Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 286 of 465) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29277) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29278-30800) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30801-46488) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | 1wlkdlem4 28501* | Lemma 4 for 1wlkd 28502. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) | ||
Theorem | 1wlkd 28502 | In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a walk. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 1trld 28503 | In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a trail. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 1pthd 28504 | In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 1pthond 28505 | In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path from one of these vertices to the other vertex. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑌)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | upgr1wlkdlem1 28506 | Lemma 1 for upgr1wlkd 28508. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋}) | ||
Theorem | upgr1wlkdlem2 28507 | Lemma 2 for upgr1wlkd 28508. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽)) | ||
Theorem | upgr1wlkd 28508 | In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a walk. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | upgr1trld 28509 | In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a trail. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | upgr1pthd 28510 | In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | upgr1pthond 28511 | In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path from one of these vertices to the other vertex. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑌)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | lppthon 28512 | A loop (which is an edge at index 𝐽) induces a path of length 1 from a vertex to itself in a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 1-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴}) → 〈“𝐽”〉(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐴)〈“𝐴𝐴”〉) | ||
Theorem | lp1cycl 28513 | A loop (which is an edge at index 𝐽) induces a cycle of length 1 in a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴}) → 〈“𝐽”〉(Cycles‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐴”〉) | ||
Theorem | 1pthon2v 28514* | For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝑒) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝) | ||
Theorem | 1pthon2ve 28515* | For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝) | ||
Theorem | wlk2v2elem1 28516 | Lemma 1 for wlk2v2e 28518: 𝐹 is a length 2 word of over {0}, the domain of the singleton word 𝐼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = 〈“{𝑋, 𝑌}”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“00”〉 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 | ||
Theorem | wlk2v2elem2 28517* | Lemma 2 for wlk2v2e 28518: The values of 𝐼 after 𝐹 are edges between two vertices enumerated by 𝑃. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = 〈“{𝑋, 𝑌}”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“00”〉 & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌𝑋”〉 ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} | ||
Theorem | wlk2v2e 28518 | In a graph with two vertices and one edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other and back to the first vertex via the same/only edge is a walk. Notice that 𝐺 is a simple graph (without loops) only if 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = 〈“{𝑋, 𝑌}”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“00”〉 & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌𝑋”〉 & ⊢ 𝐺 = 〈{𝑋, 𝑌}, 𝐼〉 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 | ||
Theorem | ntrl2v2e 28519 | A walk which is not a trail: In a graph with two vertices and one edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other and back to the first vertex via the same/only edge is a walk, see wlk2v2e 28518, but not a trail. Notice that 𝐺 is a simple graph (without loops) only if 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = 〈“{𝑋, 𝑌}”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“00”〉 & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝑋𝑌𝑋”〉 & ⊢ 𝐺 = 〈{𝑋, 𝑌}, 𝐼〉 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem1 28520 | Lemma 1 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 ⇒ ⊢ (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem2 28521 | Lemma 2 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 ⇒ ⊢ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)) = {0, 1, 2} | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem3 28522 | Lemma 3 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑃‘2) = 𝐶 ∧ (𝑃‘3) = 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem4 28523* | Lemma 4 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem5 28524* | Lemma 5 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | 3pthdlem1 28525* | Lemma 1 for 3pthd 28535. (Contributed by AV, 9-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑘 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗))) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem6 28526 | Lemma 6 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐿))) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem7 28527 | Lemma 7 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V ∧ 𝐿 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem8 28528 | Lemma 8 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘0) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝐹‘1) = 𝐾 ∧ (𝐹‘2) = 𝐿)) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem9 28529 | Lemma 9 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘2)))) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkdlem10 28530* | Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 28531. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkd 28531 | Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3wlkond 28532 | A walk of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3trld 28533 | Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3trlond 28534 | A trail of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3pthd 28535 | A path of length 3 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3pthond 28536 | A path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3spthd 28537 | A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3spthond 28538 | A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3cycld 28539 | Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 3cyclpd 28540 | Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph, containing an endpoint of one of these edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | upgr3v3e3cycl 28541* | If there is a cycle of length 3 in a pseudograph, there are three distinct vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑎))) | ||
Theorem | uhgr3cyclexlem 28542 | Lemma for uhgr3cyclex 28543. (Contributed by AV, 12-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} = (𝐼‘𝐽)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} = (𝐼‘𝐾)))) → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) | ||
Theorem | uhgr3cyclex 28543* | If there are three different vertices in a hypergraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | umgr3cyclex 28544* | If there are three (different) vertices in a multigraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | umgr3v3e3cycl 28545* | If and only if there is a 3-cycle in a multigraph, there are three (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | upgr4cycl4dv4e 28546* | If there is a cycle of length 4 in a pseudograph, there are four (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 13-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 4) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ((({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑐, 𝑑} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑑, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)) ∧ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑑)))) | ||
Syntax | cconngr 28547 | Extend class notation with connected graphs. |
class ConnGraph | ||
Definition | df-conngr 28548* | Define the class of all connected graphs. A graph is called connected if there is a path between every pair of (distinct) vertices. The distinctness of the vertices is not necessary for the definition, because there is always a path (of length 0) from a vertex to itself, see 0pthonv 28490 and dfconngr1 28549. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝} | ||
Theorem | dfconngr1 28549* | Alternative definition of the class of all connected graphs, requiring paths between distinct vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑣 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝} | ||
Theorem | isconngr 28550* | The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝)) | ||
Theorem | isconngr1 28551* | The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝)) | ||
Theorem | cusconngr 28552 | A complete hypergraph is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ComplGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph) | ||
Theorem | 0conngr 28553 | A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ ∅ ∈ ConnGraph | ||
Theorem | 0vconngr 28554 | A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph) | ||
Theorem | 1conngr 28555 | A graph with (at most) one vertex is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = {𝑁}) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph) | ||
Theorem | conngrv2edg 28556* | A vertex in a connected graph with more than one vertex is incident with at least one edge. Formerly part of proof for vdgn0frgrv2 28656. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∃𝑒 ∈ ran 𝐼 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒) | ||
Theorem | vdn0conngrumgrv2 28557 | A vertex in a connected multigraph with more than one vertex cannot have degree 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉))) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁) ≠ 0) | ||
According to Wikipedia ("Eulerian path", 9-Mar-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulerian_path): "In graph theory, an Eulerian trail (or Eulerian path) is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once (allowing for revisiting vertices). Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. ... The term Eulerian graph has two common meanings in graph theory. One meaning is a graph with an Eulerian circuit, and the other is a graph with every vertex of even degree. These definitions coincide for connected graphs. ... A graph that has an Eulerian trail but not an Eulerian circuit is called semi-Eulerian." Correspondingly, an Eulerian path is defined as "a trail containing all edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16) in df-eupth 28559 resp. iseupth 28562. (EulerPaths‘𝐺) is the set of all Eulerian paths in graph 𝐺, see eupths 28561. An Eulerian circuit (called Euler tour in the definition in [Diestel] p. 22) is "a circuit in a graph containing all the edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16), or, with other words, a circuit which is an Eulerian path. The function mapping a graph to the set of its Eulerian paths is defined as EulerPaths in df-eupth 28559, whereas there is no explicit definition for Eulerian circuits (yet): The statement "〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 is an Eulerian circuit" is formally expressed by (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃). Each Eulerian path can be made an Eulerian circuit by adding an edge which connects the endpoints of the Eulerian path (see eupth2eucrct 28578). Vice versa, removing one edge from a graph with an Eulerian circuit results in a graph with an Eulerian path, see eucrct2eupth 28606. An Eulerian path does not have to be a path in the meaning of definition df-pths 28081, because it may traverse some vertices more than once. Therefore, "Eulerian trail" would be a more appropriate name. The main result of this section is (one direction of) Euler's Theorem: "A non-trivial connected graph has an Euler[ian] circuit iff each vertex has even degree." (see part 1 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 16 and theorem 1.8.1 in [Diestel] p. 22) or, expressed with Eulerian paths: "A connected graph has an Euler[ian] trail from a vertex x to a vertex y (not equal with x) iff x and y are the only vertices of odd degree." (see part 2 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 17). In eulerpath 28602, it is shown that a pseudograph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree, and eulercrct 28603 shows that a pseudograph with an Eulerian circuit has only vertices of even degree. | ||
Syntax | ceupth 28558 | Extend class notation with Eulerian paths. |
class EulerPaths | ||
Definition | df-eupth 28559* | Define the set of all Eulerian paths on an arbitrary graph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ EulerPaths = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓:(0..^(♯‘𝑓))–onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑔))}) | ||
Theorem | releupth 28560 | The set (EulerPaths‘𝐺) of all Eulerian paths on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of an Eulerian path, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ Rel (EulerPaths‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | eupths 28561* | The Eulerian paths on the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (EulerPaths‘𝐺) = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓:(0..^(♯‘𝑓))–onto→dom 𝐼)} | ||
Theorem | iseupth 28562 | The property "〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | iseupthf1o 28563 | The property "〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | eupthi 28564 | Properties of an Eulerian path. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | eupthf1o 28565 | The 𝐹 function in an Eulerian path is a bijection from a half-open range of nonnegative integers to the set of edges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼) | ||
Theorem | eupthfi 28566 | Any graph with an Eulerian path is of finite size, i.e. with a finite number of edges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → dom 𝐼 ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | eupthseg 28567 | The 𝑁-th edge in an eulerian path is the edge having 𝑃(𝑁) and 𝑃(𝑁 + 1) as endpoints . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | upgriseupth 28568* | The property "〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 is an Eulerian path on the pseudograph 𝐺". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | upgreupthi 28569* | Properties of an Eulerian path in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) → (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})) | ||
Theorem | upgreupthseg 28570 | The 𝑁-th edge in an eulerian path is the edge from 𝑃(𝑁) to 𝑃(𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}) | ||
Theorem | eupthcl 28571 | An Eulerian path has length ♯(𝐹), which is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (♯‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | eupthistrl 28572 | An Eulerian path is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | eupthiswlk 28573 | An Eulerian path is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | eupthpf 28574 | The 𝑃 function in an Eulerian path is a function from a finite sequence of nonnegative integers to the vertices. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | eupth0 28575 | There is an Eulerian path on an empty graph, i.e. a graph with at least one vertex, but without an edge. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ∅(EulerPaths‘𝐺){〈0, 𝐴〉}) | ||
Theorem | eupthres 28576 | The restriction 〈𝐻, 𝑄〉 of an Eulerian path 〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 to an initial segment of the path (of length 𝑁) forms an Eulerian path on the subgraph 𝑆 consisting of the edges in the initial segment. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 6-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 prefix 𝑁) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ↾ (0...𝑁)) & ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄) | ||
Theorem | eupthp1 28577 | Append one path segment to an Eulerian path 〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 to become an Eulerian path 〈𝐻, 𝑄〉 of the supergraph 𝑆 obtained by adding the new edge to the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝑃‘𝑁), 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸) & ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐸〉}) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∪ {〈𝑁, 𝐵〉}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈(𝑁 + 1), 𝐶〉}) & ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘𝑁)) → 𝐸 = {𝐶}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄) | ||
Theorem | eupth2eucrct 28578 | Append one path segment to an Eulerian path 〈𝐹, 𝑃〉 which may not be an (Eulerian) circuit to become an Eulerian circuit 〈𝐻, 𝑄〉 of the supergraph 𝑆 obtained by adding the new edge to the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝑃‘𝑁), 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸) & ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐸〉}) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∪ {〈𝑁, 𝐵〉}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈(𝑁 + 1), 𝐶〉}) & ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘𝑁)) → 𝐸 = {𝐶}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑃‘0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄 ∧ 𝐻(Circuits‘𝑆)𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem1 28579 | Lemma for eupth2 28600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐵, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem2 28580 | Lemma for eupth2 28600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝑈) → (¬ 𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐵, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐵}) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐶, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐶}))) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem1 28581 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃‘𝑁) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem2 28582 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (iEdg‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem3 28583 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (iEdg‘𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem4 28584 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)) ∩ dom 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem5 28585 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑌) = {(𝐹‘𝑁)}) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem6 28586 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeglem7 28587 | Lemma for trlsegvdeg 28588. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑌) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | trlsegvdeg 28588 | Formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 28597: If a trail in a graph 𝐺 induces a subgraph 𝑍 with the vertices 𝑉 of 𝐺 and the edges being the edges of the walk, and a subgraph 𝑋 with the vertices 𝑉 of 𝐺 and the edges being the edges of the walk except the last one, and a subgraph 𝑌 with the vertices 𝑉 of 𝐺 and one edges being the last edge of the walk, then the vertex degree of any vertex 𝑈 of 𝐺 within 𝑍 is the sum of the vertex degree of 𝑈 within 𝑋 and the vertex degree of 𝑈 within 𝑌. Note that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary walks (if the last edge was identical with a previous edge, the degree of the vertices incident with this edge would not be increased because of this edge). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 20-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑍)‘𝑈) = (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem1 28589 | Lemma for eupth2lem3 28597. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem2 28590 | Lemma for eupth2lem3 28597. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem3 28591* | Lemma for eupth2lem3 28597, formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 28597: If a loop {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} is added to a trail, the degree of the vertices with odd degree remains odd (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → if-((𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁)}, {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem4 28592* | Lemma for eupth2lem3 28597, formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 28597: If an edge (not a loop) is added to a trail, the degree of the end vertices of this edge remains odd if it was odd before (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → if-((𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁)}, {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝒫 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (𝑈 = (𝑃‘𝑁) ∨ 𝑈 = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem5 28593* | Lemma for eupth2 28600. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝒫 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem6 28594* | Formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 28597: If an edge (not a loop) is added to a trail, the degree of vertices not being end vertices of this edge remains odd if it was odd before (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). Remark: This seems to be not valid for hyperedges joining more vertices than (𝑃‘0) and (𝑃‘𝑁): if there is a third vertex in the edge, and this vertex is already contained in the trail, then the degree of this vertex could be affected by this edge! (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (𝑈 ≠ (𝑃‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3lem7 28595* | Lemma for eupth2lem3 28597: Combining trlsegvdeg 28588, eupth2lem3lem3 28591, eupth2lem3lem4 28592 and eupth2lem3lem6 28594. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 27-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {〈(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))〉}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑍)‘𝑈) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | eupthvdres 28596 | Formerly part of proof of eupth2 28600: The vertex degree remains the same for all vertices if the edges are restricted to the edges of an Eulerian path. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐻 = 〈𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))))〉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (VtxDeg‘𝐻) = (VtxDeg‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lem3 28597* | Lemma for eupth2 28600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐻 = 〈𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))〉 & ⊢ 𝑋 = 〈𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))))〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 + 1) ≤ (♯‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐻)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lemb 28598* | Lemma for eupth2 28600 (induction basis): There are no vertices of odd degree in an Eulerian path of length 0, having no edge and identical endpoints (the single vertex of the Eulerian path). Formerly part of proof for eupth2 28600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘〈𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^0)))〉)‘𝑥)} = ∅) | ||
Theorem | eupth2lems 28599* | Lemma for eupth2 28600 (induction step): The only vertices of odd degree in a graph with an Eulerian path are the endpoints, and then only if the endpoints are distinct, if the Eulerian path shortened by one edge has this property. Formerly part of proof for eupth2 28600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘〈𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑛)))〉)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑛), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑛)})) → ((𝑛 + 1) ≤ (♯‘𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘〈𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(𝑛 + 1))))〉)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))})))) | ||
Theorem | eupth2 28600* | The only vertices of odd degree in a graph with an Eulerian path are the endpoints, and then only if the endpoints are distinct. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))})) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |