| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 489 of 499) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30888) |
(30889-32411) |
(32412-49816) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | logic1 48801 | Distribution of implication over biconditional with replacement (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | logic1a 48802 | Variant of logic1 48801. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | logic2 48803 | Variant of logic1 48801. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | pm5.32dav 48804 | Distribution of implication over biconditional (deduction form). Variant of pm5.32da 579. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm5.32dra 48805 | Reverse distribution of implication over biconditional (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | exp12bd 48806 | The import-export theorem (impexp 450) for biconditionals (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))) | ||
| Theorem | mpbiran3d 48807 | Equivalence with a conjunction one of whose conjuncts is a consequence of the other. Deduction form. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | mpbiran4d 48808 | Equivalence with a conjunction one of whose conjuncts is a consequence of the other. Deduction form. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | dtrucor3 48809* | An example of how ax-5 1911 without a distinct variable condition causes paradox in models of at least two objects. The hypothesis "dtrucor3.1" is provable from dtru 5377 in the ZF set theory. axc16nf 2265 and euae 2654 demonstrate that the violation of dtru 5377 leads to a model with only one object assuming its existence (ax-6 1968). The conclusion is also provable in the empty model ( see emptyal 1909). See also nf5 2283 and nf5i 2148 for the relation between unconditional ax-5 1911 and being not free. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | ralbidb 48810* | Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier and additional condition (deduction form). See ralbidc 48811 for a more generalized form. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | ralbidc 48811* | Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier and additional condition (deduction form). A variant of ralbidb 48810. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.41dv 48812* | A complex deduction form of r19.41v 3160. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | rmotru 48813 | Two ways of expressing "at most one" element. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊤) | ||
| Theorem | reutru 48814 | Two ways of expressing "exactly one" element. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊤) | ||
| Theorem | reutruALT 48815 | Alternate proof of reutru 48814. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊤) | ||
| Theorem | reueqbidva 48816* | Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. General version of reueqbidv 3382. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | reuxfr1dd 48817* | Transfer existential uniqueness from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. Simplifies reuxfr1d 3707. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | ssdisjd 48818 | Subset preserves disjointness. Deduction form of ssdisj 4408. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssdisjdr 48819 | Subset preserves disjointness. Deduction form of ssdisj 4408. Alternatively this could be proved with ineqcom 4158 in tandem with ssdisjd 48818. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | disjdifb 48820 | Relative complement is anticommutative regarding intersection. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | predisj 48821 | Preimages of disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | vsn 48822 | The singleton of the universal class is the empty set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ {V} = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | mosn 48823* | "At most one" element in a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝐵} → ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mo0 48824* | "At most one" element in an empty set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mosssn 48825* | "At most one" element in a subclass of a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝐵} → ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mo0sn 48826* | Two ways of expressing "at most one" element in a class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 𝐴 = {𝑦})) | ||
| Theorem | mosssn2 48827* | Two ways of expressing "at most one" element in a class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝐴 ⊆ {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | unilbss 48828* | Superclass of the greatest lower bound. A dual statement of ssintub 4914. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iuneq0 48829 | An indexed union is empty iff all indexed classes are empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ ↔ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | iineq0 48830 | An indexed intersection is empty if one of the intersected classes is empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | iunlub 48831* | The indexed union is the the lowest upper bound if it exists. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑋) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | iinglb 48832* | The indexed intersection is the the greatest lower bound if it exists. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑋) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | iuneqconst2 48833* | Indexed union of identical classes. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | iineqconst2 48834* | Indexed intersection of identical classes. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | inpw 48835* | Two ways of expressing a collection of subsets as seen in df-ntr 22928, unimax 4893, and others (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝒫 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | opth1neg 48836 | Two ordered pairs are not equal if their first components are not equal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ≠ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | opth2neg 48837 | Two ordered pairs are not equal if their second components are not equal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ≠ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | brab2dd 48838* | Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | brab2ddw 48839* | Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐷 = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | brab2ddw2 48840* | Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐷 = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | iinxp 48841* | Indexed intersection of Cartesian products is the Cartesian product of indexed intersections. See also inxp 5769 and intxp 48842. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 × 𝐶) = (∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | intxp 48842* | Intersection of Cartesian products is the Cartesian product of intersection of domains and ranges. See also inxp 5769 and iinxp 48841. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 = (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝑥 & ⊢ 𝑌 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝐴 = (𝑋 × 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | coxp 48843 | Composition with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) = (𝐵 × (𝐴 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cosn 48844 | Composition with an ordered pair singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 ∘ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐶}))) | ||
| Theorem | cosni 48845 | Composition with an ordered pair singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐶})) | ||
| Theorem | inisegn0a 48846 | The inverse image of a singleton subset of an image is non-empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dmrnxp 48847 | A Cartesian product is the Cartesian product of its domain and range. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = (𝐴 × 𝐵) → 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | mof0 48848 | There is at most one function into the empty set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶∅ | ||
| Theorem | mof02 48849* | A variant of mof0 48848. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mof0ALT 48850* | Alternate proof of mof0 48848 with stronger requirements on distinct variables. Uses mo4 2560. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶∅ | ||
| Theorem | eufsnlem 48851* | There is exactly one function into a singleton. For a simpler hypothesis, see eufsn 48852 assuming ax-rep 5215, or eufsn2 48853 assuming ax-pow 5301 and ax-un 7663. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶{𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | eufsn 48852* | There is exactly one function into a singleton, assuming ax-rep 5215. See eufsn2 48853 for different axiom requirements. If existence is not needed, use mofsn 48854 or mofsn2 48855 for fewer axiom assumptions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶{𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | eufsn2 48853* | There is exactly one function into a singleton, assuming ax-pow 5301 and ax-un 7663. Variant of eufsn 48852. If existence is not needed, use mofsn 48854 or mofsn2 48855 for fewer axiom assumptions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶{𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | mofsn 48854* | There is at most one function into a singleton, with fewer axioms than eufsn 48852 and eufsn2 48853. See also mofsn2 48855. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶{𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | mofsn2 48855* | There is at most one function into a singleton. An unconditional variant of mofsn 48854, i.e., the singleton could be empty if 𝑌 is a proper class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = {𝑌} → ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mofsssn 48856* | There is at most one function into a subclass of a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ {𝑌} → ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mofmo 48857* | There is at most one function into a class containing at most one element. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mofeu 48858* | The uniqueness of a function into a set with at most one element. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐴 × 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | elfvne0 48859 | If a function value has a member, then the function is not an empty set (An artifact of our function value definition.) (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐹 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fdomne0 48860 | A function with non-empty domain is non-empty and has non-empty codomain. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | f1sn2g 48861 | A function that maps a singleton to a class is injective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:{𝐴}⟶𝐵) → 𝐹:{𝐴}–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | f102g 48862 | A function that maps the empty set to a class is injective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | f1mo 48863* | A function that maps a set with at most one element to a class is injective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | f002 48864 | A function with an empty codomain must have empty domain. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | map0cor 48865* | A function exists iff an empty codomain is accompanied with an empty domain. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ffvbr 48866 | Relation with function value. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋𝐹(𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | xpco2 48867 | Composition of a Cartesian product with a function. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ovsng 48868 | The operation value of a singleton of a nested ordered pair is the last member. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴{〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉}𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ovsng2 48869 | The operation value of a singleton of an ordered triple is the last member. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴{〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉}𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ovsn 48870 | The operation value of a singleton of a nested ordered pair is the last member. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴{〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉}𝐵) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | ovsn2 48871 | The operation value of a singleton of an ordered triple is the last member. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴{〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉}𝐵) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | fvconstr 48872 | Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | fvconstrn0 48873 | Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | fvconstr2 48874 | Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ovmpt4d 48875* | Deduction version of ovmpt4g 7488. (This is the operation analogue of fvmpt2d 6937.) (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnovd 48876* | Deduction for equality of operations. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fonex 48877 | The domain of a surjection is a proper class if the range is a proper class as well. Can be used to prove that if a structure component extractor restricted to a class maps onto a proper class, then the class is a proper class as well. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∉ V & ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | eloprab1st2nd 48878* | Reconstruction of a nested ordered pair in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝐴 = 〈〈(1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)), (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴))〉, (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
| Theorem | fmpodg 48879* | Domain and codomain of the mapping operation; deduction form. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | fmpod 48880* | Domain and codomain of the mapping operation; deduction form. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | resinsnlem 48881 | Lemma for resinsnALT 48883. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | resinsn 48882 | Restriction to the intersection with a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ {𝐵})) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | resinsnALT 48883 | Restriction to the intersection with a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ {𝐵})) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos5 48884* | Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ ((𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}) ∪ {〈∅, ∅〉})) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos6 48885* | Alternate definition of tpos. The second half of the right hand side could apply ressn 6228 and become (𝐹 ↾ {∅}) (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = ((𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) ∪ ({∅} × (𝐹 “ {∅}))) | ||
| Theorem | dmtposss 48886 | The domain of tpos 𝐹 is a subset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ dom tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) | ||
| Theorem | tposres0 48887 | The transposition of a set restricted to the empty set is the set restricted to the empty set. See also ressn 6228 and dftpos6 48885 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (tpos 𝐹 ↾ {∅}) = (𝐹 ↾ {∅}) | ||
| Theorem | tposresg 48888 | The transposition restricted to a set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (tpos 𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) = ((tpos 𝐹 ↾ ◡◡𝑅) ∪ (𝐹 ↾ (𝑅 ∩ {∅}))) | ||
| Theorem | tposrescnv 48889* | The transposition restricted to a converse is the transposition of the restricted class, with the empty set removed from the domain. Note that the right hand side is a more useful form of (tpos (𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) ↾ (V ∖ {∅})) by df-tpos 8151. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (tpos 𝐹 ↾ ◡𝑅) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tposres2 48890 | The transposition restricted to a set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∅ ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (tpos 𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) = (tpos 𝐹 ↾ ◡◡𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | tposres3 48891 | The transposition restricted to a set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∅ ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (tpos 𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) = tpos (𝐹 ↾ ◡𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | tposres 48892 | The transposition restricted to a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (tpos 𝐹 ↾ 𝑅) = tpos (𝐹 ↾ ◡𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | tposresxp 48893 | The transposition restricted to a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (tpos 𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = tpos (𝐹 ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf1o 48894 | Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | tposid 48895 | Swap an ordered pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋tpos I 𝑌) = 〈𝑌, 𝑋〉 | ||
| Theorem | tposidres 48896 | Swap an ordered pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌tpos ( I ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑋) = 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉) | ||
| Theorem | tposidf1o 48897 | The swap function, or the twisting map, is bijective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ tpos ( I ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐵 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→(𝐴 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | tposideq 48898* | Two ways of expressing the swap function. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (tpos I ↾ 𝑅) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tposideq2 48899* | Two ways of expressing the swap function. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (tpos I ↾ 𝑅) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | ixpv 48900* | Infinite Cartesian product of the universal class is the set of functions with a fixed domain. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 V = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓 Fn 𝐴} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |