P. 427 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42601-42700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	onfisupcl 42601	Sufficient condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. See ordunifi 9309. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onelord 42602	Every element of a ordinal is an ordinal. Lemma 1.3 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on onelon 6388 and eloni 6373. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
Theorem	onepsuc 42603	Every ordinal is less than its successor, relationship version. Lemma 1.7 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 E suc 𝐴)
Theorem	epsoon 42604	The ordinals are strictly and completely (linearly) ordered. Theorem 1.9 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on epweon 7771 and weso 5663. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ E Or On
Theorem	epirron 42605	The strict order on the ordinals is irreflexive. Theorem 1.9(i) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ 𝐴 E 𝐴)
Theorem	oneptr 42606	The strict order on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 E 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 E 𝐶) → 𝐴 E 𝐶))
Theorem	oneltr 42607	The elementhood relation on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. See ontr1 6409. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	oneptri 42608	The strict, complete (linear) order on the ordinals is complete. Theorem 1.9(iii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 E 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	oneltri 42609	The elementhood relation on the ordinals is complete, so we have triality. Theorem 1.9(iii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. See ordtri3or 6395. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ordeldif 42610	Membership in the difference of ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordeldifsucon 42611	Membership in the difference of ordinal and successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordeldif1o 42612	Membership in the difference of ordinal and ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	ordne0gt0 42613	Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to ord0eln0 6418. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ondif1i 42614	Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal, class difference version. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ondif1 8515. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsucelab 42615*	The successor of every ordinal is an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏})
Theorem	dflim6 42616*	A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal which is not a succesor ordinal. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏))
Theorem	limnsuc 42617*	A limit ordinal is not an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏})
Theorem	onsucss 42618	If one ordinal is less than another, then the successor of the first is less than or equal to the second. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ordsucss 7815. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordnexbtwnsuc 42619*	For any distinct pair of ordinals, if there is no ordinal between the lesser and the greater, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
Theorem	orddif0suc 42620	For any distinct pair of ordinals, if the set difference between the greater and the successor of the lesser is empty, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∖ suc 𝐴) = ∅ → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
Theorem	onsucf1lem 42621*	For ordinals, the successor operation is injective, so there is at most one ordinal that a given ordinal could be the succesor of. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃*𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)
Theorem	onsucf1olem 42622*	The successor operation is bijective between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) → ∃!𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)
Theorem	onsucrn 42623*	The successor operation is surjective onto its range, the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}
Theorem	onsucf1o 42624*	The successor operation is a bijective function between the ordinals and the class of succesor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:On–1-1-onto→{𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}
Theorem	dflim7 42625*	A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal that contains all the successors of its elements. Lemma 1.18 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to dflim4 7846. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	onov0suclim 42626	Compactly express rules for binary operations on ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊗ ∅) = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ suc 𝐶) = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐸) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹)))
Theorem	oa0suclim 42627*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal addition for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.3 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oa0 8530, oasuc 8538, and oalim 8546. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐶)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +o 𝑐))))
Theorem	om0suclim 42628*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal multiplication for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.5 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See om0 8531, omsuc 8540, and omlim 8547. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∅) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐶) +o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ·o 𝑐))))
Theorem	oe0suclim 42629*	Closed form expression of the value of ordinal exponentiation for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.6 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oe0 8536, oesuc 8541, oe0m1 8535, and oelim 8548. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = 1o) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ·o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐), ∅))))
Theorem	oaomoecl 42630	The operations of addition, multiplication, and exponentiation are closed. Remark 2.8 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See oacl 8549, omcl 8550, oecl 8551. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On))
Theorem	onsupsucismax 42631*	If the union of a set of ordinals is a successor ordinal, then that union is the maximum element of the set. This is not a bijection because sets where the maximum element is zero or a limit ordinal exist. Lemma 2.11 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑏 ∈ On ∪ 𝐴 = suc 𝑏 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onsssupeqcond 42632*	If for every element of a set of ordinals there is an element of a subset which is at least as large, then the union of the set and the subset is the same. Lemma 2.12 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 ⊆ 𝑏) → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	limexissup 42633	An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to its supremum. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup(𝐴, On, E ))
Theorem	limiun 42634*	A limit ordinal is the union of its elements, indexed union version. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See limuni 6424. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥)
Theorem	limexissupab 42635*	An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to the supremum of the class of all its elements. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}, On, E ))
Theorem	om1om1r 42636	Ordinal one is both a left and right identity of ordinal multiplication. Lemma 2.15 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See om1 8556 and om1r 8557 for individual statements. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((1o ·o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ·o 1o) ∧ (𝐴 ·o 1o) = 𝐴))
Theorem	oe0rif 42637	Ordinal zero raised to any non-zero ordinal power is zero and zero to the zeroth power is one. Lemma 2.18 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (∅ ↑o 𝐴) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∅, 1o))
Theorem	oasubex 42638*	While subtraction can't be a binary operation on ordinals, for any pair of ordinals there exists an ordinal that can be added to the lessor (or equal) one which will sum to the greater. Theorem 2.19 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝑐 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 +o 𝑐) = 𝐴))
Theorem	nnamecl 42639	Natural numbers are closed under ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. Theorem 2.20 of [Schloeder] p. 6. See nnacl 8625, nnmcl 8626, nnecl 8627. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ ω))
Theorem	onsucwordi 42640	The successor operation preserves the less-than-or-equal relationship between ordinals. Lemma 3.1 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	oalim2cl 42641	The ordinal sum of any ordinal with a limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → Lim (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	oaltublim 42642	Given 𝐶 is a limit ordinal, the sum of any ordinal with an ordinal less than 𝐶 is less than the sum of the first ordinal with 𝐶. Lemma 3.5 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶))
Theorem	oaordi3 42643	Ordinal addition of the same number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.6 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oaord3 42644	When the same ordinal is added on the left, ordering of the sums is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.7 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)))
Theorem	1oaomeqom 42645	Ordinal one plus omega is equal to omega. See oaabs 8662 for the sum of any natural number on the left and ordinal at least as large as omega on the right. Lemma 3.8 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See oaabs2 8663 where a power of omega is the upper bound of the left and a lower bound on the right. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (1o +o ω) = ω
Theorem	oaabsb 42646	The right addend absorbs the sum with an ordinal iff that ordinal times omega is less than or equal to the right addend. (Contributed by RP, 19-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ·o ω) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐵))
Theorem	oaordnrex 42647	When omega is added on the right to ordinals zero and one, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (∅ ∈ 1o ↔ (∅ +o ω) ∈ (1o +o ω))
Theorem	oaordnr 42648*	When the same ordinal is added on the right, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 +o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 +o 𝑐))
Theorem	omge1 42649	Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.11 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See omword1 8587. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omge2 42650	Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.12 of [Schloeder] p. 9. See omword2 8588. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omlim2 42651	The non-zero product with an limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.13 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omord2lim 42652	Given a limit ordinal, the product of any non-zero ordinal with an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the product of the non-zero ordinal with the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.14 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	omord2i 42653	Ordinal multiplication of the same non-zero number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.15 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	omord2com 42654	When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the left, ordering of the products is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.16 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶)))
Theorem	2omomeqom 42655	Ordinal two times omega is omega. Lemma 3.17 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (2o ·o ω) = ω
Theorem	omnord1ex 42656	When omega is multiplied on the right to ordinals one and two, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (1o ∈ 2o ↔ (1o ·o ω) ∈ (2o ·o ω))
Theorem	omnord1 42657*	When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the right, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ·o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ·o 𝑐))
Theorem	oege1 42658	Any non-zero ordinal power is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.19 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oewordi 8605. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	oege2 42659	Any power of an ordinal at least as large as two is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.20 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeworde 8607. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	rp-oelim2 42660	The power of an ordinal at least as large as two with a limit ordinal on thr right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.21 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oelimcl 8614. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	oeord2lim 42661	Given a limit ordinal, the power of any base at least as large as two raised to an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the power of that base raised to the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.22 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeordi 8601. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oeord2i 42662	Ordinal exponentiation of the same base at least as large as two preserves the ordering of the exponents. Lemma 3.23 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	oeord2com 42663	When the same base at least as large as two is raised to ordinal powers, , ordering of the power is equivalent to the ordering of the exponents. Theorem 3.24 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)))
Theorem	nnoeomeqom 42664	Any natural number at least as large as two raised to the power of omega is omega. Lemma 3.25 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↑o ω) = ω)
Theorem	df3o2 42665	Ordinal 3 is the unordered triple containing ordinals 0, 1, and 2. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 3o = {∅, 1o, 2o}
Theorem	df3o3 42666	Ordinal 3, fully expanded. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 3o = {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}}
Theorem	oenord1ex 42667	When ordinals two and three are both raised to the power of omega, ordering of the powers is not equivalent to the ordering of the bases. Remark 3.26 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (2o ∈ 3o ↔ (2o ↑o ω) ∈ (3o ↑o ω))
Theorem	oenord1 42668*	When two ordinals (both at least as large as two) are raised to the same power, ordering of the powers is not equivalent to the ordering of the bases. Remark 3.26 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (On ∖ 2o)∃𝑏 ∈ (On ∖ 2o)∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ↑o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ↑o 𝑐))
Theorem	oaomoencom 42669*	Ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation do not generally commute. Theorem 4.1 of [Schloeder] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 +o 𝑏) = (𝑏 +o 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ·o 𝑏) = (𝑏 ·o 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ↑o 𝑏) = (𝑏 ↑o 𝑎))
Theorem	oenassex 42670	Ordinal two raised to two to the zeroth power is not the same as two squared then raised to the zeroth power. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ (2o ↑o (2o ↑o ∅)) = ((2o ↑o 2o) ↑o ∅)
Theorem	oenass 42671*	Ordinal exponentiation is not associative. Remark 4.6 of [Schloeder] p. 14. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ↑o (𝑏 ↑o 𝑐)) = ((𝑎 ↑o 𝑏) ↑o 𝑐)
Theorem	cantnftermord 42672	For terms of the form of a power of omega times a non-zero natural number, ordering of the exponents implies ordering of the terms. Lemma 5.1 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o))) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((ω ↑o 𝐴) ·o 𝐶) ∈ ((ω ↑o 𝐵) ·o 𝐷)))
Theorem	cantnfub 42673*	Given a finite number of terms of the form ((ω ↑o (𝐴‘𝑛)) ·o (𝑀‘𝑛)) with distinct exponents, we may order them from largest to smallest and find the sum is less than (ω ↑o 𝑋) when (𝐴‘𝑛) is less than 𝑋 and (𝑀‘𝑛) is less than ω. Lemma 5.2 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 31-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑁–1-1→𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑁⟶ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐴, (𝑀‘(◡𝐴‘𝑥)), ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom (ω CNF 𝑋) ∧ ((ω CNF 𝑋)‘𝐹) ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑋)))
Theorem	cantnfub2 42674*	Given a finite number of terms of the form ((ω ↑o (𝐴‘𝑛)) ·o (𝑀‘𝑛)) with distinct exponents, we may order them from largest to smallest and find the sum is less than (ω ↑o suc ∪ ran 𝐴) when (𝑀‘𝑛) is less than ω. Lemma 5.2 of [Schloeder] p. 15. (Contributed by RP, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑁–1-1→On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑁⟶ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ suc ∪ ran 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐴, (𝑀‘(◡𝐴‘𝑥)), ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (suc ∪ ran 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom (ω CNF suc ∪ ran 𝐴) ∧ ((ω CNF suc ∪ ran 𝐴)‘𝐹) ∈ (ω ↑o suc ∪ ran 𝐴)))
Theorem	bropabg 42675*	Equivalence for two classes related by an ordered-pair class abstraction. A generalization of brsslt 27705. (Contributed by RP, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	cantnfresb 42676*	A Cantor normal form which sums to less than a certain power has only zeros for larger components. (Contributed by RP, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2o) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))) → (((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅))
Theorem	cantnf2 42677*	For every ordinal, 𝐴, there is a an ordinal exponent 𝑏 such that 𝐴 is less than (ω ↑o 𝑏) and for every ordinal at least as large as 𝑏 there is a unique Cantor normal form, 𝑓, with zeros for all the unnecessary higher terms, that sums to 𝐴. Theorem 5.3 of [Schloeder] p. 16. (Contributed by RP, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∀𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 𝑏)∃!𝑓 ∈ dom (ω CNF 𝑐)((𝐴 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑏) ∧ 𝑓 finSupp ∅) ∧ (((ω CNF 𝑏)‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑏)) = 𝐴 ∧ ((ω CNF 𝑐)‘𝑓) = 𝐴)))
21.34.2  Natural addition of Cantor normal forms
Theorem	oawordex2 42678*	If 𝐶 is between 𝐴 (inclusive) and (𝐴 +o 𝐵) (exclusive), there is an ordinal which equals 𝐶 when summed to 𝐴. This is a slightly different statement than oawordex 8571 or oawordeu 8569. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = 𝐶)
Theorem	nnawordexg 42679*	If an ordinal, 𝐵, is in a half-open interval between some 𝐴 and the next limit ordinal, 𝐵 is the sum of the 𝐴 and some natural number. This weakens the antecedent of nnawordex 8651. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 +o ω)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	succlg 42680	Closure law for ordinal successor. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 = ∅ ∨ (𝐵 = (ω ·o 𝐶) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)))) → suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dflim5 42681*	A limit ordinal is either the proper class of ordinals or some nonzero product with omega. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = On ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)𝐴 = (ω ·o 𝑥)))
Theorem	oacl2g 42682	Closure law for ordinal addition. Here we show that ordinal addition is closed within the empty set or any ordinal power of omega. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐶 = ∅ ∨ (𝐶 = (ω ↑o 𝐷) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On))) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	onmcl 42683	If an ordinal is less than a power of omega, the product with a natural number is also less than that power of omega. (Contributed by RP, 19-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐵) → (𝐴 ·o 𝑁) ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	omabs2 42684	Ordinal multiplication by a larger ordinal is absorbed when the larger ordinal is either 2 or ω raised to some power of ω. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = 2o ∨ (𝐵 = (ω ↑o (ω ↑o 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On))) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	omcl2 42685	Closure law for ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐶 = ∅ ∨ (𝐶 = (ω ↑o (ω ↑o 𝐷)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On))) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	omcl3g 42686	Closure law for ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 3o ∨ (𝐶 = (ω ↑o (ω ↑o 𝐷)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On))) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ordsssucb 42687	An ordinal number is less than or equal to the successor of an ordinal class iff the ordinal number is either less than or equal to the ordinal class or the ordinal number is equal to the successor of the ordinal class. See also ordsssucim 42755, limsssuc 7848. (Contributed by RP, 22-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	tfsconcatlem 42688*	Lemma for tfsconcatun 42689. (Contributed by RP, 23-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)) → ∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 = (𝐴 +o 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)))
Theorem	tfsconcatun 42689*	The concatenation of two transfinite series is a union of functions. (Contributed by RP, 23-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐶 +o 𝐷) ∖ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑥 = (𝐶 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐵‘𝑧)))}))
Theorem	tfsconcatfn 42690*	The concatenation of two transfinite series is a transfinite series. (Contributed by RP, 22-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) Fn (𝐶 +o 𝐷))
Theorem	tfsconcatfv1 42691*	An early value of the concatenation of two transfinite series. (Contributed by RP, 23-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)‘𝑋) = (𝐴‘𝑋))
Theorem	tfsconcatfv2 42692*	A latter value of the concatenation of two transfinite series. (Contributed by RP, 23-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)‘(𝐶 +o 𝑋)) = (𝐵‘𝑋))
Theorem	tfsconcatfv 42693*	The value of the concatenation of two transfinite series. (Contributed by RP, 24-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 +o 𝐷)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)‘𝑋) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐶, (𝐴‘𝑋), (𝐵‘(℩𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 (𝐶 +o 𝑑) = 𝑋))))
Theorem	tfsconcatrn 42694*	The range of the concatenation of two transfinite series. (Contributed by RP, 24-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵))
Theorem	tfsconcatfo 42695*	The concatenation of two transfinite series is onto the union of the ranges. (Contributed by RP, 24-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵):(𝐶 +o 𝐷)–onto→(ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵))
Theorem	tfsconcatb0 42696*	The concatentation with the empty series leaves the series unchanged. (Contributed by RP, 25-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (𝐵 = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐴))
Theorem	tfsconcat0i 42697*	The concatentation with the empty series leaves the series unchanged. (Contributed by RP, 28-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐵))
Theorem	tfsconcat0b 42698*	The concatentation with the empty series leaves the finite series unchanged. (Contributed by RP, 1-Mar-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ω)) → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐵))
Theorem	tfsconcat00 42699*	The concatentation of two empty series results in an empty series. (Contributed by RP, 25-Feb-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = ∅))
Theorem	tfsconcatrev 42700*	If the domain of a transfinite sequence is an ordinal sum, the sequence can be decomposed into two sequences with domains corresponding to the addends. Theorem 2 in Grzegorz Bancerek, "Epsilon Numbers and Cantor Normal Form", Formalized Mathematics, Vol. 17, No. 4, Pages 249–256, 2009. DOI: 10.2478/v10037-009-0032-8 (Contributed by RP, 2-Mar-2025.)
⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐶 +o 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → ∃𝑢 ∈ (ran 𝐹 ↑m 𝐶)∃𝑣 ∈ (ran 𝐹 ↑m 𝐷)((𝑢 + 𝑣) = 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑣 = 𝐷))