P. 447 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44601-44700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	frege43 44601	If there is a choice only between 𝜑 and 𝜑, then 𝜑 takes place. Identical to pm2.18 129. Proposition 43 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege44 44602	Similar to a commuted pm2.62 912. Proposition 44 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege45 44603	Deduce pm2.6 193 from con1 147. Proposition 45 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege46 44604	If 𝜓 holds when 𝜑 occurs as well as when 𝜑 does not occur, then 𝜓 holds. If 𝜓 or 𝜑 occurs and if the occurrences of 𝜑 has 𝜓 as a necessary consequence, then 𝜓 takes place. Identical to pm2.6 193. Proposition 46 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege47 44605	Deduce consequence follows from either path implied by a disjunction. If 𝜑, as well as 𝜓 is sufficient condition for 𝜒 and 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place, then the proposition 𝜒 holds. Proposition 47 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege48 44606	Closed form of syllogism with internal disjunction. If 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for the occurrence of 𝜒 or 𝜓 and if 𝜒, as well as 𝜓, is a sufficient condition for 𝜃, then 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for 𝜃. See application in frege101 44718. Proposition 48 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege49 44607	Closed form of deduction with disjunction. Proposition 49 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege50 44608	Closed form of jaoi 870. Proposition 50 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege51 44609	Compare with jaod 872. Proposition 51 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜒))))
21.37.6.5  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with logical equivalence Here we leverage df-ifp 1079 to partition a wff into two that are disjoint with the selector wff. Thus if we are given ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) then we replace the concept (illegal in our notation ) (𝜑‘𝜓) with if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) to reason about the values of the "function." Likewise, we replace the similarly illegal concept ∀𝜓𝜑 with (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃).
Theorem	axfrege52a 44610	Justification for ax-frege52a 44611. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Axiom	ax-frege52a 44611	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝜑 is affirmed (in this specific case the identity logical function) and the same proposition, this time where we substituted the content of 𝜓, is denied does not take place. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege52aid 44612	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which 𝜑 is affirmed and 𝜓 is denied does not take place. Identical to biimp 218. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53aid 44613	Specialization of frege53a 44614. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53a 44614	Lemma for frege55a 44622. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	axfrege54a 44615	Justification for ax-frege54a 44616. Identical to biid 264. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege54a 44616	Reflexive equality of wffs. The content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜑. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to biid 264. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege54cor0a 44617	Synonym for logical equivalence. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1a 44618	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege55aid 44619	Lemma for frege57aid 44626. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55lem1a 44620	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜏 → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) → (𝜏 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege55lem2a 44621	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55a 44622	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55cor1a 44623	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege56aid 44624	Lemma for frege57aid 44626. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege56a 44625	Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege57aid 44626	This is the all important formula which allows to apply Frege-style definitions and explore their consequences. A closed form of biimpri 231. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege57a 44627	Analogue of frege57aid 44626. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	axfrege58a 44628	Identical to anifp 1088. Justification for ax-frege58a 44629. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Axiom	ax-frege58a 44629	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2102. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	frege58acor 44630	Lemma for frege59a 44631. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege59a 44631	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44567 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44586 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → ¬ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege60a 44632	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58a 44629. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜂) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege61a 44633	Lemma for frege65a 44637. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege62a 44634	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2690 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege63a 44635	Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (𝜂 → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege64a 44636	Lemma for frege65a 44637. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜒, 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege65a 44637	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2690 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege66a 44638	Swap antecedents of frege65a 44637. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege67a 44639	Lemma for frege68a 44640. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege68a 44640	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)))
21.37.6.6  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of sets
Theorem	axfrege52c 44641	Justification for ax-frege52c 44642. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege52c 44642	One side of dfsbcq 3746. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege52b 44643	The case when the content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑦 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝑥 is affirmed and the same proposition, this time where we substitute the content of 𝑦, is denied does not take place. In [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑, 𝑥 can also occur in other than the argument (𝑧) places. Hence 𝑥 may still be contained in [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	frege53b 44644	Lemma for frege102 (via frege92 44709). Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege54c 44645	Reflexive equality of classes. Identical to eqid 2763. Justification for ax-frege54c 44646. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Axiom	ax-frege54c 44646	Reflexive equality of sets (as classes). Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to eqid 2763. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege54b 44647	Reflexive equality of sets. The content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑥. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Slightly specialized version of eqid 2763. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege54cor1b 44648	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege55lem1b 44649*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑧) → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	frege55lem2b 44650	Lemma for frege55b 44651. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55b 44651	Lemma for frege57b 44653. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Note that eqtr2 2784 incorporates eqcom 2770 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2047. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56b 44652	Lemma for frege57b 44653. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)) → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57b 44653	Analogue of frege57aid 44626. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege58b 44654	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2102. Justification for ax-frege58b 44655. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege58b 44655	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2102. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bid 44656	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, 𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to sp 2219. See ax-frege58b 44655 and frege58c 44675 for versions which more closely track the original. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bcor 44657	Lemma for frege59b 44658. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege59b 44658	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44567 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44586 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege60b 44659	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58b 44655. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege61b 44660	Lemma for frege65b 44664. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege62b 44661	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2690 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege63b 44662	Lemma for frege91 44708. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege64b 44663	Lemma for frege65b 44664. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) → (∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege65b 44664	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2690 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. In Frege care is taken to point out that the variables in the first clauses are independent of each other and of the final term so another valid translation could be : ⊢ (∀𝑥([𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) → (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑏]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑐]𝜒) → ([𝑧 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑐]𝜒))). But that is perhaps too pedantic a translation for this exploration. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege66b 44665	Swap antecedents of frege65b 44664. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	frege67b 44666	Lemma for frege68b 44667. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege68b 44667	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
21.37.6.7  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of classes Begriffsschrift Chapter II with equivalence of classes (where they are sets).
Theorem	frege53c 44668	Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1c 44669*	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Revised by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege55lem1c 44670*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege55lem2c 44671*	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → [𝐴 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55c 44672	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56c 44673*	Lemma for frege57c 44674. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57c 44674*	Swap order of implication in ax-frege52c 44642. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege58c 44675	Principle related to sp 2219. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege59c 44676	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44567 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44586 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege60c 44677	Swap antecedents of frege58c 44675. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege61c 44678	Lemma for frege65c 44682. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege62c 44679	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2690 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege63c 44680	Analogue of frege63b 44662. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege64c 44681	Lemma for frege65c 44682. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (([𝐶 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝐶 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege65c 44682	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2690 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege66c 44683	Swap antecedents of frege65c 44682. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	frege67c 44684	Lemma for frege68c 44685. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege68c 44685	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
21.37.6.8  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter III Properties hereditary in a sequence (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 means membership in 𝐴 is hereditary in the sequence dictated by relation 𝑅. This differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on. While the above notation is modern, it is cumbersome in the case when 𝐴 is complex and to more closely follow Frege, we abbreviate it with new notation 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴. This greatly shortens the statements for frege97 44714 and frege109 44726. dffrege69 44686 through frege75 44692 develop this, but translation to Metamath is pending some decisions. While Frege does not limit discussion to sets, we may have to depart from Frege by limiting 𝑅 or 𝐴 to sets when we quantify over all hereditary relations or all classes where membership is hereditary in a sequence dictated by 𝑅.
Theorem	dffrege69 44686*	If from the proposition that 𝑥 has property 𝐴 it can be inferred generally, whatever 𝑥 may be, that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥 has property 𝐴, then we say " Property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Definition 69 of [Frege1879] p. 55. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴)
Theorem	frege70 44687*	Lemma for frege72 44689. Proposition 70 of [Frege1879] p. 58. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑋𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege71 44688*	Lemma for frege72 44689. Proposition 71 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege72 44689	If property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, if 𝑥 has property 𝐴, and if 𝑦 is a result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥, then 𝑦 has property 𝐴. Proposition 72 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege73 44690	Lemma for frege87 44704. Proposition 73 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege74 44691	If 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, then every result of a application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has the property 𝐴. Proposition 74 of [Frege1879] p. 60. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege75 44692*	If from the proposition that 𝑥 has property 𝐴, whatever 𝑥 may be, it can be inferred that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥 has property 𝐴, then property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 75 of [Frege1879] p. 60. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴)
21.37.6.9  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter III Following in a sequence 𝑝(t+‘𝑅)𝑐 means 𝑐 follows 𝑝 in the 𝑅-sequence. dffrege76 44693 through frege98 44715 develop this. This will be shown to be the transitive closure of the relation 𝑅. But more work needs to be done on transitive closure of relations before this is ready for Metamath.
Theorem	dffrege76 44693*	If from the two propositions that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝐵 has property 𝑓 and that property 𝑓 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, it can be inferred, whatever 𝑓 may be, that 𝐸 has property 𝑓, then we say 𝐸 follows 𝐵 in the 𝑅-sequence. Definition 76 of [Frege1879] p. 60. Each of 𝐵, 𝐸 and 𝑅 must be sets. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑎(𝐵𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑓)) ↔ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐸)
Theorem	frege77 44694*	If 𝑌 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, if property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, and if every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has the property 𝐴, then 𝑌 has property 𝐴. Proposition 77 of [Frege1879] p. 62. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege78 44695*	Commuted form of frege77 44694. Proposition 78 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege79 44696*	Distributed form of frege78 44695. Proposition 79 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → ∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege80 44697*	Add additional condition to both clauses of frege79 44696. Proposition 80 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → ∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege81 44698	If 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅 -sequence, and if 𝑌 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑌 has property 𝐴. This is a form of induction attributed to Jakob Bernoulli. Proposition 81 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege82 44699	Closed-form deduction based on frege81 44698. Proposition 82 of [Frege1879] p. 64. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝜑 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege83 44700	Apply commuted form of frege81 44698 when the property 𝑅 is hereditary in a disjunction of two properties, only one of which is known to be held by 𝑋. Proposition 83 of [Frege1879] p. 65. Here we introduce the union of classes where Frege has a disjunction of properties which are represented by membership in either of the classes. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑇    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))))