P. 122 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 12101-12200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	msq11i 12101	The square of a nonnegative number is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 · 𝐴) = (𝐵 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	divgt0i2i 12102	The ratio of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐴 → 0 < (𝐴 / 𝐵))
Theorem	ltrecii 12103	The reciprocal of both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (1 / 𝐵) < (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	divgt0ii 12104	The ratio of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 / 𝐵)
Theorem	ltmul1i 12105	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltdiv1i 12106	Division of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < (𝐵 / 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltmuldivi 12107	'Less than' relationship between division and multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐵 / 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltmul2i 12108	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 · 𝐴) < (𝐶 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	lemul1i 12109	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	lemul2i 12110	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 · 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltdiv23i 12111	Swap denominator with other side of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 < 𝐵 ∧ 0 < 𝐶) → ((𝐴 / 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < 𝐵))
Theorem	ledivp1i 12112	"Less than or equal to" and division relation. (Lemma for computing upper bounds of products. The "+ 1" prevents division by zero.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2005.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 / (𝐶 + 1))) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltdivp1i 12113	Less-than and division relation. (Lemma for computing upper bounds of products. The "+ 1" prevents division by zero.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2005.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝐵 / (𝐶 + 1))) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < 𝐵)
Theorem	ltdiv23ii 12114	Swap denominator with other side of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 / 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < 𝐵)
Theorem	ltmul1ii 12115	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Paul Chapman, 25-Jan-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	ltdiv1ii 12116	Division of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < (𝐵 / 𝐶))
Theorem	ltp1d 12117	A number is less than itself plus 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < (𝐴 + 1))
Theorem	lep1d 12118	A number is less than or equal to itself plus 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 + 1))
Theorem	ltm1d 12119	A number minus 1 is less than itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 1) < 𝐴)
Theorem	lem1d 12120	A number minus 1 is less than or equal to itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 1) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	recgt0d 12121	The reciprocal of a positive number is positive. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 21. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	divgt0d 12122	The ratio of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 / 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt1d 12123	The product of two numbers greater than 1 is greater than 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lemulge11d 12124	Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lemulge12d 12125	Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	lemul1ad 12126	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	lemul2ad 12127	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝐵))
Theorem	ltmul12ad 12128	Comparison of product of two positive numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	lemul12ad 12129	Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	lemul12bd 12130	Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷))
5.3.8  Completeness Axiom and Suprema
Theorem	fimaxre 12131*	A finite set of real numbers has a maximum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fimaxre2 12132*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has an upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 27-May-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fimaxre3 12133*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a maximum (image set version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fiminre 12134*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a minimum. Analogous to fimaxre 12131. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	fiminre2 12135*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers is bounded below. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	negfi 12136*	The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	lbreu 12137*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	lbcl 12138*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound that belongs to the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lble 12139*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	lbinf 12140*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	lbinfcl 12141*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lbinfle 12142*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	sup2 12143*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Stronger version of completeness axiom (it has a slightly weaker antecedent). (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	sup3 12144*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	infm3lem 12145*	Lemma for infm3 12146. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝑥 = -𝑦)
Theorem	infm3 12146*	The completeness axiom for reals in terms of infimum: a nonempty, bounded-below set of reals has an infimum. (This theorem is the dual of sup3 12144.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
Theorem	suprcl 12147*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprub 12148*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprubd 12149*	Natural deduction form of suprubd 12149. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprcld 12150*	Natural deduction form of suprcl 12147. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprlub 12151*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnub 12152*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleub 12153*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	supaddc 12154*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul1 12156. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝐵)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + 𝐵) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supadd 12155*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul 12159. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝑏)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmul1 12156*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that 𝐴 · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝐴 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. This is the simple version, with only one set argument; see supmul 12159 for the more general case with two set arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝐴 · 𝑣)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmullem1 12157*	Lemma for supmul 12159. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	supmullem2 12158*	Lemma for supmul 12159. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	supmul 12159*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that (sup𝐴) · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝑎 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. We made use of this in our definition of multiplication in the Dedekind cut construction of the reals (see df-mp 10937). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	sup3ii 12160*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprclii 12161*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	suprubii 12162*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprlubii 12163*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnubii 12164*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleubii 12165*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	riotaneg 12166*	The negative of the unique real such that 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑) = -(℩𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝜓))
Theorem	negiso 12167	Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the real numbers, which is its own inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ -𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ, ℝ) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	dfinfre 12168*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	infrecl 12169*	Closure of infimum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	infrenegsup 12170*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. The antecedent ensures that 𝐴 is nonempty and has a lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	infregelb 12171*	Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	infrelb 12172*	If a nonempty set of real numbers has a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infrefilb 12173	The infimum of a finite set of reals is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	supfirege 12174	The supremum of a finite set of real numbers is greater than or equal to all the real numbers of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝑆)
5.3.9  Imaginary and complex number properties
Theorem	neg1cn 12175	-1 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ -1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	neg1rr 12176	-1 is a real number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 5-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	neg1ne0 12177	-1 is nonzero. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -1 ≠ 0
Theorem	neg1lt0 12178	-1 is less than 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -1 < 0
Theorem	negneg1e1 12179	--1 is 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ --1 = 1
Theorem	inelr 12180	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 12181	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	cru 12182	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	crne0 12183	The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0))
Theorem	creur 12184*	The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	creui 12185*	The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	cju 12186*	The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ))
5.3.10  Function operation analogue theorems
Theorem	ofsubeq0 12187	Function analogue of subeq0 11452. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	ofnegsub 12188	Function analogue of negsub 11474. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺))
Theorem	ofsubge0 12189	Function analogue of subge0 11695. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹))
5.3.11  Indicator Functions According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indicator_function, "Indicator function", 11-Apr-2026): "In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function of a subset of a set is a function that maps elements of the subset to one, and all other elements to zero. That is, if 𝐴 is a subset of some set 𝑋, then the indicator function of 𝐴 is the function 𝟭A defined by 𝟭A ( x ) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, and 𝟭A ( x ) = 0 otherwise." See also definition in [Lang2] p. 3: "The characteristic function of a subset S' of S is the function 𝜒 such that 𝜒(x) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆' and 𝜒(x) = 0 if 𝑥 ∉ 𝑆'".
Syntax	cind 12190	Extend class notation with the indicator function generator.
class 𝟭
Definition	df-ind 12191*	Define the indicator function generator. It generates an indicator function ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) for a given domain 𝑂 and a given subset 𝐴 of the domain, see indval 12193. In contrast to the definitions and notations in Wikipedia and [Lang2] p. 3, the domain and the subset are always mentioned explicitly. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝟭 = (𝑜 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑜 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, 1, 0))))
Theorem	indv 12192*	Value of the indicator function generator with domain 𝑂. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝟭‘𝑂) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, 1, 0))))
Theorem	indval 12193*	Value of the indicator function generator for a set 𝐴 and a domain 𝑂, i.e., an indicator function for a given domain 𝑂 and a given subset 𝐴 of the domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0)))
Theorem	indval0 12194	The indicator function generator does not generate a (meaningful) indicator function for a class which is not a subset of the domain. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2026.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	indval2 12195	Alternate value of the indicator function generator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = ((𝐴 × {1}) ∪ ((𝑂 ∖ 𝐴) × {0})))
Theorem	indf 12196	An indicator function as a function with domain and codomain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴):𝑂⟶{0, 1})
Theorem	indfval 12197	Value of the indicator function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0))
Theorem	fvindre 12198	The range of the indicator function is a subset of ℝ. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2026.)
⊢ (((𝑂 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	ind1 12199	Value of the indicator function where it is 1. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 1)
Theorem	ind0 12200	Value of the indicator function where it is 0. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑂 ∖ 𝐴)) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 0)