| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 395 of 494) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30937) |
(30938-32460) |
(32461-49324) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | hlateq 39401* | The equality of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat4i 32392 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | hlrelat1 39402* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32382, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | hlrelat5N 39403* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic, using the definition in Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | hlrelat 39404* | A Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 32383 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | hlrelat2 39405* | A consequence of relative atomicity. (chrelat2i 32384 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | exatleN 39406 | A condition for an atom to be less than or equal to a lattice element. Part of proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | hl2at 39407* | A Hilbert lattice has at least 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) | ||
| Theorem | atex 39408 | At least one atom exists. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | intnatN 39409 | If the intersection with a non-majorizing element is an atom, the intersecting element is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2llnne2N 39410 | Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | 2llnneN 39411 | Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cvr1 39412 | A Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 32374 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | cvr2N 39413 | Less-than and covers equivalence in a Hilbert lattice. (chcv2 32375 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | hlrelat3 39414* | The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Stronger version of hlrelat 39404. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrval3 39415* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrval4N 39416* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrval5 39417* | Binary relation expressing 𝑋 covers 𝑋 ∧ 𝑌. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrp 39418 | A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 32394 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | atcvr1 39419 | An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | atcvr2 39420 | An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrexchlem 39421 | Lemma for cvrexch 39422. (cvexchlem 32387 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrexch 39422 | A Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (cvexchi 32388 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cvratlem 39423 | Lemma for cvrat 39424. (atcvatlem 32404 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑃(le‘𝐾)𝑋 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrat 39424 | A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 32405 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltltncvr 39425 | A chained strong ordering is not a covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ltcvrntr 39426 | Non-transitive condition for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrntr 39427 | The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 32311 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | atcvr0eq 39428 | The covers relation is not transitive. (atcv0eq 32398 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ( 0 𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | lnnat 39429 | A line (the join of two distinct atoms) is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | atcvrj0 39430 | Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 32399 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 = 0 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrat2 39431 | A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 32406 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | atcvrneN 39432 | Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | atcvrj1 39433 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | atcvrj2b 39434 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | atcvrj2 39435 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | atleneN 39436 | Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | atltcvr 39437 | An equivalence of less-than ordering and covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | atle 39438* | Any nonzero element has an atom under it. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | atlt 39439 | Two atoms are unequal iff their join is greater than one of them. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | atlelt 39440 | Transfer less-than relation from one atom to another. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 < 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | 2atlt 39441* | Given an atom less than an element, there is another atom less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 < 𝑋) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 < 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | atexchcvrN 39442 | Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 39398 with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | atexchltN 39443 | Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 39398 with less-than ordering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrat3 39444 | A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 32415 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrat4 39445* | A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 in [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Also Lemma 9.2(delta) in [MaedaMaeda] p. 41. (atcvat4i 32416 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrat42 39446* | Commuted version of cvrat4 39445. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑄)))) | ||
| Theorem | 2atjm 39447 | The meet of a line (expressed with 2 atoms) and a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | atbtwn 39448 | Property of a 3rd atom 𝑅 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ↔ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | atbtwnexOLDN 39449* | There exists a 3rd atom 𝑟 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃, such that 𝑟 is different from 𝑄 and not in 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | atbtwnex 39450* | Given atoms 𝑃 in 𝑋 and 𝑄 not in 𝑋, there exists an atom 𝑟 not in 𝑋 such that the line 𝑄 ∨ 𝑟 intersects 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | 3noncolr2 39451 | Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | 3noncolr1N 39452 | Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | hlatcon3 39453 | Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | hlatcon2 39454 | Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | 4noncolr3 39455 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 3 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | 4noncolr2 39456 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | 4noncolr1 39457 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑆 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | athgt 39458* | A Hilbert lattice, whose height is at least 4, has a chain of 4 successively covering atom joins. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝𝐶(𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)𝐶(((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∨ 𝑠)))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dim0 39459* | There exists a 3-dimensional (height-4) element i.e. a volume. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem1 39460 | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem2 39461 | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem3a 39462 | Lemma for 3dim3 39471. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem3 39463 | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem3OLDN 39464 | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem4a 39465 | Lemma for 3dim3 39471. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem4 39466 | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dimlem4OLDN 39467 | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dim1lem5 39468* | Lemma for 3dim1 39469. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ ¬ 𝑤 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∨ 𝑣))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dim1 39469* | Construct a 3-dimensional volume (height-4 element) on top of a given atom 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dim2 39470* | Construct 2 new layers on top of 2 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | 3dim3 39471* | Construct a new layer on top of 3 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | 2dim 39472* | Generate a height-3 element (2-dimensional plane) from an atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | 1dimN 39473* | An atom is covered by a height-2 element (1-dimensional line). (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)) | ||
| Theorem | 1cvrco 39474 | The orthocomplement of an element covered by 1 is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶 1 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | 1cvratex 39475* | There exists an atom less than an element covered by 1. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 < 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | 1cvratlt 39476 | An atom less than or equal to an element covered by 1 is less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | 1cvrjat 39477 | An element covered by the lattice unity, when joined with an atom not under it, equals the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | 1cvrat 39478 | Create an atom under an element covered by the lattice unity. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ps-1 39479 | The join of two atoms 𝑅 ∨ 𝑆 (specifying a projective geometry line) is determined uniquely by any two atoms (specifying two points) less than or equal to that join. Part of Lemma 16.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 69, showing projective space postulate PS1 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | ps-2 39480* | Lattice analogue for the projective geometry axiom, "if a line intersects two sides of a triangle at different points then it also intersects the third side." Projective space condition PS2 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 68 and part of Theorem 16.4 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | 2atjlej 39481 | Two atoms are different if their join majorizes the join of two different atoms. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | hlatexch3N 39482 | Rearrange join of atoms in an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | hlatexch4 39483 | Exchange 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | ps-2b 39484 | Variation of projective geometry axiom ps-2 39480. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem1 39485 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem2 39486 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem3 39487 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem4 39488 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem5 39489 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem6 39490 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | 3atlem7 39491 | Lemma for 3at 39492. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | 3at 39492 | Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 39479 for lines and 4at 39615 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))) | ||
| Syntax | clln 39493 | Extend class notation with set of all "lattice lines" (lattice elements which cover an atom) in a Hilbert lattice. |
| class LLines | ||
| Syntax | clpl 39494 | Extend class notation with set of all "lattice planes" (lattice elements which cover a line) in a Hilbert lattice. |
| class LPlanes | ||
| Syntax | clvol 39495 | Extend class notation with set of all 3-dimensional "lattice volumes" (lattice elements which cover a plane) in a Hilbert lattice. |
| class LVols | ||
| Syntax | clines 39496 | Extend class notation with set of all projective lines for a Hilbert lattice. |
| class Lines | ||
| Syntax | cpointsN 39497 | Extend class notation with set of all projective points. |
| class Points | ||
| Syntax | cpsubsp 39498 | Extend class notation with set of all projective subspaces. |
| class PSubSp | ||
| Syntax | cpmap 39499 | Extend class notation with projective map. |
| class pmap | ||
| Definition | df-llines 39500* | Define the set of all "lattice lines" (lattice elements which cover an atom) in a Hilbert lattice 𝑘, in other words all elements of height 2 (or lattice dimension 2 or projective dimension 1). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ LLines = (𝑘 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘) ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑝( ⋖ ‘𝑘)𝑥}) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |