P. 418 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 41701-41800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	flt4lem5e 41701	Satisfy the hypotheses of flt4lem4 41694. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) + (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) − (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) + (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) − (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑅 gcd 𝑆) = 1 ∧ (𝑅 gcd 𝑀) = 1 ∧ (𝑆 gcd 𝑀) = 1) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝑀 · (𝑅 · 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 / 2)↑2) ∧ (𝐵 / 2) ∈ ℕ)))
Theorem	flt4lem5f 41702	Final equation of https://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/notes/numberfield/fermatn4.html. Given 𝐴↑4 + 𝐵↑4 = 𝐶↑2, provide a smaller solution. This satisfies the infinite descent condition. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) + (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) − (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) + (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) − (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 gcd (𝐵 / 2))↑2) = (((𝑅 gcd (𝐵 / 2))↑4) + ((𝑆 gcd (𝐵 / 2))↑4)))
Theorem	flt4lem6 41703	Remove shared factors in a solution to 𝐴↑4 + 𝐵↑4 = 𝐶↑2. (Contributed by SN, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐶 / ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑2)) ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑4) + ((𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑4)) = ((𝐶 / ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑2))↑2)))
Theorem	flt4lem7 41704*	Convert flt4lem5f 41702 into a convenient form for nna4b4nsq 41705. TODO-SN: The change to (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 points at some inefficiency in the lemmas. (Contributed by SN, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑙 ∈ ℕ (∃𝑔 ∈ ℕ ∃ℎ ∈ ℕ (¬ 2 ∥ 𝑔 ∧ ((𝑔 gcd ℎ) = 1 ∧ ((𝑔↑4) + (ℎ↑4)) = (𝑙↑2))) ∧ 𝑙 < 𝐶))
Theorem	nna4b4nsq 41705	Strengthening of Fermat's last theorem for exponent 4, where the sum is only assumed to be a square. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) ≠ (𝐶↑2))
Theorem	fltltc 41706	(𝐶↑𝑁) is the largest term and therefore 𝐵 < 𝐶. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)
Theorem	fltnltalem 41707	Lemma for fltnlta 41708. A lower bound for 𝐴 based on pwdif 15819. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) + ((𝑁 − 1) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 1))))) < (𝐴↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltnlta 41708	In a Fermat counterexample, the exponent 𝑁 is less than all three numbers (𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶). Note that 𝐴 < 𝐵 (hypothesis) and 𝐵 < 𝐶 (fltltc 41706). See https://youtu.be/EymVXkPWxyc 41706 for an outline. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝐴)
21.28.8  Exemplar theorems These theorems were added for illustration or pedagogical purposes without the intention of being used, but some may still be moved to main and used, of course.
Theorem	iddii 41709	Version of a1ii 2 with the hypotheses switched. The first hypothesis is redundant so this theorem should not normally appear in a proof. Inference associated with idd 24. (Contributed by SN, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	bicomdALT 41710	Alternate proof of bicomd 222 which is shorter after expanding all parent theorems (as of 8-Aug-2024, bicom 221 depends on bicom1 220 and sylib 217 depends on syl 17). Additionally, the labels bicom1 220 and syl 17 happen to contain fewer characters than bicom 221 and sylib 217. However, neither of these conditions count as a shortening according to conventions 29921. In the first case, the criteria could easily be broken by upstream changes, and in many cases the upstream dependency tree is nontrivial (see orass 919 and pm2.31 920). For the latter case, theorem labels are up to revision, so they are not counted in the size of a proof. (Contributed by SN, 21-May-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	elabgw 41711*	Membership in a class abstraction, using two substitution hypotheses to avoid a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥 and 𝐴. This is to elabg 3666 what sbievw2 2098 is to sbievw 2094. (Contributed by SN, 20-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	elab2gw 41712*	Membership in a class abstraction, using two substitution hypotheses to avoid a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥 and 𝐴, which is not usually significant since 𝐵 is usually a constant. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	elrab2w 41713*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction. This is to elrab2 3686 what elab2gw 41712 is to elab2g 3670. (Contributed by SN, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	ruvALT 41714	Alternate proof of ruv 9601 with one fewer syntax step thanks to using elirrv 9595 instead of elirr 9596. However, it does not change the compressed proof size or the number of symbols in the generated display, so it is not considered a shortening according to conventions 29921. (Contributed by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} = V
Theorem	sn-wcdeq 41715	Alternative to wcdeq 3759 and df-cdeq 3760. This flattens the syntax representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( sn-wcdeq vx vy wph ), illustrating the comment of df-cdeq 3760. (Contributed by SN, 26-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
wff (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)
Theorem	sq45 41716	45 squared is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (;45↑2) = ;;;2025
Theorem	sum9cubes 41717	The sum of the first nine perfect cubes is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...9)(𝑘↑3) = ;;;2025
Theorem	acos1half 41718	The arccosine of 1 / 2 is π / 3. (Contributed by SN, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (arccos‘(1 / 2)) = (π / 3)
Theorem	aprilfools2025 41719	An abuse of notation. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {⟨“𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑙”⟩, ⟨“𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠!”⟩} ∈ V
21.29  Mathbox for Igor Ieskov
Theorem	binom2d 41720	Deduction form of binom2. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑2) = (((𝐴↑2) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵))) + (𝐵↑2)))
Theorem	cu3addd 41721	Cube of sum of three numbers. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶)↑3) = (((((𝐴↑3) + (3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐵))) + ((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐵↑2))) + (𝐵↑3))) + (((3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐶)) + (((3 · 2) · (𝐴 · 𝐵)) · 𝐶)) + (3 · ((𝐵↑2) · 𝐶)))) + (((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐶↑2))) + (3 · (𝐵 · (𝐶↑2)))) + (𝐶↑3))))
Theorem	sqnegd 41722	The square of the negative of a number. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (-𝐴↑2) = (𝐴↑2))
Theorem	negexpidd 41723	The sum of a real number to the power of N and the negative of the number to the power of N equals zero if N is a nonnegative odd integer. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (-𝐴↑𝑁)) = 0)
Theorem	rexlimdv3d 41724*	An extended version of rexlimdvv 3209 to include three set variables. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	3cubeslem1 41725	Lemma for 3cubes 41731. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (((𝐴 + 1)↑2) − 𝐴))
Theorem	3cubeslem2 41726	Lemma for 3cubes 41731. Used to show that the denominators in 3cubeslem4 41730 are nonzero. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3) = 0)
Theorem	3cubeslem3l 41727	Lemma for 3cubes 41731. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3)))))))))
Theorem	3cubeslem3r 41728	Lemma for 3cubes 41731. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + (((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3)))))))))
Theorem	3cubeslem3 41729	Lemma for 3cubes 41731. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + (((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)))
Theorem	3cubeslem4 41730	Lemma for 3cubes 41731. This is Ryley's explicit formula for decomposing a rational 𝐴 into a sum of three rational cubes. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3) + ((((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)) + (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)))
Theorem	3cubes 41731*	Every rational number is a sum of three rational cubes. See S. Ryley, The Ladies' Diary 122 (1825), 35. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑3) + (𝑏↑3)) + (𝑐↑3)))
21.30  Mathbox for OpenAI
Theorem	rntrclfvOAI 41732	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by OpenAI, 7-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
21.31  Mathbox for Stefan O'Rear
21.31.1  Additional elementary logic and set theory
Theorem	moxfr 41733*	Transfer at-most-one between related expressions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∃!𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓)
21.31.2  Additional theory of functions
Theorem	imaiinfv 41734*	Indexed intersection of an image. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
21.31.3  Additional topology
Theorem	elrfi 41735*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑣)))
Theorem	elrfirn 41736*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran 𝐹)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐹‘𝑦))))
Theorem	elrfirn2 41737*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets (implicit). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐶))) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 𝐶)))
Theorem	cmpfiiin 41738*	In a compact topology, a system of closed sets with nonempty finite intersections has a nonempty intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑙 ⊆ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑙 ∈ Fin)) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑙 𝑆) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) ≠ ∅)
21.31.4  Characterization of closure operators. Kuratowski closure axioms
Theorem	ismrcd1 41739*	Any function from the subsets of a set to itself, which is extensive (satisfies mrcssid 17566), isotone (satisfies mrcss 17565), and idempotent (satisfies mrcidm 17568) has a collection of fixed points which is a Moore collection, and itself is the closure operator for that collection. This can be taken as an alternate definition for the closure operators. This is the first half, ismrcd2 41740 is the second. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ∩ I ) ∈ (Moore‘𝐵))
Theorem	ismrcd2 41740*	Second half of ismrcd1 41739. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (mrCls‘dom (𝐹 ∩ I )))
Theorem	istopclsd 41741*	A closure function which satisfies sscls 22781, clsidm 22792, cls0 22805, and clsun 35517 defines a (unique) topology which it is the closure function on. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∪ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐵) ∧ (cls‘𝐽) = 𝐹))
Theorem	ismrc 41742*	A function is a Moore closure operator iff it satisfies mrcssid 17566, mrcss 17565, and mrcidm 17568. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mrCls “ (Moore‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))))
21.31.5  Algebraic closure systems
Syntax	cnacs 41743	Class of Noetherian closure systems.
class NoeACS
Definition	df-nacs 41744*	Define a closure system of Noetherian type (not standard terminology) as an algebraic system where all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ NoeACS = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (ACS‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = ((mrCls‘𝑐)‘𝑔)})
Theorem	isnacs 41745*	Expand definition of Noetherian-type closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
Theorem	nacsfg 41746*	In a Noetherian-type closure system, all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔))
Theorem	isnacs2 41747	Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
Theorem	mrefg2 41748*	Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
Theorem	mrefg3 41749*	Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑔)))
Theorem	nacsacs 41750	A closure system of Noetherian type is algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	isnacs3 41751*	A choice-free order equivalent to the Noetherian condition on a closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑠)))
Theorem	incssnn0 41752*	Transitivity induction of subsets, lemma for nacsfix 41753. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	nacsfix 41753*	An increasing sequence of closed sets in a Noetherian-type closure system eventually fixates. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ0⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
21.31.6  Miscellanea 1. Map utilities
Theorem	constmap 41754	A constant (represented without dummy variables) is an element of a function set. Note: In the following development, we will be quite often quantifying over functions and points in N-dimensional space (which are equivalent to functions from an "index set"). Many of the following theorems exist to transfer standard facts about functions to elements of function sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	mapco2g 41755	Renaming indices in a tuple, with sethood as antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸))
Theorem	mapco2 41756	Post-composition (renaming indices) of a mapping viewed as a point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸))
Theorem	mapfzcons 41757	Extending a one-based mapping by adding a tuple at the end results in another mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨𝑀, 𝐶⟩}) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀)))
Theorem	mapfzcons1 41758	Recover prefix mapping from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) → ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨𝑀, 𝐶⟩}) ↾ (1...𝑁)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mapfzcons1cl 41759	A nonempty mapping has a prefix. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀)) → (𝐴 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)))
Theorem	mapfzcons2 41760	Recover added element from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨𝑀, 𝐶⟩})‘𝑀) = 𝐶)
21.31.7  Miscellanea for polynomials
Theorem	mptfcl 41761*	Interpret range of a maps-to notation as a constraint on the definition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))
21.31.8  Multivariate polynomials over the integers
Syntax	cmzpcl 41762	Extend class notation to include pre-polynomial rings.
class mzPolyCld
Syntax	cmzp 41763	Extend class notation to include polynomial rings.
class mzPoly
Definition	df-mzpcl 41764*	Define the polynomially closed function rings over an arbitrary index set 𝑣. The set (mzPolyCld‘𝑣) contains all sets of functions from (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) to ℤ which include all constants and projections and are closed under addition and multiplication. This is a "temporary" set used to define the polynomial function ring itself (mzPoly‘𝑣); see df-mzp 41765. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ mzPolyCld = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑣)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑣) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))})
Definition	df-mzp 41765	Polynomials over ℤ with an arbitrary index set, that is, the smallest ring of functions containing all constant functions and all projections. This is almost the most general reasonable definition; to reach full generality, we would need to be able to replace ZZ with an arbitrary (semi)ring (and a coordinate subring), but rings have not been defined yet. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ mzPoly = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑣))
Theorem	mzpclval 41766*	Substitution lemma for mzPolyCld. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))})
Theorem	elmzpcl 41767*	Double substitution lemma for mzPolyCld. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ↔ (𝑃 ⊆ (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑃) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑃)))))
Theorem	mzpclall 41768	The set of all functions with the signature of a polynomial is a polynomially closed set. This is a lemma to show that the intersection in df-mzp 41765 is well-defined. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpcln0 41769	Corollary of mzpclall 41768: polynomially closed function sets are not empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	mzpcl1 41770	Defining property 1 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all constant functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐹}) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	mzpcl2 41771*	Defining property 2 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all projections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝐹)) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	mzpcl34 41772	Defining properties 3 and 4 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it is closed under pointwise addition and multiplication. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	mzpval 41773	Value of the mzPoly function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) = ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉))
Theorem	dmmzp 41774	mzPoly is defined for all index sets which are sets. This is used with elfvdm 6928 to eliminate sethood antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ dom mzPoly = V
Theorem	mzpincl 41775	Polynomial closedness is a universal first-order property and passes to intersections. This is where the closure properties of the polynomial ring itself are proved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpconst 41776	Constant functions are polynomial. See also mzpconstmpt 41781. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐶}) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpf 41777	A polynomial function is a function from the coordinate space to the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → 𝐹:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ)
Theorem	mzpproj 41778*	A projection function is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑋)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpadd 41779	The pointwise sum of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpaddmpt 41782. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f + 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpmul 41780	The pointwise product of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpmulmpt 41783. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpconstmpt 41781*	A constant function expressed in maps-to notation is polynomial. This theorem and the several that follow (mzpaddmpt 41782, mzpmulmpt 41783, mzpnegmpt 41785, mzpsubmpt 41784, mzpexpmpt 41786) can be used to build proofs that functions which are "manifestly polynomial", in the sense of being a maps-to containing constants, projections, and simple arithmetic operations, are actually polynomial functions. There is no mzpprojmpt because mzpproj 41778 is already expressed using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐶) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpaddmpt 41782*	Sum of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpadd 41779. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 + 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpmulmpt 41783*	Product of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpmulmpt 41783. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpsubmpt 41784*	The difference of two polynomial functions is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpnegmpt 41785*	Negation of a polynomial function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ -𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpexpmpt 41786*	Raise a polynomial function to a (fixed) exponent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴↑𝐷)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpindd 41787*	"Structural" induction to prove properties of all polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ℤ) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜎)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑓}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑓)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑓 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → 𝜌)
Theorem	mzpmfp 41788	Relationship between multivariate Z-polynomials and general multivariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (mzPoly‘𝐼) = ran (𝐼 eval ℤring)
Theorem	mzpsubst 41789*	Substituting polynomials for the variables of a polynomial results in a polynomial. 𝐺 is expected to depend on 𝑦 and provide the polynomials which are being substituted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝐺 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐺‘𝑥)))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzprename 41790*	Simplified version of mzpsubst 41789 to simply relabel variables in a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝑅:𝑉⟶𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∘ 𝑅))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpresrename 41791*	A polynomial is a polynomial over all larger index sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑉))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpcompact2lem 41792*	Lemma for mzpcompact2 41793. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
Theorem	mzpcompact2 41793*	Polynomials are finitary objects and can only reference a finite number of variables, even if the index set is infinite. Thus, every polynomial can be expressed as a (uniquely minimal, although we do not prove that) polynomial on a finite number of variables, which is then extended by adding an arbitrary set of ignored variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
21.31.9  Miscellanea for Diophantine sets 1
Theorem	coeq0i 41794	coeq0 6254 but without explicitly introducing domain and range symbols. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐵:𝐸⟶𝐹 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐹) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	fzsplit1nn0 41795	Split a finite 1-based set of integers in the middle, allowing either end to be empty ((1...0)). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (1...𝐵) = ((1...𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 + 1)...𝐵)))
21.31.10  Diophantine sets 1: definitions
Syntax	cdioph 41796	Extend class notation to include the family of Diophantine sets.
class Dioph
Definition	df-dioph 41797*	A Diophantine set is a set of positive integers which is a projection of the zero set of some polynomial. This definition somewhat awkwardly mixes ℤ (via mzPoly) and ℕ0 (to define the zero sets); the former could be avoided by considering coincidence sets of ℕ0 polynomials at the cost of requiring two, and the second is driven by consistency with our mu-recursive functions and the requirements of the Davis-Putnam-Robinson-Matiyasevich proof. Both are avoidable at a complexity cost. In particular, it is a consequence of 4sq 16902 that implicitly restricting variables to ℕ0 adds no expressive power over allowing them to range over ℤ. While this definition stipulates a specific index set for the polynomials, there is actually flexibility here, see eldioph2b 41804. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ Dioph = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ran (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑛), 𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘)) ↦ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑛)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophb 41798*	Initial expression of Diophantine property of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘))𝐷 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph 41799*	Condition for a set to be Diophantine (unpacking existential quantifier). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝐾))) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophrw 41800*	Renaming and adding unused witness variables does not change the Diophantine set coded by a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀:𝑇–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑀 ↾ 𝑂) = ( I ↾ 𝑂)) → {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑆) ↦ (𝑃‘(𝑑 ∘ 𝑀)))‘𝑏) = 0)} = {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑇)(𝑎 = (𝑐 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑐) = 0)})