P. 176 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17501-17600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	clatglbcl2 17501	Any subset of the base set has a GLB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	clatl 17502	A complete lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) TODO: use eqrelrdv2 5466 to shorten proof and eliminate joindmss 17393 and meetdmss 17407?
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	isglbd 17503*	Properties that determine the greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐻 ≤ 𝑦)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CLat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝐻)
Theorem	lublem 17504*	Lemma for the least upper bound properties in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑧)))
Theorem	lubub 17505	The LUB of a complete lattice subset is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆))
Theorem	lubl 17506*	The LUB of a complete lattice subset is the least bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	lubss 17507	Subset law for least upper bounds. (chsupss 28773 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑈‘𝑇))
Theorem	lubel 17508	An element of a set is less than or equal to the least upper bound of the set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆))
Theorem	lubun 17509	The LUB of a union. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘(𝑆 ∪ 𝑇)) = ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑈‘𝑇)))
Theorem	clatglb 17510*	Properties of greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆))))
Theorem	clatglble 17511	The greatest lower bound is the least element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	clatleglb 17512*	Two ways of expressing "less than or equal to the greatest lower bound." (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	clatglbss 17513	Subset law for greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐺‘𝑇) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆))
9.2.3  The dual of an ordered set
Syntax	codu 17514	Class function defining dual orders.
class ODual
Definition	df-odu 17515	Define the dual of an ordered structure, which replaces the order component of the structure with its reverse. See odubas 17519, oduleval 17517, and oduleg 17518 for its principal properties. EDITORIAL: likely usable to simplify many lattice proofs, as it allows for duality arguments to be formalized; for instance latmass 17574. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ODual = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet ⟨(le‘ndx), ◡(le‘𝑤)⟩))
Theorem	oduval 17516	Value of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑂 sSet ⟨(le‘ndx), ◡ ≤ ⟩)
Theorem	oduleval 17517	Value of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ ◡ ≤ = (le‘𝐷)
Theorem	oduleg 17518	Truth of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (le‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	odubas 17519	Base set of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)
Theorem	pospropd 17520*	Posethood is determined only by structure components and only by the value of the relation within the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥(le‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Poset))
Theorem	odupos 17521	Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Poset → 𝐷 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	oduposb 17522	Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Poset))
Theorem	meet0 17523	Lemma for odujoin 17528. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 6883 update): This proof increased from 152 bytes to 547 bytes after the df-riota 6883 change. Any way to shorten it? join0 17524 also.
⊢ (meet‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	join0 17524	Lemma for odumeet 17526. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (join‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	oduglb 17525	Greatest lower bounds in a dual order are least upper bounds in the original order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = (glb‘𝐷))
Theorem	odumeet 17526	Meets in a dual order are joins in the original. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ ∨ = (meet‘𝐷)
Theorem	odulub 17527	Least upper bounds in a dual order are greatest lower bounds in the original order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (glb‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐷))
Theorem	odujoin 17528	Joins in a dual order are meets in the original. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ ∧ = (join‘𝐷)
Theorem	odulatb 17529	Being a lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Lat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Lat))
Theorem	oduclatb 17530	Being a complete lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ CLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ CLat)
Theorem	odulat 17531	Being a lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Lat → 𝐷 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	poslubmo 17532*	Least upper bounds in a poset are unique if they exist. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))
Theorem	posglbmo 17533*	Greatest lower bounds in a poset are unique if they exist. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	poslubd 17534*	Properties which determine the least upper bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇)
Theorem	poslubdg 17535*	Properties which determine the least upper bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇)
Theorem	posglbd 17536*	Properties which determine the greatest lower bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑇)
9.2.4  Subset order structures
Syntax	cipo 17537	Class function defining inclusion posets.
class toInc
Definition	df-ipo 17538*	For any family of sets, define the poset of that family ordered by inclusion. See ipobas 17541, ipolerval 17542, and ipole 17544 for its contract. EDITORIAL: I'm not thrilled with the name. Any suggestions? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ toInc = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} / 𝑜⦌({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑓⟩, ⟨(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘𝑜)⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), 𝑜⟩, ⟨(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑓 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑓 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})⟩}))
Theorem	ipostr 17539	The structure of df-ipo 17538 is a structure defining indices up to 11. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(TopSet‘ndx), 𝐽⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩, ⟨(oc‘ndx), ⊥ ⟩}) Struct ⟨1, ;11⟩
Theorem	ipoval 17540*	Value of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = ({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐹⟩, ⟨(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘ ≤ )⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩, ⟨(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})⟩}))
Theorem	ipobas 17541	Base set of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 = (Base‘𝐼))
Theorem	ipolerval 17542*	Relation of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} = (le‘𝐼))
Theorem	ipotset 17543	Topology of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (ordTop‘ ≤ ) = (TopSet‘𝐼))
Theorem	ipole 17544	Weak order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌))
Theorem	ipolt 17545	Strict order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊊ 𝑌))
Theorem	ipopos 17546	The inclusion poset on a family of sets is actually a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ Poset
Theorem	isipodrs 17547*	Condition for a family of sets to be directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑧))
Theorem	ipodrscl 17548	Direction by inclusion as used here implies sethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	ipodrsfi 17549*	Finite upper bound property for directed collections of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧)
Theorem	fpwipodrs 17550	The finite subsets of any set are directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (toInc‘(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) ∈ Dirset)
Theorem	ipodrsima 17551*	The monotone image of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑢) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑣))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘𝐵) ∈ Dirset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘(𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ∈ Dirset)
Theorem	isacs3lem 17552*	An algebraic closure system satisfies isacs3 17560. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	acsdrsel 17553	An algebraic closure system contains all directed unions of closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	isacs4lem 17554*	In a closure system in which directed unions of closed sets are closed, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))))
Theorem	isacs5lem 17555*	If closure commutes with directed unions, then the closure of a set is the closure of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin))))
Theorem	acsdrscl 17556	In an algebraic closure system, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑌) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑌))
Theorem	acsficl 17557	A closure in an algebraic closure system is the union of the closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)))
Theorem	isacs5 17558*	A closure system is algebraic iff the closure of a generating set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin))))
Theorem	isacs4 17559*	A closure system is algebraic iff closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑠))))
Theorem	isacs3 17560*	A closure system is algebraic iff directed unions of closed sets are closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	acsficld 17561	In an algebraic closure system, the closure of a set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. Deduction form of acsficl 17557. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝑁 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)))
Theorem	acsficl2d 17562*	In an algebraic closure system, an element is in the closure of a set if and only if it is in the closure of a finite subset. Alternate form of acsficl 17557. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑥)))
Theorem	acsfiindd 17563	In an algebraic closure system, a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are independent. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝐼))
Theorem	acsmapd 17564*	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑇 is contained in the closure of 𝑆, there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 contains 𝑇. This is proven by applying acsficl2d 17562 to each element of 𝑇. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘∪ ran 𝑓)))
Theorem	acsmap2d 17565*	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is independent, then there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that 𝑆 equals the union of ran 𝑓. This is proven by taking the map 𝑓 from acsmapd 17564 and observing that, since 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure, the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 must contain 𝑆. Since 𝑆 is independent, by mrissmrcd 16686, ∪ ran 𝑓 must equal 𝑆. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑆 = ∪ ran 𝑓))
Theorem	acsinfd 17566	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 is infinite. This follows from applying unirnffid 8546 to the map given in acsmap2d 17565. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	acsdomd 17567	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This follows from applying acsinfd 17566 and then applying unirnfdomd 9724 to the map given in acsmap2d 17565. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇)
Theorem	acsinfdimd 17568	In an algebraic closure system, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is infinite, then they are equinumerous. This is proven by using acsdomd 17567 twice with acsinfd 17566. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
Theorem	acsexdimd 17569*	In an algebraic closure system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure, they are equinumerous. See mreexfidimd 16696 for the finite case and acsinfdimd 17568 for the infinite case. This is a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
Theorem	mrelatglb 17570	Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈)
Theorem	mrelatglb0 17571	The empty intersection in a Moore space is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	mrelatlub 17572	Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈))
Theorem	mreclatBAD 17573*	A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 6883 update): Reprove using isclat 17495 instead of the isclatBAD. hypothesis. See commented-out mreclat above.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐼 ∈ Poset ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ (Base‘𝐼) → (((lub‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼) ∧ ((glb‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat)
9.2.5  Distributive lattices
Theorem	latmass 17574	Lattice meet is associative. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	latdisdlem 17575*	Lemma for latdisd 17576. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Lat → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑢 ∨ (𝑣 ∧ 𝑤)) = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑢 ∨ 𝑤)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧))))
Theorem	latdisd 17576*	In a lattice, joins distribute over meets if and only if meets distribute over joins; the distributive property is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Lat → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧))))
Syntax	cdlat 17577	The class of distributive lattices.
class DLat
Definition	df-dlat 17578*	A distributive lattice is a lattice in which meets distribute over joins, or equivalently (latdisd 17576) joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ DLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ [(Base‘𝑘) / 𝑏][(join‘𝑘) / 𝑗][(meet‘𝑘) / 𝑚]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑚(𝑦𝑗𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑚𝑦)𝑗(𝑥𝑚𝑧))}
Theorem	isdlat 17579*	Property of being a distributive lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧))))
Theorem	dlatmjdi 17580	In a distributive lattice, meets distribute over joins. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	dlatl 17581	A distributive lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	odudlatb 17582	The dual of a distributive lattice is a distributive lattice and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ DLat))
Theorem	dlatjmdi 17583	In a distributive lattice, joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍)))
9.2.6  Posets and lattices as relations
Syntax	cps 17584	Extend class notation with the class of all posets.
class PosetRel
Syntax	ctsr 17585	Extend class notation with the class of all totally ordered sets.
class TosetRel
Definition	df-ps 17586	Define the class of all posets (partially ordered sets) with weak ordering (e.g., "less than or equal to" instead of "less than"). A poset is a relation which is transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.)
⊢ PosetRel = {𝑟 ∣ (Rel 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∩ ◡𝑟) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟))}
Definition	df-tsr 17587	Define the class of all totally ordered sets. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.)
⊢ TosetRel = {𝑟 ∈ PosetRel ∣ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟) ⊆ (𝑟 ∪ ◡𝑟)}
Theorem	isps 17588	The predicate "is a poset" i.e. a transitive, reflexive, antisymmetric relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ (Rel 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅))))
Theorem	psrel 17589	A poset is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ PosetRel → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	psref2 17590	A poset is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅))
Theorem	pstr2 17591	A poset is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅)
Theorem	pslem 17592	Lemma for psref 17594 and others. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	psdmrn 17593	The domain and range of a poset equal its field. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅 ∧ ran 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅))
Theorem	psref 17594	A poset is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	psrn 17595	The range of a poset equals it domain. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑋 = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	psasym 17596	A poset is antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	pstr 17597	A poset is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	cnvps 17598	The converse of a poset is a poset. In the general case (◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel) is not true. See cnvpsb 17599 for a special case where the property holds. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	cnvpsb 17599	The converse of a poset is a poset. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel))
Theorem	psss 17600	Any subset of a partially ordered set is partially ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ PosetRel)