P. 302 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 30101-30200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	3wlkdlem9 30101	Lemma 9 for 3wlkd 30103. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘2))))
Theorem	3wlkdlem10 30102*	Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 30103. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	3wlkd 30103	Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3wlkond 30104	A walk of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3trld 30105	Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3trlond 30106	A trail of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3pthd 30107	A path of length 3 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3pthond 30108	A path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3spthd 30109	A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3spthond 30110	A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3cycld 30111	Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3cyclpd 30112	Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph, containing an endpoint of one of these edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	upgr3v3e3cycl 30113*	If there is a cycle of length 3 in a pseudograph, there are three distinct vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑎)))
Theorem	uhgr3cyclexlem 30114	Lemma for uhgr3cyclex 30115. (Contributed by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} = (𝐼‘𝐽)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} = (𝐼‘𝐾)))) → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)
Theorem	uhgr3cyclex 30115*	If there are three different vertices in a hypergraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	umgr3cyclex 30116*	If there are three (different) vertices in a multigraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	umgr3v3e3cycl 30117*	If and only if there is a 3-cycle in a multigraph, there are three (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	upgr4cycl4dv4e 30118*	If there is a cycle of length 4 in a pseudograph, there are four (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 13-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 4) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ((({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑐, 𝑑} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑑, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)) ∧ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑑))))
17.3.12  Connected graphs
Syntax	cconngr 30119	Extend class notation with connected graphs.
class ConnGraph
Definition	df-conngr 30120*	Define the class of all connected graphs. A graph is called connected if there is a path between every pair of (distinct) vertices. The distinctness of the vertices is not necessary for the definition, because there is always a path (of length 0) from a vertex to itself, see 0pthonv 30062 and dfconngr1 30121. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝}
Theorem	dfconngr1 30121*	Alternative definition of the class of all connected graphs, requiring paths between distinct vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑣 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝}
Theorem	isconngr 30122*	The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝))
Theorem	isconngr1 30123*	The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝))
Theorem	cusconngr 30124	A complete hypergraph is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ComplGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	0conngr 30125	A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ConnGraph
Theorem	0vconngr 30126	A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	1conngr 30127	A graph with (at most) one vertex is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = {𝑁}) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	conngrv2edg 30128*	A vertex in a connected graph with more than one vertex is incident with at least one edge. Formerly part of proof for vdgn0frgrv2 30228. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∃𝑒 ∈ ran 𝐼 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒)
Theorem	vdn0conngrumgrv2 30129	A vertex in a connected multigraph with more than one vertex cannot have degree 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉))) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁) ≠ 0)
17.4  Eulerian paths and the Konigsberg Bridge problem
17.4.1  Eulerian paths According to Wikipedia ("Eulerian path", 9-Mar-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulerian_path): "In graph theory, an Eulerian trail (or Eulerian path) is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once (allowing for revisiting vertices). Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. ... The term Eulerian graph has two common meanings in graph theory. One meaning is a graph with an Eulerian circuit, and the other is a graph with every vertex of even degree. These definitions coincide for connected graphs. ... A graph that has an Eulerian trail but not an Eulerian circuit is called semi-Eulerian." Correspondingly, an Eulerian path is defined as "a trail containing all edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16) in df-eupth 30131 resp. iseupth 30134. (EulerPaths‘𝐺) is the set of all Eulerian paths in graph 𝐺, see eupths 30133. An Eulerian circuit (called Euler tour in the definition in [Diestel] p. 22) is "a circuit in a graph containing all the edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16), or, with other words, a circuit which is an Eulerian path. The function mapping a graph to the set of its Eulerian paths is defined as EulerPaths in df-eupth 30131, whereas there is no explicit definition for Eulerian circuits (yet): The statement "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian circuit" is formally expressed by (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃). Each Eulerian path can be made an Eulerian circuit by adding an edge which connects the endpoints of the Eulerian path (see eupth2eucrct 30150). Vice versa, removing one edge from a graph with an Eulerian circuit results in a graph with an Eulerian path, see eucrct2eupth 30178. An Eulerian path does not have to be a path in the meaning of definition df-pths 29653, because it may traverse some vertices more than once. Therefore, "Eulerian trail" would be a more appropriate name. The main result of this section is (one direction of) Euler's Theorem: "A non-trivial connected graph has an Euler[ian] circuit iff each vertex has even degree." (see part 1 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 16 and theorem 1.8.1 in [Diestel] p. 22) or, expressed with Eulerian paths: "A connected graph has an Euler[ian] trail from a vertex x to a vertex y (not equal with x) iff x and y are the only vertices of odd degree." (see part 2 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 17). In eulerpath 30174, it is shown that a pseudograph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree, and eulercrct 30175 shows that a pseudograph with an Eulerian circuit has only vertices of even degree.
Syntax	ceupth 30130	Extend class notation with Eulerian paths.
class EulerPaths
Definition	df-eupth 30131*	Define the set of all Eulerian paths on an arbitrary graph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ EulerPaths = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓:(0..^(♯‘𝑓))–onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑔))})
Theorem	releupth 30132	The set (EulerPaths‘𝐺) of all Eulerian paths on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of an Eulerian path, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ Rel (EulerPaths‘𝐺)
Theorem	eupths 30133*	The Eulerian paths on the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (EulerPaths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓:(0..^(♯‘𝑓))–onto→dom 𝐼)}
Theorem	iseupth 30134	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼))
Theorem	iseupthf1o 30135	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))
Theorem	eupthi 30136	Properties of an Eulerian path. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))
Theorem	eupthf1o 30137	The 𝐹 function in an Eulerian path is a bijection from a half-open range of nonnegative integers to the set of edges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼)
Theorem	eupthfi 30138	Any graph with an Eulerian path is of finite size, i.e. with a finite number of edges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → dom 𝐼 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	eupthseg 30139	The 𝑁-th edge in an eulerian path is the edge having 𝑃(𝑁) and 𝑃(𝑁 + 1) as endpoints . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)))
Theorem	upgriseupth 30140*	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the pseudograph 𝐺". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	upgreupthi 30141*	Properties of an Eulerian path in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) → (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))
Theorem	upgreupthseg 30142	The 𝑁-th edge in an eulerian path is the edge from 𝑃(𝑁) to 𝑃(𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})
Theorem	eupthcl 30143	An Eulerian path has length ♯(𝐹), which is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (♯‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eupthistrl 30144	An Eulerian path is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	eupthiswlk 30145	An Eulerian path is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	eupthpf 30146	The 𝑃 function in an Eulerian path is a function from a finite sequence of nonnegative integers to the vertices. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	eupth0 30147	There is an Eulerian path on an empty graph, i.e. a graph with at least one vertex, but without an edge. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ∅(EulerPaths‘𝐺){⟨0, 𝐴⟩})
Theorem	eupthres 30148	The restriction ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩ of an Eulerian path ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ to an initial segment of the path (of length 𝑁) forms an Eulerian path on the subgraph 𝑆 consisting of the edges in the initial segment. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 6-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 prefix 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ↾ (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
Theorem	eupthp1 30149	Append one path segment to an Eulerian path ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ to become an Eulerian path ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩ of the supergraph 𝑆 obtained by adding the new edge to the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝑃‘𝑁), 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑁, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨(𝑁 + 1), 𝐶⟩})    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘𝑁)) → 𝐸 = {𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
Theorem	eupth2eucrct 30150	Append one path segment to an Eulerian path ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ which may not be an (Eulerian) circuit to become an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩ of the supergraph 𝑆 obtained by adding the new edge to the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝑃‘𝑁), 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑁, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨(𝑁 + 1), 𝐶⟩})    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘𝑁)) → 𝐸 = {𝐶})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄 ∧ 𝐻(Circuits‘𝑆)𝑄))
Theorem	eupth2lem1 30151	Lemma for eupth2 30172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐵, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	eupth2lem2 30152	Lemma for eupth2 30172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝑈) → (¬ 𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐵, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐵}) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐶, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐶})))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem1 30153	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃‘𝑁) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem2 30154	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (iEdg‘𝑋))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem3 30155	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (iEdg‘𝑌))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem4 30156	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)) ∩ dom 𝐼))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem5 30157	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑌) = {(𝐹‘𝑁)})
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem6 30158	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem7 30159	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30160. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑌) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	trlsegvdeg 30160	Formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30169: If a trail in a graph 𝐺 induces a subgraph 𝑍 with the vertices 𝑉 of 𝐺 and the edges being the edges of the walk, and a subgraph 𝑋 with the vertices 𝑉 of 𝐺 and the edges being the edges of the walk except the last one, and a subgraph 𝑌 with the vertices 𝑉 of 𝐺 and one edges being the last edge of the walk, then the vertex degree of any vertex 𝑈 of 𝐺 within 𝑍 is the sum of the vertex degree of 𝑈 within 𝑋 and the vertex degree of 𝑈 within 𝑌. Note that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary walks (if the last edge was identical with a previous edge, the degree of the vertices incident with this edge would not be increased because of this edge). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑍)‘𝑈) = (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem1 30161	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30169. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem2 30162	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30169. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem3 30163*	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30169, formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30169: If a loop {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} is added to a trail, the degree of the vertices with odd degree remains odd (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → if-((𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁)}, {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem4 30164*	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30169, formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30169: If an edge (not a loop) is added to a trail, the degree of the end vertices of this edge remains odd if it was odd before (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → if-((𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁)}, {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (𝑈 = (𝑃‘𝑁) ∨ 𝑈 = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem5 30165*	Lemma for eupth2 30172. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem6 30166*	Formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30169: If an edge (not a loop) is added to a trail, the degree of vertices not being end vertices of this edge remains odd if it was odd before (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). Remark: This seems to be not valid for hyperedges joining more vertices than (𝑃‘0) and (𝑃‘𝑁): if there is a third vertex in the edge, and this vertex is already contained in the trail, then the degree of this vertex could be affected by this edge! (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (𝑈 ≠ (𝑃‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem7 30167*	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30169: Combining trlsegvdeg 30160, eupth2lem3lem3 30163, eupth2lem3lem4 30164 and eupth2lem3lem6 30166. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑍)‘𝑈) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupthvdres 30168	Formerly part of proof of eupth2 30172: The vertex degree remains the same for all vertices if the edges are restricted to the edges of an Eulerian path. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (VtxDeg‘𝐻) = (VtxDeg‘𝐺))
Theorem	eupth2lem3 30169*	Lemma for eupth2 30172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))))⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 + 1) ≤ (♯‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐻)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lemb 30170*	Lemma for eupth2 30172 (induction basis): There are no vertices of odd degree in an Eulerian path of length 0, having no edge and identical endpoints (the single vertex of the Eulerian path). Formerly part of proof for eupth2 30172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^0)))⟩)‘𝑥)} = ∅)
Theorem	eupth2lems 30171*	Lemma for eupth2 30172 (induction step): The only vertices of odd degree in a graph with an Eulerian path are the endpoints, and then only if the endpoints are distinct, if the Eulerian path shortened by one edge has this property. Formerly part of proof for eupth2 30172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑛)))⟩)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑛), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑛)})) → ((𝑛 + 1) ≤ (♯‘𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(𝑛 + 1))))⟩)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))}))))
Theorem	eupth2 30172*	The only vertices of odd degree in a graph with an Eulerian path are the endpoints, and then only if the endpoints are distinct. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))}))
Theorem	eulerpathpr 30173*	A graph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) ∈ {0, 2})
Theorem	eulerpath 30174*	A pseudograph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ (EulerPaths‘𝐺) ≠ ∅) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) ∈ {0, 2})
Theorem	eulercrct 30175*	A pseudograph with an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ (an "Eulerian pseudograph") has only vertices of even degree. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥))
Theorem	eucrctshift 30176*	Cyclically shifting the indices of an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑄 ∧ 𝐻(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑄))
Theorem	eucrct2eupth1 30177	Removing one edge (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) from a nonempty graph 𝐺 with an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a graph 𝑆 with an Eulerian path ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. This is the special case of eucrct2eupth 30178 (with 𝐽 = (𝑁 − 1)) where the last segment/edge of the circuit is removed. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((♯‘𝐹) − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 prefix 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ↾ (0...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
Theorem	eucrct2eupth 30178*	Removing one edge (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐽)) from a graph 𝐺 with an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a graph 𝑆 with an Eulerian path ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 17-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ ((0..^𝑁) ∖ {𝐽}))))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐹 cyclShift 𝐾) prefix (𝑁 − 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝐾), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝐾)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝐾) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
17.4.2  The Königsberg Bridge problem According to Wikipedia ("Seven Bridges of Königsberg", 9-Mar-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_Koenigsberg): "The Seven Bridges of Königsberg is a historically notable problem in mathematics. Its negative resolution by Leonhard Euler in 1736 laid the foundations of graph theory and prefigured the idea of topology. The city of Königsberg in [East] Prussia (now Kaliningrad, Russia) was set on both sides of the Pregel River, and included two large islands - Kneiphof and Lomse - which were connected to each other, or to the two mainland portions of the city, by seven bridges. The problem was to devise a walk through the city that would cross each of those bridges once and only once.". Euler proved that the problem has no solution by applying Euler's theorem to the Königsberg graph, which is obtained by replacing each land mass with an abstract "vertex" or node, and each bridge with an abstract connection, an "edge", which connects two land masses/vertices. The Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a multigraph consisting of 4 vertices and 7 edges, represented by the following ordered pair: 𝐺 = ⟨(0...3), ⟨“{0, 1}{0, 2} {0, 3}{1, 2}{1, 2}{2, 3}{2, 3}”⟩⟩, see konigsbergumgr 30184. konigsberg 30190 shows that the Königsberg graph has no Eulerian path, thus the Königsberg Bridge problem has no solution.
Theorem	konigsbergvtx 30179	The set of vertices of the Königsberg graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (0...3)
Theorem	konigsbergiedg 30180	The indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩
Theorem	konigsbergiedgw 30181*	The indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a word over the pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ Word {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ (♯‘𝑥) = 2}
Theorem	konigsbergssiedgwpr 30182*	Each subset of the indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a word over the pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐸 = (𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ Word {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ (♯‘𝑥) = 2})
Theorem	konigsbergssiedgw 30183*	Each subset of the indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a word over the pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐸 = (𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ Word {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
Theorem	konigsbergumgr 30184	The Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a multigraph. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 9-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph
Theorem	konigsberglem1 30185	Lemma 1 for konigsberg 30190: Vertex 0 has degree three. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2016.) (Revised by AV, 4-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘0) = 3
Theorem	konigsberglem2 30186	Lemma 2 for konigsberg 30190: Vertex 1 has degree three. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2016.) (Revised by AV, 4-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘1) = 3
Theorem	konigsberglem3 30187	Lemma 3 for konigsberg 30190: Vertex 3 has degree three. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2016.) (Revised by AV, 4-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘3) = 3
Theorem	konigsberglem4 30188*	Lemma 4 for konigsberg 30190: Vertices 0, 1, 3 are vertices of odd degree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ {0, 1, 3} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}
Theorem	konigsberglem5 30189*	Lemma 5 for konigsberg 30190: The set of vertices of odd degree is greater than 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 2 < (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)})
Theorem	konigsberg 30190	The Königsberg Bridge problem. If 𝐺 is the Königsberg graph, i.e. a graph on four vertices 0, 1, 2, 3, with edges {0, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 3}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, {2, 3}, then vertices 0, 1, 3 each have degree three, and 2 has degree five, so there are four vertices of odd degree and thus by eulerpath 30174 the graph cannot have an Eulerian path. It is sufficient to show that there are 3 vertices of odd degree, since a graph having an Eulerian path can only have 0 or 2 vertices of odd degree. This is Metamath 100 proof #54. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2016.) (Revised by AV, 9-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (EulerPaths‘𝐺) = ∅
17.5  The Friendship Theorem
17.5.1  Friendship graphs - basics
Syntax	cfrgr 30191	Extend class notation with friendship graphs.
class FriendGraph
Definition	df-frgr 30192*	Define the class of all friendship graphs: a simple graph is called a friendship graph if every pair of its vertices has exactly one common neighbor. This condition is called the friendship condition , see definition in [MertziosUnger] p. 152. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2024.)
⊢ FriendGraph = {𝑔 ∈ USGraph ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(Edg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑙 ∈ (𝑣 ∖ {𝑘})∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 {{𝑥, 𝑘}, {𝑥, 𝑙}} ⊆ 𝑒}
Theorem	isfrgr 30193*	The property of being a friendship graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑙 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑘})∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 {{𝑥, 𝑘}, {𝑥, 𝑙}} ⊆ 𝐸))
Theorem	frgrusgr 30194	A friendship graph is a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USGraph)
Theorem	frgr0v 30195	Any null graph (set with no vertices) is a friendship graph iff its edge function is empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅) → (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅))
Theorem	frgr0vb 30196	Any null graph (without vertices and edges) is a friendship graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅) → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )
Theorem	frgruhgr0v 30197	Any null graph (without vertices) represented as hypergraph is a friendship graph. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅) → 𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph )
Theorem	frgr0 30198	The null graph (graph without vertices) is a friendship graph. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ FriendGraph
Theorem	frcond1 30199*	The friendship condition: any two (different) vertices in a friendship graph have a unique common neighbor. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 {{𝐴, 𝑏}, {𝑏, 𝐶}} ⊆ 𝐸))
Theorem	frcond2 30200*	The friendship condition: any two (different) vertices in a friendship graph have a unique common neighbor. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ FriendGraph → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝐴, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))