Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 176 of 466) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29289) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29290-30812) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30813-46532) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | oppcinv 17501 | An inverse in the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Inv‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐽𝑌) = (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | oppciso 17502 | An isomorphism in the opposite category. See also remark 3.9 in [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Iso‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐽𝑌) = (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | sectmon 17503 | If 𝐹 is a section of 𝐺, then 𝐹 is a monomorphism. A monomorphism that arises from a section is also known as a split monomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | monsect 17504 | If 𝐹 is a monomorphism and 𝐺 is a section of 𝐹, then 𝐺 is an inverse of 𝐹 and they are both isomorphisms. This is also stated as "a monomorphism which is also a split epimorphism is an isomorphism". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑌𝑆𝑋)𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺) | ||
Theorem | sectepi 17505 | If 𝐹 is a section of 𝐺, then 𝐺 is an epimorphism. An epimorphism that arises from a section is also known as a split epimorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐸𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | episect 17506 | If 𝐹 is an epimorphism and 𝐹 is a section of 𝐺, then 𝐺 is an inverse of 𝐹 and they are both isomorphisms. This is also stated as "an epimorphism which is also a split monomorphism is an isomorphism". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐸𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺) | ||
Theorem | sectid 17507 | The identity is a section of itself. (Contributed by AV, 8-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋)(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)(𝐼‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | invid 17508 | The inverse of the identity is the identity. (Contributed by AV, 8-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋)(𝑋(Inv‘𝐶)𝑋)(𝐼‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | idiso 17509 | The identity is an isomorphism. Example 3.13 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by AV, 8-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | idinv 17510 | The inverse of the identity is the identity. Example 3.13 of [Adamek] p. 28. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(Inv‘𝐶)𝑋)‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = (𝐼‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | invisoinvl 17511 | The inverse of an isomorphism 𝐹 (which is unique because of invf 17489 and is therefore denoted by ((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝐹), see also remark 3.12 in [Adamek] p. 28) is invers to the isomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝐹)(𝑌𝑁𝑋)𝐹) | ||
Theorem | invisoinvr 17512 | The inverse of an isomorphism is invers to the isomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | invcoisoid 17513 | The inverse of an isomorphism composed with the isomorphism is the identity. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ ⚬ = (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝐹) ⚬ 𝐹) = ( 1 ‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | isocoinvid 17514 | The inverse of an isomorphism composed with the isomorphism is the identity. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ ⚬ = (〈𝑌, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⚬ ((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝐹)) = ( 1 ‘𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | rcaninv 17515 | Right cancellation of an inverse of an isomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌(Iso‘𝐶)𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑌𝑁𝑋)‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⚬ = (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ⚬ 𝑅) = (𝐻 ⚬ 𝑅) → 𝐺 = 𝐻)) | ||
In this subsection, the "is isomorphic to" relation between objects of a category ≃𝑐 is defined (see df-cic 17517). It is shown that this relation is an equivalence relation, see cicer 17527. | ||
Syntax | ccic 17516 | Extend class notation to include the category isomorphism relation. |
class ≃𝑐 | ||
Definition | df-cic 17517 | Function returning the set of isomorphic objects for each category 𝑐. Definition 3.15 of [Adamek] p. 29. Analogous to the definition of the group isomorphism relation ≃𝑔, see df-gic 18885. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ≃𝑐 = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ((Iso‘𝑐) supp ∅)) | ||
Theorem | cicfval 17518 | The set of isomorphic objects of the category 𝑐. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) = ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅)) | ||
Theorem | brcic 17519 | The relation "is isomorphic to" for categories. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑌 ↔ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | cic 17520* | Objects 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a category are isomorphic provided that there is an isomorphism 𝑓:𝑋⟶𝑌, see definition 3.15 of [Adamek] p. 29. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | brcici 17521 | Prove that two objects are isomorphic by an explicit isomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑌) | ||
Theorem | cicref 17522 | Isomorphism is reflexive. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) → 𝑂( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑂) | ||
Theorem | ciclcl 17523 | Isomorphism implies the left side is an object. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑅( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑆) → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cicrcl 17524 | Isomorphism implies the right side is an object. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑅( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cicsym 17525 | Isomorphism is symmetric. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑅( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑆) → 𝑆( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑅) | ||
Theorem | cictr 17526 | Isomorphism is transitive. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑅( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑆 ∧ 𝑆( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑇) → 𝑅( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑇) | ||
Theorem | cicer 17527 | Isomorphism is an equivalence relation on objects of a category. Remark 3.16 in [Adamek] p. 29. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) Er (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
Syntax | cssc 17528 | Extend class notation to include the subset relation for subcategories. |
class ⊆cat | ||
Syntax | cresc 17529 | Extend class notation to include category restriction (which is like structure restriction but also allows limiting the collection of morphisms). |
class ↾cat | ||
Syntax | csubc 17530 | Extend class notation to include the collection of subcategories of a category. |
class Subcat | ||
Definition | df-ssc 17531* | Define the subset relation for subcategories. Despite the name, this is not really a "category-aware" definition, which is to say it makes no explicit references to homsets or composition; instead this is a subset-like relation on the functions that are used as subcategory specifications in df-subc 17533, which makes it play an analogous role to the subset relation applied to the subgroups of a group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ⊆cat = {〈ℎ, 𝑗〉 ∣ ∃𝑡(𝑗 Fn (𝑡 × 𝑡) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑡ℎ ∈ X𝑥 ∈ (𝑠 × 𝑠)𝒫 (𝑗‘𝑥))} | ||
Definition | df-resc 17532* | Define the restriction of a category to a given set of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ↾cat = (𝑐 ∈ V, ℎ ∈ V ↦ ((𝑐 ↾s dom dom ℎ) sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ℎ〉)) | ||
Definition | df-subc 17533* | (Subcat‘𝐶) is the set of all the subcategory specifications of the category 𝐶. Like df-subg 18761, this is not actually a collection of categories (as in definition 4.1(a) of [Adamek] p. 48), but only sets which when given operations from the base category (using df-resc 17532) form a category. All the objects and all the morphisms of the subcategory belong to the supercategory. The identity of an object, the domain and the codomain of a morphism are the same in the subcategory and the supercategory. The composition of the subcategory is a restriction of the composition of the supercategory. (Contributed by FL, 17-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Subcat = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ {ℎ ∣ (ℎ ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝑐) ∧ [dom dom ℎ / 𝑠]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 (((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑧)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉(comp‘𝑐)𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑧)))}) | ||
Theorem | sscrel 17534 | The subcategory subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Rel ⊆cat | ||
Theorem | brssc 17535* | The subcategory subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐽 ↔ ∃𝑡(𝐽 Fn (𝑡 × 𝑡) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑡𝐻 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ (𝑠 × 𝑠)𝒫 (𝐽‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | sscpwex 17536* | An analogue of pwex 5304 for the subcategory subset relation: The collection of subcategory subsets of a given set 𝐽 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ {ℎ ∣ ℎ ⊆cat 𝐽} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | subcrcl 17537 | Reverse closure for the subcategory predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | sscfn1 17538 | The subcategory subset relation is defined on functions with square domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = dom dom 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | sscfn2 17539 | The subcategory subset relation is defined on functions with square domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = dom dom 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑇 × 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | ssclem 17540 | Lemma for ssc1 17542 and similar theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∈ V ↔ 𝑆 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | isssc 17541* | Value of the subcategory subset relation when the arguments are known functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑇 × 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐽 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ⊆ (𝑥𝐽𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | ssc1 17542 | Infer subset relation on objects from the subcategory subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑇 × 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | ssc2 17543 | Infer subset relation on morphisms from the subcategory subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | sscres 17544 | Any function restricted to a square domain is a subcategory subset of the original. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐻 ↾ (𝑇 × 𝑇)) ⊆cat 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | sscid 17545 | The subcategory subset relation is reflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐻 ⊆cat 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | ssctr 17546 | The subcategory subset relation is transitive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆cat 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆cat 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆cat 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | ssceq 17547 | The subcategory subset relation is antisymmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆cat 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆cat 𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rescval 17548 | Value of the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐷 = ((𝐶 ↾s dom dom 𝐻) sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉)) | ||
Theorem | rescval2 17549 | Value of the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = ((𝐶 ↾s 𝑆) sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉)) | ||
Theorem | rescbas 17550 | Base set of the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | rescbasOLD 17551 | Obsolete version of rescbas 17550 as of 18-Oct-2024. Base set of the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | reschom 17552 | Hom-sets of the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | reschomf 17553 | Hom-sets of the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | rescco 17554 | Composition in the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | resccoOLD 17555 | Obsolete proof of rescco 17554 as of 14-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | rescabs 17556 | Restriction absorption law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑇 × 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) ↾cat 𝐽) = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽)) | ||
Theorem | rescabsOLD 17557 | Obsolete proof of seqp1d 13747 as of 10-Nov-2024. Restriction absorption law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑇 × 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) ↾cat 𝐽) = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽)) | ||
Theorem | rescabs2 17558 | Restriction absorption law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑇 × 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ↾s 𝑆) ↾cat 𝐽) = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽)) | ||
Theorem | issubc 17559* | Elementhood in the set of subcategories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = dom dom 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) ↔ (𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (( 1 ‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐽𝑧)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))))) | ||
Theorem | issubc2 17560* | Elementhood in the set of subcategories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) ↔ (𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (( 1 ‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐽𝑧)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))))) | ||
Theorem | 0ssc 17561 | For any category 𝐶, the empty set is a subcategory subset of 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | 0subcat 17562 | For any category 𝐶, the empty set is a (full) subcategory of 𝐶, see example 4.3(1.a) in [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | catsubcat 17563 | For any category 𝐶, 𝐶 itself is a (full) subcategory of 𝐶, see example 4.3(1.b) in [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Homf ‘𝐶) ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | subcssc 17564 | An element in the set of subcategories is a subset of the category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | subcfn 17565 | An element in the set of subcategories is a binary function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = dom dom 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | subcss1 17566 | The objects of a subcategory are a subset of the objects of the original. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | subcss2 17567 | The morphisms of a subcategory are a subset of the morphisms of the original. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐽𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | subcidcl 17568 | The identity of the original category is contained in each subcategory. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | subccocl 17569 | A subcategory is closed under composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐽𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | subccatid 17570* | A subcategory is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ( 1 ‘𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | subcid 17571 | The identity in a subcategory is the same as the original category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = ((Id‘𝐷)‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | subccat 17572 | A subcategory is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | issubc3 17573* | Alternate definition of a subcategory, as a subset of the category which is itself a category. The assumption that the identity be closed is necessary just as in the case of a monoid, issubm2 18452, for the same reasons, since categories are a generalization of monoids. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) ↔ (𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ( 1 ‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cat))) | ||
Theorem | fullsubc 17574 | The full subcategory generated by a subset of objects is the category with these objects and the same morphisms as the original. The result is always a subcategory (and it is full, meaning that all morphisms of the original category between objects in the subcategory is also in the subcategory), see definition 4.1(2) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fullresc 17575 | The category formed by structure restriction is the same as the category restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 ↾cat (𝐻 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘𝐷) = (Homf ‘𝐸) ∧ (compf‘𝐷) = (compf‘𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | resscat 17576 | A category restricted to a smaller set of objects is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐶 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | subsubc 17577 | A subcategory of a subcategory is a subcategory. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) → (𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐽 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻))) | ||
Syntax | cfunc 17578 | Extend class notation with the class of all functors. |
class Func | ||
Syntax | cidfu 17579 | Extend class notation with identity functor. |
class idfunc | ||
Syntax | ccofu 17580 | Extend class notation with functor composition. |
class ∘func | ||
Syntax | cresf 17581 | Extend class notation to include restriction of a functor to a subcategory. |
class ↾f | ||
Definition | df-func 17582* | Function returning all the functors from a category 𝑡 to a category 𝑢. Definition 3.17 of [Adamek] p. 29, and definition in [Lang] p. 62 ("covariant functor"). Intuitively a functor associates any morphism of 𝑡 to a morphism of 𝑢, any object of 𝑡 to an object of 𝑢, and respects the identity, the composition, the domain and the codomain. Here to capture the idea that a functor associates any object of 𝑡 to an object of 𝑢 we write it associates any identity of 𝑡 to an identity of 𝑢 which simplifies the definition. According to remark 3.19 in [Adamek] p. 30, "a functor F : A -> B is technically a family of functions; one from Ob(A) to Ob(B) [here: f, called "the object part" in the following], and for each pair (A,A') of A-objects, one from hom(A,A') to hom(FA, FA') [here: g, called "the morphism part" in the following]". (Contributed by FL, 10-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Func = (𝑡 ∈ Cat, 𝑢 ∈ Cat ↦ {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ [(Base‘𝑡) / 𝑏](𝑓:𝑏⟶(Base‘𝑢) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏)(((𝑓‘(1st ‘𝑧))(Hom ‘𝑢)(𝑓‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m ((Hom ‘𝑡)‘𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 (((𝑥𝑔𝑥)‘((Id‘𝑡)‘𝑥)) = ((Id‘𝑢)‘(𝑓‘𝑥)) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑚 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑡)𝑦)∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝑡)𝑧)((𝑥𝑔𝑧)‘(𝑛(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉(comp‘𝑡)𝑧)𝑚)) = (((𝑦𝑔𝑧)‘𝑛)(〈(𝑓‘𝑥), (𝑓‘𝑦)〉(comp‘𝑢)(𝑓‘𝑧))((𝑥𝑔𝑦)‘𝑚))))}) | ||
Definition | df-idfu 17583* | Define the identity functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ idfunc = (𝑡 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑡) / 𝑏⦌〈( I ↾ 𝑏), (𝑧 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏) ↦ ( I ↾ ((Hom ‘𝑡)‘𝑧)))〉) | ||
Definition | df-cofu 17584* | Define the composition of two functors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ∘func = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑔) ∘ (1st ‘𝑓)), (𝑥 ∈ dom dom (2nd ‘𝑓), 𝑦 ∈ dom dom (2nd ‘𝑓) ↦ ((((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝑔)((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)))〉) | ||
Definition | df-resf 17585* | Define the restriction of a functor to a subcategory (analogue of df-res 5602). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ↾f = (𝑓 ∈ V, ℎ ∈ V ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑓) ↾ dom dom ℎ), (𝑥 ∈ dom ℎ ↦ (((2nd ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↾ (ℎ‘𝑥)))〉) | ||
Theorem | relfunc 17586 | The set of functors is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Rel (𝐷 Func 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | funcrcl 17587 | Reverse closure for a functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝐷 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝐸 ∈ Cat)) | ||
Theorem | isfunc 17588* | Value of the set of functors between two categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑥𝐺𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)) = (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑚 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)((𝑥𝐺𝑧)‘(𝑛(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑚)) = (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑛)(〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)〉𝑂(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑚)))))) | ||
Theorem | isfuncd 17589* | Deduce that an operation is a functor of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)) = (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑥))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑚 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧))) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)‘(𝑛(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑚)) = (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑛)(〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)〉𝑂(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑚))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
Theorem | funcf1 17590 | The object part of a functor is a function on objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶) | ||
Theorem | funcixp 17591* | The morphism part of a functor is a function on homsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | funcf2 17592 | The morphism part of a functor is a function on homsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)⟶((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | funcfn2 17593 | The morphism part of a functor is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | funcid 17594 | A functor maps each identity to the corresponding identity in the target category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑋)‘( 1 ‘𝑋)) = (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | funcco 17595 | A functor maps composition in the source category to composition in the target. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝑁(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝑀)) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝑁)(〈(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐹‘𝑌)〉𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | funcsect 17596 | The image of a section under a functor is a section. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (Sect‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝑋)𝑇(𝐹‘𝑌))((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | funcinv 17597 | The image of an inverse under a functor is an inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Inv‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀(𝑋𝐼𝑌)𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | funciso 17598 | The image of an isomorphism under a functor is an isomorphism. Proposition 3.21 of [Adamek] p. 32. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Iso‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑀) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | funcoppc 17599 | A functor on categories yields a functor on the opposite categories (in the same direction), see definition 3.41 of [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)tpos 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | idfuval 17600* | Value of the identity functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = 〈( I ↾ 𝐵), (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧)))〉) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |