Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 302 of 470) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29568) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29569-31091) |
Users' Mathboxes
(31092-46925) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | ch0lei 30101 | The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chle0i 30102 | No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chne0i 30103* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | chocini 30104 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | chj0i 30105 | Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chm1i 30106 | Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chjcli 30107 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
Theorem | chsleji 30108 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chseli 30109* | Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | chincli 30110 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
Theorem | chsscon3i 30111 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chsscon1i 30112 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chsscon2i 30113 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chcon2i 30114 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chcon1i 30115 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chcon3i 30116 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chunssji 30117 | Union is smaller than Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chjcomi 30118 | Commutative law for join in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chub1i 30119 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chub2i 30120 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chlubi 30121 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | chlubii 30122 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements (one direction of chlubi 30121). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | chlej1i 30123 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej2i 30124 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlej12i 30125 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb1i 30126 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmm1i 30127 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm2i 30128 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm3i 30129 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmm4i 30130 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmj1i 30131 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj2i 30132 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj3i 30133 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chdmj4i 30134 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | chnlei 30135 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chjassi 30136 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chj00i 30137 | Two Hilbert lattice elements are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chjoi 30138 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ | ||
Theorem | chj1i 30139 | Join with Hilbert lattice one. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ℋ) = ℋ | ||
Theorem | chm0i 30140 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | chm0 30141 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | shjshsi 30142 | Hilbert lattice join equals the double orthocomplement of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (⊥‘(⊥‘(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | shjshseli 30143 | A closed subspace sum equals Hilbert lattice join. Part of Lemma 31.1.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chne0 30144* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | chocin 30145 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chssoc 30146 | A closed subspace less than its orthocomplement is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | chj0 30147 | Join with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chslej 30148 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chincl 30149 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | chsscon3 30150 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chsscon1 30151 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chsscon2 30152 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon3 30153 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon1 30154 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chpsscon2 30155 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | chjcom 30156 | Commutative law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chub1 30157 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chub2 30158 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | chlub 30159 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej1 30160 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chlej2 30161 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb1 30162 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chlejb2 30163 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chnle 30164 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chjo 30165 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement is all of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
Theorem | chabs1 30166 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chabs2 30167 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chabs1i 30168 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chabs2i 30169 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chjidm 30170 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chjidmi 30171 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | chj12i 30172 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chj4i 30173 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | chjjdiri 30174 | Hilbert lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm1 30175 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmm2 30176 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmm3 30177 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmm4 30178 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj1 30179 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmj2 30180 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | chdmj3 30181 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chdmj4 30182 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chjass 30183 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | chj12 30184 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | chj4 30185 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | ledii 30186 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | lediri 30187 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | lejdii 30188 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction (join version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | lejdiri 30189 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction (join version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ledi 30190 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | spansn0 30191 | The span of the singleton of the zero vector is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (span‘{0ℎ}) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | span0 30192 | The span of the empty set is the zero subspace. Remark 11.6.e of [Schechter] p. 276. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (span‘∅) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | elspani 30193* | Membership in the span of a subset of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐵 ∈ (span‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Sℋ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | spanuni 30194 | The span of a union is the subspace sum of spans. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (span‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((span‘𝐴) +ℋ (span‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | spanun 30195 | The span of a union is the subspace sum of spans. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℋ) → (span‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((span‘𝐴) +ℋ (span‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | sshhococi 30196 | The join of two Hilbert space subsets (not necessarily closed subspaces) equals the join of their closures (double orthocomplements). (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ((⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) ∨ℋ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | hne0 30197 | Hilbert space has a nonzero vector iff it is not trivial. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ℋ ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℋ 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
Theorem | chsup0 30198 | The supremum of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ∨ℋ ‘∅) = 0ℋ | ||
Theorem | h1deoi 30199 | Membership in orthocomplement of 1-dimensional subspace. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘{𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ (𝐴 ·ih 𝐵) = 0)) | ||
Theorem | h1dei 30200* | Membership in 1-dimensional subspace. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ((𝐵 ·ih 𝑥) = 0 → (𝐴 ·ih 𝑥) = 0))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |