P. 161 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16001-16100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pcmpt2 16001*	Dividing two prime count maps yields a number with all dividing primes confined to an interval. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt ((seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀) / (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) = if((𝑃 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑁), 𝐵, 0))
Theorem	pcmptdvds 16002	The partial products of the prime power map form a divisibility chain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ∥ (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀))
Theorem	pcprod 16003*	The product of the primes taken to their respective powers reconstructs the original number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑(𝑛 pCnt 𝑁)), 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = 𝑁)
Theorem	sumhash 16004*	The sum of 1 over a set is the size of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0) = (♯‘𝐴))
Theorem	fldivp1 16005	The difference between the floors of adjacent fractions is either 1 or 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((⌊‘((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘(𝑀 / 𝑁))) = if(𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 + 1), 1, 0))
Theorem	pcfaclem 16006	Lemma for pcfac 16007. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑀))) = 0)
Theorem	pcfac 16007*	Calculate the prime count of a factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (!‘𝑁)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)(⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘))))
Theorem	pcbc 16008*	Calculate the prime count of a binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (𝑁C𝐾)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)((⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘))) − ((⌊‘((𝑁 − 𝐾) / (𝑃↑𝑘))) + (⌊‘(𝐾 / (𝑃↑𝑘))))))
Theorem	qexpz 16009	If a power of a rational number is an integer, then the number is an integer. In other words, all n-th roots are irrational unless they are integers (so that the original number is an n-th power). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	expnprm 16010	A second or higher power of a rational number is not a prime number. Or by contraposition, the n-th root of a prime number is irrational. Suggested by Norm Megill. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ¬ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	oddprmdvds 16011*	Every positive integer which is not a power of two is divisible by an odd prime number. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐾 = (2↑𝑛)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2})𝑝 ∥ 𝐾)
6.2.8  Pocklington's theorem
Theorem	prmpwdvds 16012	A relation involving divisibility by a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑𝑁)) ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑(𝑁 − 1))))) → (𝑃↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐷)
Theorem	pockthlem 16013	Lemma for pockthg 16014. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑄)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑄 pCnt (𝑃 − 1)))
Theorem	pockthg 16014*	The generalized Pocklington's theorem. If 𝑁 − 1 = 𝐴 · 𝐵 where 𝐵 < 𝐴, then 𝑁 is prime if and only if for every prime factor 𝑝 of 𝐴, there is an 𝑥 such that 𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1) = 1( mod 𝑁) and gcd (𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝) − 1, 𝑁) = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (((𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1 ∧ (((𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	pockthi 16015	Pocklington's theorem, which gives a sufficient criterion for a number 𝑁 to be prime. This is the preferred method for verifying large primes, being much more efficient to compute than trial division. This form has been optimized for application to specific large primes; see pockthg 16014 for a more general closed-form version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐺 · 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐷 · (𝑃↑𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 < (𝑃↑𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴↑𝐺) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
6.2.9  Infinite primes theorem
Theorem	unbenlem 16016*	Lemma for unben 16017. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ω)
Theorem	unben 16017*	An unbounded set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	infpnlem1 16018*	Lemma for infpn 16020. The smallest divisor (greater than 1) 𝑀 of 𝑁! + 1 is a prime greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (((1 < 𝑀 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((1 < 𝑗 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑗)) → (𝑁 < 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((𝑀 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ → (𝑗 = 1 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑀)))))
Theorem	infpnlem2 16019*	Lemma for infpn 16020. For any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗))))
Theorem	infpn 16020*	There exist infinitely many prime numbers: for any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (See infpn2 16021 for the equinumerosity version.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗))))
Theorem	infpn2 16021*	There exist infinitely many prime numbers: the set of all primes 𝑆 is unbounded by infpn 16020, so by unben 16017 it is infinite. This is Metamath 100 proof #11. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (1 < 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑛 / 𝑚) ∈ ℕ → (𝑚 = 1 ∨ 𝑚 = 𝑛)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ≈ ℕ
Theorem	prmunb 16022*	The primes are unbounded. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 < 𝑝)
Theorem	prminf 16023	There are an infinite number of primes. Theorem 1.7 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ℙ ≈ ℕ
6.2.10  Sum of prime reciprocals
Theorem	prmreclem1 16024*	Lemma for prmrec 16030. Properties of the "square part" function, which extracts the 𝑚 of the decomposition 𝑁 = 𝑟𝑚↑2, with 𝑚 maximal and 𝑟 squarefree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ sup({𝑟 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑟↑2) ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑄‘𝑁) ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑁)↑2) ∥ 𝑁 ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ¬ (𝐾↑2) ∥ (𝑁 / ((𝑄‘𝑁)↑2)))))
Theorem	prmreclem2 16025*	Lemma for prmrec 16030. There are at most 2↑𝐾 squarefree numbers which divide no primes larger than 𝐾. (We could strengthen this to 2↑♯(ℙ ∩ (1...𝐾)) but there's no reason to.) We establish the inequality by showing that the prime counts of the number up to 𝐾 completely determine it because all higher prime counts are zero, and they are all at most 1 because no square divides the number, so there are at most 2↑𝐾 possibilities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ sup({𝑟 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑟↑2) ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ (𝑄‘𝑥) = 1}) ≤ (2↑𝐾))
Theorem	prmreclem3 16026*	Lemma for prmrec 16030. The main inequality established here is ♯𝑀 ≤ ♯{𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ (𝑄‘𝑥) = 1} · √𝑁, where {𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ (𝑄‘𝑥) = 1} is the set of squarefree numbers in 𝑀. This is demonstrated by the map 𝑦 ↦ ⟨𝑦 / (𝑄‘𝑦)↑2, (𝑄‘𝑦)⟩ where 𝑄‘𝑦 is the largest number whose square divides 𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ sup({𝑟 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑟↑2) ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑀) ≤ ((2↑𝐾) · (√‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prmreclem4 16027*	Lemma for prmrec 16030. Show by induction that the indexed (nondisjoint) union 𝑊‘𝑘 is at most the size of the prime reciprocal series. The key counting lemma is hashdvds 15884, to show that the number of numbers in 1...𝑁 that divide 𝑘 is at most 𝑁 / 𝑘. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐾 + 1))if(𝑘 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑘), 0) < (1 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑝 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾) → (♯‘∪ 𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(𝑊‘𝑘)) ≤ (𝑁 · Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)if(𝑘 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑘), 0))))
Theorem	prmreclem5 16028*	Lemma for prmrec 16030. Here we show the inequality 𝑁 / 2 < ♯𝑀 by decomposing the set (1...𝑁) into the disjoint union of the set 𝑀 of those numbers that are not divisible by any "large" primes (above 𝐾) and the indexed union over 𝐾 < 𝑘 of the numbers 𝑊‘𝑘 that divide the prime 𝑘. By prmreclem4 16027 the second of these has size less than 𝑁 times the prime reciprocal series, which is less than 1 / 2 by assumption, we find that the complementary part 𝑀 must be at least 𝑁 / 2 large. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐾 + 1))if(𝑘 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑘), 0) < (1 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑝 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 / 2) < ((2↑𝐾) · (√‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prmreclem6 16029*	Lemma for prmrec 16030. If the series 𝐹 was convergent, there would be some 𝑘 such that the sum starting from 𝑘 + 1 sums to less than 1 / 2; this is a sufficient hypothesis for prmreclem5 16028 to produce the contradictory bound 𝑁 / 2 < (2↑𝑘)√𝑁, which is false for 𝑁 = 2↑(2𝑘 + 2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝
Theorem	prmrec 16030*	The sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges. Theorem 1.13 in [ApostolNT] p. 18. This is the "second" proof at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_harmonic_series, attributed to Paul Erdős. This is Metamath 100 proof #81. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℙ ∩ (1...𝑛))(1 / 𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝
6.2.11  Fundamental theorem of arithmetic
Theorem	1arithlem1 16031*	Lemma for 1arith 16035. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁) = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑁)))
Theorem	1arithlem2 16032*	Lemma for 1arith 16035. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑀‘𝑁)‘𝑃) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁))
Theorem	1arithlem3 16033*	Lemma for 1arith 16035. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁):ℙ⟶ℕ0)
Theorem	1arithlem4 16034*	Lemma for 1arith 16035. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑦 ∈ ℙ, (𝑦↑(𝐹‘𝑦)), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℙ⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑞)) → (𝐹‘𝑞) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝑥))
Theorem	1arith 16035*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a sequence of prime exponents, for which only finitely many primes have nonzero exponent. The function 𝑀 maps the set of positive integers one-to-one onto the set of prime factorizations 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀:ℕ–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	1arith2 16036*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a finite monotonic 1-based sequence of primes. Every positive integer has a unique prime factorization. Theorem 1.10 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. This is Metamath 100 proof #80. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑔 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑀‘𝑧) = 𝑔
6.2.12  Lagrange's four-square theorem
Syntax	cgz 16037	Extend class notation with the set of gaussian integers.
class ℤ[i]
Definition	df-gz 16038	Define the set of gaussian integers, which are complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are integers. (Note that the [i] is actually part of the symbol token and has no independent meaning.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ℤ[i] = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((ℜ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ)}
Theorem	elgz 16039	Elementhood in the gaussian integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (ℜ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	gzcn 16040	A gaussian integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	zgz 16041	An integer is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	igz 16042	i is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ i ∈ ℤ[i]
Theorem	gznegcl 16043	The gaussian integers are closed under negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → -𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzcjcl 16044	The gaussian integers are closed under conjugation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → (∗‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzaddcl 16045	The gaussian integers are closed under addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzmulcl 16046	The gaussian integers are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzreim 16047	Construct a gaussian integer from real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzsubcl 16048	The gaussian integers are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzabssqcl 16049	The squared norm of a gaussian integer is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	4sqlem5 16050	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	4sqlem6 16051	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (-(𝑀 / 2) ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < (𝑀 / 2)))
Theorem	4sqlem7 16052	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵↑2) ≤ (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2))
Theorem	4sqlem8 16053	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2)))
Theorem	4sqlem9 16054	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐵↑2) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝐴↑2))
Theorem	4sqlem10 16055	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐵↑2)) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2)))
Theorem	4sqlem1 16056*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ0; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ0
Theorem	4sqlem2 16057*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. Change bound variables in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2))))
Theorem	4sqlem3 16058*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. Sufficient condition to be in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem4a 16059*	Lemma for 4sqlem4 16060. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem4 16060*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. We can express the four-square property more compactly in terms of gaussian integers, because the norms of gaussian integers are exactly sums of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] ∃𝑣 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑣)↑2)))
Theorem	mul4sqlem 16061*	Lemma for mul4sq 16062: algebraic manipulations. The extra assumptions involving 𝑀 are for a part of 4sqlem17 16069 which needs to know not just that the product is a sum of squares, but also that it preserves divisibility by 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (((abs‘𝐶)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐷)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐶) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 − 𝐷) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 / 𝑀) · (𝑌 / 𝑀)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	mul4sq 16062*	Euler's four-square identity: The product of two sums of four squares is also a sum of four squares. This is usually quoted as an explicit formula involving eight real variables; we save some time by working with complex numbers (gaussian integers) instead, so that we only have to work with four variables, and also hiding the actual formula for the product in the proof of mul4sqlem 16061. (For the curious, the explicit formula that is used is ( ∣ 𝑎 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑏 ∣ ↑2)( ∣ 𝑐 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑑 ∣ ↑2) = ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑐 + 𝑏 · 𝑑∗ ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑑 − 𝑏 · 𝑐∗ ∣ ↑2.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem11 16063*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. Use the pigeonhole principle to show that the sets {𝑚↑2 ∣ 𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)} and {-1 − 𝑛↑2 ∣ 𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)} have a common element, mod 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	4sqlem12 16064*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. For any odd prime 𝑃, there is a 𝑘 < 𝑃 such that 𝑘𝑃 − 1 is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + 1) = (𝑘 · 𝑃))
Theorem	4sqlem13 16065*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑀 < 𝑃))
Theorem	4sqlem14 16066*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	4sqlem15 16067*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → ((((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐸↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐹↑2)) = 0) ∧ (((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐺↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐻↑2)) = 0)))
Theorem	4sqlem16 16068*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ((𝑅 = 0 ∨ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑃))))
Theorem	4sqlem17 16069*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	4sqlem18 16070*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. Inductive step, odd prime case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem19 16071*	Lemma for 4sq 16072. The proof is by strong induction - we show that if all the integers less than 𝑘 are in 𝑆, then 𝑘 is as well. In this part of the proof we do the induction argument and dispense with all the cases except the odd prime case, which is sent to 4sqlem18 16070. If 𝑘 is 0, 1, 2, we show 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 directly; otherwise if 𝑘 is composite, 𝑘 is the product of two numbers less than it (and hence in 𝑆 by assumption), so by mul4sq 16062 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ℕ0 = 𝑆
Theorem	4sq 16072*	Lagrange's four-square theorem, or Bachet's conjecture: every nonnegative integer is expressible as a sum of four squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #19. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2))))
6.2.13  Van der Waerden's theorem
Syntax	cvdwa 16073	The arithmetic progression function.
class AP
Syntax	cvdwm 16074	The monochromatic arithmetic progression predicate.
class MonoAP
Syntax	cvdwp 16075	The polychromatic arithmetic progression predicate.
class PolyAP
Definition	df-vdwap 16076*	Define the arithmetic progression function, which takes as input a length 𝑘, a start point 𝑎, and a step 𝑑 and outputs the set of points in this progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ AP = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ ℕ, 𝑑 ∈ ℕ ↦ ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑘 − 1)) ↦ (𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)))))
Definition	df-vdwmc 16077*	Define the "contains a monochromatic AP" predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ MonoAP = {⟨𝑘, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐(ran (AP‘𝑘) ∩ 𝒫 (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})) ≠ ∅}
Definition	df-vdwpc 16078*	Define the "contains a polychromatic collection of APs" predicate. See vdwpc 16088 for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ PolyAP = {⟨⟨𝑚, 𝑘⟩, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℕ ↑𝑚 (1...𝑚))(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑚)((𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))(AP‘𝑘)(𝑑‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {(𝑓‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖)))}) ∧ (♯‘ran (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑚) ↦ (𝑓‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))))) = 𝑚)}
Theorem	vdwapfval 16079*	Define the arithmetic progression function, which takes as input a length 𝑘, a start point 𝑎, and a step 𝑑 and outputs the set of points in this progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 → (AP‘𝐾) = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ, 𝑑 ∈ ℕ ↦ ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1)) ↦ (𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)))))
Theorem	vdwapf 16080	The arithmetic progression function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 → (AP‘𝐾):(ℕ × ℕ)⟶𝒫 ℕ)
Theorem	vdwapval 16081*	Value of the arithmetic progression function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑚 · 𝐷))))
Theorem	vdwapun 16082	Remove the first element of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘(𝐾 + 1))𝐷) = ({𝐴} ∪ ((𝐴 + 𝐷)(AP‘𝐾)𝐷)))
Theorem	vdwapid1 16083	The first element of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷))
Theorem	vdwap0 16084	Value of a length-1 arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘0)𝐷) = ∅)
Theorem	vdwap1 16085	Value of a length-1 arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘1)𝐷) = {𝐴})
Theorem	vdwmc 16086*	The predicate " The ⟨𝑅, 𝑁⟩-coloring 𝐹 contains a monochromatic AP of length 𝐾". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑐∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ (𝑎(AP‘𝐾)𝑑) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	vdwmc2 16087*	Expand out the definition of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	vdwpc 16088*	The predicate " The coloring 𝐹 contains a polychromatic 𝑀-tuple of AP's of length 𝐾". A polychromatic 𝑀-tuple of AP's is a set of AP's with the same base point but different step lengths, such that each individual AP is monochromatic, but the AP's all have mutually distinct colors. (The common basepoint is not required to have the same color as any of the AP's.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (1...𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℕ ↑𝑚 𝐽)(∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐽 ((𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝑑‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖)))}) ∧ (♯‘ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))))) = 𝑀)))
Theorem	vdwlem1 16089*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐷‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘(𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘(𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝐼))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐹)
Theorem	vdwlem2 16090*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑀)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑊 + 𝑁)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐺 → 𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹))
Theorem	vdwlem3 16091	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (1...𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + (𝑊 · ((𝐴 − 1) + 𝑉))) ∈ (1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉))))
Theorem	vdwlem4 16092*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑉)⟶(𝑅 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑊)))
Theorem	vdwlem5 16093*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐺}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐸‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {(𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘ran 𝐽) = 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐵 + (𝑊 · ((𝐴 + (𝑉 − 𝐷)) − 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑗 ∈ (1...(𝑀 + 1)) ↦ (if(𝑗 = (𝑀 + 1), 0, (𝐸‘𝑗)) + (𝑊 · 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	vdwlem6 16094*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐺}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐸‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {(𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘ran 𝐽) = 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐵 + (𝑊 · ((𝐴 + (𝑉 − 𝐷)) − 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑗 ∈ (1...(𝑀 + 1)) ↦ (if(𝑗 = (𝑀 + 1), 0, (𝐸‘𝑗)) + (𝑊 · 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨(𝑀 + 1), 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐻 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐺))
Theorem	vdwlem7 16095*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐺}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐺 → (⟨(𝑀 + 1), 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐻 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐺)))
Theorem	vdwlem8 16096*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...(2 · 𝑊))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {𝐶}))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨1, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐹)
Theorem	vdwlem9 16097*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Fin ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑠 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑅 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑊))(⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝑔 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝑔))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑓 ∈ ((𝑅 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑊)) ↑𝑚 (1...𝑉))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨(𝑀 + 1), 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐻 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐻))
Theorem	vdwlem10 16098*	Lemma for vdw 16102. Set up secondary induction on 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Fin ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑠 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑛))(⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝑓 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝑓))
Theorem	vdwlem11 16099*	Lemma for vdw 16102. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Fin ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑠 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑𝑚 (1...𝑛))(𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝑓)
Theorem	vdwlem12 16100	Lemma for vdw 16102. 𝐾 = 2 base case of induction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...((♯‘𝑅) + 1))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 MonoAP 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑