P. 422 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42101-42200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	euabsneu 42101*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff 𝜑: its associated class abstraction {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} is a singleton. Variant of euabsn2 4492 using existential uniqueness for the singleton element instead of existence only. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦})
20.36.1.3  Unordered and ordered pairs - extension for unordered pairs
Theorem	elprneb 42102	An element of a proper unordered pair is the first element iff it is not the second element. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶))
20.36.1.4  Relations - extension
Theorem	eubrv 42103*	If there is a unique set which is related to a class, then the class must be a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑏 𝐴𝑅𝑏 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	eubrdm 42104*	If there is a unique set which is related to a class, then the class is an element of the domain of the relation. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑏 𝐴𝑅𝑏 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	eldmressn 42105	Element of the domain of a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → 𝐵 = 𝐴)
20.36.1.5  Definite description binder (inverted iota) - extension
Theorem	iota0def 42106*	Example for a defined iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅
Theorem	iota0ndef 42107*	Example for an undefined iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) = ∅
20.36.1.6  Functions - extension
Theorem	fveqvfvv 42108	If a function's value at an argument is the universal class (which can never be the case because of fvex 6459), the function's value at this argument is any set (especially the empty set). In short "If a function's value is a proper class, it is a set", which sounds strange/contradictory, but which is a consequence of that a contradiction implies anything (see pm2.21i 117). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	fnresfnco 42109	Composition of two functions, similar to fnco 6245. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) Fn ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Fn 𝐵)
Theorem	funcoressn 42110	A composition restricted to a singleton is a function under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((((𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {(𝐺‘𝑋)})) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → Fun ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↾ {𝑋}))
Theorem	funressnfv 42111	A restriction to a singleton with a function value is a function under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∧ Fun ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↾ {𝑋})) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {(𝐺‘𝑋)}))
Theorem	funressndmfvrn 42112	The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐴 is in the domain of the function 𝐹. It is sufficient that 𝐹 is a function at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	funressnvmo 42113*	A function restricted to a singleton has at most one value for the singleton element as argument. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝑥}) → ∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funressnvmoOLD 42114*	Old proof of funressnvmo 42113. Obsolete as of 9-Oct-2022. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝑥}) → ∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funressnmo 42115*	A function restricted to a singleton has at most one value for the singleton element as argument. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})) → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funressneu 42116*	There is exactly one value of a class which is a function restricted to a singleton, analogous to funeu 6160. 𝐴 ∈ V is required because otherwise ∃!𝑦𝐴𝐹𝑦, see brprcneu 6438. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
20.36.2  Alternative for Russell's definition of a description binder
Syntax	caiota 42117	Extend class notation with an alternative for Russell's definition of a description binder (inverted iota).
class (℩'𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	aiotajust 42118*	Soundness justification theorem for df-aiota 42119. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
Definition	df-aiota 42119*	Alternate version of Russell's definition of a description binder, which can be read as "the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑", where 𝜑 ordinarily contains 𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see aiotaval 42127); otherwise, it is not a set (see aiotaexb 42123), or even more concrete, it is the universe V (see aiotavb 42124). Since this is an alternative for df-iota 6099, we call this symbol ℩' alternate iota in the following. The advantage of this definition is the clear distinguishability of the defined and undefined cases: the alternate iota over a wff is defined iff it is a set (see aiotaexb 42123). With the original definition, there is no corresponding theorem (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅), because ∅ can be a valid unique set satisfying a wff (see, for example, iota0def 42106). Only the right to left implication would hold, see (negated) iotanul 6114. For defined cases, however, both definitions df-iota 6099 and df-aiota 42119 are equivalent, see reuaiotaiota 42122. (Proposed by BJ, 13-Aug-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}}
Theorem	dfaiota2 42120*	Alternate definition of the alternate version of Russell's definition of a description binder. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	reuabaiotaiota 42121*	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique satisfying value of {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	reuaiotaiota 42122	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaexb 42123	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotavb 42124	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is the universe iff there is no unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = V)
Theorem	iotan0aiotaex 42125	If the iota over a wff 𝜑 is not empty, the alternate iota over 𝜑 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅ → (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotaexaiotaiota 42126	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff the iota and the alternate iota over 𝜑 are equal. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaval 42127*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of (alternate) iota. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	aiota0def 42128*	Example for a defined alternate iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). This corresponds to iota0def 42106. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅
Theorem	aiota0ndef 42129*	Example for an undefined alternate iota being no set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). This is different from iota0ndef 42107, where the iota still is a set (the empty set). (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ∉ V
20.36.3  Double restricted existential uniqueness
20.36.3.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	r19.32 42130	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, analogous to r19.32v 3269. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsb 42131*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2327. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rexrsb 42132*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2327. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexsb 42133*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to rexsb 42131. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexrsb 42134*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to 2exsb 2328. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	cbvral2 42135*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvral2v 3375. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex2 42136*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvrex2v 3376. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	2ralbiim 42137	Split a biconditional and distribute 2 quantifiers, analogous to 2albiim 1936 and ralbiim 3255. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
20.36.3.2  Restricted uniqueness and "at most one" quantification
Theorem	rmoimi 42138	Restricted "at most one" is preserved through implication (note wff reversal). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	2reu5a 42139	Double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existence and restricted "at most one." (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)))
Theorem	reuimrmo 42140	Restricted uniqueness implies restricted "at most one" through implication, analogous to euimmo 2651. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	rmoanim 42141*	Introduction of a conjunct into restricted "at most one" quantifier, analogous to moanim 2655. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	reuan 42142*	Introduction of a conjunct into restricted unique existential quantifier, analogous to euan 2656. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	reuf1odnf 42143*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. Variant of reuf1od 42144 with no distinct variable condition for 𝜒. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	reuf1od 42144*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	euoreqb 42145*	There is a set which is equal to one of two other sets iff the other sets are equal. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
20.36.3.3  Analogs to Existential uniqueness (double quantification)
Theorem	2reurex 42146*	Double restricted quantification with existential uniqueness, analogous to 2euex 2671. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	2reurmo 42147*	Double restricted quantification with restricted existential uniqueness and restricted "at most one.", analogous to 2eumo 2672. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	2reu2rex 42148*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu2ex 2673. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	2rmoswap 42149*	A condition allowing swap of restricted "at most one" and restricted existential quantifiers, analogous to 2moswap 2674. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexreu 42150*	Double restricted existential uniqueness implies double restricted unique existential quantification, analogous to 2exeu 2676. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	2reu1 42151*	Double restricted existential uniqueness. This theorem shows a condition under which a "naive" definition matches the correct one, analogous to 2eu1 2680. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu2 42152*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu2 2682. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	2reu3 42153*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu3 2683. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu4a 42154*	Definition of double restricted existential uniqueness ("exactly one 𝑥 and exactly one 𝑦"), analogous to 2eu4 2685 with the additional requirement that the restricting classes are not empty (which is not necessary as shown in 2reu4 42155). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))))
Theorem	2reu4 42155*	Definition of double restricted existential uniqueness ("exactly one 𝑥 and exactly one 𝑦"), analogous to 2eu4 2685. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))))
Theorem	2reu7 42156*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu7 2688. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	2reu8 42157*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu8 2689. Curiously, we can put ∃! on either of the internal conjuncts but not both. We can also commute ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 using 2reu7 42156. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
20.36.3.4  Additional theorems for double restricted existential uniqueness
Theorem	2reu8i 42158*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification, see also 2reu8 42157. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(x,y), ta(v,y), ch(x,w), th(v,w), et(x,b), ps(a,b), ze(a,w) (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑏 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑏) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜂 → (𝑏 = 𝑦 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑎 = 𝑥)))))
Theorem	2reuimp0 42159*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification. The involved wwfs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(a,b), th(a,c), ch(d,b), ta(d,c), et(a,e), ps(a,f) (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜂 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → 𝑎 = 𝑑)) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑒 = 𝑓)))
Theorem	2reuimp 42160*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification if the class of the quantified elements is not empty. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → (𝜓 → (𝜂 ∧ (𝑎 = 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝑓)))))
20.36.4  Alternative definitions of function and operation values The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6143) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 6761. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6476 and fvprc 6439). Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6477). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹'''𝐴) (see df-afv 42165) would be possible which evaluates to the universal class ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V) if it is not meaningful (see afvnfundmuv 42184, ndmafv 42185, afvprc 42189 and nfunsnafv 42187), and which corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴)) if it is (see afvfundmfveq 42183). That means (𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afvpcfv0 42191), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V is not generally valid. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴, which also would result in (𝐹'''𝐴) = V. In this context we say (𝐹'''𝐴) "is not defined" instead of "is not meaningful". With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ V <-> "(𝐹'''𝐴) is meaningful/defined". An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 19) proofs using the definition df-fv 6143 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 8 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6445-> afveq1 42179, fveq2 6446-> afveq2 42180, nffv 6456-> nfafv 42181, csbfv12 6490-> csbafv12g , fvres 6465-> afvres 42217, rlimdm 14690-> rlimdmafv 42222, tz6.12-1 6468-> tz6.12-1-afv 42219, fveu 6437-> afveu 42198. Three theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6143 are within a mathbox (fvsb 39614) or not used (isumclim3 14895, avril1 27894). However, the remaining 8 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6143 are used more or less often: * fvex 6459: used in about 1750 proofs. * tz6.12-1 6468: root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: fvprc 6439 (used in about 127 proofs), tz6.12i 6472 (used - indirectly via fvbr0 6473 and fvrn0 6474- in 18 proofs, and in fvclss 6772 used in fvclex 7417 used in fvresex 7418, which is not used!), dcomex 9604 (used in 4 proofs), ndmfv 6476 (used in 86 proofs) and nfunsn 6484 (used by dffv2 6531 which is not used). * fv2 6441: only used by elfv 6444, which is only used by fv3 6464, which is not used. * dffv3 6442: used by dffv4 6443 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in deprecated (usage discouraged) theorems or within mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 40072), by shftval 14221 (itself used in 9 proofs), by dffv5 32620 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6533, which has the analogue afvco2 42221. * fvopab5 6572: used only by ajval 28289 (not used) and by adjval 29321 ( used - indirectly - in 9 proofs). * zsum 14856: used (via isum 14857, sum0 14859 and fsumsers 14866) in more than 90 proofs. * isumshft 14975: used in pserdv2 24621 and (via logtayl 24843) 4 other proofs. * ovtpos 7649: used in 14 proofs. As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6441, dffv3 6442, fvopab5 6572, zsum 14856, isumshft 14975 and ovtpos 7649 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6459 and tz6.12-1 6468 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values. With the same arguments, an alternative definition of operation values ((𝐴𝑂𝐵)) could be meaningful to avoid ambiguities, see df-aov 42166. For additional discussions/material see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/metamath/cteNUppB6A4.
Syntax	wdfat 42161	Extend the definition of a wff to include the "defined at" predicate. Read: "(the function) 𝐹 is defined at (the argument) 𝐴". In a previous version, the token "def@" was used. However, since the @ is used (informally) as a replacement for $ in commented out sections that may be deleted some day. While there is no violation of any standard to use the @ in a token, it could make the search for such commented-out sections slightly more difficult. (See remark of Norman Megill at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/metamath/cteNUppB6A4).
wff 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Syntax	cafv 42162	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". In a previous version, the symbol " ' " was used. However, since the similarity with the symbol ‘ used for the current definition of a function's value (see df-fv 6143), which, by the way, was intended to visualize that in many cases ‘ and " ' " are exchangeable, makes reading the theorems, especially those which uses both definitions as dfafv2 42177, very difficult, 3 apostrophes ''' are used now so that it's easier to distinguish from df-fv 6143 and df-ima 5368. And not three backticks ( three times ‘) since that would be annoying to escape in a comment. (See remark of Norman Megill and Gerard Lang at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/metamath/cteNUppB6A4).
class (𝐹'''𝐴)
Syntax	caov 42163	Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as +) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by a pair of parentheses in contrast to the current definition, see df-ov 6925.
class ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Definition	df-dfat 42164	Definition of the predicate that determines if some class 𝐹 is defined as function for an argument 𝐴 or, in other words, if the function value for some class 𝐹 for an argument 𝐴 is defined. We say that 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 if a 𝐹 is a function restricted to the member 𝐴 of its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
Definition	df-afv 42165*	Alternative definition of the value of a function, (𝐹'''𝐴), also known as function application. In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see df-fv 6143 and ndmfv 6476), (𝐹'''𝐴) = V if F is not defined for A! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) (Revised by BJ/AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = (℩'𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-aov 42166	Define the value of an operation. In contrast to df-ov 6925, the alternative definition for a function value (see df-afv 42165) is used. By this, the value of the operation applied to two arguments is the universal class if the operation is not defined for these two arguments. There are still no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐹'''⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
20.36.4.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	ralbinrald 42167*	Elemination of a restricted universal quantification under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
20.36.4.2  The universal class (extension)
Theorem	nvelim 42168	If a class is the universal class it doesn't belong to any class, generalization of nvel 5035. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
20.36.4.3  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets (extension)
Theorem	alneu 42169	If a statement holds for all sets, there is not a unique set for which the statement holds. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eu2ndop1stv 42170*	If there is a unique second component in an ordered pair contained in a given set, the first component must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
20.36.4.4  Predicate "defined at"
Theorem	dfateq12d 42171	Equality deduction for "defined at". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 defAt 𝐵))
Theorem	nfdfat 42172	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, C_, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Theorem	dfdfat2 42173*	Alternate definition of the predicate "defined at" not using the Fun predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	fundmdfat 42174	A function is defined at any element of its domain. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatprc 42175	A function is not defined at a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatelrn 42176	The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
20.36.4.5  Alternative definition of the value of a function
Theorem	dfafv2 42177	Alternative definition of (𝐹'''𝐴) using (𝐹‘𝐴) directly. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Revised by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
Theorem	afveq12d 42178	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6453. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐵))
Theorem	afveq1 42179	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6445. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐴))
Theorem	afveq2 42180	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6445. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐵))
Theorem	nfafv 42181	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6456. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6458 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 42172 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)
Theorem	csbafv12g 42182	Move class substitution in and out of a function value, analogous to csbfv12 6490, with a direct proof proposed by Mario Carneiro, analogous to csbov123 6963. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹'''𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹'''⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
Theorem	afvfundmfveq 42183	If a class is a function restricted to a member of its domain, then the function value for this member is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvnfundmuv 42184	If a set is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the set, then the function value for this set is the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	ndmafv 42185	The value of a class outside its domain is the universe, compare with ndmfv 6476. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvdm 42186	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the argument is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnafv 42187	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its value is the universe, compare with nfunsn 6484. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvfunressn 42188	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the class restricted to the singleton of the argument is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
Theorem	afvprc 42189	A function's value at a proper class is the universe, compare with fvprc 6439. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvv 42190	If a function's value at an argument is a set, the argument is also a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	afvpcfv0 42191	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the universe, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvnufveq 42192	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ≠ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvvfveq 42193	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0fv0 42194	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the empty set, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvfvn0fveq 42195	If the function's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the value of the alternative function at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0nbfvbi 42196	The function's value at an argument is an element of a set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is an element of that set, if the set does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∅ ∉ 𝐵 → ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvfv0bi 42197	The function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is either the empty set or the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹'''𝐴) = V))
Theorem	afveu 42198*	The value of a function at a unique point, analogous to fveu 6437. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑥})
Theorem	fnbrafvb 42199	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6495. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	fnopafvb 42200	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6496. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))