Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 176 of 462) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28971) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28972-30494) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30495-46134) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Syntax | choma 17501 | Extend class notation to include the set of all arrows with a specific domain and codomain. |
class Homa | ||
Definition | df-doma 17502 | Definition of the domain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ doma = (1st ∘ 1st ) | ||
Definition | df-coda 17503 | Definition of the codomain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ coda = (2nd ∘ 1st ) | ||
Definition | df-homa 17504* | Definition of the hom-set extractor for arrows, which tags the morphisms of the underlying hom-set with domain and codomain, which can then be extracted using df-doma 17502 and df-coda 17503. (Contributed by FL, 6-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Homa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)) ↦ ({𝑥} × ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥)))) | ||
Definition | df-arw 17505 | Definition of the set of arrows of a category. We will use the term "arrow" to denote a morphism tagged with its domain and codomain, as opposed to Hom, which allows hom-sets for distinct objects to overlap. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Arrow = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ∪ ran (Homa‘𝑐)) | ||
Theorem | homarcl 17506 | Reverse closure for an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | homafval 17507* | Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ({𝑥} × (𝐽‘𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | homaf 17508 | Functionality of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐵 × 𝐵)⟶𝒫 ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × V)) | ||
Theorem | homaval 17509 | Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = ({〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} × (𝑋𝐽𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | elhoma 17510 | Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝑍 = 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)))) | ||
Theorem | elhomai 17511 | Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹) | ||
Theorem | elhomai2 17512 | Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐹〉 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | homarcl2 17513 | Reverse closure for the domain and codomain of an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | homarel 17514 | An arrow is an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐻𝑌) | ||
Theorem | homa1 17515 | The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝑍 = 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉) | ||
Theorem | homahom2 17516 | The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | homahom 17517 | The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | homadm 17518 | The domain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | homacd 17519 | The codomain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | homadmcd 17520 | Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐹 = 〈𝑋, 𝑌, (2nd ‘𝐹)〉) | ||
Theorem | arwval 17521 | The set of arrows is the union of all the disjointified hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ran 𝐻 | ||
Theorem | arwrcl 17522 | The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | arwhoma 17523 | An arrow is contained in the hom-set corresponding to its domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐻(coda‘𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | homarw 17524 | A hom-set is a subset of the collection of all arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | arwdm 17525 | The domain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (doma‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | arwcd 17526 | The codomain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (coda‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dmaf 17527 | The domain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (doma ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cdaf 17528 | The codomain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (coda ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵 | ||
Theorem | arwhom 17529 | The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | arwdmcd 17530 | Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 = 〈(doma‘𝐹), (coda‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)〉) | ||
Syntax | cida 17531 | Extend class notation to include identity for arrows. |
class Ida | ||
Syntax | ccoa 17532 | Extend class notation to include composition for arrows. |
class compa | ||
Definition | df-ida 17533* | Definition of the identity arrow, which is just the identity morphism tagged with its domain and codomain. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Ida = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ 〈𝑥, 𝑥, ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)〉)) | ||
Definition | df-coa 17534* | Definition of the composition of arrows. Since arrows are tagged with domain and codomain, this does not need to be a quinary operation like the regular composition in a category comp. Instead, it is a partial binary operation on arrows, which is defined when the domain of the first arrow matches the codomain of the second. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ compa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ 〈(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(〈(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)〉(comp‘𝑐)(coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))〉)) | ||
Theorem | idafval 17535* | Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈𝑥, 𝑥, ( 1 ‘𝑥)〉)) | ||
Theorem | idaval 17536 | Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = 〈𝑋, 𝑋, ( 1 ‘𝑋)〉) | ||
Theorem | ida2 17537 | Morphism part of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = ( 1 ‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | idahom 17538 | Domain and codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | idadm 17539 | Domain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (doma‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | idacd 17540 | Codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (coda‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | idaf 17541 | The identity arrow function is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:𝐵⟶𝐴) | ||
Theorem | coafval 17542* | The value of the composition of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ · = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ 〈(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(〈(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)〉 ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))〉) | ||
Theorem | eldmcoa 17543 | A pair 〈𝐺, 𝐹〉 is in the domain of the arrow composition, if the domain of 𝐺 equals the codomain of 𝐹. (In this case we say 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺dom · 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | dmcoass 17544 | The domain of composition is a collection of pairs of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ dom · ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | homdmcoa 17545 | If 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 and 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍, then 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom · 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | coaval 17546 | Value of composition for composable arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = 〈𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))〉) | ||
Theorem | coa2 17547 | The morphism part of arrow composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺 · 𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | coahom 17548 | The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | coapm 17549 | Composition of arrows is a partial binary operation on arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ · ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm (𝐴 × 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | arwlid 17550 | Left identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌) · 𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | arwrid 17551 | Right identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 · ( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | arwass 17552 | Associativity of composition in a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝐺) · 𝐹) = (𝐾 · (𝐺 · 𝐹))) | ||
Syntax | csetc 17553 | Extend class notation to include the category Set. |
class SetCat | ||
Definition | df-setc 17554* | Definition of the category Set, relativized to a subset 𝑢. Example 3.3(1) of [Adamek] p. 22. This is the category of all sets in 𝑢 and functions between these sets. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Contributed by FL, 8-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ SetCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑢〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))〉}) | ||
Theorem | setcval 17555* | Value of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑈〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) | ||
Theorem | setcbas 17556 | Set of objects of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | setchomfval 17557* | Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | setchom 17558 | Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | elsetchom 17559 | A morphism of sets is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | setccofval 17560* | Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))) | ||
Theorem | setcco 17561 | Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | setccatid 17562* | Lemma for setccat 17563. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ( I ↾ 𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | setccat 17563 | The category of sets is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | setcid 17564 | The identity arrow in the category of sets is the identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = ( I ↾ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | setcmon 17565 | A monomorphism of sets is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–1-1→𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | setcepi 17566 | An epimorphism of sets is a surjection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2o ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐸𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–onto→𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | setcsect 17567 | A section in the category of sets, written out. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑋 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝑋)))) | ||
Theorem | setcinv 17568 | An inverse in the category of sets is the converse operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌 ∧ 𝐺 = ◡𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | setciso 17569 | An isomorphism in the category of sets is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | resssetc 17570 | The restriction of the category of sets to a subset is the category of sets in the subset. Thus, the SetCat‘𝑈 categories for different 𝑈 are full subcategories of each other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ∧ (compf‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (compf‘𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | funcsetcres2 17571 | A functor into a smaller category of sets is a functor into the larger category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 Func 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐸 Func 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | setc2obas 17572 | ∅ and 1o are distinct objects in (SetCat‘2o). This combined with setc2ohom 17573 demonstrates that the category does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets. See also df-cat 17143 and cat1 17575. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘2o) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 1o ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | setc2ohom 17573 | (SetCat‘2o) is a category (provable from setccat 17563 and 2oex 8208) that does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets, proved by this theorem combined with setc2obas 17572. Notably, the empty set ∅ is simultaneously an object (setc2obas 17572) , an identity morphism from ∅ to ∅ (setcid 17564 or thincid 45941) , and a non-identity morphism from ∅ to 1o. See cat1lem 17574 and cat1 17575 for a more general statement. This category is also thin (setc2othin 45964), and therefore is "equivalent" to a preorder (actually a partial order). See prsthinc 45962 for more details on the "equivalence". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘2o) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∅ ∈ ((∅𝐻∅) ∩ (∅𝐻1o)) | ||
Theorem | cat1lem 17574* | The category of sets in a "universe" containing the empty set and another set does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets as required in Axiom CAT 1 in [Lang] p. 53. Lemma for cat1 17575. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∩ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)) ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))) | ||
Theorem | cat1 17575* | The definition of category df-cat 17143 does not impose pairwise disjoint hom-sets as required in Axiom CAT 1 in [Lang] p. 53. See setc2obas 17572 and setc2ohom 17573 for a counterexample. For a version with pairwise disjoint hom-sets, see df-homa 17504 and its subsection. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ] ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 (((𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∩ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)) ≠ ∅ → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) | ||
Syntax | ccatc 17576 | Extend class notation to include the category Cat. |
class CatCat | ||
Definition | df-catc 17577* | Definition of the category Cat, which consists of all categories in the universe 𝑢 (i.e. "𝑢-small categories", see definition 3.44. of [Adamek] p. 39), with functors as the morphisms. Definition 3.47 of [Adamek] p. 40. We do not introduce a specific definition for "𝑢 -large categories", which can be expressed as (Cat ∖ 𝑢). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ CatCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑢 ∩ Cat) / 𝑏⦌{〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑏〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))〉}) | ||
Theorem | catcval 17578* | Value of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑈 ∩ Cat)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), · 〉}) | ||
Theorem | catcbas 17579 | Set of objects of the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑈 ∩ Cat)) | ||
Theorem | catchomfval 17580* | Set of arrows of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | catchom 17581 | Set of arrows of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑋 Func 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | catccofval 17582* | Composition in the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))) | ||
Theorem | catcco 17583 | Composition in the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 Func 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌 Func 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | catccatid 17584* | Lemma for catccat 17586. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (idfunc‘𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | catcid 17585 | The identity arrow in the category of categories is the identity functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = 𝐼) | ||
Theorem | catccat 17586 | The category of categories is a category, see remark 3.48 in [Adamek] p. 40. (Clearly it cannot be an element of itself, hence it is "𝑈 -large".) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | resscatc 17587 | The restriction of the category of categories to a subset is the category of categories in the subset. Thus, the CatCat‘𝑈 categories for different 𝑈 are full subcategories of each other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (CatCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ∧ (compf‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (compf‘𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | catcisolem 17588* | Lemma for catciso 17589. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ◡((◡𝐹‘𝑥)𝐺(◡𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹((𝑋 Full 𝑌) ∩ (𝑋 Faith 𝑌))𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅–1-1-onto→𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐹, 𝐺〉(𝑋𝐼𝑌)〈◡𝐹, 𝐻〉) | ||
Theorem | catciso 17589 | A functor is an isomorphism of categories if and only if it is full and faithful, and is a bijection on the objects. Remark 3.28(2) in [Adamek] p. 34. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ ((𝑋 Full 𝑌) ∩ (𝑋 Faith 𝑌)) ∧ (1st ‘𝐹):𝑅–1-1-onto→𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | catcbascl 17590 | An element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 17595. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | catcslotelcl 17591 | A slot entry of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 17595. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | catcbaselcl 17592 | The base set of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 17595. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | catchomcl 17593 | The Hom-set of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 17595. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Hom ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | catcccocl 17594 | The composition operation of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 17595. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | catcoppccl 17595 | The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under taking opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | catcoppcclOLD 17596 | Obsolete proof of catcoppccl 17595 as of 13-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | catcfuccl 17597 | The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under the functor category operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑋 FuncCat 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | catcfucclOLD 17598 | Obsolete proof of catcfuccl 17597 as of 14-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑋 FuncCat 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
The "category of extensible structures" ExtStrCat is the category of all sets in a universe regarded as extensible structures and the functions between their base sets, see df-estrc 17602. Since we consider only "small categories" (i.e. categories whose objects and morphisms are actually sets and not proper classes), the objects of the category (i.e. the base set of the category regarded as extensible structure) are all sets in a universe 𝑢, which can be an arbitrary set, see estrcbas 17604. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. If a set is not a real extensible structure, it is regarded as extensible structure with an empty base set. Because of bascnvimaeqv 17600 we do not need to restrict the universe to sets which "have a base". The morphisms (or arrows) between two objects, i.e. sets from the universe, are the mappings between their base sets, see estrchomfval 17605, whereas the composition is the ordinary composition of functions, see estrccofval 17608 and estrcco 17609. It is shown that the category of extensible structures ExtStrCat is actually a category, see estrccat 17612 with the identity function as identity arrow, see estrcid 17613. In the following, some background information about the category of extensible structures is given, taken from the discussion in Github issue #1507 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1507 17613): At the beginning, the categories of non-unital rings RngCat and unital rings RingCat were defined separately (as unordered triples of ordereds pairs, see dfrngc2 45157 and dfringc2 45203, but with special compositions). With this definitions, however, Theorem rngcresringcat 45215 could not be proven, because the compositions were not compatible. Unfortunately, no precise definition of the composition within the category of rings could be found in the literature. In section 3.3 EXAMPLES, paragraph (2) of [Adamek] p. 22, however, a definition is given for "Grp", the category of groups: "The following constructs; i.e., categories of structured sets and structure-preserving functions between them (o will always be the composition of functions and idA will always be the identity function on A): ... (b) Grp with objects all groups and morphisms all homomorphisms between them." Therefore, the compositions should have been harmonized by using the composition of the category of sets SetCat, see df-setc 17554, which is the ordinary composition of functions. Analogously, categories of Rngs (and Rings) could have been shown to be restrictions resp. subcategories of the category of sets. BJ and MC observed, however, that "... ↾cat [cannot be used] to restrict the category Set to Ring, because the homs are different. Although Ring is a concrete category, a hom between rings R and S is a function (Base`R) --> (Base`S) with certain properties, unlike in Set where it is a function R --> S.". Therefore, MC suggested that "we could have an alternative version of the Set category consisting of extensible structures (in U) together with (A Hom B) := (Base`A) --> (Base`B). This category is not isomorphic to Set because different extensible structures can have the same base set, but it is equivalent to Set; the relevant functors are (U`A) = (Base`A), the forgetful functor, and (F`A) = { <. (Base`ndx), A >. }". This led to the current definition of ExtStrCat, see df-estrc 17602. The claimed equivalence is proven by equivestrcsetc 17631. Having a definition of a category of extensible structures, the categories of non-unital and unital rings can be defined as appropriate restrictions of the category of extensible structures, see df-rngc 45144 and df-ringc 45190. In the same way, more subcategories could be provided, resulting in the following "inclusion chain" by proving theorems like rngcresringcat 45215, although the morphisms of the shown categories are different ( "->" means "is subcategory of"): RingCat-> RngCat-> GrpCat -> MndCat -> MgmCat -> ExtStrCat According to MC, "If we generalize from subcategories to embeddings, then we can even fit SetCat into the chain, equivalent to ExtStrCat at the end." As mentioned before, the equivalence of SetCat and ExtStrCat is proven by equivestrcsetc 17631. Furthermore, it can be shown that SetCat is embedded into ExtStrCat, see embedsetcestrc 17646. Remark: equivestrcsetc 17631 as well as embedsetcestrc 17646 require that the index of the base set extractor is contained within the considered universe. This is ensured by assuming that the natural numbers are contained within the considered universe: ω ∈ 𝑈 (see wunndx 16704), but it would be currently sufficient to assume that 1 ∈ 𝑈, because the index value of the base set extractor is hard-coded as 1, see basendx 16748. Some people, however, feel uncomfortable to say that a ring "is a" group (without mentioning the restriction to the addition, which is usually found in the literature, e.g., the definition of a ring in [Herstein] p. 126: "... Note that so far all we have said is that R is an abelian group under +.". The main argument against a ring being a group is the number of components/slots: usually, a group consists of (exactly!) two components (a base set and an operation), whereas a ring consists of (exactly!) three components (a base set and two operations). According to this "definition", a ring cannot be a group. This is also an (unfortunately informal) argument for the category of rings not being a subcategory of the category of abelian groups in "Categories and Functors", Bodo Pareigis, Academic Press, New York, London, 1970: "A category A is called a subcategory of a category B if Ob(A) ⊆ Ob(B) and MorA(X,Y) ⊆ MorB(X,Y) for all X,Y e. Ob(A), if the composition of morphisms in A coincides with the composition of the same morphisms in B and if the identity of an object in A is also the identity of the same object viewed as an object in B. Then there is a forgetful functor from A to B. We note that Ri [the category of rings] is not a subcategory of Ab [the category of abelian groups]. In fact, Ob(Ri) ⊆ Ob(Ab) is not true, although every ring can also be regarded as an abelian group. The corresponding abelian groups of two rings may coincide even if the rings do not coincide. The multiplication may be defined differently.". As long as we define Rings, Groups, etc. in a way that 𝐴 ∈ Ring → 𝐴 ∈ Grp is valid (see ringgrp 19539) the corresponding categories are in a subcategory relation. If we do not want Rings to be Groups (then the category of rings would not be a subcategory of the category of groups, as observed by Pareigis), we would have to change the definitions of Magmas, Monoids, Groups, Rings etc. to restrict them to have exactly the required number of slots, so that the following holds 𝑔 ∈ Grp → 𝑔 Struct 〈(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx)〉 𝑟 ∈ Ring → 𝑟 Struct 〈(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx), (.r‘ndx)〉 | ||
Theorem | fncnvimaeqv 17599 | The inverse images of the universal class V under functions on the universal class V are the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐹 Fn V → (◡𝐹 “ V) = V) | ||
Theorem | bascnvimaeqv 17600 | The inverse image of the universal class V under the base function is the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ (◡Base “ V) = V |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |