P. 186 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18501-18600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lublem 18501*	Lemma for the least upper bound properties in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑧)))
Theorem	lubub 18502	The LUB of a complete lattice subset is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆))
Theorem	lubl 18503*	The LUB of a complete lattice subset is the least bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	lubss 18504	Subset law for least upper bounds. (chsupss 31196 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑈‘𝑇))
Theorem	lubel 18505	An element of a set is less than or equal to the least upper bound of the set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆))
Theorem	lubun 18506	The LUB of a union. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘(𝑆 ∪ 𝑇)) = ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑈‘𝑇)))
Theorem	clatglb 18507*	Properties of greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆))))
Theorem	clatglble 18508	The greatest lower bound is the least element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	clatleglb 18509*	Two ways of expressing "less than or equal to the greatest lower bound." (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	clatglbss 18510	Subset law for greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐺‘𝑇) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆))
9.5.3  Distributive lattices
Syntax	cdlat 18511	The class of distributive lattices.
class DLat
Definition	df-dlat 18512*	A distributive lattice is a lattice in which meets distribute over joins, or equivalently (latdisd 18488) joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ DLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ [(Base‘𝑘) / 𝑏][(join‘𝑘) / 𝑗][(meet‘𝑘) / 𝑚]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑚(𝑦𝑗𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑚𝑦)𝑗(𝑥𝑚𝑧))}
Theorem	isdlat 18513*	Property of being a distributive lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧))))
Theorem	dlatmjdi 18514	In a distributive lattice, meets distribute over joins. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	dlatl 18515	A distributive lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	odudlatb 18516	The dual of a distributive lattice is a distributive lattice and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ DLat))
Theorem	dlatjmdi 18517	In a distributive lattice, joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍)))
9.5.4  Subset order structures
Syntax	cipo 18518	Class function defining inclusion posets.
class toInc
Definition	df-ipo 18519*	For any family of sets, define the poset of that family ordered by inclusion. See ipobas 18522, ipolerval 18523, and ipole 18525 for its contract. EDITORIAL: I'm not thrilled with the name. Any suggestions? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ toInc = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} / 𝑜⦌({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑓⟩, ⟨(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘𝑜)⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), 𝑜⟩, ⟨(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑓 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑓 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})⟩}))
Theorem	ipostr 18520	The structure of df-ipo 18519 is a structure defining indices up to 11. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(TopSet‘ndx), 𝐽⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩, ⟨(oc‘ndx), ⊥ ⟩}) Struct ⟨1, ;11⟩
Theorem	ipoval 18521*	Value of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = ({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐹⟩, ⟨(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘ ≤ )⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩, ⟨(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})⟩}))
Theorem	ipobas 18522	Base set of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 = (Base‘𝐼))
Theorem	ipolerval 18523*	Relation of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} = (le‘𝐼))
Theorem	ipotset 18524	Topology of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (ordTop‘ ≤ ) = (TopSet‘𝐼))
Theorem	ipole 18525	Weak order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌))
Theorem	ipolt 18526	Strict order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊊ 𝑌))
Theorem	ipopos 18527	The inclusion poset on a family of sets is actually a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ Poset
Theorem	isipodrs 18528*	Condition for a family of sets to be directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑧))
Theorem	ipodrscl 18529	Direction by inclusion as used here implies sethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	ipodrsfi 18530*	Finite upper bound property for directed collections of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧)
Theorem	fpwipodrs 18531	The finite subsets of any set are directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (toInc‘(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) ∈ Dirset)
Theorem	ipodrsima 18532*	The monotone image of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑢) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑣))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘𝐵) ∈ Dirset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘(𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ∈ Dirset)
Theorem	isacs3lem 18533*	An algebraic closure system satisfies isacs3 18541. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	acsdrsel 18534	An algebraic closure system contains all directed unions of closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	isacs4lem 18535*	In a closure system in which directed unions of closed sets are closed, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))))
Theorem	isacs5lem 18536*	If closure commutes with directed unions, then the closure of a set is the closure of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin))))
Theorem	acsdrscl 18537	In an algebraic closure system, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑌) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑌))
Theorem	acsficl 18538	A closure in an algebraic closure system is the union of the closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)))
Theorem	isacs5 18539*	A closure system is algebraic iff the closure of a generating set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin))))
Theorem	isacs4 18540*	A closure system is algebraic iff closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑠))))
Theorem	isacs3 18541*	A closure system is algebraic iff directed unions of closed sets are closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	acsficld 18542	In an algebraic closure system, the closure of a set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. Deduction form of acsficl 18538. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝑁 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)))
Theorem	acsficl2d 18543*	In an algebraic closure system, an element is in the closure of a set if and only if it is in the closure of a finite subset. Alternate form of acsficl 18538. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑥)))
Theorem	acsfiindd 18544	In an algebraic closure system, a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are independent. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝐼))
Theorem	acsmapd 18545*	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑇 is contained in the closure of 𝑆, there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 contains 𝑇. This is proven by applying acsficl2d 18543 to each element of 𝑇. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘∪ ran 𝑓)))
Theorem	acsmap2d 18546*	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is independent, then there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that 𝑆 equals the union of ran 𝑓. This is proven by taking the map 𝑓 from acsmapd 18545 and observing that, since 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure, the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 must contain 𝑆. Since 𝑆 is independent, by mrissmrcd 17619, ∪ ran 𝑓 must equal 𝑆. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑆 = ∪ ran 𝑓))
Theorem	acsinfd 18547	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 is infinite. This follows from applying unirnffid 9368 to the map given in acsmap2d 18546. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	acsdomd 18548	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This follows from applying acsinfd 18547 and then applying unirnfdomd 10590 to the map given in acsmap2d 18546. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇)
Theorem	acsinfdimd 18549	In an algebraic closure system, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is infinite, then they are equinumerous. This is proven by using acsdomd 18548 twice with acsinfd 18547. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
Theorem	acsexdimd 18550*	In an algebraic closure system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure, they are equinumerous. See mreexfidimd 17629 for the finite case and acsinfdimd 18549 for the infinite case. This is a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
Theorem	mrelatglb 18551	Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) See mrelatglbALT 48119 for an alternate proof.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈)
Theorem	mrelatglb0 18552	The empty intersection in a Moore space is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	mrelatlub 18553	Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) See mrelatlubALT 48118 for an alternate proof.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈))
Theorem	mreclatBAD 18554*	A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7372 update): Reprove using isclat 18491 instead of the isclatBAD. hypothesis. See commented-out mreclat above. See mreclat 48120 for a good version.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐼 ∈ Poset ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ (Base‘𝐼) → (((lub‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼) ∧ ((glb‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat)
9.6  Posets, directed sets, and lattices as relations
9.6.1  Posets and lattices as relations See commented-out notes for lattices as relations.
Syntax	cps 18555	Extend class notation with the class of all posets.
class PosetRel
Syntax	ctsr 18556	Extend class notation with the class of all totally ordered sets.
class TosetRel
Definition	df-ps 18557	Define the class of all posets (partially ordered sets) with weak ordering (e.g., "less than or equal to" instead of "less than"). A poset is a relation which is transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.)
⊢ PosetRel = {𝑟 ∣ (Rel 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∩ ◡𝑟) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟))}
Definition	df-tsr 18558	Define the class of all totally ordered sets. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.)
⊢ TosetRel = {𝑟 ∈ PosetRel ∣ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟) ⊆ (𝑟 ∪ ◡𝑟)}
Theorem	isps 18559	The predicate "is a poset" i.e. a transitive, reflexive, antisymmetric relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ (Rel 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅))))
Theorem	psrel 18560	A poset is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ PosetRel → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	psref2 18561	A poset is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅))
Theorem	pstr2 18562	A poset is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅)
Theorem	pslem 18563	Lemma for psref 18565 and others. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	psdmrn 18564	The domain and range of a poset equal its field. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅 ∧ ran 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅))
Theorem	psref 18565	A poset is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	psrn 18566	The range of a poset equals it domain. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑋 = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	psasym 18567	A poset is antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	pstr 18568	A poset is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	cnvps 18569	The converse of a poset is a poset. In the general case (◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel) is not true. See cnvpsb 18570 for a special case where the property holds. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	cnvpsb 18570	The converse of a poset is a poset. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel))
Theorem	psss 18571	Any subset of a partially ordered set is partially ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	psssdm2 18572	Field of a subposet. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → dom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	psssdm 18573	Field of a subposet. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋) → dom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	istsr 18574	The predicate is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ (𝑋 × 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅)))
Theorem	istsr2 18575*	The predicate is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	tsrlin 18576	A toset is a linear order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	tsrlemax 18577	Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the maximum of two others. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐶, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	tsrps 18578	A toset is a poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	cnvtsr 18579	The converse of a toset is a toset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ TosetRel )
Theorem	tsrss 18580	Any subset of a totally ordered set is totally ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ TosetRel )
Theorem	ledm 18581	The domain of ≤ is ℝ*. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = dom ≤
Theorem	lern 18582	The range of ≤ is ℝ*. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = ran ≤
Theorem	lefld 18583	The field of the 'less or equal to' relationship on the extended real. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = ∪ ∪ ≤
Theorem	letsr 18584	The "less than or equal to" relationship on the extended reals is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ≤ ∈ TosetRel
9.6.2  Directed sets, nets
Syntax	cdir 18585	Extend class notation with the class of directed sets.
class DirRel
Syntax	ctail 18586	Extend class notation with the tail function for directed sets.
class tail
Definition	df-dir 18587	Define the class of directed sets (the order relation itself is sometimes called a direction, and a directed set is a set equipped with a direction). (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.)
⊢ DirRel = {𝑟 ∣ ((Rel 𝑟 ∧ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) ∧ ((𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (∪ ∪ 𝑟 × ∪ ∪ 𝑟) ⊆ (◡𝑟 ∘ 𝑟)))}
Definition	df-tail 18588*	Define the tail function for directed sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.)
⊢ tail = (𝑟 ∈ DirRel ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑟 ↦ (𝑟 “ {𝑥})))
Theorem	isdir 18589	A condition for a relation to be a direction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ DirRel ↔ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)))))
Theorem	reldir 18590	A direction is a relation. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DirRel → Rel 𝑅)
Theorem	dirdm 18591	A direction's domain is equal to its field. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DirRel → dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅)
Theorem	dirref 18592	A direction is reflexive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	dirtr 18593	A direction is transitive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	dirge 18594*	For any two elements of a directed set, there exists a third element greater than or equal to both. Note that this does not say that the two elements have a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	tsrdir 18595	A totally ordered set is a directed set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TosetRel → 𝐴 ∈ DirRel)
PART 10  BASIC ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURES
10.1  Monoids
10.1.1  Magmas According to Wikipedia ("Magma (algebra)", 08-Jan-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/magma_(algebra)) "In abstract algebra, a magma [...] is a basic kind of algebraic structure. Specifically, a magma consists of a set equipped with a single binary operation. The binary operation must be closed by definition but no other properties are imposed.". Since the concept of a "binary operation" is used in different variants, these differences are explained in more detail in the following: With df-mpo 7421, binary operations are defined by a rule, and with df-ov 7419, the value of a binary operation applied to two operands can be expressed. In both cases, the two operands can belong to different sets, and the result can be an element of a third set. However, according to Wikipedia "Binary operation", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_operation 7419 (19-Jan-2020), "... a binary operation on a set 𝑆 is a mapping of the elements of the Cartesian product 𝑆 × 𝑆 to S: 𝑓:𝑆 × 𝑆⟶𝑆. Because the result of performing the operation on a pair of elements of S is again an element of S, the operation is called a closed binary operation on S (or sometimes expressed as having the property of closure).". To distinguish this more restrictive definition (in Wikipedia and most of the literature) from the general case, binary operations mapping the elements of the Cartesian product 𝑆 × 𝑆 are more precisely called internal binary operations. If, in addition, the result is also contained in the set 𝑆, the operation should be called closed internal binary operation. Therefore, a "binary operation on a set 𝑆" according to Wikipedia is a "closed internal binary operation" in a more precise terminology. If the sets are different, the operation is explicitly called external binary operation (see Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_operation#External_binary_operations 7419). The definition of magmas (Mgm, see df-mgm 18599) concentrates on the closure property of the associated operation, and poses no additional restrictions on it. In this way, it is most general and flexible.
Syntax	cplusf 18596	Extend class notation with group addition as a function.
class +𝑓
Syntax	cmgm 18597	Extend class notation with class of all magmas.
class Mgm
Definition	df-plusf 18598*	Define group addition function. Usually we will use +g directly instead of +𝑓, and they have the same behavior in most cases. The main advantage of +𝑓 for any magma is that it is a guaranteed function (mgmplusf 18609), while +g only has closure (mgmcl 18602). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.)
⊢ +𝑓 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝑔)𝑦)))
Definition	df-mgm 18599*	A magma is a set equipped with an everywhere defined internal operation. Definition 1 in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 1, or definition of a groupoid in section I.1 of [Bruck] p. 1. Note: The term "groupoid" is now widely used to refer to other objects: (small) categories all of whose morphisms are invertible, or groups with a partial function replacing the binary operation. Therefore, we will only use the term "magma" for the present notion in set.mm. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by AV, 6-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Mgm = {𝑔 ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑏][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑜]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) ∈ 𝑏}
Theorem	ismgm 18600*	The predicate "is a magma". (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by AV, 6-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑀 ∈ Mgm ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵))