| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 161 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31526) |
(31527-33049) |
(33050-51159) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | indsum 16001* | Finite sum of a product with the indicator function / Cartesian product with the indicator function. Note: this theorem cannot be efficiently shortened using sumss2 15898, unless there are some additional auxiliary theorems like (if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0) · 𝐵) = if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 11-Apr-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ((((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑥) · 𝐵) = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | indsumhash 16002* | The finite sum of the indicator function is the number of elements of the corresponding subset. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2026.) |
| ⊢ 1 = ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑂 ( 1 ‘𝑘) = (♯‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ackbijnn 16003* | Translate the Ackermann bijection ackbij1 10319 onto the positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) ↦ Σ𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (2↑𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin)–1-1-onto→ℕ0 | ||
| Theorem | binomlem 16004* | Lemma for binom 16005 (binomial theorem). Inductive step. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝑁C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑(𝑁 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑(𝑁 + 1)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 + 1))(((𝑁 + 1)C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑((𝑁 + 1) − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | binom 16005* | The binomial theorem: (𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑁 is the sum from 𝑘 = 0 to 𝑁 of (𝑁C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑘) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 𝑘)). Theorem 15-2.8 of [Gleason] p. 296. This part of the proof sets up the induction and does the base case, with the bulk of the work (the induction step) in binomlem 16004. This is Metamath 100 proof #44. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝑁C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑(𝑁 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | binom1p 16006* | Special case of the binomial theorem for (1 + 𝐴)↑𝑁. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((1 + 𝐴)↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝑁C𝑘) · (𝐴↑𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | binom11 16007* | Special case of the binomial theorem for 2↑𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (2↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)(𝑁C𝑘)) | ||
| Theorem | binom1dif 16008* | A summation for the difference between ((𝐴 + 1)↑𝑁) and (𝐴↑𝑁). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴 + 1)↑𝑁) − (𝐴↑𝑁)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))((𝑁C𝑘) · (𝐴↑𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | bcxmaslem1 16009 | Lemma for bcxmas 16010. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑁 + 𝐴)C𝐴) = ((𝑁 + 𝐵)C𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | bcxmas 16010* | Parallel summation (Christmas Stocking) theorem for Pascal's Triangle. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝑁 + 1) + 𝑀)C𝑀) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)((𝑁 + 𝑗)C𝑗)) | ||
| Theorem | incexclem 16011* | Lemma for incexc 16012. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → ((♯‘𝐵) − (♯‘(𝐵 ∩ ∪ 𝐴))) = Σ𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(( -1↑(♯‘𝑠)) · (♯‘(𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑠)))) | ||
| Theorem | incexc 16012* | The inclusion/exclusion principle for counting the elements of a finite union of finite sets. This is Metamath 100 proof #96. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → (♯‘∪ 𝐴) = Σ𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})(( -1↑((♯‘𝑠) − 1)) · (♯‘∩ 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | incexc2 16013* | The inclusion/exclusion principle for counting the elements of a finite union of finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → (♯‘∪ 𝐴) = Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(♯‘𝐴))(( -1↑(𝑛 − 1)) · Σ𝑠 ∈ {𝑘 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (♯‘𝑘) = 𝑛} (♯‘∩ 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | isumshft 16014* | Index shift of an infinite sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝐾 + 𝑘) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | isumsplit 16015* | Split off the first 𝑁 terms of an infinite sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 + Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isum1p 16016* | The infinite sum of a converging infinite series equals the first term plus the infinite sum of the rest of it. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 = ((𝐹‘𝑀) + Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isumnn0nn 16017* | Sum from 0 to infinity in terms of sum from 1 to infinity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑘 = 0 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 = (𝐵 + Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isumrpcl 16018* | The infinite sum of positive reals is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) | ||
| Theorem | isumle 16019* | Comparison of two infinite sums. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 13-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | isumless 16020* | A finite sum of nonnegative numbers is less than or equal to its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | isumsup2 16021* | An infinite sum of nonnegative terms is equal to the supremum of the partial sums. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐺‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | isumsup 16022* | An infinite sum of nonnegative terms is equal to the supremum of the partial sums. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐺‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | isumltss 16023* | A partial sum of a series with positive terms is less than the infinite sum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | climcndslem1 16024* | Lemma for climcnds 16026: bound the original series by the condensed series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = ((2↑𝑛) · (𝐹‘(2↑𝑛)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘((2↑(𝑁 + 1)) − 1)) ≤ (seq0( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | climcndslem2 16025* | Lemma for climcnds 16026: bound the condensed series by the original series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = ((2↑𝑛) · (𝐹‘(2↑𝑛)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁) ≤ (2 · (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(2↑𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | climcnds 16026* | The Cauchy condensation test. If 𝑎(𝑘) is a decreasing sequence of nonnegative terms, then Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ𝑎(𝑘) converges iff Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ02↑𝑛 · 𝑎(2↑𝑛) converges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = ((2↑𝑛) · (𝐹‘(2↑𝑛)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )) | ||
| Theorem | divrcnv 16027* | The sequence of reciprocals of real numbers, multiplied by the factor 𝐴, converges to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝐴 / 𝑛)) ⇝𝑟 0) | ||
| Theorem | divcnv 16028* | The sequence of reciprocals of positive integers, multiplied by the factor 𝐴, converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐴 / 𝑛)) ⇝ 0) | ||
| Theorem | flo1 16029 | The floor function satisfies ⌊(𝑥) = 𝑥 + 𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 − (⌊‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
| Theorem | divcnvshft 16030* | Limit of a ratio function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐴 / (𝑘 + 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0) | ||
| Theorem | supcvg 16031* | Extract a sequence 𝑓 in 𝑋 such that the image of the points in the bounded set 𝐴 converges to the supremum 𝑆 of the set. Similar to Equation 4 of [Kreyszig] p. 144. The proof uses countable choice ax-cc 10517. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑆 − (1 / 𝑛))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℕ⟶𝑋 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) ⇝ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | infcvgaux1i 16032* | Auxiliary theorem for applications of supcvg 16031. Hypothesis for several supremum theorems. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝑥 = -𝐴} & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑋 & ⊢ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | infcvgaux2i 16033* | Auxiliary theorem for applications of supcvg 16031. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝑥 = -𝐴} & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑋 & ⊢ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧 & ⊢ 𝑆 = -sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑆 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | harmonic 16034 | The harmonic series 𝐻 diverges. This fact follows from the stronger emcl 27336, which establishes that the harmonic series grows as log𝑛 + γ + o(1), but this uses a more elementary method, attributed to Nicole Oresme (1323-1382). This is Metamath 100 proof #34. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / 𝑛)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐻 ∈ dom ⇝ | ||
| Theorem | arisum 16035* | Arithmetic series sum of the first 𝑁 positive integers. This is Metamath 100 proof #68. (Contributed by FL, 16-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)𝑘 = (((𝑁↑2) + 𝑁) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | arisum2 16036* | Arithmetic series sum of the first 𝑁 nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Timothy J. O'Malley, 9-Oct-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))𝑘 = (((𝑁↑2) − 𝑁) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | trireciplem 16037 | Lemma for trirecip 16038. Show that the sum converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / (𝑛 · (𝑛 + 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 1 | ||
| Theorem | trirecip 16038 | The sum of the reciprocals of the triangle numbers converge to two. This is Metamath 100 proof #42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (2 / (𝑘 · (𝑘 + 1))) = 2 | ||
| Theorem | expcnv 16039* | A sequence of powers of a complex number 𝐴 with absolute value less than 1 converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐴↑𝑛)) ⇝ 0) | ||
| Theorem | explecnv 16040* | A sequence of terms converges to zero when it is less than powers of a number 𝐴 whose absolute value is less than 1. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0) | ||
| Theorem | geoserg 16041* | The value of the finite geometric series 𝐴↑𝑀 + 𝐴↑(𝑀 + 1) +... + 𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)(𝐴↑𝑘) = (((𝐴↑𝑀) − (𝐴↑𝑁)) / (1 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | geoser 16042* | The value of the finite geometric series 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2 +... + 𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1). This is Metamath 100 proof #66. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(𝐴↑𝑘) = ((1 − (𝐴↑𝑁)) / (1 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pwdif 16043* | The difference of two numbers to the same power is the difference of the two numbers multiplied with a finite sum. Generalization of subsq 14358. See Wikipedia "Fermat number", section "Other theorems about Fermat numbers", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number 14358, 5-Aug-2021. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2021.) (Revised by AV, 19-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴↑𝑁) − (𝐵↑𝑁)) = ((𝐴 − 𝐵) · Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑁)((𝐴↑𝑘) · (𝐵↑((𝑁 − 𝑘) − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | pwm1geoser 16044* | The n-th power of a number decreased by 1 expressed by the finite geometric series 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2 +... + 𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by AV, 14-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) − 1) = ((𝐴 − 1) · Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(𝐴↑𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | geolim 16045* | The partial sums in the infinite series 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... converge to (1 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐴↑𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (1 / (1 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | geolim2 16046* | The partial sums in the geometric series 𝐴↑𝑀 + 𝐴↑(𝑀 + 1)... converge to ((𝐴↑𝑀) / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐴↑𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ ((𝐴↑𝑀) / (1 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | georeclim 16047* | The limit of a geometric series of reciprocals. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Dec-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | geo2sum 16048* | The value of the finite geometric series 2↑ -1 + 2↑ -2 +... + 2↑ -𝑁, multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴 / (2↑𝑘)) = (𝐴 − (𝐴 / (2↑𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | geo2sum2 16049* | The value of the finite geometric series 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 +... + 2↑(𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(2↑𝑘) = ((2↑𝑁) − 1)) | ||
| Theorem | geo2lim 16050* | The value of the infinite geometric series 2↑ -1 + 2↑ -2 +... , multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐴 / (2↑𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | geomulcvg 16051* | The geometric series converges even if it is multiplied by 𝑘 to result in the larger series 𝑘 · 𝐴↑𝑘. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑘 · (𝐴↑𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → seq0( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | geoisum 16052* | The infinite sum of 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... is (1 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐴↑𝑘) = (1 / (1 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | geoisumr 16053* | The infinite sum of reciprocals 1 + (1 / 𝐴)↑1 + (1 / 𝐴)↑2... is 𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1). (Contributed by rpenner, 3-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 < (abs‘𝐴)) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑘) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | geoisum1 16054* | The infinite sum of 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... is (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝐴↑𝑘) = (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | geoisum1c 16055* | The infinite sum of 𝐴 · (𝑅↑1) + 𝐴 · (𝑅↑2)... is (𝐴 · 𝑅) / (1 − 𝑅). (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝑅) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) = ((𝐴 · 𝑅) / (1 − 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | 0.999... 16056 | The recurring decimal 0.999..., which is defined as the infinite sum 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... i.e. 9 / 10↑1 + 9 / 10↑2 + 9 / 10↑3 + ..., is exactly equal to 1, according to ZF set theory. Interestingly, about 40% of the people responding to a poll at http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=13177 disagree. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (9 / (;10↑𝑘)) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | geoihalfsum 16057 | Prove that the infinite geometric series of 1/2, 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1. Uses geoisum1 16054. This is a representation of .111... in binary with an infinite number of 1's. Theorem 0.999... 16056 proves a similar claim for .999... in base 10. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (1 / (2↑𝑘)) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | cvgrat 16058* | Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms beyond some index 𝐵, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. Equivalent to first part of Exercise 4 of [Gleason] p. 182. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | mertenslem1 16059* | Lemma for mertens 16061. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑡)(𝐾‘𝑚) < (((𝐸 / 2) / 𝑠) / (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) + 1))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 ≤ sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ∧ (𝑇 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑇 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | mertenslem2 16060* | Lemma for mertens 16061. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | mertens 16061* | Mertens' theorem. If 𝐴(𝑗) is an absolutely convergent series and 𝐵(𝑘) is convergent, then (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0𝐴(𝑗) · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0𝐵(𝑘)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴(𝑗) · 𝐵(𝑘 − 𝑗)) (and this latter series is convergent). This latter sum is commonly known as the Cauchy product of the sequences. The proof follows the outline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product#Proof_of_Mertens.27_theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐻) ⇝ (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | prodf 16062* | An infinite product of complex terms is a function from an upper set of integers to ℂ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹):𝑍⟶ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | clim2prod 16063* | The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | clim2div 16064* | The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | prodfmul 16065* | The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | prodf1 16066 | The value of the partial products in a one-valued infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1}))‘𝑁) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | prodf1f 16067 | A one-valued infinite product is equal to the constant one function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) = (𝑍 × {1})) | ||
| Theorem | prodfclim1 16068 | The constant one product converges to one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) ⇝ 1) | ||
| Theorem | prodfn0 16069* | No term of a nonzero infinite product is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | prodfrec 16070* | The reciprocal of an infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁) = (1 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | prodfdiv 16071* | The quotient of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) / (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | ntrivcvg 16072* | A non-trivially converging infinite product converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | ntrivcvgn0 16073* | A product that converges to a nonzero value converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | ntrivcvgfvn0 16074* | Any value of a product sequence that converges to a nonzero value is itself nonzero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | ntrivcvgtail 16075* | A tail of a non-trivially convergent sequence converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ⇝ ‘seq𝑁( · , 𝐹)) ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑁( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑁( · , 𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | ntrivcvgmullem 16076* | Lemma for ntrivcvgmul 16077. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑁( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑃( · , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝑌) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≤ 𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑤(𝑤 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑞( · , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝑤)) | ||
| Theorem | ntrivcvgmul 16077* | The product of two non-trivially converging products converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑧(𝑧 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑚( · , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝑧)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑤(𝑤 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑝( · , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝑤)) | ||
| Syntax | cprod 16078 | Extend class notation to include complex products. |
| class ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 | ||
| Definition | df-prod 16079* | Define the product of a series with an index set of integers 𝐴. This definition takes most of the aspects of df-sum 15860 and adapts them for multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite case, there is a nonzero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the convergence criteria match those of infinite sums. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 ≠ 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)))) | ||
| Theorem | prodex 16080 | A product is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | prodeq1f 16081 | Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq1 16082* | Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | nfcprod1 16083* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | nfcprod 16084* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product: if 𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2w 16085* | Equality theorem for product, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2ii 16086* | Equality theorem for product, with the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 guarded by I to be always sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ( I ‘𝐵) = ( I ‘𝐶) → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2 16087* | Equality theorem for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvprod 16088* | Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | cbvprodv 16089* | Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | cbvprodi 16090* | Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | prodeq1i 16091 | Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) Remove DV conditions. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2i 16092* | Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | prodeq12i 16093* | Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | prodeq1d 16094* | Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2d 16095* | Equality deduction for product. Note that unlike prodeq2dv 16096, 𝑘 may occur in 𝜑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2dv 16096* | Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq2sdv 16097* | Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | 2cprodeq2dv 16098* | Equality deduction for double product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq12dv 16099* | Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq12rdv 16100* | Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |