from reals to sequences of rational numbers is injective. Note: The ℕ and ℚ existence hypotheses provide for use with either nnex 12322 and qex 13069, or nnexALT 12318 and qexALT 13072. The proof should not be modified to use any of those 4 theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Revised by NM, 15-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ ≼ (ℚ ↑m ℕ)
Theorem	reexALT 13093	Alternate proof of reex 11272. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ∈ V
Theorem	cnref1o 13094*	There is a natural one-to-one mapping from (ℝ × ℝ) to ℂ, where we map ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ to (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)). In our construction of the complex numbers, this is in fact our definition of ℂ (see df-c 11187), but in the axiomatic treatment we can only show that there is the expected mapping between these two sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(ℝ × ℝ)–1-1-onto→ℂ
Theorem	cnexALT 13095	The set of complex numbers exists. This theorem shows that ax-cnex 11237 is redundant if we assume ax-rep 5232. See also ax-cnex 11237. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	xrex 13096	The set of extended reals exists. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.)
⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
Theorem	mpoaddex 13097*	The addition operation is a set. Version of addex 13098 using maps-to notation , which does not require ax-addf 11260. (Contributed by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) ∈ V
Theorem	addex 13098	The addition operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ + ∈ V
Theorem	mpomulex 13099*	The multiplication operation is a set. Version of mulex 13100 using maps-to notation , which does not require ax-mulf 11261. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) ∈ V
Theorem	mulex 13100	The multiplication operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ · ∈ V