P. 395 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39401-39500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hlomcmcv 39401	A Hilbert lattice is orthomodular, complete, and has the covering (exchange) property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat))
Theorem	hloml 39402	A Hilbert lattice is orthomodular. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ OML)
Theorem	hlclat 39403	A Hilbert lattice is complete. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ CLat)
Theorem	hlcvl 39404	A Hilbert lattice is an atomic lattice with the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ CvLat)
Theorem	hlatl 39405	A Hilbert lattice is atomic. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ AtLat)
Theorem	hlol 39406	A Hilbert lattice is an ortholattice. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ OL)
Theorem	hlop 39407	A Hilbert lattice is an orthoposet. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ OP)
Theorem	hllat 39408	A Hilbert lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	hllatd 39409	Deduction form of hllat 39408. A Hilbert lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ HL)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	hlomcmat 39410	A Hilbert lattice is orthomodular, complete, and atomic. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat))
Theorem	hlpos 39411	A Hilbert lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	hlatjcl 39412	Closure of join operation. Frequently-used special case of latjcl 18345 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	hlatjcom 39413	Commutatitivity of join operation. Frequently-used special case of latjcom 18353 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑌 ∨ 𝑋))
Theorem	hlatjidm 39414	Idempotence of join operation. Frequently-used special case of latjcom 18353 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	hlatjass 39415	Lattice join is associative. Frequently-used special case of latjass 18389 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑃 ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatj12 39416	Swap 1st and 2nd members of lattice join. Frequently-used special case of latj32 18391 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = (𝑄 ∨ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatj32 39417	Swap 2nd and 3rd members of lattice join. Frequently-used special case of latj32 18391 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	hlatjrot 39418	Rotate lattice join of 3 classes. Frequently-used special case of latjrot 18394 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	hlatj4 39419	Rearrangement of lattice join of 4 classes. Frequently-used special case of latj4 18395 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	hlatlej1 39420	A join's first argument is less than or equal to the join. Special case of latlej1 18354 to show an atom is on a line. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	hlatlej2 39421	A join's second argument is less than or equal to the join. Special case of latlej2 18355 to show an atom is on a line. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	glbconN 39422*	De Morgan's law for GLB and LUB. This holds in any complete ortholattice, although we assume HL for convenience. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) New df-riota 7303. (Revised by SN, 3-Jan-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ( ⊥ ‘(𝑈‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑆})))
Theorem	glbconxN 39423*	De Morgan's law for GLB and LUB. Index-set version of glbconN 39422, where we read 𝑆 as 𝑆(𝑖). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = 𝑆}) = ( ⊥ ‘(𝑈‘{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 𝑥 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑆)})))
Theorem	atnlej1 39424	If an atom is not less than or equal to the join of two others, it is not equal to either. (This also holds for non-atoms, but in this form it is convenient.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	atnlej2 39425	If an atom is not less than or equal to the join of two others, it is not equal to either. (This also holds for non-atoms, but in this form it is convenient.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	hlsuprexch 39426*	A Hilbert lattice has the superposition and exchange properties. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑧 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑧 ∨ 𝑃))))
Theorem	hlexch1 39427	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlexch2 39428	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	hlexchb1 39429	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlexchb2 39430	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	hlsupr 39431*	A Hilbert lattice has the superposition property. Theorem 13.2 in [Crawley] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlsupr2 39432*	A Hilbert lattice has the superposition property. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))
Theorem	hlhgt4 39433*	A Hilbert lattice has a height of at least 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 1 )))
Theorem	hlhgt2 39434*	A Hilbert lattice has a height of at least 2. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ( 0 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 1 ))
Theorem	hl0lt1N 39435	Lattice 0 is less than lattice 1 in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 0 < 1 )
Theorem	hlexch3 39436	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 32359 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlexch4N 39437	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlatexchb1 39438	A version of hlexchb1 39429 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlatexchb2 39439	A version of hlexchb2 39430 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatexch1 39440	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlatexch2 39441	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatmstcOLDN 39442*	An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32340 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	hlatle 39443*	The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32349 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	hlateq 39444*	The equality of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat4i 32351 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat1 39445*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32341, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	hlrelat5N 39446*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic, using the definition in Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat 39447*	A Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 32342 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat2 39448*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (chrelat2i 32343 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	exatleN 39449	A condition for an atom to be less than or equal to a lattice element. Part of proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑃))
Theorem	hl2at 39450*	A Hilbert lattice has at least 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞)
Theorem	atex 39451	At least one atom exists. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	intnatN 39452	If the intersection with a non-majorizing element is an atom, the intersecting element is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2llnne2N 39453	Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	2llnneN 39454	Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cvr1 39455	A Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 32333 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvr2N 39456	Less-than and covers equivalence in a Hilbert lattice. (chcv2 32334 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlrelat3 39457*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Stronger version of hlrelat 39447. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrval3 39458*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrval4N 39459*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrval5 39460*	Binary relation expressing 𝑋 covers 𝑋 ∧ 𝑌. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvrp 39461	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 32353 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atcvr1 39462	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	atcvr2 39463	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvrexchlem 39464	Lemma for cvrexch 39465. (cvexchlem 32346 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrexch 39465	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (cvexchi 32347 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvratlem 39466	Lemma for cvrat 39467. (atcvatlem 32363 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑃(le‘𝐾)𝑋 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvrat 39467	A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 32364 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltltncvr 39468	A chained strong ordering is not a covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	ltcvrntr 39469	Non-transitive condition for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	cvrntr 39470	The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 32270 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	atcvr0eq 39471	The covers relation is not transitive. (atcv0eq 32357 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ( 0 𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	lnnat 39472	A line (the join of two distinct atoms) is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	atcvrj0 39473	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 32358 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 = 0 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	cvrat2 39474	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 32365 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	atcvrneN 39475	Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	atcvrj1 39476	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	atcvrj2b 39477	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atcvrj2 39478	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	atleneN 39479	Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	atltcvr 39480	An equivalence of less-than ordering and covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atle 39481*	Any nonzero element has an atom under it. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atlt 39482	Two atoms are unequal iff their join is greater than one of them. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄))
Theorem	atlelt 39483	Transfer less-than relation from one atom to another. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 < 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋)
Theorem	2atlt 39484*	Given an atom less than an element, there is another atom less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 < 𝑋) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 < 𝑋))
Theorem	atexchcvrN 39485	Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 39441 with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atexchltN 39486	Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 39441 with less-than ordering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvrat3 39487	A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 32374 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvrat4 39488*	A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 in [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Also Lemma 9.2(delta) in [MaedaMaeda] p. 41. (atcvat4i 32375 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	cvrat42 39489*	Commuted version of cvrat4 39488. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	2atjm 39490	The meet of a line (expressed with 2 atoms) and a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑃)
Theorem	atbtwn 39491	Property of a 3rd atom 𝑅 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ↔ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	atbtwnexOLDN 39492*	There exists a 3rd atom 𝑟 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃, such that 𝑟 is different from 𝑄 and not in 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	atbtwnex 39493*	Given atoms 𝑃 in 𝑋 and 𝑄 not in 𝑋, there exists an atom 𝑟 not in 𝑋 such that the line 𝑄 ∨ 𝑟 intersects 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3noncolr2 39494	Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3noncolr1N 39495	Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlatcon3 39496	Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	hlatcon2 39497	Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	4noncolr3 39498	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 3 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	4noncolr2 39499	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	4noncolr1 39500	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑆 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄)))