P. 447 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44601-44700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	frege98d 44601	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 98 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege98 44809. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege102d 44602	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 102 of [Frege1879] p. 72. Compare with frege102 44813. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege106d 44603	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 106 of [Frege1879] p. 73. Compare with frege106 44817. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege108d 44604	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 44819. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege109d 44605	If 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 109 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege109 44820. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege114d 44606	If either 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵 or 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵, 𝑅 relates 𝐵 and 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 114 of [Frege1879] p. 76. Compare with frege114 44825. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	frege111d 44607	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 and 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 111 of [Frege1879] p. 75. Compare with frege111 44822. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐴))
Theorem	frege122d 44608	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 is the successor of 𝑋, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same (or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹). Similar to Proposition 122 of [Frege1879] p. 79. Compare with frege122 44833. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege124d 44609	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 124 of [Frege1879] p. 80. Compare with frege124 44835. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege126d 44610	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 126 of [Frege1879] p. 81. Compare with frege126 44837. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
Theorem	frege129d 44611	If 𝐹 is a function and (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, the successor of 𝐴 is either 𝐵 or it follows 𝐵 or it comes before 𝐵 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 129 of [Frege1879] p. 83. Comparw with frege129 44840. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶(t+‘𝐹)𝐵))
Theorem	frege131d 44612	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements before or after those elements of 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then the image under 𝐹 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 131 of [Frege1879] p. 85. Compare with frege131 44842. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((◡(t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈) ∪ ((t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege133d 44613	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 and 𝐵 both follow 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹 (or both if it loops). Similar to Proposition 133 of [Frege1879] p. 86. Compare with frege133 44844. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
21.38.6  Propositions from _Begriffsschrift_ In 1879, Frege introduced notation for documenting formal reasoning about propositions (and classes) which covered elements of propositional logic, predicate calculus and reasoning about relations. However, due to the pitfalls of naive set theory, adapting this work for inclusion in set.mm required dividing statements about propositions from those about classes and identifying when a restriction to sets is required. For an overview comparing the details of Frege's two-dimensional notation and that used in set.mm, see mmfrege.html. See ru 3741 for discussion of an example of a class that is not a set. Numbered propositions from [Frege1879]. ax-frege1 44638, ax-frege2 44639, ax-frege8 44657, ax-frege28 44678, ax-frege31 44682, ax-frege41 44693, frege52 (see ax-frege52a 44705, frege52b 44737, and ax-frege52c 44736 for translations), frege54 (see ax-frege54a 44710, frege54b 44741 and ax-frege54c 44740 for translations) and frege58 (see ax-frege58a 44723, ax-frege58b 44749 and frege58c 44769 for translations) are considered "core" or axioms. However, at least ax-frege8 44657 can be derived from ax-frege1 44638 and ax-frege2 44639, see axfrege8 44655. Frege introduced implication, negation and the universal quantifier as primitives and did not in the numbered propositions use other logical connectives other than equivalence introduced in ax-frege52a 44705, frege52b 44737, and ax-frege52c 44736. In dffrege69 44780, Frege introduced 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 to say that relation 𝑅, when restricted to operate on elements of class 𝐴, will only have elements of class 𝐴 in its domain; see df-he 44621 for a definition in terms of image and subset. In dffrege76 44787, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌, which requires 𝑅 to also be a set. In dffrege99 44810, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets either identical or related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌, which is a superclass of sets related by the reflexive-transitive relation 𝑋(t*‘𝑅)𝑌. Finally, in dffrege115 44826, Frege introduced notation for the concept of a relation having the property elements in its domain pair up with only one element each in its range, for which we write Fun ◡◡𝑅 (to ignore any non-relational content of the class 𝑅). Frege did this without the expressing concept of a relation (or its transitive closure) as a class, and needed to invent conventions for discussing indeterminate propositions with two slots free and how to recognize which of the slots was domain and which was range. See mmfrege.html 44826 for details. English translations for specific propositions lifted in part from a translation by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg as reprinted in From Frege to Goedel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. An attempt to align these propositions in the larger set.mm database has also been made. See frege77d 44594 for an example.
21.38.6.1  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter I Section 2 introduces the turnstile ⊢ which turns an idea which may be true 𝜑 into an assertion that it does hold true ⊢ 𝜑. Section 5 introduces implication, (𝜑 → 𝜓). Section 6 introduces the single rule of interference relied upon, modus ponens ax-mp 5. Section 7 introduces negation and with in synonyms for or (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) , and ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓), and two for exclusive-or corresponding to df-or 862, df-an 402, dfxor4 44614, dfxor5 44615. Section 8 introduces the problematic notation for identity of conceptual content which must be separated into cases for biconditional (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) or class equality 𝐴 = 𝐵 in this adaptation. Section 10 introduces "truth functions" for one or two variables in equally troubling notation, as the arguments may be understood to be logical predicates or collections. Here f(𝜑) is interpreted to mean if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) where the content of the "function" is specified by the latter two arguments or logical equivalent, while g(𝐴) is read as 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and h(𝐴, 𝐵) as 𝐴𝐻𝐵. This necessarily introduces a need for set theory as both 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and 𝐴𝐻𝐵 cannot hold unless 𝐴 is a set. (Also 𝐵.) Section 11 introduces notation for generality, but there is no standard notation for generality when the variable is a proposition because it was realized after Frege that the universe of all possible propositions includes paradoxical constructions leading to the failure of naive set theory. So adopting f(𝜑) as if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) would result in the translation of ∀𝜑 f (𝜑) as (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒). For collections, we must generalize over set variables or run into the same problems; this leads to ∀𝐴 g(𝐴) being translated as ∀𝑎𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 and so forth. Under this interpreation the text of section 11 gives us sp 2221 (or simpl 488 and simpr 490 and anifp 1088 in the propositional case) and statements similar to cbvalivw 2040, ax-gen 1828, alrimiv 1960, and alrimdv 1962. These last four introduce a generality and have no useful definition in terms of propositional variables. Section 12 introduces some combinations of primitive symbols and their human language counterparts. Using class notation, these can also be expressed without dummy variables. All are A, ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 alex 1859, 𝐴 = V eqv 3463; Some are not B, ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 exnal 1860, 𝐵 ⊊ V pssv 4365, 𝐵 ≠ V nev 44618; There are no C, ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, ¬ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 alnex 1814, 𝐶 = ∅ eq0 4300; There exist D, ¬ ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 df-ex 1813, ∅ ⊊ 𝐷 0pss 4363, 𝐷 ≠ ∅ n0 4303. Notation for relations between expressions also can be written in various ways. All E are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) dfss6 3924, 𝐸 = (𝐸 ∩ 𝑃) dfss2 3920, 𝐸 ⊆ 𝑃 df-ss 3919; No F are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) alinexa 1876, (𝐹 ∩ 𝑃) = ∅ disj1 4408; Some G are not P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exanali 1892, (𝐺 ∩ 𝑃) ⊊ 𝐺 nssinpss 4216, ¬ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑃 nss 3998; Some H are P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exnalimn 1877, ∅ ⊊ (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) 0pssin 44619, (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) ≠ ∅ ndisj 4321.
Theorem	dfxor4 44614	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dfxor5 44615	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	df3or2 44616	Express triple-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3an2 44617	Express triple-and in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	nev 44618*	Express that not every set is in a class. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ V ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	0pssin 44619*	Express that an intersection is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (∅ ⊊ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21.38.6.2  _Begriffsschrift_ Notation hints The statement 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 means relation 𝑅 is hereditary (in the sense of Frege) in the class 𝐴 or (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴. The former is only a slight reduction in the number of symbols, but this reduces the number of floating hypotheses needed to be checked. As Frege was not using the language of classes or sets, this naturally differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on.
Syntax	whe 44620	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴.
wff 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴
Definition	df-he 44621	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfhe2 44622	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	dfhe3 44623*	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	heeq12 44624	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	heeq1 44625	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	heeq2 44626	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	sbcheg 44627	Distribute proper substitution through herditary relation. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 hereditary 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 hereditary ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	hess 44628	Subclass law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑅 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	xphe 44629	Any Cartesian product is hereditary in its second class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) hereditary 𝐵
Theorem	0he 44630	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	0heALT 44631	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	he0 44632	Any relation is hereditary in the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 hereditary ∅
Theorem	unhe1 44633	The union of two relations hereditary in a class is also hereditary in a class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴) → (𝑅 ∪ 𝑆) hereditary 𝐴)
Theorem	snhesn 44634	Any singleton is hereditary in any singleton. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩} hereditary {𝐵}
Theorem	idhe 44635	The identity relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ I hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	psshepw 44636	The relation between sets and their proper subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ◡ [⊊] hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	sshepw 44637	The relation between sets and their subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (◡ [⊊] ∪ I ) hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
21.38.6.3  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication
Axiom	ax-frege1 44638	The case in which 𝜑 is denied, 𝜓 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed is excluded. This is evident since 𝜑 cannot at the same time be denied and affirmed. Axiom 1 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-1 6. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege2 44639	If a proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of two propositions 𝜓 and 𝜑 and one of those, 𝜓, is in turn a necessary consequence of the other, 𝜑, then the proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the latter one, 𝜑, alone. Axiom 2 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-2 7. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-simp2-frege 44640	Simplification of triple conjunction. Compare with simp2 1155. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-simp2 44641	Simplification of triple conjunction. Identical to simp2 1155. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	rp-frege3g 44642	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 44639. More general statement than frege3 44643. Like ax-frege2 44639, it is essentially a closed form of mpd 16, however it has an extra antecedent. It would be more natural to prove from a1i 11 and ax-frege2 44639 in Metamath. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege3 44643	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 44639. Special case of rp-frege3g 44642. Proposition 3 of [Frege1879] p. 29. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	rp-misc1-frege 44644	Double-use of ax-frege2 44639. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-frege24 44645	Introducing an embedded antecedent. Alternate proof for frege24 44663. Closed form for a1d 26. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-frege4g 44646	Deduction related to distribution. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege4 44647	Special case of closed form of a2d 30. Special case of rp-frege4g 44646. Proposition 4 of [Frege1879] p. 31. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	frege5 44648	A closed form of syl 18. Identical to imim2 59. Theorem *2.05 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. Proposition 5 of [Frege1879] p. 32. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-7frege 44649	Distribute antecedent and add another. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜃 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-4frege 44650	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rp-6frege 44651	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃)) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-8frege 44652	Eliminate antecedent when it is implied by previous antecedent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-frege25 44653	Closed form for a1dd 51. Alternate route to Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege6 44654	A closed form of imim2d 58 which is a deduction adding nested antecedents. Proposition 6 of [Frege1879] p. 33. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	axfrege8 44655	Swap antecedents. Identical to pm2.04 91. This demonstrates that Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35 is redundant. Proof follows closely proof of pm2.04 91 in https://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt 91, but in the style of Frege's 1879 work. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege7 44656	A closed form of syl6 36. The first antecedent is used to replace the consequent of the second antecedent. Proposition 7 of [Frege1879] p. 34. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))))
Axiom	ax-frege8 44657	Swap antecedents. If two conditions have a proposition as a consequence, their order is immaterial. Third axiom of Frege's 1879 work but identical to pm2.04 91 which can be proved from only ax-mp 5, ax-frege1 44638, and ax-frege2 44639. (Redundant) Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege26 44658	Identical to idd 25. Proposition 26 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege27 44659	We cannot (at the same time) affirm 𝜑 and deny 𝜑. Identical to id 23. Proposition 27 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege9 44660	Closed form of syl 18 with swapped antecedents. This proposition differs from frege5 44648 only in an unessential way. Identical to imim1 84. Proposition 9 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege12 44661	A closed form of com23 87. Proposition 12 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege11 44662	Elimination of a nested antecedent as a partial converse of ja 188. If the proposition that 𝜓 takes place or 𝜑 does not is a sufficient condition for 𝜒, then 𝜓 by itself is a sufficient condition for 𝜒. Identical to jarr 107. Proposition 11 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege24 44663	Closed form for a1d 26. Deduction introducing an embedded antecedent. Identical to rp-frege24 44645 which was proved without relying on ax-frege8 44657. Proposition 24 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege16 44664	A closed form of com34 92. Proposition 16 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege25 44665	Closed form for a1dd 51. Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege18 44666	Closed form of a syllogism followed by a swap of antecedents. Proposition 18 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege22 44667	A closed form of com45 98. Proposition 22 of [Frege1879] p. 41. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))
Theorem	frege10 44668	Result commuting antecedents within an antecedent. Proposition 10 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege17 44669	A closed form of com3l 90. Proposition 17 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege13 44670	A closed form of com3r 88. Proposition 13 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege14 44671	Closed form of a deduction based on com3r 88. Proposition 14 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege19 44672	A closed form of syl6 36. Proposition 19 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege23 44673	Syllogism followed by rotation of three antecedents. Proposition 23 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜃)))))
Theorem	frege15 44674	A closed form of com4r 95. Proposition 15 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege21 44675	Replace antecedent in antecedent. Proposition 21 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege20 44676	A closed form of syl8 77. Proposition 20 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜃 → 𝜏) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
21.38.6.4  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication and Negation
Theorem	axfrege28 44677	Contraposition. Identical to con3 154. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege28 44678	Contraposition. Identical to con3 154. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. Axiom 28 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege29 44679	Closed form of con3d 153. Proposition 29 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege30 44680	Commuted, closed form of con3d 153. Proposition 30 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑)))
Theorem	axfrege31 44681	Identical to notnotr 131. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege31 44682	𝜑 cannot be denied and (at the same time ) ¬ ¬ 𝜑 affirmed. Duplex negatio affirmat. The denial of the denial is affirmation. Identical to notnotr 131. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege32 44683	Deduce con1 147 from con3 154. Proposition 32 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege33 44684	If 𝜑 or 𝜓 takes place, then 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place. Identical to con1 147. Proposition 33 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege34 44685	If as a consequence of the occurrence of the circumstance 𝜑, when the obstacle 𝜓 is removed, 𝜒 takes place, then from the circumstance that 𝜒 does not take place while 𝜑 occurs the occurrence of the obstacle 𝜓 can be inferred. Closed form of con1d 146. Proposition 34 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege35 44686	Commuted, closed form of con1d 146. Proposition 35 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (¬ 𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege36 44687	The case in which 𝜓 is denied, ¬ 𝜑 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed does not occur. If 𝜑 occurs, then (at least) one of the two, 𝜑 or 𝜓, takes place (no matter what 𝜓 might be). Identical to pm2.24 125. Proposition 36 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege37 44688	If 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the occurrence of 𝜓 or 𝜑, then 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of 𝜑 alone. Similar to a closed form of orcs 889. Proposition 37 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege38 44689	Identical to pm2.21 124. Proposition 38 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege39 44690	Syllogism between pm2.18 129 and pm2.24 125. Proposition 39 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege40 44691	Anything implies pm2.18 129. Proposition 40 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	axfrege41 44692	Identical to notnot 143. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege41 44693	The affirmation of 𝜑 denies the denial of 𝜑. Identical to notnot 143. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege42 44694	Not not id 23. Proposition 42 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege43 44695	If there is a choice only between 𝜑 and 𝜑, then 𝜑 takes place. Identical to pm2.18 129. Proposition 43 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege44 44696	Similar to a commuted pm2.62 913. Proposition 44 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege45 44697	Deduce pm2.6 193 from con1 147. Proposition 45 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege46 44698	If 𝜓 holds when 𝜑 occurs as well as when 𝜑 does not occur, then 𝜓 holds. If 𝜓 or 𝜑 occurs and if the occurrences of 𝜑 has 𝜓 as a necessary consequence, then 𝜓 takes place. Identical to pm2.6 193. Proposition 46 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege47 44699	Deduce consequence follows from either path implied by a disjunction. If 𝜑, as well as 𝜓 is sufficient condition for 𝜒 and 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place, then the proposition 𝜒 holds. Proposition 47 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege48 44700	Closed form of syllogism with internal disjunction. If 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for the occurrence of 𝜒 or 𝜓 and if 𝜒, as well as 𝜓, is a sufficient condition for 𝜃, then 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for 𝜃. See application in frege101 44812. Proposition 48 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))