P. 176 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17501-17600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	xpsle 17501	Value of the ordering in a binary structure product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑅 ×s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (le‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (le‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴𝑀𝐶 ∧ 𝐵𝑁𝐷)))
7.2  Moore spaces
Syntax	cmre 17502	The class of Moore systems.
class Moore
Syntax	cmrc 17503	The class function generating Moore closures.
class mrCls
Syntax	cmri 17504	mrInd is a class function which takes a Moore system to its set of independent sets.
class mrInd
Syntax	cacs 17505	The class of algebraic closure (Moore) systems.
class ACS
Definition	df-mre 17506*	Define a Moore collection, which is a family of subsets of a base set which preserve arbitrary intersection. Elements of a Moore collection are termed closed; Moore collections generalize the notion of closedness from topologies (cldmre 22981) and vector spaces (lssmre 20887) to the most general setting in which such concepts make sense. Definition of Moore collection of sets in [Schechter] p. 78. A Moore collection may also be called a closure system (Section 0.6 in [Gratzer] p. 23.) The name Moore collection is after Eliakim Hastings Moore, who discussed these systems in Part I of [Moore] p. 53 to 76. See ismre 17510, mresspw 17512, mre1cl 17514 and mreintcl 17515 for the major properties of a Moore collection. Note that a Moore collection uniquely determines its base set (mreuni 17520); as such the disjoint union of all Moore collections is sometimes considered as ∪ ran Moore, justified by mreunirn 17521. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Revised by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ Moore = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑐(𝑠 ≠ ∅ → ∩ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑐))})
Definition	df-mrc 17507*	Define the Moore closure of a generating set, which is the smallest closed set containing all generating elements. Definition of Moore closure in [Schechter] p. 79. This generalizes topological closure (mrccls 22982) and linear span (mrclsp 20910). A Moore closure operation 𝑁 is (1) extensive, i.e., 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑥) for all subsets 𝑥 of the base set (mrcssid 17541), (2) isotone, i.e., 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 implies that (𝑁‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑦) for all subsets 𝑥 and 𝑦 of the base set (mrcss 17540), and (3) idempotent, i.e., (𝑁‘(𝑁‘𝑥)) = (𝑁‘𝑥) for all subsets 𝑥 of the base set (mrcidm 17543.) Operators satisfying these three properties are in bijective correspondence with Moore collections, so these properties may be used to give an alternate characterization of a Moore collection by providing a closure operation 𝑁 on the set of subsets of a given base set which satisfies (1), (2), and (3); the closed sets can be recovered as those sets which equal their closures (Section 4.5 in [Schechter] p. 82.) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Revised by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ mrCls = (𝑐 ∈ ∪ ran Moore ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑐 ↦ ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠}))
Definition	df-mri 17508*	In a Moore system, a set is independent if no element of the set is in the closure of the set with the element removed (Section 0.6 in [Gratzer] p. 27; Definition 4.1.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83.) mrInd is a class function which takes a Moore system to its set of independent sets. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ mrInd = (𝑐 ∈ ∪ ran Moore ↦ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑐 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ((mrCls‘𝑐)‘(𝑠 ∖ {𝑥}))})
Definition	df-acs 17509*	An important subclass of Moore systems are those which can be interpreted as closure under some collection of operators of finite arity (the collection itself is not required to be finite). These are termed algebraic closure systems; similar to definition (A) of an algebraic closure system in [Schechter] p. 84, but to avoid the complexity of an arbitrary mixed collection of functions of various arities (especially if the axiom of infinity omex 9558 is to be avoided), we consider a single function defined on finite sets instead. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ACS = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (Moore‘𝑥) ∣ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝒫 𝑥⟶𝒫 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ↔ ∪ (𝑓 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠))})
Theorem	ismre 17510*	Property of being a Moore collection on some base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶(𝑠 ≠ ∅ → ∩ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	fnmre 17511	The Moore collection generator is a well-behaved function. Analogue for Moore collections of fntopon 22827 for topologies. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Moore Fn V
Theorem	mresspw 17512	A Moore collection is a subset of the power of the base set; each closed subset of the system is actually a subset of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	mress 17513	A Moore-closed subset is a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	mre1cl 17514	In any Moore collection the base set is closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mreintcl 17515	A nonempty collection of closed sets has a closed intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mreiincl 17516*	A nonempty indexed intersection of closed sets is closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐼 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mrerintcl 17517	The relative intersection of a set of closed sets is closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑆) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mreriincl 17518*	The relative intersection of a family of closed sets is closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mreincl 17519	Two closed sets have a closed intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mreuni 17520	Since the entire base set of a Moore collection is the greatest element of it, the base set can be recovered from a Moore collection by set union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → ∪ 𝐶 = 𝑋)
Theorem	mreunirn 17521	Two ways to express the notion of being a Moore collection on an unspecified base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ∪ ran Moore ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘∪ 𝐶))
Theorem	ismred 17522*	Properties that determine a Moore collection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑠 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
Theorem	ismred2 17523*	Properties that determine a Moore collection, using restricted intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑠) ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
Theorem	mremre 17524	The Moore collections of subsets of a space, viewed as a kind of subset of the power set, form a Moore collection in their own right on the power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (Moore‘𝑋) ∈ (Moore‘𝒫 𝑋))
Theorem	submre 17525	The subcollection of a closed set system below a given closed set is itself a closed set system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝒫 𝐴) ∈ (Moore‘𝐴))
Theorem	xrsle 17526	The ordering of the extended real number structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘ℝ*𝑠)
Theorem	xrge0le 17527	The "less than or equal to" relation in the extended real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2018.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘(ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞)))
Theorem	xrsbas 17528	The base set of the extended real number structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = (Base‘ℝ*𝑠)
Theorem	xrge0base 17529	The base of the extended nonnegative real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (0[,]+∞) = (Base‘(ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞)))
7.2.1  Moore closures
Theorem	mrcflem 17530*	The domain and codomain of the function expression for Moore closures. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠}):𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
Theorem	fnmrc 17531	Moore-closure is a well-behaved function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ mrCls Fn ∪ ran Moore
Theorem	mrcfval 17532*	Value of the function expression for the Moore closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠}))
Theorem	mrcf 17533	The Moore closure is a function mapping arbitrary subsets to closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
Theorem	mrcval 17534*	Evaluation of the Moore closure of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) = ∩ {𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑠})
Theorem	mrccl 17535	The Moore closure of a set is a closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mrcsncl 17536	The Moore closure of a singleton is a closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘{𝑈}) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mrcid 17537	The closure of a closed set is itself. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑈) = 𝑈)
Theorem	mrcssv 17538	The closure of a set is a subset of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	mrcidb 17539	A set is closed iff it is equal to its closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑈) = 𝑈))
Theorem	mrcss 17540	Closure preserves subset ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑉))
Theorem	mrcssid 17541	The closure of a set is a superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑈))
Theorem	mrcidb2 17542	A set is closed iff it contains its closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈))
Theorem	mrcidm 17543	The closure operation is idempotent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑈)) = (𝐹‘𝑈))
Theorem	mrcsscl 17544	The closure is the minimal closed set; any closed set which contains the generators is a superset of the closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)
Theorem	mrcuni 17545	Idempotence of closure under a general union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑈)))
Theorem	mrcun 17546	Idempotence of closure under a pair union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘(𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) = (𝐹‘((𝐹‘𝑈) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑉))))
Theorem	mrcssvd 17547	The Moore closure of a set is a subset of the base. Deduction form of mrcssv 17538. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	mrcssd 17548	Moore closure preserves subset ordering. Deduction form of mrcss 17540. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑈) ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑉))
Theorem	mrcssidd 17549	A set is contained in its Moore closure. Deduction form of mrcssid 17541. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑈))
Theorem	mrcidmd 17550	Moore closure is idempotent. Deduction form of mrcidm 17543. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘(𝑁‘𝑈)) = (𝑁‘𝑈))
Theorem	mressmrcd 17551	In a Moore system, if a set is between another set and its closure, the two sets have the same closure. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))
Theorem	submrc 17552	In a closure system which is cut off above some level, closures below that level act as normal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (mrCls‘(𝐶 ∩ 𝒫 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘𝑈))
Theorem	mrieqvlemd 17553	In a Moore system, if 𝑌 is a member of 𝑆, (𝑆 ∖ {𝑌}) and 𝑆 have the same closure if and only if 𝑌 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∖ {𝑌}). Used in the proof of mrieqvd 17562 and mrieqv2d 17563. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌})) ↔ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌})) = (𝑁‘𝑆)))
7.2.2  Independent sets in a Moore system
Theorem	mrisval 17554*	Value of the set of independent sets of a Moore system. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∖ {𝑥}))})
Theorem	ismri 17555*	Criterion for a set to be an independent set of a Moore system. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})))))
Theorem	ismri2 17556*	Criterion for a subset of the base set in a Moore system to be independent. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))))
Theorem	ismri2d 17557*	Criterion for a subset of the base set in a Moore system to be independent. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))))
Theorem	ismri2dd 17558*	Definition of independence of a subset of the base set in a Moore system. One-way deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	mriss 17559	An independent set of a Moore system is a subset of the base set. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	mrissd 17560	An independent set of a Moore system is a subset of the base set. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	ismri2dad 17561	Consequence of a set in a Moore system being independent. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌})))
Theorem	mrieqvd 17562*	In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if, for all elements of the set, the closure of the set with the element removed is unequal to the closure of the original set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ≠ (𝑁‘𝑆)))
Theorem	mrieqv2d 17563*	In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if all its proper subsets have closure properly contained in the closure of the set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑠(𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → (𝑁‘𝑠) ⊊ (𝑁‘𝑆))))
Theorem	mrissmrcd 17564	In a Moore system, if an independent set is between a set and its closure, the two sets are equal (since the two sets must have equal closures by mressmrcd 17551, and so are equal by mrieqv2d 17563.) (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = 𝑇)
Theorem	mrissmrid 17565	In a Moore system, subsets of independent sets are independent. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	mreexd 17566*	In a Moore system, the closure operator is said to have the exchange property if, for all elements 𝑦 and 𝑧 of the base set and subsets 𝑆 of the base set such that 𝑧 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑦}) but not in the closure of 𝑆, 𝑦 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑧}) (Definition 3.1.9 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 57 to 58.) This theorem allows to construct substitution instances of this definition. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑌})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑍})))
Theorem	mreexmrid 17567*	In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if a set is independent and an element is not in its closure, then adding the element to the set gives another independent set. Lemma 4.1.5 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 84. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∪ {𝑌}) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	mreexexlemd 17568*	This lemma is used to generate substitution instances of the induction hypothesis in mreexexd 17572. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑡∀𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)∀𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)(((𝑢 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝑣 ≈ 𝐾) ∧ 𝑢 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑣 ∪ 𝑡)) ∧ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣(𝑢 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexlem2d 17569*	Used in mreexexlem4d 17571 to prove the induction step in mreexexd 17572. See the proof of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 to 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 (¬ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∧ ((𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∪ (𝐻 ∪ {𝑔})) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexlem3d 17570*	Base case of the induction in mreexexd 17572. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = ∅ ∨ 𝐺 = ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexlem4d 17571*	Induction step of the induction in mreexexd 17572. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀ℎ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)∀𝑔 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)(((𝑓 ≈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑔 ≈ 𝐿) ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑔 ∪ ℎ)) ∧ (𝑓 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝑔(𝑓 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ suc 𝐿 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ suc 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexd 17572*	Exchange-type theorem. In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝐹 and 𝐺 are disjoint from 𝐻, (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) is independent, 𝐹 is contained in the closure of (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻), and either 𝐹 or 𝐺 is finite, then there is a subset 𝑞 of 𝐺 equinumerous to 𝐹 such that (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) is independent. This implies the case of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 where either (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) or (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) is finite. The theorem is proven by induction using mreexexlem3d 17570 for the base case and mreexexlem4d 17571 for the induction step. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) Remove dependencies on ax-rep 5221 and ax-ac2 10376. (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝐺 ∈ Fin))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑞 ∧ (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexdomd 17573*	In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝑆 is independent and contained in the closure of 𝑇, and either 𝑆 or 𝑇 is finite, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This is an immediate consequence of mreexexd 17572. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝑇 ∈ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇)
Theorem	mreexfidimd 17574*	In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is finite, then they are equinumerous. Proven by using mreexdomd 17573 twice. This implies a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
7.2.3  Algebraic closure systems
Theorem	isacs 17575*	A set is an algebraic closure system iff it is specified by some function of the finite subsets, such that a set is closed iff it does not expand under the operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∪ (𝑓 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠))))
Theorem	acsmre 17576	Algebraic closure systems are closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
Theorem	isacs2 17577*	In the definition of an algebraic closure system, we may always take the operation being closed over as the Moore closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑠)))
Theorem	acsfiel 17578*	A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆)))
Theorem	acsfiel2 17579*	A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆))
Theorem	acsmred 17580	An algebraic closure system is also a Moore system. Deduction form of acsmre 17576. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
Theorem	isacs1i 17581*	A closure system determined by a function is a closure system and algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋) → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	mreacs 17582	Algebraicity is a composable property; combining several algebraic closure properties gives another. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (ACS‘𝑋) ∈ (Moore‘𝒫 𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn 17583*	Algebraicity of a conditional point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎)} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn0 17584*	Algebraicity of a point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn1 17585*	Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn1c 17586*	Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition with additional constant. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn2 17587*	Algebraicity of a two-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
PART 8  BASIC CATEGORY THEORY
8.1  Categories
8.1.1  Categories
Syntax	ccat 17588	Extend class notation with the class of categories.
class Cat
Syntax	ccid 17589	Extend class notation with the identity arrow of a category.
class Id
Syntax	chomf 17590	Extend class notation to include functionalized Hom-set extractor.
class Homf
Syntax	ccomf 17591	Extend class notation to include functionalized composition operation.
class compf
Definition	df-cat 17592*	A category is an abstraction of a structure (a group, a topology, an order...) Category theory consists in finding new formulation of the concepts associated with those structures (product, substructure...) using morphisms instead of the belonging relation. That trick has the interesting property that heterogeneous structures like topologies or groups for instance become comparable. Definition in [Lang] p. 53, without the axiom CAT 1, i.e., pairwise disjointness of hom-sets (cat1 18022). See setc2obas 18019 and setc2ohom 18020 for a counterexample. In contrast to definition 3.1 of [Adamek] p. 21, where "A category is a quadruple A = (O, hom, id, o)", a category is defined as an extensible structure consisting of three slots: the objects "O" ((Base‘𝑐)), the morphisms "hom" ((Hom ‘𝑐)) and the composition law "o" ((comp‘𝑐)). The identities "id" are defined by their properties related to morphisms and their composition, see condition 3.1(b) in [Adamek] p. 21 and df-cid 17593. (Note: in category theory morphisms are also called arrows.) (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Cat = {𝑐 ∣ [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ][(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑧)((𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝑜𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩𝑜𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝑜𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩𝑜𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝑜𝑧)𝑓))))}
Definition	df-cid 17593*	Define the category identity arrow. Since it is uniquely defined when it exists, we do not need to add it to the data of the category, and instead extract it by uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Id = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ⦌⦋(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜⦌(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))))
Definition	df-homf 17594*	Define the functionalized Hom-set operator, which is exactly like Hom but is guaranteed to be a function on the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Homf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦)))
Definition	df-comf 17595*	Define the functionalized composition operator, which is exactly like comp but is guaranteed to be a function of the proper type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ compf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥(comp‘𝑐)𝑦)𝑓))))
Theorem	iscat 17596*	The predicate "is a category". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)((𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓))))))
Theorem	iscatd 17597*	Properties that determine a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧))) → (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤))) → ((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	catidex 17598*	Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))
Theorem	catideu 17599*	Each object in a category has a unique identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))
Theorem	cidfval 17600*	Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))))