P. 358 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35701-35800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bnj1318 35701	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = trCl(𝑌, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj1326 35702*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) = (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))
Theorem	bnj1321 35703*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑓𝜏) → ∃!𝑓𝜏)
Theorem	bnj1364 35704	Property of FrSe. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1371 35705*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 → Fun 𝑓)
Theorem	bnj1373 35706*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
Theorem	bnj1374 35707*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 → 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1384 35708*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝑃)
Theorem	bnj1388 35709*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)∃𝑓𝜏′)
Theorem	bnj1398 35710*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = dom 𝑃)
Theorem	bnj1413 35711*	Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj1408 35712*	Technical lemma for bnj1414 35713. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ trCl (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1414 35713*	Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1415 35714*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj1416 35715	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1418 35716	Property of pred. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	bnj1417 35717*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj1421 35718*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1444 35719*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜌 → ∀𝑦𝜌)
Theorem	bnj1445 35720*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜎 → ∀𝑑𝜎)
Theorem	bnj1446 35721*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑑(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1447 35722*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑦(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1448 35723*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑓(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1449 35724*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁 → ∀𝑓𝜁)
Theorem	bnj1442 35725*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1450 35726*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1423 35727*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1452 35728*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1466 35729*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑓 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1467 35730*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑑 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1463 35731*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1489 35732*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj1491 35733*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
Theorem	bnj1312 35734*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e., a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1493 35735*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1497 35736*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
Theorem	bnj1498 35737*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35738. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
21.5.5  Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3
Theorem	bnj60 35738*	Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1514 35739*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35744. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))
Theorem	bnj1518 35740*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35744. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑑𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1519 35741*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35744. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) → ∀𝑑(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1520 35742*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35744. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) → ∀𝑓(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1501 35743*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35744. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝑓 = 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
21.5.6  Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3
Theorem	bnj1500 35744*	Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1525 35745*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35748. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1529 35746*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35748. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑦, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1523 35747*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35748. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
21.5.7  Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3
Theorem	bnj1522 35748*	Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
21.6  Mathbox for BTernaryTau
21.6.1  First-order logic
21.6.1.1  Auxiliary axiom schemes
Theorem	nfan1c 35749	Variant of nfan 1931 and commuted form of nfan1 2236. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)
Theorem	cbvex1v 35750*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	dvelimalcased 35751*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	dvelimalcasei 35752*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimalcased 35751. See axsepg2 35864 for an example of its use. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ∀𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜒
Theorem	dvelimexcased 35753*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	dvelimexcasei 35754*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimexcased 35753. See axnulg 35869 for an example of its use. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ∃𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜒
21.6.2  ZF set theory
Theorem	reu6f 35755*	Version of reu6 3683 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Sep-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	rmo6 35756*	Alternate version of rmo2 3833 where 𝑦 has a restricted quantifier. The antecedent ∃𝑧𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 on the right-hand side handles the case where 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Sep-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	inv2 35757	The intersection of the universal class with a class is itself. A commuted form of inv1 4347. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (V ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	jaeqifi 35758	Inference combining four equality antecedents into one equality of conditional operators antecedent. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 14-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐷 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐷) → 𝜑)
Theorem	exdifsn 35759	There exists an element in a class excluding a singleton if and only if there exists an element in the original class not equal to the singleton element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	axnulALT2 35760*	Alternate proof of axnul 5258, proved from propositional calculus, ax-gen 1827, ax-4 1841, ax-6 1999, and ax-rep 5231. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Mar-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	f1preimaex 35761	If the image under a one-to-one function exists, then the corresponding preimage also exists. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐶 ∈ V)
Theorem	fnfvintima 35762*	Condition for a function value to equal the intersection of an image that contains it. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝐶) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	fwfffun 35763*	If 𝜓 is function-like over 𝐴, then 𝐹 matches its behavior. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝑧 = 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑧)))
Theorem	fwfffunres 35764*	If 𝜓 is function-like over 𝐴, then 𝐹 matches its behavior over 𝑥. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝑧 = 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ↾ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑤) = 𝑧)))
Theorem	ordunmax 35765	The union of two ordinals is equal to their maximum. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Oct-2026.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = if(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝐴))
Theorem	ordprcon 35766	If an ordinal class is not a set, then it must be the proper class of all ordinals. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V) → 𝐴 = On)
Theorem	xoromon 35767	ω is either an ordinal set or the proper class of all ordinal sets, but not both. This is a stronger version of omon 7889. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (ω ∈ On ⊻ ω = On)
Theorem	soinfdom 35768	A strict order relation on an infinite set dominates that set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 14-Jul-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝑅)
Theorem	abweex 35769*	The class of well-orders of a set 𝐴 and its subsets is a set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 2-Aug-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑟 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∧ 𝑟 We 𝑥)} ∈ V)
Theorem	ordtypeon 35770	A proper class with a set-like well-ordering is isomorphic to the proper class of all ordinal numbers. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Jun-2026.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (On, 𝐴))
Theorem	onf1we 35771*	If 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into the ordinals, then 𝑅 well-orders 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 16-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→On → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
Theorem	fnrelpredd 35772*	A function that preserves a relation also preserves predecessors. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 16-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Pred(𝑆, (𝐹 “ 𝐶), (𝐹‘𝐷)) = (𝐹 “ Pred(𝑅, 𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	cardpred 35773	The cardinality function preserves predecessors. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → Pred( E , (card “ 𝐴), (card‘𝐵)) = (card “ Pred( ≺ , 𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	nummin 35774*	Every nonempty class of numerable sets has a minimal element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ dom card ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Pred( ≺ , 𝐴, 𝑥) = ∅)
Theorem	1enumen 35775*	The Fundamental Theorem of Enumeration (see https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/mamarim/mamarimPDF/enu.pdf), extended to all sets. The expression ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴({𝑥} × 𝐵) can be thought of as expressing an indexed disjoint union ⊔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 where each 𝐵 has its elements tagged with the set 𝑥 that generated it. See the comment directly before undjudom 10249 for context on disjoint union as a representation of cardinal addition. This theorem is not limited to numerable sets, but it also does not depend on AC. See 1enumcard 35776 for a version that uses the card function, 1enumkard 35896 for a version that uses the kard function , and 1enum 35980 for a version that uses an explicit sum of complex number 1s. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐴 ≈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 1o))
Theorem	1enumcard 35776*	The Fundamental Theorem of Enumeration (see https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/mamarim/mamarimPDF/enu.pdf), extended to all sets. The expression ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴({𝑥} × 𝐵) can be thought of as expressing an indexed disjoint union ⊔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 where each 𝐵 has its elements tagged with the set 𝑥 that generated it. See the comment directly before undjudom 10249 for context on disjoint union as a representation of cardinal addition. This theorem does not depend on AC, but it is only meaningful for numerable sets. See 1enumen 35775 and 1enumkard 35896 for versions that are meaningful for non-numerable sets, and see 1enum 35980 for a version that uses an explicit sum of complex number 1s. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 1o)))
Theorem	r11 35777	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at 1o. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘1o) = 1o
Theorem	r12 35778	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at 2o. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘2o) = 2o
Theorem	onrankid 35779	The rank of an ordinal number is itself. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	rankfilimb 35780*	The rank of a finite well-founded set is less than a limit ordinal iff the ranks of all of its elements are less than that limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	r1filim 35781*	A finite set appears in the cumulative hierarchy prior to a limit ordinal iff all of its elements appear in the cumulative hierarchy prior to that limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	r1omfi 35782	Obsolete theorem, use hffi 9912 instead. Hereditarily finite sets are finite sets. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ Fin
Theorem	r1omhf 35783*	A set is hereditarily finite iff it is finite and all of its elements are hereditarily finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 19-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω)))
Theorem	r1ssel 35784	A set is a subset of the value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function iff it is an element of the value at the successor. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	axnulALT3 35785*	Alternate proof of axnul 5258, proved from propositional calculus, ax-gen 1827, ax-4 1841, ax-5 1942, and ax-inf2 9645. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	axprALT2 35786*	Alternate proof of axpr 5388, proved from predicate calculus, ax-rep 5231, and ax-inf2 9645. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Mar-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Theorem	rankfo 35787	The rank function maps the universe onto the ordinals. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2026.)
⊢ rank:V–onto→On
Theorem	rankfn 35788	The rank function is a function on the universe. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2026.)
⊢ rank Fn V
Theorem	trssfir1om 35789	If every element in a transitive class is finite, then every element is also hereditarily finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω))
Theorem	r1omhfb 35790*	The class of all hereditarily finite sets is the only class with the property that all sets are members of it iff they are finite and all of their elements are members of it. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐻 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)))
Theorem	werankwe 35791*	Construct a well-order given a relation 𝑅(𝑥) that well-orders elements of the same rank. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 16-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑥) ∈ (rank‘𝑦) ∨ ((rank‘𝑥) = (rank‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))}    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = (rank‘𝑥) → 𝑇 = 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑥 → 𝑈 = 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 We {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑥)} → 𝑆 We 𝐴)
Theorem	werankwe2 35792*	Construct a well-order given a relation that well-orders elements of the same rank. See werankwe 35791 for a version where 𝑅 can depend on 𝑤. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑥) ∈ (rank‘𝑦) ∨ ((rank‘𝑥) = (rank‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 We {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑤)} → 𝑆 We 𝐴)
Theorem	rankse 35793*	Construct a relation that is set-like on any class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑥) ∈ (rank‘𝑦) ∨ ((rank‘𝑥) = (rank‘𝑦) ∧ 𝜑))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐴
Theorem	scotteqi 35794	Equality theorem for the Scott operation. Inference form of scotteq 9934. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Jul-2026.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Scott 𝐴 = Scott 𝐵
Theorem	elscott 35795*	Membership in a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝑥)))
Theorem	dfscott2 35796*	Alternate definition of a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Jul-2026.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (rank‘𝑥) = ∩ (rank “ 𝐴)}
Theorem	dfscott3 35797	Alternate definition of a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 10-Jul-2026.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ (𝑅1‘suc ∩ (rank “ 𝐴)))
Theorem	elscott2 35798	Membership in a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 10-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ (rank “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	elscottrank 35799	The rank of an element in a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ (rank “ 𝐵))
Theorem	elscottrankeq 35800	Elements in a Scott's trick set have the same rank. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Jul-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Scott 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐶) → (rank‘𝐴) = (rank‘𝐵))