P. 348 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 34701-34800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	shftvalg 34701	Value of a sequence shifted by 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐹 shift 𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	divcnvlin 34702*	Limit of the ratio of two linear functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((𝑘 + 𝐴) / (𝑘 + 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 1)
Theorem	climlec3 34703*	Comparison of a constant to the limit of a sequence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jan-2018.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	logi 34704	Calculate the logarithm of i. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (log‘i) = (i · (π / 2))
Theorem	iexpire 34705	i raised to itself is real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (i↑𝑐i) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	bcneg1 34706	The binomial coefficent over negative one is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁C-1) = 0)
Theorem	bcm1nt 34707	The proportion of one bionmial coefficient to another with 𝑁 decreased by 1. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))) → (𝑁C𝐾) = (((𝑁 − 1)C𝐾) · (𝑁 / (𝑁 − 𝐾))))
Theorem	bcprod 34708*	A product identity for binomial coefficents. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∏𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))((𝑁 − 1)C𝑘) = ∏𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))(𝑘↑((2 · 𝑘) − 𝑁)))
Theorem	bccolsum 34709*	A column-sum rule for binomial coefficents. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)(𝑘C𝐶) = ((𝑁 + 1)C(𝐶 + 1)))
21.10.6  Infinite products
Theorem	iprodefisumlem 34710	Lemma for iprodefisum 34711. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2018.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , (exp ∘ 𝐹)) = (exp ∘ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)))
Theorem	iprodefisum 34711*	Applying the exponential function to an infinite sum yields an infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2018.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (exp‘𝐵) = (exp‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵))
Theorem	iprodgam 34712*	An infinite product version of Euler's gamma function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Γ‘𝐴) = (∏𝑘 ∈ ℕ (((1 + (1 / 𝑘))↑𝑐𝐴) / (1 + (𝐴 / 𝑘))) / 𝐴))
21.10.7  Factorial limits
Theorem	faclimlem1 34713*	Lemma for faclim 34716. Closed form for a particular sequence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((1 + (𝑀 / 𝑛)) · (1 + (1 / 𝑛))) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑛))))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑀 + 1) · ((𝑥 + 1) / (𝑥 + (𝑀 + 1))))))
Theorem	faclimlem2 34714*	Lemma for faclim 34716. Show a limit for the inductive step. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((1 + (𝑀 / 𝑛)) · (1 + (1 / 𝑛))) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑛))))) ⇝ (𝑀 + 1))
Theorem	faclimlem3 34715	Lemma for faclim 34716. Algebraic manipulation for the final induction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (((1 + (1 / 𝐵))↑(𝑀 + 1)) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝐵))) = ((((1 + (1 / 𝐵))↑𝑀) / (1 + (𝑀 / 𝐵))) · (((1 + (𝑀 / 𝐵)) · (1 + (1 / 𝐵))) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝐵)))))
Theorem	faclim 34716*	An infinite product expression relating to factorials. Originally due to Euler. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((1 + (1 / 𝑛))↑𝐴) / (1 + (𝐴 / 𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → seq1( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (!‘𝐴))
Theorem	iprodfac 34717*	An infinite product expression for factorial. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝐴) = ∏𝑘 ∈ ℕ (((1 + (1 / 𝑘))↑𝐴) / (1 + (𝐴 / 𝑘))))
Theorem	faclim2 34718*	Another factorial limit due to Euler. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((!‘𝑛) · ((𝑛 + 1)↑𝑀)) / (!‘(𝑛 + 𝑀))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → 𝐹 ⇝ 1)
21.10.8  Greatest common divisor and divisibility
Theorem	gcd32 34719	Swap the second and third arguments of a gcd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) gcd 𝐶) = ((𝐴 gcd 𝐶) gcd 𝐵))
Theorem	gcdabsorb 34720	Absorption law for gcd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) gcd 𝐵) = (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))
21.10.9  Properties of relationships
Theorem	dftr6 34721	A potential definition of transitivity for sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (V ∖ ran (( E ∘ E ) ∖ E )))
Theorem	coep 34722*	Composition with the membership relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴( E ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	coepr 34723*	Composition with the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ∘ ◡ E )𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	dffr5 34724	A quantifier-free definition of a well-founded relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ⊆ ran ( E ∖ ( E ∘ ◡𝑅)))
Theorem	dfso2 34725	Quantifier-free definition of a strict order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ( I ∪ ◡𝑅))))
Theorem	br8 34726*	Substitution for an eight-place predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐻 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑃 ∃ℎ ∈ 𝑃 (𝑝 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩, ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑄)) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩𝑅⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ 𝜌))
Theorem	br6 34727*	Substitution for a six-place predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑑, ⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑄)) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩𝑅⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ 𝜁))
Theorem	br4 34728*	Substitution for a four-place predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑄)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ 𝜏))
Theorem	cnvco1 34729	Another distributive law of converse over class composition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ◡(◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 ∘ 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvco2 34730	Another distributive law of converse over class composition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐵) = (𝐵 ∘ ◡𝐴)
Theorem	eldm3 34731	Quantifier-free definition of membership in a domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ↾ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	elrn3 34732	Quantifier-free definition of membership in a range. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ (V × {𝐴})) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	pocnv 34733	The converse of a partial ordering is still a partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴)
Theorem	socnv 34734	The converse of a strict ordering is still a strict ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴)
Theorem	sotrd 34735	Transitivity law for strict orderings, deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌𝑅𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑍)
Theorem	elintfv 34736*	Membership in an intersection of function values. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∈ ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
21.10.10  Properties of functions and mappings
Theorem	funpsstri 34737	A condition for subset trichotomy for functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐻 ∧ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ⊆ dom 𝐺 ∨ dom 𝐺 ⊆ dom 𝐹)) → (𝐹 ⊊ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ∨ 𝐺 ⊊ 𝐹))
Theorem	fundmpss 34738	If a class 𝐹 is a proper subset of a function 𝐺, then dom 𝐹 ⊊ dom 𝐺. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐹 ⊊ 𝐺 → dom 𝐹 ⊊ dom 𝐺))
Theorem	funsseq 34739	Given two functions with equal domains, equality only requires one direction of the subset relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Apr-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺 ∧ dom 𝐹 = dom 𝐺) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺))
Theorem	fununiq 34740	The uniqueness condition of functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	funbreq 34741	An equality condition for functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → (𝐴𝐹𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	br1steq 34742	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)
Theorem	br2ndeq 34743	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵)
Theorem	dfdm5 34744	Definition of domain in terms of 1st and image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = ((1st ↾ (V × V)) “ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfrn5 34745	Definition of range in terms of 2nd and image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ran 𝐴 = ((2nd ↾ (V × V)) “ 𝐴)
Theorem	opelco3 34746	Alternate way of saying that an ordered pair is in a composition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-May-2018.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶 “ (𝐷 “ {𝐴})))
Theorem	elima4 34747	Quantifier-free expression saying that a class is a member of an image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 “ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐵 × {𝐴})) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	fv1stcnv 34748	The value of the converse of 1st restricted to a singleton. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (◡(1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝑌}))‘𝑋) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
Theorem	fv2ndcnv 34749	The value of the converse of 2nd restricted to a singleton. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (◡(2nd ↾ ({𝑋} × 𝐴))‘𝑌) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
21.10.11  Set induction (or epsilon induction)
Theorem	setinds 34750*	Principle of set induction (or E-induction). If a property passes from all elements of 𝑥 to 𝑥 itself, then it holds for all 𝑥. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2f 34751*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2 34752*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
21.10.12  Ordinal numbers
Theorem	elpotr 34753*	A class of transitive sets is partially ordered by E. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑧 → E Po 𝐴)
Theorem	dford5reg 34754	Given ax-reg 9587, an ordinal is a transitive class totally ordered by the membership relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Jan-2011.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Or 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem1 34755	Lemma for dfon2 34764. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.)
⊢ Tr ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfon2lem2 34756*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	dfon2lem3 34757*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. All sets satisfying the new definition are transitive and untangled. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	dfon2lem4 34758*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. If two sets satisfy the new definition, then one is a subset of the other. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem5 34759*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. Two sets satisfying the new definition also satisfy trichotomy with respect to ∈. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem6 34760*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. A transitive class of sets satisfying the new definition satisfies the new definition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑧((𝑧 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) → ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑆 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	dfon2lem7 34761*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. All elements of a new ordinal are new ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dfon2lem8 34762*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. The intersection of a nonempty class 𝐴 of new ordinals is itself a new ordinal and is contained within 𝐴 (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) → (∀𝑧((𝑧 ⊊ ∩ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) ∧ ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem9 34763*	Lemma for dfon2 34764. A class of new ordinals is well-founded by E. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → E Fr 𝐴)
Theorem	dfon2 34764*	On consists of all sets that contain all its transitive proper subsets. This definition comes from J. R. Isbell, "A Definition of Ordinal Numbers", American Mathematical Monthly, vol 67 (1960), pp. 51-52. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2011.)
⊢ On = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	rdgprc0 34765	The value of the recursive definition generator at ∅ when the base value is a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐼 ∈ V → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘∅) = ∅)
Theorem	rdgprc 34766	The value of the recursive definition generator when 𝐼 is a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐼 ∈ V → rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(𝐹, ∅))
Theorem	dfrdg2 34767*	Alternate definition of the recursive function generator when 𝐼 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = if(𝑦 = ∅, 𝐼, if(Lim 𝑦, ∪ (𝑓 “ 𝑦), (𝐹‘(𝑓‘∪ 𝑦)))))})
Theorem	dfrdg3 34768*	Generalization of dfrdg2 34767 to remove sethood requirement. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = if(𝑦 = ∅, if(𝐼 ∈ V, 𝐼, ∅), if(Lim 𝑦, ∪ (𝑓 “ 𝑦), (𝐹‘(𝑓‘∪ 𝑦)))))}
21.10.13  Defined equality axioms
Theorem	axextdfeq 34769	A version of ax-ext 2704 for use with defined equality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑧((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)))
Theorem	ax8dfeq 34770	A version of ax-8 2109 for use with defined equality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑧((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	axextdist 34771	ax-ext 2704 with distinctors instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	axextbdist 34772	axextb 2707 with distinctors instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	19.12b 34773*	Version of 19.12vv 2344 with not-free hypotheses, instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	exnel 34774	There is always a set not in 𝑦. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	distel 34775	Distinctors in terms of membership. (NOTE: this only works with relations where we can prove el 5438 and elirrv 9591.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	axextndbi 34776	axextnd 10586 as a biconditional. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
21.10.14  Hypothesis builders
Theorem	hbntg 34777	A more general form of hbnt 2291. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	hbimtg 34778	A more general and closed form of hbim 2296. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜃)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	hbaltg 34779	A more general and closed form of hbal 2168. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	hbng 34780	A more general form of hbn 2292. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	hbimg 34781	A more general form of hbim 2296. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜃))
21.10.15  Well-founded zero, successor, and limits
Syntax	cwsuc 34782	Declare the syntax for well-founded successor.
class wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Syntax	cwlim 34783	Declare the syntax for well-founded limit class.
class WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)
Definition	df-wsuc 34784	Define the concept of a successor in a well-founded set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = inf(Pred(◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-wlim 34785*	Define the class of limit points of a well-founded set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
Theorem	wsuceq123 34786	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌))
Theorem	wsuceq1 34787	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	wsuceq2 34788	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	wsuceq3 34789	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌))
Theorem	nfwsuc 34790	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Theorem	wlimeq12 34791	Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐵))
Theorem	wlimeq1 34792	Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐴))
Theorem	wlimeq2 34793	Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑅, 𝐵))
Theorem	nfwlim 34794	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)
Theorem	elwlim 34795	Membership in the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑋 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	wzel 34796	The zero of a well-founded set is a member of that set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wsuclem 34797*	Lemma for the supremum properties of well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋𝑅𝑤)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ Pred (◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ Pred (◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	wsucex 34798	Existence theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V)
Theorem	wsuccl 34799*	If 𝑋 is a set with an 𝑅 successor in 𝐴, then its well-founded successor is a member of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wsuclb 34800	A well-founded successor is a lower bound on points after 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌𝑅wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))