| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 496 of 508) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31343) |
(31344-32866) |
(32867-50712) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | itcoval0 49501 | A function iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = ( I ↾ dom 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | itcoval1 49502 | A function iterated once. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘1) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | itcoval2 49503 | A function iterated twice. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘2) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | itcoval3 49504 | A function iterated three times. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | itcoval0mpt 49505* | A mapping iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalsuc 49506* | The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐺(𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔))𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalsucov 49507 | The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalendof 49508 | The n-th iterate of an endofunction is an endofunction. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑁):𝐴⟶𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalpclem1 49509* | Lemma 1 for itcovalpc 49511: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 0)))) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalpclem2 49510* | Lemma 2 for itcovalpc 49511: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝑦))) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · (𝑦 + 1)))))) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalpc 49511* | The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝐼)))) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalt2lem2lem1 49512 | Lemma 1 for itcovalt2lem2 49515. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · 𝑌) − 𝐶) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalt2lem2lem2 49513 | Lemma 2 for itcovalt2lem2 49515. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2 · (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑌)) − 𝐶)) + 𝐶) = (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑌 + 1))) − 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalt2lem1 49514* | Lemma 1 for itcovalt2 49516: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 5-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑0)) − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalt2lem2 49515* | Lemma 2 for itcovalt2 49516: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑦)) − 𝐶)) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑦 + 1))) − 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | itcovalt2 49516* | The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "times 2 plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝐼)) − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ackvalsuc1mpt 49517* | The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument as a mapping of the second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘(𝑀 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1))) | ||
| Theorem | ackvalsuc1 49518 | The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument and an arbitrary second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1)) | ||
| Theorem | ackval0 49519 | The Ackermann function at 0. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Ack‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1)) | ||
| Theorem | ackval1 49520 | The Ackermann function at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Ack‘1) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 2)) | ||
| Theorem | ackval2 49521 | The Ackermann function at 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Ack‘2) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 3)) | ||
| Theorem | ackval3 49522 | The Ackermann function at 3. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Ack‘3) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2↑(𝑛 + 3)) − 3)) | ||
| Theorem | ackendofnn0 49523 | The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is an endofunction on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀):ℕ0⟶ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | ackfnnn0 49524 | The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is a function on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀) Fn ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | ackval0val 49525 | The Ackermann function at 0 (for the first argument). This is the first equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1)) | ||
| Theorem | ackvalsuc0val 49526 | The Ackermann function at a successor (of the first argument). This is the second equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1)) | ||
| Theorem | ackvalsucsucval 49527 | The Ackermann function at the successors. This is the third equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | ackval0012 49528 | The Ackermann function at (0,0), (0,1), (0,2). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 〈((Ack‘0)‘0), ((Ack‘0)‘1), ((Ack‘0)‘2)〉 = 〈1, 2, 3〉 | ||
| Theorem | ackval1012 49529 | The Ackermann function at (1,0), (1,1), (1,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 〈((Ack‘1)‘0), ((Ack‘1)‘1), ((Ack‘1)‘2)〉 = 〈2, 3, 4〉 | ||
| Theorem | ackval2012 49530 | The Ackermann function at (2,0), (2,1), (2,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 〈((Ack‘2)‘0), ((Ack‘2)‘1), ((Ack‘2)‘2)〉 = 〈3, 5, 7〉 | ||
| Theorem | ackval3012 49531 | The Ackermann function at (3,0), (3,1), (3,2). (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 〈((Ack‘3)‘0), ((Ack‘3)‘1), ((Ack‘3)‘2)〉 = 〈5, ;13, ;29〉 | ||
| Theorem | ackval40 49532 | The Ackermann function at (4,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘0) = ;13 | ||
| Theorem | ackval41a 49533 | The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ((2↑;16) − 3) | ||
| Theorem | ackval41 49534 | The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ;;;;65533 | ||
| Theorem | ackval42 49535 | The Ackermann function at (4,2). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑;;;;65536) − 3) | ||
| Theorem | ackval42a 49536 | The Ackermann function at (4,2), expressed with powers of 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑(2↑(2↑(2↑2)))) − 3) | ||
| Theorem | ackval50 49537 | The Ackermann function at (5,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Ack‘5)‘0) = ;;;;65533 | ||
| Theorem | fv1prop 49538 | The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({〈1, 𝐴〉, 〈2, 𝐵〉}‘1) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fv2prop 49539 | The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ({〈1, 𝐴〉, 〈2, 𝐵〉}‘2) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | submuladdmuld 49540 | Transformation of a sum of a product of a difference and a product with the subtrahend of the difference. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · (𝐷 − 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | affinecomb1 49541* | Combination of two real affine combinations, one class variable resolved. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐺 − 𝐹) / (𝐶 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ 𝐸 = ((𝑆 · (𝐴 − 𝐵)) + 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | affinecomb2 49542* | Combination of two real affine combinations, presented without fraction. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · 𝐸) = (((𝐺 − 𝐹) · 𝐴) + ((𝐹 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐺))))) | ||
| Theorem | affineid 49543 | Identity of an affine combination. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 1subrec1sub 49544 | Subtract the reciprocal of 1 minus a number from 1 results in the number divided by the number minus 1. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (1 − (1 / (1 − 𝐴))) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | resum2sqcl 49545 | The sum of two squares of real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | resum2sqgt0 49546 | The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is greater than zero. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 0 < 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | resum2sqrp 49547 | The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is a positive real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ+) | ||
| Theorem | resum2sqorgt0 49548 | The sum of the square of two real numbers is greater than zero if at least one of the real numbers is nonzero. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → 0 < 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | reorelicc 49549 | Membership in and outside of a closed real interval. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2pxel 49550 | The x-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘1) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2pyel 49551 | The y-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘2) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | prelrrx2 49552 | An unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 and real numbers as second components is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {〈1, 𝐴〉, 〈2, 𝐵〉} ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | prelrrx2b 49553 | An unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 and real numbers as second components is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, determined by its coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (((𝑍‘1) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑍‘2) = 𝐵) ∨ ((𝑍‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑍‘2) = 𝑌))) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {{〈1, 𝐴〉, 〈2, 𝐵〉}, {〈1, 𝑋〉, 〈2, 𝑌〉}})) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2pnecoorneor 49554 | If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then they are different at least at one coordinate. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑋‘1) ≠ (𝑌‘1) ∨ (𝑋‘2) ≠ (𝑌‘2))) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2pnedifcoorneor 49555 | If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘2) − (𝑋‘2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2pnedifcoorneorr 49556 | If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑋‘2) − (𝑌‘2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2xpref1o 49557* | There is a bijection between the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) and the set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane (represented as mappings from {1, 2} to the real numbers). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {〈1, 𝑥〉, 〈2, 𝑦〉}) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:(ℝ × ℝ)–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | rrx2xpreen 49558 | The set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane and the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 ≈ (ℝ × ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2plord 49559* | The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: a point is less than another point iff its first coordinate is less than the first coordinate of the other point, or the first coordinates of both points are equal and the second coordinate of the first point is less than the second coordinate of the other point: 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ≤ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 iff (𝑎 < 𝑥 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑦)). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋‘1) < (𝑌‘1) ∨ ((𝑋‘1) = (𝑌‘1) ∧ (𝑋‘2) < (𝑌‘2))))) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2plord1 49560* | The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: a point is less than another point if its first coordinate is less than the first coordinate of the other point. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑋‘1) < (𝑌‘1)) → 𝑋𝑂𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2plord2 49561* | The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: if the first coordinates of two points are equal, a point is less than another point iff the second coordinate of the point is less than the second coordinate of the other point. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑋‘1) = (𝑌‘1)) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌 ↔ (𝑋‘2) < (𝑌‘2))) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2plordisom 49562* | The set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane with the lexicographical ordering is isomorphic to the cartesian product of the real numbers with the lexicographical ordering implied by the ordering of the real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {〈1, 𝑥〉, 〈2, 𝑦〉}) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) < (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) < (2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Isom 𝑇, 𝑂 ((ℝ × ℝ), 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2plordso 49563* | The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane is a strict total ordering. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))} & ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑂 Or 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | ehl2eudisval0 49564 | The Euclidean distance of a point to the origin in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝔼hil‘2) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸) & ⊢ 0 = ({1, 2} × {0}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹𝐷 0 ) = (√‘(((𝐹‘1)↑2) + ((𝐹‘2)↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | ehl2eudis0lt 49565 | An upper bound of the Euclidean distance of a point to the origin in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝔼hil‘2) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2}) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸) & ⊢ 0 = ({1, 2} × {0}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) → ((𝐹𝐷 0 ) < 𝑅 ↔ (((𝐹‘1)↑2) + ((𝐹‘2)↑2)) < (𝑅↑2))) | ||
| Syntax | cline 49566 | Declare the syntax for lines in generalized real Euclidean spaces. |
| class LineM | ||
| Syntax | csph 49567 | Declare the syntax for spheres in generalized real Euclidean spaces. |
| class Sphere | ||
| Definition | df-line 49568* | Definition of lines passing through two different points in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ LineM = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤))𝑝 = ((((1r‘(Scalar‘𝑤))(-g‘(Scalar‘𝑤))𝑡)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑥)(+g‘𝑤)(𝑡( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑦))})) | ||
| Definition | df-sph 49569* | Definition of spheres for given centers and radii in a metric space (or more generally, in a distance space, see distspace 24526, or even in any extended structure having a base set and a distance function into the real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ Sphere = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑟 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑝(dist‘𝑤)𝑥) = 𝑟})) | ||
| Theorem | lines 49570* | The lines passing through two different points in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐾 𝑝 = ((( 1 − 𝑡) · 𝑥) + (𝑡 · 𝑦))})) | ||
| Theorem | line 49571* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐾 𝑝 = ((( 1 − 𝑡) · 𝑋) + (𝑡 · 𝑌))}) | ||
| Theorem | rrxlines 49572* | Definition of lines passing through two different points in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐸) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ 𝑝 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑥) + (𝑡 · 𝑦))})) | ||
| Theorem | rrxline 49573* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐸) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ 𝑝 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑋) + (𝑡 · 𝑌))}) | ||
| Theorem | rrxlinesc 49574* | Definition of lines passing through two different points in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension, expressed by their coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖)))})) | ||
| Theorem | rrxlinec 49575* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension, expressed by its coordinates. Remark: This proof is shorter and requires less distinct variables than the proof using rrxlinesc 49574. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘𝑖)))}) | ||
| Theorem | eenglngeehlnmlem1 49576* | Lemma 1 for eenglngeehlnm 49578. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∖ {𝑥})) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁))) → ((∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖)))) → ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖))))) | ||
| Theorem | eenglngeehlnmlem2 49577* | Lemma 2 for eenglngeehlnm 49578. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∖ {𝑥})) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁))) → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) → (∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖)))))) | ||
| Theorem | eenglngeehlnm 49578 | The line definition in the Tarski structure for the Euclidean geometry (see elntg 29391) corresponds to the definition of lines passing through two different points in a left module (see rrxlines 49572). (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (LineG‘(EEG‘𝑁)) = (LineM‘(𝔼hil‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2line 49579* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ((𝑝‘1) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘1)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘1))) ∧ (𝑝‘2) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘2)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘2))))}) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2vlinest 49580* | The vertical line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ((𝑋‘1) = (𝑌‘1) ∧ (𝑋‘2) ≠ (𝑌‘2))) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑝‘1) = (𝑋‘1)}) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2linest 49581* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘2) − (𝑋‘2)) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝑋‘2) · (𝑌‘1)) − ((𝑋‘1) · (𝑌‘2))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝐴 · (𝑝‘2)) = ((𝐵 · (𝑝‘1)) + 𝐶)}) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2linesl 49582* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, expressed by the slope 𝑆 between the two points ("point-slope form"), sometimes also written as ((𝑝‘2) − (𝑋‘2)) = (𝑆 · ((𝑝‘1) − (𝑋‘1))). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (((𝑌‘2) − (𝑋‘2)) / ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑋‘1) ≠ (𝑌‘1)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑝‘2) = ((𝑆 · ((𝑝‘1) − (𝑋‘1))) + (𝑋‘2))}) | ||
| Theorem | rrx2linest2 49583* | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in another "standard form" (usually with (𝑝‘1) = 𝑥 and (𝑝‘2) = 𝑦). (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑋‘2) − (𝑌‘2)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝑋‘2) · (𝑌‘1)) − ((𝑋‘1) · (𝑌‘2))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | elrrx2linest2 49584 | The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in another "standard form" (usually with (𝑝‘1) = 𝑥 and (𝑝‘2) = 𝑦). (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑋‘2) − (𝑌‘2)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝑋‘2) · (𝑌‘1)) − ((𝑋‘1) · (𝑌‘2))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ((𝐴 · (𝐺‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝐺‘2))) = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | spheres 49585* | The spheres for given centers and radii in a metric space (or any extensible structure having a base set and a distance function). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑟 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑝𝐷𝑥) = 𝑟})) | ||
| Theorem | sphere 49586* | A sphere with center 𝑋 and radius 𝑅 in a metric space (or any extensible structure having a base set and a distance function). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → (𝑋𝑆𝑅) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑝𝐷𝑋) = 𝑅}) | ||
| Theorem | rrxsphere 49587* | The sphere with center 𝑀 and radius 𝑅 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. Remark: this theorem holds also for the degenerate case 𝑅 < 0 (negative radius): in this case, (𝑀𝑆𝑅) is empty. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑀𝑆𝑅) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑝𝐷𝑀) = 𝑅}) | ||
| Theorem | 2sphere 49588* | The sphere with center 𝑀 and radius 𝑅 in a two dimensional Euclidean space is a circle. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((((𝑝‘1) − (𝑀‘1))↑2) + (((𝑝‘2) − (𝑀‘2))↑2)) = (𝑅↑2)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) → (𝑀𝑆𝑅) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | 2sphere0 49589* | The sphere around the origin 0 (see rrx0 25609) with radius 𝑅 in a two dimensional Euclidean space is a circle. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝐸) & ⊢ 0 = (𝐼 × {0}) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (((𝑝‘1)↑2) + ((𝑝‘2)↑2)) = (𝑅↑2)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ (0[,)+∞) → ( 0 𝑆𝑅) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | line2ylem 49590* | Lemma for line2y 49594. This proof is based on counterexamples for the following cases: 1. 𝐶 ≠ 0: p = (0,0) (LHS of biconditional is false, RHS is true); 2. 𝐶 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0: p = (1,-A/B) (LHS of biconditional is true, RHS is false); 3. 𝐴 = 𝐵 = 𝐶 = 0: p = (1,1) (LHS of biconditional is true, RHS is false). (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑝‘1) = 0) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0 ∧ 𝐶 = 0))) | ||
| Theorem | line2 49591* | Example for a line 𝐺 passing through two different points in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶} & ⊢ 𝑋 = {〈1, 0〉, 〈2, (𝐶 / 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝑌 = {〈1, 1〉, 〈2, ((𝐶 − 𝐴) / 𝐵)〉} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐺 = (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | line2xlem 49592* | Lemma for line2x 49593. This proof is based on counterexamples for the following cases: 1. 𝑀 ≠ (𝐶 / 𝐵): p = (0,C/B) (LHS of biconditional is true, RHS is false); 2. 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑀 = (𝐶 / 𝐵): p = (1,C/B) (LHS of biconditional is false, RHS is true). (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶} & ⊢ 𝑋 = {〈1, 0〉, 〈2, 𝑀〉} & ⊢ 𝑌 = {〈1, 1〉, 〈2, 𝑀〉} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑝‘2) = 𝑀) → (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝑀 = (𝐶 / 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | line2x 49593* | Example for a horizontal line 𝐺 passing through two different points in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶} & ⊢ 𝑋 = {〈1, 0〉, 〈2, 𝑀〉} & ⊢ 𝑌 = {〈1, 1〉, 〈2, 𝑀〉} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐺 = (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝑀 = (𝐶 / 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | line2y 49594* | Example for a vertical line 𝐺 passing through two different points in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘2))) = 𝐶} & ⊢ 𝑋 = {〈1, 0〉, 〈2, 𝑀〉} & ⊢ 𝑌 = {〈1, 0〉, 〈2, 𝑁〉} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁)) → (𝐺 = (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0 ∧ 𝐶 = 0))) | ||
| Theorem | itsclc0lem1 49595 | Lemma for theorems about intersections of lines and circles in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 . (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑊 ≠ 0)) → (((𝑆 · 𝑈) + (𝑇 · (√‘𝑉))) / 𝑊) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | itsclc0lem2 49596 | Lemma for theorems about intersections of lines and circles in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 . (Contributed by AV, 3-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑊 ≠ 0)) → (((𝑆 · 𝑈) − (𝑇 · (√‘𝑉))) / 𝑊) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | itsclc0lem3 49597 | Lemma for theorems about intersections of lines and circles in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 . (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝑅↑2) · 𝑄) − (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | itscnhlc0yqe 49598 | Lemma for itsclc0 49610. Quadratic equation for the y-coordinate of the intersection points of a nonhorizontal line and a circle. (Contributed by AV, 6-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = -(2 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐶↑2) − ((𝐴↑2) · (𝑅↑2))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)) = (𝑅↑2) ∧ ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌)) = 𝐶) → ((𝑄 · (𝑌↑2)) + ((𝑇 · 𝑌) + 𝑈)) = 0)) | ||
| Theorem | itschlc0yqe 49599 | Lemma for itsclc0 49610. Quadratic equation for the y-coordinate of the intersection points of a horizontal line and a circle. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = -(2 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐶↑2) − ((𝐴↑2) · (𝑅↑2))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)) = (𝑅↑2) ∧ ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌)) = 𝐶) → ((𝑄 · (𝑌↑2)) + ((𝑇 · 𝑌) + 𝑈)) = 0)) | ||
| Theorem | itsclc0yqe 49600 | Lemma for itsclc0 49610. Quadratic equation for the y-coordinate of the intersection points of an arbitrary line and a circle. This theorem holds even for degenerate lines (𝐴 = 𝐵 = 0). (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = -(2 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐶↑2) − ((𝐴↑2) · (𝑅↑2))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)) = (𝑅↑2) ∧ ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌)) = 𝐶) → ((𝑄 · (𝑌↑2)) + ((𝑇 · 𝑌) + 𝑈)) = 0)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |