| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 122 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31014) |
(31015-32537) |
(32538-50296) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | fiminre 12101* | A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a minimum. Analogous to fimaxre 12098. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | fiminre2 12102* | A nonempty finite set of real numbers is bounded below. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | negfi 12103* | The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | lbreu 12104* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | lbcl 12105* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound that belongs to the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | lble 12106* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lbinf 12107* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | lbinfcl 12108* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | lbinfle 12109* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sup2 12110* | A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Stronger version of completeness axiom (it has a slightly weaker antecedent). (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | sup3 12111* | A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | infm3lem 12112* | Lemma for infm3 12113. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝑥 = -𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | infm3 12113* | The completeness axiom for reals in terms of infimum: a nonempty, bounded-below set of reals has an infimum. (This theorem is the dual of sup3 12111.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | suprcl 12114* | Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | suprub 12115* | A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | suprubd 12116* | Natural deduction form of suprubd 12116. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | suprcld 12117* | Natural deduction form of suprcl 12114. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | suprlub 12118* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | suprnub 12119* | An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | suprleub 12120* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | supaddc 12121* | The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul1 12123. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝐵)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + 𝐵) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | supadd 12122* | The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul 12126. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝑏)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | supmul1 12123* | The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that 𝐴 · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝐴 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. This is the simple version, with only one set argument; see supmul 12126 for the more general case with two set arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝐴 · 𝑣)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | supmullem1 12124* | Lemma for supmul 12126. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < ))) | ||
| Theorem | supmullem2 12125* | Lemma for supmul 12126. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | supmul 12126* | The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that (sup𝐴) · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝑎 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. We made use of this in our definition of multiplication in the Dedekind cut construction of the reals (see df-mp 10905). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | sup3ii 12127* | A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | suprclii 12128* | Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | suprubii 12129* | A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | suprlubii 12130* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | suprnubii 12131* | An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | suprleubii 12132* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaneg 12133* | The negative of the unique real such that 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑) = -(℩𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | negiso 12134 | Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the real numbers, which is its own inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ -𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ, ℝ) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dfinfre 12135* | The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))}) | ||
| Theorem | infrecl 12136* | Closure of infimum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | infrenegsup 12137* | The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. The antecedent ensures that 𝐴 is nonempty and has a lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | infregelb 12138* | Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | infrelb 12139* | If a nonempty set of real numbers has a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | infrefilb 12140 | The infimum of a finite set of reals is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | supfirege 12141 | The supremum of a finite set of real numbers is greater than or equal to all the real numbers of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | neg1cn 12142 | -1 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ -1 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | neg1rr 12143 | -1 is a real number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 5-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ -1 ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | neg1ne0 12144 | -1 is nonzero. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ -1 ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | neg1lt0 12145 | -1 is less than 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ -1 < 0 | ||
| Theorem | negneg1e1 12146 | --1 is 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ --1 = 1 | ||
| Theorem | inelr 12147 | The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | rimul 12148 | A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0) | ||
| Theorem | cru 12149 | The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | crne0 12150 | The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0)) | ||
| Theorem | creur 12151* | The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | creui 12152* | The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cju 12153* | The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | ofsubeq0 12154 | Function analogue of subeq0 11418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | ofnegsub 12155 | Function analogue of negsub 11440. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | ofsubge0 12156 | Function analogue of subge0 11661. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹)) | ||
According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indicator_function, "Indicator function", 11-Apr-2026): "In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function of a subset of a set is a function that maps elements of the subset to one, and all other elements to zero. That is, if 𝐴 is a subset of some set 𝑋, then the indicator function of 𝐴 is the function 𝟭A defined by 𝟭A ( x ) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, and 𝟭A ( x ) = 0 otherwise." See also definition in [Lang2] p. 3: "The characteristic function of a subset S' of S is the function 𝜒 such that 𝜒(x) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆' and 𝜒(x) = 0 if 𝑥 ∉ 𝑆'". | ||
| Syntax | cind 12157 | Extend class notation with the indicator function generator. |
| class 𝟭 | ||
| Definition | df-ind 12158* | Define the indicator function generator. It generates an indicator function ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) for a given domain 𝑂 and a given subset 𝐴 of the domain, see indval 12160. In contrast to the definitions and notations in Wikipedia and [Lang2] p. 3, the domain and the subset are always mentioned explicitly. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝟭 = (𝑜 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑜 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, 1, 0)))) | ||
| Theorem | indv 12159* | Value of the indicator function generator with domain 𝑂. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝟭‘𝑂) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, 1, 0)))) | ||
| Theorem | indval 12160* | Value of the indicator function generator for a set 𝐴 and a domain 𝑂, i.e., an indicator function for a given domain 𝑂 and a given subset 𝐴 of the domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0))) | ||
| Theorem | indval0 12161 | The indicator function generator does not generate a (meaningful) indicator function for a class which is not a subset of the domain. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2026.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | indval2 12162 | Alternate value of the indicator function generator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = ((𝐴 × {1}) ∪ ((𝑂 ∖ 𝐴) × {0}))) | ||
| Theorem | indf 12163 | An indicator function as a function with domain and codomain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴):𝑂⟶{0, 1}) | ||
| Theorem | indfval 12164 | Value of the indicator function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | fvindre 12165 | The range of the indicator function is a subset of ℝ. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2026.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑂 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | ind1 12166 | Value of the indicator function where it is 1. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | ind0 12167 | Value of the indicator function where it is 0. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑂 ∖ 𝐴)) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | ind1a 12168 | Value of the indicator function where it is 1. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → ((((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 1 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | indconst0 12169 | Indicator of the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘∅) = (𝑂 × {0})) | ||
| Theorem | indconst1 12170 | Indicator of the whole set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝑂) = (𝑂 × {1})) | ||
| Theorem | indpi1 12171 | Preimage of the singleton {1} by the indicator function. See i1f1lem 25681. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → (◡((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) “ {1}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Syntax | cn 12172 | Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers. |
| class ℕ | ||
| Definition | df-nn 12173 |
Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis
books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to
include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a
subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 12177), in contrast to the more elementary
ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7814). See nnind 12190 for the
principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12436 for the set of
nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12448
for ℕ defined in terms of
ℕ0.
This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9560 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 12186 (or its slight variant dfnn2 12185). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω) | ||
| Theorem | nnexALT 12174 | Alternate proof of nnex 12178, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5206. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℕ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | peano5nni 12175* | Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nnssre 12176 | The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | nnsscn 12177 | The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 12176 and ax-resscn 11093 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | nnex 12178 | The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℕ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | nnre 12179 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | nncn 12180 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | nnrei 12181 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | nncni 12182 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | 1nn 12183 | Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | peano2nn 12184 | Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | dfnn2 12185* | Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 12173 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | dfnn3 12186* | Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | nnred 12187 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | nncnd 12188 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | peano2nnd 12189 | Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | nnind 12190* | Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 12195 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12622 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12619, uzind4 12854 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12864 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 12191. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | nnindALT 12191* |
Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The last four
hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are
the induction step and the basis.
This ALT version of nnind 12190 has a different hypothesis order. It may be easier to use with the Metamath program Proof Assistant, because "MM-PA> ASSIGN LAST" will be applied to the substitution instances first. We may eventually use this one as the official version. You may use either version. After the proof is complete, the ALT version can be changed to the non-ALT version with "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH nnind / MAYGROW". (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | nnindd 12192* | Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | nn1m1nn 12193 | Every positive integer is one or a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 = 1 ∨ (𝐴 − 1) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | nn1suc 12194* | If a statement holds for 1 and also holds for a successor, it holds for all positive integers. The first three hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two show that it holds for 1 and for a successor. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | nnaddcl 12195 | Closure of addition of positive integers, proved by induction on the second addend. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | nnmulcl 12196 | Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) Remove dependency on ax-mulcom 11100 and ax-mulass 11102. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | nnmulcli 12197 | Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | nnadd1com 12198 | Addition with 1 is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) = (1 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nnaddcom 12199 | Addition is commutative for natural numbers. Uses fewer axioms than addcom 11330. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nnaddcomli 12200 | Version of addcomli 11336 for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |