P. 161 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16001-16100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	modfsummods 16001*	Induction step for modfsummod 16002. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝑧})𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 mod 𝑁) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 mod 𝑁) mod 𝑁) → (Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝑧})𝐵 mod 𝑁) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝑧})(𝐵 mod 𝑁) mod 𝑁)))
Theorem	modfsummod 16002*	A finite sum modulo a positive integer equals the finite sum of their summands modulo the positive integer, modulo the positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 mod 𝑁) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 mod 𝑁) mod 𝑁))
Theorem	fsumge0 16003*	If all of the terms of a finite sum are nonnegative, so is the sum. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	fsumless 16004*	A shorter sum of nonnegative terms is smaller than a longer one. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	fsumge1 16005*	A sum of nonnegative numbers is greater than or equal to any one of its terms. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	fsum00 16006*	A sum of nonnegative numbers is zero iff all terms are zero. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 0 ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 0))
Theorem	fsumle 16007*	If all of the terms of finite sums compare, so do the sums. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	fsumlt 16008*	If every term in one finite sum is less than the corresponding term in another, then the first sum is less than the second. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	fsumabs 16009*	Generalized triangle inequality: the absolute value of a finite sum is less than or equal to the sum of absolute values. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵))
Theorem	telfsumo 16010*	Sum of a telescoping series, using half-open intervals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑗 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑁 → 𝐴 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)(𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))
Theorem	telfsumo2 16011*	Sum of a telescoping series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑗 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑁 → 𝐴 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)(𝐶 − 𝐵) = (𝐸 − 𝐷))
Theorem	telfsum 16012*	Sum of a telescoping series. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑗 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑁 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)(𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))
Theorem	telfsum2 16013*	Sum of a telescoping series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑗 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑁 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)(𝐶 − 𝐵) = (𝐸 − 𝐷))
Theorem	fsumparts 16014*	Summation by parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑉 = 𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑗 + 1) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑉 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝑉 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑁 → (𝐴 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑉 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝑉 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)(𝐵 · (𝑋 − 𝑊)) = (((𝐸 · 𝑍) − (𝐷 · 𝑌)) − Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)((𝐶 − 𝐵) · 𝑋)))
Theorem	fsumrelem 16015*	Lemma for fsumre 16016, fsumim 16017, and fsumcj 16018. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹:ℂ⟶ℂ    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐹‘𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	fsumre 16016*	The real part of a sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℜ‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (ℜ‘𝐵))
Theorem	fsumim 16017*	The imaginary part of a sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (ℑ‘𝐵))
Theorem	fsumcj 16018*	The complex conjugate of a sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∗‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (∗‘𝐵))
Theorem	fsumrlim 16019*	Limit of a finite sum of converging sequences. Note that 𝐶(𝑘) is a collection of functions with implicit parameter 𝑘, each of which converges to 𝐷(𝑘) as 𝑛 ⇝ +∞. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	fsumo1 16020*	The finite sum of eventually bounded functions (where the index set 𝐵 does not depend on 𝑥) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1fsum 16021*	If 𝐴(𝑘) is O(1), then Σ𝑘 ≤ 𝑥, 𝐴(𝑘) is O(𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))𝐴 / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	seqabs 16022*	Generalized triangle inequality: the absolute value of a finite sum is less than or equal to the sum of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)) ≤ (seq𝑀( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
Theorem	iserabs 16023*	Generalized triangle inequality: the absolute value of an infinite sum is less than or equal to the sum of absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	cvgcmp 16024*	A comparison test for convergence of a real infinite series. Exercise 3 of [Gleason] p. 182. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgcmpub 16025*	An upper bound for the limit of a real infinite series. This theorem can also be used to compare two infinite series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	cvgcmpce 16026*	A comparison test for convergence of a complex infinite series. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (abs‘(𝐺‘𝑘)) ≤ (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	abscvgcvg 16027*	An absolutely convergent series is convergent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	climfsum 16028*	Limit of a finite sum of converging sequences. Note that 𝐹(𝑘) is a collection of functions with implicit parameter 𝑘, each of which converges to 𝐵(𝑘) as 𝑛 ⇝ +∞. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑛) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	fsumiun 16029*	Sum over a disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝐶 = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	hashiun 16030*	The cardinality of a disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (♯‘𝐵))
Theorem	hash2iun 16031*	The cardinality of a nested disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Σ𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (♯‘𝐶))
Theorem	hash2iun1dif1 16032*	The cardinality of a nested disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (♯‘𝐶) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) = ((♯‘𝐴) · ((♯‘𝐴) − 1)))
Theorem	hashrabrex 16033*	The number of elements in a class abstraction with a restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ 𝜓})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝜓}) = Σ𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ 𝜓}))
Theorem	hashuni 16034*	The cardinality of a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘∪ 𝐴) = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (♯‘𝑥))
Theorem	qshash 16035*	The cardinality of a set with an equivalence relation is the sum of the cardinalities of its equivalence classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐴) = Σ𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 / ∼ )(♯‘𝑥))
Theorem	indsum 16036*	Finite sum of a product with the indicator function / Cartesian product with the indicator function. Note: this theorem cannot be efficiently shortened using sumss2 15933, unless there are some additional auxiliary theorems like (if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0) · 𝐵) = if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 11-Apr-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ((((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑥) · 𝐵) = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	indsumhash 16037*	The finite sum of the indicator function is the number of elements of the corresponding subset. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2026.)
⊢ 1 = ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑂 ( 1 ‘𝑘) = (♯‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbijnn 16038*	Translate the Ackermann bijection ackbij1 10352 onto the positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) ↦ Σ𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (2↑𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin)⟶1-1ontoℕ0
5.10.4  The binomial theorem
Theorem	binomlem 16039*	Lemma for binom 16040 (binomial theorem). Inductive step. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝑁C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑(𝑁 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑(𝑁 + 1)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 + 1))(((𝑁 + 1)C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑((𝑁 + 1) − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binom 16040*	The binomial theorem: (𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑁 is the sum from 𝑘 = 0 to 𝑁 of (𝑁C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑘) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 𝑘)). Theorem 15-2.8 of [Gleason] p. 296. This part of the proof sets up the induction and does the base case, with the bulk of the work (the induction step) in binomlem 16039. This is Metamath 100 proof #44. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝑁C𝑘) · ((𝐴↑(𝑁 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binom1p 16041*	Special case of the binomial theorem for (1 + 𝐴)↑𝑁. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((1 + 𝐴)↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝑁C𝑘) · (𝐴↑𝑘)))
Theorem	binom11 16042*	Special case of the binomial theorem for 2↑𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (2↑𝑁) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)(𝑁C𝑘))
Theorem	binom1dif 16043*	A summation for the difference between ((𝐴 + 1)↑𝑁) and (𝐴↑𝑁). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴 + 1)↑𝑁) − (𝐴↑𝑁)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))((𝑁C𝑘) · (𝐴↑𝑘)))
Theorem	bcxmaslem1 16044	Lemma for bcxmas 16045. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑁 + 𝐴)C𝐴) = ((𝑁 + 𝐵)C𝐵))
Theorem	bcxmas 16045*	Parallel summation (Christmas Stocking) theorem for Pascal's Triangle. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝑁 + 1) + 𝑀)C𝑀) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)((𝑁 + 𝑗)C𝑗))
5.10.5  The inclusion/exclusion principle
Theorem	incexclem 16046*	Lemma for incexc 16047. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → ((♯‘𝐵) − (♯‘(𝐵 ∩ ∪ 𝐴))) = Σ𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(( -1↑(♯‘𝑠)) · (♯‘(𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑠))))
Theorem	incexc 16047*	The inclusion/exclusion principle for counting the elements of a finite union of finite sets. This is Metamath 100 proof #96. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → (♯‘∪ 𝐴) = Σ𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})(( -1↑((♯‘𝑠) − 1)) · (♯‘∩ 𝑠)))
Theorem	incexc2 16048*	The inclusion/exclusion principle for counting the elements of a finite union of finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) → (♯‘∪ 𝐴) = Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(♯‘𝐴))(( -1↑(𝑛 − 1)) · Σ𝑠 ∈ {𝑘 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (♯‘𝑘) = 𝑛} (♯‘∩ 𝑠)))
5.10.6  Infinite sums (cont.)
Theorem	isumshft 16049*	Index shift of an infinite sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝐾 + 𝑘) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵)
Theorem	isumsplit 16050*	Split off the first 𝑁 terms of an infinite sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 + Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴))
Theorem	isum1p 16051*	The infinite sum of a converging infinite series equals the first term plus the infinite sum of the rest of it. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 = ((𝐹‘𝑀) + Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))𝐴))
Theorem	isumnn0nn 16052*	Sum from 0 to infinity in terms of sum from 1 to infinity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 0 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 = (𝐵 + Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ 𝐴))
Theorem	isumrpcl 16053*	The infinite sum of positive reals is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	isumle 16054*	Comparison of two infinite sums. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 13-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵)
Theorem	isumless 16055*	A finite sum of nonnegative numbers is less than or equal to its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵)
Theorem	isumsup2 16056*	An infinite sum of nonnegative terms is equal to the supremum of the partial sums. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐺‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	isumsup 16057*	An infinite sum of nonnegative terms is equal to the supremum of the partial sums. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐺‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐴 = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	isumltss 16058*	A partial sum of a series with positive terms is less than the infinite sum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵)
Theorem	climcndslem1 16059*	Lemma for climcnds 16061: bound the original series by the condensed series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = ((2↑𝑛) · (𝐹‘(2↑𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘((2↑(𝑁 + 1)) − 1)) ≤ (seq0( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
Theorem	climcndslem2 16060*	Lemma for climcnds 16061: bound the condensed series by the original series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = ((2↑𝑛) · (𝐹‘(2↑𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁) ≤ (2 · (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(2↑𝑁))))
Theorem	climcnds 16061*	The Cauchy condensation test. If 𝑎(𝑘) is a decreasing sequence of nonnegative terms, then Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ𝑎(𝑘) converges iff Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ02↑𝑛 · 𝑎(2↑𝑛) converges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = ((2↑𝑛) · (𝐹‘(2↑𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
5.10.7  Miscellaneous converging and diverging sequences
Theorem	divrcnv 16062*	The sequence of reciprocals of real numbers, multiplied by the factor 𝐴, converges to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝐴 / 𝑛)) ⇝𝑟 0)
Theorem	divcnv 16063*	The sequence of reciprocals of positive integers, multiplied by the factor 𝐴, converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐴 / 𝑛)) ⇝ 0)
Theorem	flo1 16064	The floor function satisfies ⌊(𝑥) = 𝑥 + 𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 − (⌊‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	divcnvshft 16065*	Limit of a ratio function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐴 / (𝑘 + 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)
Theorem	supcvg 16066*	Extract a sequence 𝑓 in 𝑋 such that the image of the points in the bounded set 𝐴 converges to the supremum 𝑆 of the set. Similar to Equation 4 of [Kreyszig] p. 144. The proof uses countable choice ax-cc 10550. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑆 − (1 / 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶onto𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℕ⟶𝑋 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓) ⇝ 𝑆))
Theorem	infcvgaux1i 16067*	Auxiliary theorem for applications of supcvg 16066. Hypothesis for several supremum theorems. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2008.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝑥 = -𝐴}    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑋    &   ⊢ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧)
Theorem	infcvgaux2i 16068*	Auxiliary theorem for applications of supcvg 16066. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2008.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝑥 = -𝐴}    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑋    &   ⊢ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = -sup(𝑅, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑆 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	harmonic 16069	The harmonic series 𝐻 diverges. This fact follows from the stronger emcl 27376, which establishes that the harmonic series grows as log𝑛 + γ + o(1), but this uses a more elementary method, attributed to Nicole Oresme (1323-1382). This is Metamath 100 proof #34. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / 𝑛))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq1( + , 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐻 ∈ dom ⇝
5.10.8  Arithmetic series
Theorem	arisum 16070*	Arithmetic series sum of the first 𝑁 positive integers. This is Metamath 100 proof #68. (Contributed by FL, 16-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)𝑘 = (((𝑁↑2) + 𝑁) / 2))
Theorem	arisum2 16071*	Arithmetic series sum of the first 𝑁 nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Timothy J. O'Malley, 9-Oct-2026.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))𝑘 = (((𝑁↑2) − 𝑁) / 2))
Theorem	trireciplem 16072	Lemma for trirecip 16073. Show that the sum converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / (𝑛 · (𝑛 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 1
Theorem	trirecip 16073	The sum of the reciprocals of the triangle numbers converge to two. This is Metamath 100 proof #42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (2 / (𝑘 · (𝑘 + 1))) = 2
5.10.9  Geometric series
Theorem	expcnv 16074*	A sequence of powers of a complex number 𝐴 with absolute value less than 1 converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐴↑𝑛)) ⇝ 0)
Theorem	explecnv 16075*	A sequence of terms converges to zero when it is less than powers of a number 𝐴 whose absolute value is less than 1. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)
Theorem	geoserg 16076*	The value of the finite geometric series 𝐴↑𝑀 + 𝐴↑(𝑀 + 1) +... + 𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁)(𝐴↑𝑘) = (((𝐴↑𝑀) − (𝐴↑𝑁)) / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	geoser 16077*	The value of the finite geometric series 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2 +... + 𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1). This is Metamath 100 proof #66. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(𝐴↑𝑘) = ((1 − (𝐴↑𝑁)) / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	pwdif 16078*	The difference of two numbers to the same power is the difference of the two numbers multiplied with a finite sum. Generalization of subsq 14392. See Wikipedia "Fermat number", section "Other theorems about Fermat numbers", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number 14392, 5-Aug-2021. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2021.) (Revised by AV, 19-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴↑𝑁) − (𝐵↑𝑁)) = ((𝐴 − 𝐵) · Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑁)((𝐴↑𝑘) · (𝐵↑((𝑁 − 𝑘) − 1)))))
Theorem	pwm1geoser 16079*	The n-th power of a number decreased by 1 expressed by the finite geometric series 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2 +... + 𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by AV, 14-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) − 1) = ((𝐴 − 1) · Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(𝐴↑𝑘)))
Theorem	geolim 16080*	The partial sums in the infinite series 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... converge to (1 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐴↑𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (1 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	geolim2 16081*	The partial sums in the geometric series 𝐴↑𝑀 + 𝐴↑(𝑀 + 1)... converge to ((𝐴↑𝑀) / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐴↑𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ ((𝐴↑𝑀) / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	georeclim 16082*	The limit of a geometric series of reciprocals. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Dec-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	geo2sum 16083*	The value of the finite geometric series 2↑ -1 + 2↑ -2 +... + 2↑ -𝑁, multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴 / (2↑𝑘)) = (𝐴 − (𝐴 / (2↑𝑁))))
Theorem	geo2sum2 16084*	The value of the finite geometric series 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 +... + 2↑(𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(2↑𝑘) = ((2↑𝑁) − 1))
Theorem	geo2lim 16085*	The value of the infinite geometric series 2↑ -1 + 2↑ -2 +... , multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐴 / (2↑𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	geomulcvg 16086*	The geometric series converges even if it is multiplied by 𝑘 to result in the larger series 𝑘 · 𝐴↑𝑘. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑘 · (𝐴↑𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → seq0( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	geoisum 16087*	The infinite sum of 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... is (1 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐴↑𝑘) = (1 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	geoisumr 16088*	The infinite sum of reciprocals 1 + (1 / 𝐴)↑1 + (1 / 𝐴)↑2... is 𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1). (Contributed by rpenner, 3-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 < (abs‘𝐴)) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑘) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	geoisum1 16089*	The infinite sum of 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... is (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝐴↑𝑘) = (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	geoisum1c 16090*	The infinite sum of 𝐴 · (𝑅↑1) + 𝐴 · (𝑅↑2)... is (𝐴 · 𝑅) / (1 − 𝑅). (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝑅) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) = ((𝐴 · 𝑅) / (1 − 𝑅)))
Theorem	0.999... 16091	The recurring decimal 0.999..., which is defined as the infinite sum 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... i.e. 9 / 10↑1 + 9 / 10↑2 + 9 / 10↑3 + ..., is exactly equal to 1, according to ZF set theory. Interestingly, about 40% of the people responding to a poll at http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=13177 disagree. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (9 / (;10↑𝑘)) = 1
Theorem	geoihalfsum 16092	Prove that the infinite geometric series of 1/2, 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1. Uses geoisum1 16089. This is a representation of .111... in binary with an infinite number of 1's. Theorem 0.999... 16091 proves a similar claim for .999... in base 10. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (1 / (2↑𝑘)) = 1
5.10.10  Ratio test for infinite series convergence
Theorem	cvgrat 16093*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms beyond some index 𝐵, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. Equivalent to first part of Exercise 4 of [Gleason] p. 182. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
5.10.11  Mertens' theorem
Theorem	mertenslem1 16094*	Lemma for mertens 16096. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑡)(𝐾‘𝑚) < (((𝐸 / 2) / 𝑠) / (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 ≤ sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ∧ (𝑇 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑇 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸)
Theorem	mertenslem2 16095*	Lemma for mertens 16096. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸)
Theorem	mertens 16096*	Mertens' theorem. If 𝐴(𝑗) is an absolutely convergent series and 𝐵(𝑘) is convergent, then (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0𝐴(𝑗) · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0𝐵(𝑘)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴(𝑗) · 𝐵(𝑘 − 𝑗)) (and this latter series is convergent). This latter sum is commonly known as the Cauchy product of the sequences. The proof follows the outline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product#Proof_of_Mertens.27_theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐻) ⇝ (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝐵))
5.10.12  Finite and infinite products
5.10.12.1  Product sequences
Theorem	prodf 16097*	An infinite product of complex terms is a function from an upper set of integers to ℂ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹):𝑍⟶ℂ)
Theorem	clim2prod 16098*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · 𝐴))
Theorem	clim2div 16099*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prodfmul 16100*	The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))