P. 52 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 5101-5200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	disjxsn 5101*	A singleton collection is disjoint. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Disj 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵
Theorem	disjx0 5102	An empty collection is disjoint. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Disj 𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐵
Theorem	disjprg 5103*	A pair collection is disjoint iff the two sets in the family have empty intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝐶 ↔ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐸) = ∅))
Theorem	disjxiun 5104*	An indexed union of a disjoint collection of disjoint collections is disjoint if each component is disjoint, and the disjoint unions in the collection are also disjoint. Note that 𝐵(𝑦) and 𝐶(𝑥) may have the displayed free variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 27-May-2021.)
⊢ (Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝐶 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∧ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)))
Theorem	disjxun 5105*	The union of two disjoint collections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝐶 ↔ (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∧ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjss3 5106*	Expand a disjoint collection with any number of empty sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)𝐶 = ∅) → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↔ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶))
2.1.23  Binary relations
Syntax	wbr 5107	Extend wff notation to include the general binary relation predicate. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row. Since binary relations are the only possible wff expressions consisting of three class expressions in a row, the syntax is unambiguous. (For an example of how syntax could become ambiguous if we are not careful, see the comment in cneg 11406.)
wff 𝐴𝑅𝐵
Definition	df-br 5108	Define a general binary relation. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row. Definition 6.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 29 generalized to arbitrary classes. Class 𝑅 often denotes a relation such as "< " that compares two classes 𝐴 and 𝐵, which might be numbers such as 1 and 2 (see df-ltxr 11213 for the specific definition of <). As a wff, relations are true or false. For example, (𝑅 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → 3𝑅9) (ex-br 30360). Often class 𝑅 meets the Rel criteria to be defined in df-rel 5645, and in particular 𝑅 may be a function (see df-fun 6513). This definition of relations is well-defined, although not very meaningful, when classes 𝐴 and/or 𝐵 are proper classes (i.e., are not sets). On the other hand, we often find uses for this definition when 𝑅 is a proper class (see for example iprc 7887). (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	breq 5109	Equality theorem for binary relations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1995.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝑆𝐵))
Theorem	breq1 5110	Equality theorem for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	breq2 5111	Equality theorem for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶𝑅𝐴 ↔ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	breq12 5112	Equality theorem for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	breqi 5113	Equality inference for binary relations. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝑆𝐵)
Theorem	breq1i 5114	Equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breq2i 5115	Equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶𝑅𝐴 ↔ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	breq12i 5116	Equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	breq1d 5117	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	breqd 5118	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐴𝐷 ↔ 𝐶𝐵𝐷))
Theorem	breq2d 5119	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝑅𝐴 ↔ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	breq12d 5120	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	breq123d 5121	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑆𝐷))
Theorem	breqdi 5122	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐴𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐵𝐷)
Theorem	breqan12d 5123	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	breqan12rd 5124	Equality deduction for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	eqnbrtrd 5125	Substitution of equal classes into the negation of a binary relation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	nbrne1 5126	Two classes are different if they don't have the same relationship to a third class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nbrne2 5127	Two classes are different if they don't have the same relationship to a third class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqbrtri 5128	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵𝑅𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐶
Theorem	eqbrtrd 5129	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	eqbrtrri 5130	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵𝑅𝐶
Theorem	eqbrtrrd 5131	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breqtri 5132	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐶
Theorem	breqtrd 5133	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breqtrri 5134	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐶
Theorem	breqtrrd 5135	Substitution of equal classes into a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	3brtr3i 5136	Substitution of equality into both sides of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶𝑅𝐷
Theorem	3brtr4i 5137	Substitution of equality into both sides of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶𝑅𝐷
Theorem	3brtr3d 5138	Substitution of equality into both sides of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	3brtr4d 5139	Substitution of equality into both sides of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	3brtr3g 5140	Substitution of equality into both sides of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	3brtr4g 5141	Substitution of equality into both sides of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	eqbrtrid 5142	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	eqbrtrrid 5143	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breqtrid 5144	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breqtrrid 5145	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
⊢ 𝐴𝑅𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	eqbrtrdi 5146	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵𝑅𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	eqbrtrrdi 5147	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐵𝑅𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breqtrdi 5148	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	breqtrrdi 5149	A chained equality inference for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	ssbrd 5150	Deduction from a subclass relationship of binary relations. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐴𝐷 → 𝐶𝐵𝐷))
Theorem	ssbr 5151	Implication from a subclass relationship of binary relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶𝐴𝐷 → 𝐶𝐵𝐷))
Theorem	ssbri 5152	Inference from a subclass relationship of binary relations. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶𝐴𝐷 → 𝐶𝐵𝐷)
Theorem	nfbrd 5153	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfbr 5154. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	nfbr 5154	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴𝑅𝐵
Theorem	brab1 5155*	Relationship between a binary relation and a class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝐴})
Theorem	br0 5156	The empty binary relation never holds. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴∅𝐵
Theorem	brne0 5157	If two sets are in a binary relation, the relation cannot be empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝑅 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	brun 5158	The union of two binary relations. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴𝑆𝐵))
Theorem	brin 5159	The intersection of two relations. (Contributed by FL, 7-Oct-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐵))
Theorem	brdif 5160	The difference of two binary relations. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ∖ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴𝑆𝐵))
Theorem	sbcbr123 5161	Move substitution in and out of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	sbcbr 5162*	Move substitution in and out of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	sbcbr12g 5163*	Move substitution in and out of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵𝑅⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	sbcbr1g 5164*	Move substitution in and out of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	sbcbr2g 5165*	Move substitution in and out of a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	brsymdif 5166	Characterization of the symmetric difference of two binary relations. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 △ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝑆𝐵))
Theorem	brralrspcev 5167*	Restricted existential specialization with a restricted universal quantifier over a relation, closed form. (Contributed by AV, 20-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	brimralrspcev 5168*	Restricted existential specialization with a restricted universal quantifier over an implication with a relation in the antecedent, closed form. (Contributed by AV, 20-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥) → 𝜓))
2.1.24  Ordered-pair class abstractions (class builders)
Syntax	copab 5169	Extend class notation to include ordered-pair class abstraction (class builder).
class {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Definition	df-opab 5170*	Define the class abstraction of a collection of ordered pairs. Definition 3.3 of [Monk1] p. 34. Usually 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, although the definition does not require it (see dfid2 5535 for a case where they are not distinct). The brace notation is called "class abstraction" by Quine; it is also called "class builder" in the literature. An alternate definition using no existential quantifiers is shown by dfopab2 8031. An example is given by ex-opab 30361. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	opabss 5171*	The collection of ordered pairs in a class is a subclass of it. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ⊆ 𝑅
Theorem	opabbid 5172	Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	opabbidv 5173*	Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	opabbii 5174	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	nfopabd 5175*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	nfopab 5176*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfopab1 5177	The first abstraction variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction is effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfopab2 5178	The second abstraction variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction is effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	cbvopab 5179*	Rule used to change bound variables in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvopabv 5180*	Rule used to change bound variables in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvopab1 5181*	Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2370. See cbvopab1g 5182 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by GG, 17-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvopab1g 5182*	Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2370. See cbvopab1 5181 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2370. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvopab2 5183*	Change second bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvopab1s 5184*	Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑}
Theorem	cbvopab1v 5185*	Rule used to change the first bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvopab2v 5186*	Rule used to change the second bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	unopab 5187	Union of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
2.1.25  Functions in maps-to notation
Syntax	cmpt 5188	Extend the definition of a class to include maps-to notation for defining a function via a rule.
class (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Definition	df-mpt 5189*	Define maps-to notation for defining a function via a rule. Read as "the function which maps 𝑥 (in 𝐴) to 𝐵(𝑥)". The class expression 𝐵 is the value of the function at 𝑥 and normally contains the variable 𝑥. An example is the square function for complex numbers, (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑2)). Similar to the definition of mapping in [ChoquetDD] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)}
Theorem	mpteq12da 5190	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2142. (Revised by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpteq12df 5191	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. Compare mpteq12dv 5194. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpteq12f 5192	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐷) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpteq12dva 5193*	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2142, ax-12 2178. (Revised by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpteq12dv 5194*	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2142, ax-12 2178. (Revised by SN and GG, 1-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpteq12 5195*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐷) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpteq1 5196*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	mpteq1d 5197*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	mpteq1i 5198	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) Remove all disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	mpteq2da 5199	Slightly more general equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 14-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	mpteq2dva 5200*	Slightly more general equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Apr-2012.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2142. (Revised by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))