| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 496 of 498) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30847) |
(30848-32370) |
(32371-49794) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | fulltermc2 49501 | Given a full functor to a terminal category, the source category must not have empty hom-sets. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Oct-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Full 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | termcterm 49502 | A terminal category is a terminal object of the category of small categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (TermO‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | termcterm2 49503 | A terminal object of the category of small categories is a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Oct-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∩ TermCat) ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (TermO‘𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | termcterm3 49504 | In the category of small categories, a terminal object is equivalent to a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (SetCat‘1o) ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ TermCat ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (TermO‘𝐸))) | ||
| Theorem | termcciso 49505 | A category is isomorphic to a terminal category iff it itself is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ TermCat ↔ 𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | termccisoeu 49506* | The isomorphism between terminal categories is unique. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐶)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | termc2 49507* | If there exists a unique functor from both the category itself and the trivial category, then the category is terminal. Note that the converse also holds, so that it is a biconditional. See the proof of termc 49508 for hints. See also eufunc 49511 and euendfunc2 49516 for some insights on why two categories are sufficient. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Oct-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑑 ∈ ({𝐶, (SetCat‘1o)} ∩ Cat)∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑑 Func 𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | termc 49508* | Alternate definition of TermCat. See also df-termc 49462. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ TermCat ↔ ∀𝑑 ∈ Cat ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑑 Func 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dftermc2 49509* | Alternate definition of TermCat. See also df-termc 49462 and dftermc3 49520. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ TermCat = {𝑐 ∣ ∀𝑑 ∈ Cat ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑑 Func 𝑐)} | ||
| Theorem | eufunclem 49510* | If there exists a unique functor from a non-empty category, then the base of the target category is at most a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≼ 1o) | ||
| Theorem | eufunc 49511* | If there exists a unique functor from a non-empty category, then the base of the target category is a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | idfudiag1lem 49512 | Lemma for idfudiag1bas 49513 and idfudiag1 49514. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐴 × {𝐵})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | idfudiag1bas 49513 | If the identity functor of a category is the same as a constant functor to the category, then the base is a singleton. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | idfudiag1 49514 | If the identity functor of a category is the same as a constant functor to the category, then the category is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | euendfunc 49515* | If there exists a unique endofunctor (a functor from a category to itself) for a non-empty category, then the category is terminal. This partially explains why two categories are sufficient in termc2 49507. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | euendfunc2 49516 | If there exists a unique endofunctor (a functor from a category to itself) for a category, then it is either initial (empty) or terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 Func 𝐶) ≈ 1o → ((Base‘𝐶) = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 ∈ TermCat)) | ||
| Theorem | termcarweu 49517* | There exists a unique disjointified arrow in a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ TermCat → ∃!𝑎 𝑎 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | arweuthinc 49518* | If a structure has a unique disjointified arrow, then the structure is a thin category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑎 𝑎 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ ThinCat) | ||
| Theorem | arweutermc 49519* | If a structure has a unique disjointified arrow, then the structure is a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑎 𝑎 ∈ (Arrow‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | dftermc3 49520 | Alternate definition of TermCat. See also df-termc 49462, dftermc2 49509. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ TermCat = {𝑐 ∣ (Arrow‘𝑐) ≈ 1o} | ||
| Theorem | termcfuncval 49521 | The value of a functor from a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((1st ‘𝐾)‘𝑌) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐾 = 〈{〈𝑌, 𝑋〉}, {〈〈𝑌, 𝑌〉, {〈(𝐼‘𝑌), ( 1 ‘𝑋)〉}〉}〉)) | ||
| Theorem | diag1f1olem 49522 | To any functor from a terminal category can an object in the target base be assigned. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((1st ‘𝐾)‘𝑌) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | diag1f1o 49523 | The object part of the diagonal functor is a bijection if 𝐷 is terminal. So any functor from a terminal category is one-to-one correspondent to an object of the target base. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝐿):𝐴–1-1-onto→(𝐷 Func 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | termcnatval 49524 | Value of natural transformations for a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹𝑁𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐴‘𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {〈𝑋, 𝑅〉}) | ||
| Theorem | diag2f1olem 49525 | Lemma for diag2f1o 49526. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐷 Nat 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋)𝑁((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑌))) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ∧ 𝑀 = ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐿)𝑌)‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | diag2f1o 49526 | If 𝐷 is terminal, the morphism part of a diagonal functor is bijective functions from hom-sets into sets of natural transformations. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐷 Nat 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(2nd ‘𝐿)𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1-onto→(((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋)𝑁((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | diagffth 49527 | The diagonal functor is a fully faithful functor from a category 𝐶 to the category of functors from a terminal category to 𝐶. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝑄) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | diagciso 49528 |
The diagonal functor is an isomorphism from a category 𝐶 to the
category of functors from a terminal category to 𝐶.
It is provable that the inverse of the diagonal functor is the mapped object by the transposed curry of (𝐷 evalF 𝐶), i.e., ∪ ran (1st ‘(〈𝐷, 𝑄〉 curryF ((𝐷 evalF 𝐶) ∘func (𝐷 swapF 𝑄)))). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | diagcic 49529 | Any category 𝐶 is isomorphic to the category of functors from a terminal category to 𝐶. See also the "Properties" section of https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/terminal+category. Therefore the number of categories isomorphic to a non-empty category is at least the number of singletons, so large (snnex 7734) that these isomorphic categories form a proper class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐸)𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | funcsn 49530 | The category of one functor to a thin category is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 Func 𝐷) = {𝐹}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ThinCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | fucterm 49531 | The category of functors to a terminal category is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | 0fucterm 49532 | The category of functors from an initial category is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | termfucterm 49533 | All functors between two terminal categories are isomorphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 Func 𝑌) = (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cofuterm 49534 | Post-compose with a functor to a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | uobeqterm 49535 | Universal objects and terminal categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹(𝐶 UP 𝐷)𝑋) = dom (𝐺(𝐶 UP 𝐸)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | isinito4 49536 | The predicate "is an initial object" of a category, using universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘ 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 1 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐼 ∈ dom (𝐹(𝐶 UP 1 )𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | isinito4a 49537 | The predicate "is an initial object" of a category, using universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘ 1 )) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((1st ‘( 1 Δfunc𝐶))‘𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐼 ∈ dom (𝐹(𝐶 UP 1 )𝑋))) | ||
| Syntax | cprstc 49538 | Class function defining preordered sets as categories. |
| class ProsetToCat | ||
| Definition | df-prstc 49539 |
Definition of the function converting a preordered set to a category.
Justified by prsthinc 49453.
This definition is somewhat arbitrary. Example 3.3(4.d) of [Adamek] p. 24 demonstrates an alternate definition with pairwise disjoint hom-sets. The behavior of the function is defined entirely, up to isomorphism (thincciso 49442), by prstcnid 49542, prstchom 49551, and prstcthin 49550. Other important properties include prstcbas 49543, prstcleval 49544, prstcle 49545, prstcocval 49546, prstcoc 49547, prstchom2 49552, and prstcprs 49549. Use those instead. Note that the defining property prstchom 49551 is equivalent to prstchom2 49552 given prstcthin 49550. See thincn0eu 49420 for justification. "ProsetToCat" was taken instead of "ProsetCat" because the latter might mean the category of preordered sets (classes). However, "ProsetToCat" seems too long. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ProsetToCat = (𝑘 ∈ Proset ↦ ((𝑘 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ((le‘𝑘) × {1o})〉) sSet 〈(comp‘ndx), ∅〉)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcval 49540 | Lemma for prstcnidlem 49541 and prstcthin 49550. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((𝐾 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ((le‘𝐾) × {1o})〉) sSet 〈(comp‘ndx), ∅〉)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcnidlem 49541 | Lemma for prstcnid 49542 and prstchomval 49548. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (comp‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝐶) = (𝐸‘(𝐾 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ((le‘𝐾) × {1o})〉))) | ||
| Theorem | prstcnid 49542 | Components other than Hom and comp are unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (comp‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Hom ‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝐾) = (𝐸‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcbas 49543 | The base set is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcleval 49544 | Value of the less-than-or-equal-to relation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcle 49545 | Value of the less-than-or-equal-to relation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋(le‘𝐶)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcocval 49546 | Orthocomplementation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥ = (oc‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcoc 49547 | Orthocomplementation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ((oc‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | prstchomval 49548 | Hom-sets of the constructed category which depend on an arbitrary definition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ≤ × {1o}) = (Hom ‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcprs 49549 | The category is a preordered set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Proset ) | ||
| Theorem | prstcthin 49550 | The preordered set is equipped with a thin category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ThinCat) | ||
| Theorem | prstchom 49551 |
Hom-sets of the constructed category are dependent on the preorder.
Note that prstchom.x and prstchom.y are redundant here due to our definition of ProsetToCat. However, this should not be assumed as it is definition-dependent. Therefore, the two hypotheses are added for explicitness. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | prstchom2 49552* |
Hom-sets of the constructed category are dependent on the preorder.
Note that prstchom.x and prstchom.y are redundant here due to our definition of ProsetToCat ( see prstchom2ALT 49553). However, this should not be assumed as it is definition-dependent. Therefore, the two hypotheses are added for explicitness. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | prstchom2ALT 49553* | Hom-sets of the constructed category are dependent on the preorder. This proof depends on the definition df-prstc 49539. See prstchom2 49552 for a version that does not depend on the definition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | oduoppcbas 49554 | The dual of a preordered set and the opposite category have the same set of objects. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (ProsetToCat‘(ODual‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐷) = (Base‘𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | oduoppcciso 49555 | The dual of a preordered set and the opposite category are category-isomorphic. Example 3.6(1) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (ProsetToCat‘(ODual‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷( ≃𝑐 ‘(CatCat‘𝑈))𝑂) | ||
| Theorem | postcpos 49556 | The converted category is a poset iff the original proset is a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐶 ∈ Poset)) | ||
| Theorem | postcposALT 49557 | Alternate proof of postcpos 49556. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐶 ∈ Poset)) | ||
| Theorem | postc 49558* | The converted category is a poset iff no distinct objects are isomorphic. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Poset ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | discsntermlem 49559* | A singlegon is an element of the class of singlegons. The converse (basrestermcfolem 49560) also holds. This is trivial if 𝐵 is 𝑏 (abid 2711). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝐵 = {𝑥} → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑏 = {𝑥}}) | ||
| Theorem | basrestermcfolem 49560* | An element of the class of singlegons is a singlegon. The converse (discsntermlem 49559) also holds. This is trivial if 𝐵 is 𝑏 (abid 2711). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑏 = {𝑥}} → ∃𝑥 𝐵 = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | discbas 49561 | A discrete category (a category whose only morphisms are the identity morphisms) can be constructed for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | discthin 49562 | A discrete category (a category whose only morphisms are the identity morphisms) is thin. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ ThinCat) | ||
| Theorem | discsnterm 49563* | A discrete category (a category whose only morphisms are the identity morphisms) with a singlegon base is terminal. Corollary of example 3.3(4)(c) of [Adamek] p. 24 and example 3.26(1) of [Adamek] p. 33. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝐵 = {𝑥} → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | basrestermcfo 49564* | The base function restricted to the class of terminal categories maps the class of terminal categories onto the class of singletons. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Base ↾ TermCat):TermCat–onto→{𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑏 = {𝑥}} | ||
| Theorem | termcnex 49565 | The class of all terminal categories is a proper class. Therefore both the class of all thin categories and the class of all categories are proper classes. Note that snnex 7734 is equivalent to sngl V ∉ V. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ TermCat ∉ V | ||
| Syntax | cmndtc 49566 | Class function defining monoids as categories. |
| class MndToCat | ||
| Definition | df-mndtc 49567 |
Definition of the function converting a monoid to a category. Example
3.3(4.e) of [Adamek] p. 24.
The definition of the base set is arbitrary. The whole extensible structure becomes the object here (see mndtcbasval 49569), instead of just the base set, as is the case in Example 3.3(4.e) of [Adamek] p. 24. The resulting category is defined entirely, up to isomorphism, by mndtcbas 49570, mndtchom 49573, mndtcco 49574. Use those instead. See example 3.26(3) of [Adamek] p. 33 for more on isomorphism. "MndToCat" was taken instead of "MndCat" because the latter might mean the category of monoids. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ MndToCat = (𝑚 ∈ Mnd ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑚}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈𝑚, 𝑚, (Base‘𝑚)〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈𝑚, 𝑚, 𝑚〉, (+g‘𝑚)〉}〉}) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcval 49568 | Value of the category built from a monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑀}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈𝑀, 𝑀, (Base‘𝑀)〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈𝑀, 𝑀, 𝑀〉, (+g‘𝑀)〉}〉}) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcbasval 49569 | The base set of the category built from a monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑀}) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcbas 49570* | The category built from a monoid contains precisely one object. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcob 49571 | Lemma for mndtchom 49573 and mndtcco 49574. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcbas2 49572 | Two objects in a category built from a monoid are identical. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | mndtchom 49573 | The only hom-set of the category built from a monoid is the base set of the monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (Base‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcco 49574 | The composition of the category built from a monoid is the monoid operation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) = (+g‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcco2 49575 | The composition of the category built from a monoid is the monoid operation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⚬ = (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ⚬ 𝐹) = (𝐺(+g‘𝑀)𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | mndtccatid 49576* | Lemma for mndtccat 49577 and mndtcid 49578. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ↦ (0g‘𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | mndtccat 49577 | The function value is a category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcid 49578 | The identity morphism, or identity arrow, of the category built from a monoid is the identity element of the monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (Id‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = (0g‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | oppgoppchom 49579 | The converted opposite monoid has the same hom-set as that of the opposite category. Example 3.6(2) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (MndToCat‘(oppg‘𝑀))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝑂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = (𝑌𝐽𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | oppgoppcco 49580 | The converted opposite monoid has the same composition as that of the opposite category. Example 3.6(2) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (MndToCat‘(oppg‘𝑀))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∙ = (comp‘𝑂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) = (〈𝑌, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | oppgoppcid 49581 | The converted opposite monoid has the same identity morphism as that of the opposite category. Example 3.6(2) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (MndToCat‘(oppg‘𝑀))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝑂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Id‘𝐷)‘𝑋) = ((Id‘𝑂)‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | grptcmon 49582 | All morphisms in a category converted from a group are monomorphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑀𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | grptcepi 49583 | All morphisms in a category converted from a group are epimorphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem1 49584 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49589. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = { 0 , 1 } ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑋) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑓 = 0 ∨ 𝑓 = 1 ) ∧ (𝑔 = 0 ∨ 𝑔 = 1 ) ∧ (𝑘 = 0 ∨ 𝑘 = 1 ))) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑋} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑋}) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑋} ∧ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑋}) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem2 49585 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49589. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 0 ∨ 𝐹 = 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 0 ) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 𝐶)𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem3 49586 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49589. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 0 ∨ 𝐹 = 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 𝐶) 1 ) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem4 49587 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49589. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 0 ∨ 𝐹 = 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 0 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 0 ) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 = 0 ∨ 𝐺 = 1 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 𝐶)𝐹) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem5 49588 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49589. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 · 0 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 · 1 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 · 0 ) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 0 · 0 ) · 0 ) = ( 0 · ( 0 · 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcat 49589* | The condition for a structure with at most one object and at most two morphisms being a category. "2arwcat.2" to "2arwcat.5" are also necessary conditions if 𝑋, 0, and 1 are all sets, due to catlid 17644, catrid 17645, and catcocl 17646. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑋} = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = { 0 , 1 } & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 0 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 1 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 0 ) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑋} ↦ 1 ))) | ||
| Theorem | incat 49590* | Constructing a category with at most one object and at most two morphisms. If 𝑋 is a set then 𝐶 is the category 𝐴 in Exercise 3G of [Adamek] p. 45. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑋}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈𝑋, 𝑋, 𝐻〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈𝑋, 𝑋〉, 𝑋, · 〉}〉} & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝐹, 𝐺} & ⊢ · = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑔)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑋} ↦ 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | setc1onsubc 49591* | Construct a category with one object and two morphisms and prove that category (SetCat‘1o) satisfies all conditions for a subcategory but the compatibility of identity morphisms, showing the necessity of the latter condition in defining a subcategory. Exercise 4A of [Adamek] p. 58. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {∅}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈∅, ∅, 2o〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈∅, ∅〉, ∅, · 〉}〉} & ⊢ · = (𝑓 ∈ 2o, 𝑔 ∈ 2o ↦ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑔)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (SetCat‘1o) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = 1o & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ (𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ( 1 ‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cat)) | ||
| Theorem | cnelsubclem 49592* | Lemma for cnelsubc 49593. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ (𝐽 ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝐶) ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) ∈ Cat)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat ∃𝑗∃𝑠(𝑗 Fn (𝑠 × 𝑠) ∧ (𝑗 ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝑐) ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑗𝑥) ∧ (𝑐 ↾cat 𝑗) ∈ Cat)) | ||
| Theorem | cnelsubc 49593* | Remark 4.2(2) of [Adamek] p. 48. There exists a category satisfying all conditions for a subcategory but the compatibility of identity morphisms. Therefore such condition in df-subc 17774 is necessary. A stronger statement than nelsubc3 49060. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat ∃𝑗∃𝑠(𝑗 Fn (𝑠 × 𝑠) ∧ (𝑗 ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝑐) ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑗𝑥) ∧ (𝑐 ↾cat 𝑗) ∈ Cat)) | ||
| Syntax | clan 49594 | Class function defining the (local) left Kan extension. |
| class Lan | ||
| Syntax | cran 49595 | Class function defining the (local) right Kan extension. |
| class Ran | ||
| Definition | df-lan 49596* |
Definition of the (local) left Kan extension. Given a functor
𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and a functor 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸, the set
(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) consists of left Kan extensions of
𝑋 along 𝐹, which are universal pairs from 𝑋 to the
pre-composition functor given by 𝐹 (lanval2 49616). See also
§
3 of Chapter X in p. 240 of Mac Lane, Saunders,
Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer
Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at
https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf 49616 (retrieved
3 Nov 2025).
A left Kan extension is in the form of 〈𝐿, 𝐴〉 where the first component is a functor 𝐿:𝐷⟶𝐸 (lanrcl4 49623) and the second component is a natural transformation 𝐴:𝑋⟶𝐿𝐹 (lanrcl5 49624) where 𝐿𝐹 is the composed functor. Intuitively, the first component 𝐿 can be regarded as the result of an "inverse" of pre-composition; the source category of 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸 is "extended" along 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷. The left Kan extension is a generalization of many categorical concepts such as colimit. In § 7 of Chapter X of Categories for the Working Mathematician, it is concluded that "the notion of Kan extensions subsumes all the other fundamental concepts of category theory". This definition was chosen over the other version in the commented out section due to its better reverse closure property. See df-ran 49597 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Lan = (𝑝 ∈ (V × V), 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑐⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑑⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑑), 𝑥 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑒) ↦ ((〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 −∘F 𝑓)((𝑑 FuncCat 𝑒) UP (𝑐 FuncCat 𝑒))𝑥))) | ||
| Definition | df-ran 49597* |
Definition of the (local) right Kan extension. Given a functor
𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and a functor 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸, the set
(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) consists of right Kan extensions of
𝑋 along 𝐹, which are universal pairs from the pre-composition
functor given by 𝐹 to 𝑋 (ranval2 49619). The definition in
§
3 of Chapter X in p. 236 of Mac Lane, Saunders,
Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer
Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at
https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf 49619 (retrieved
3 Nov 2025).
A right Kan extension is in the form of 〈𝐿, 𝐴〉 where the first component is a functor 𝐿:𝐷⟶𝐸 (ranrcl4 49628) and the second component is a natural transformation 𝐴:𝐿𝐹⟶𝑋 (ranrcl5 49629) where 𝐿𝐹 is the composed functor. Intuitively, the first component 𝐿 can be regarded as the result of an "inverse" of pre-composition; the source category of 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸 is "extended" along 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷. The right Kan extension is a generalization of many categorical concepts such as limit. In § 7 of Chapter X of Categories for the Working Mathematician, it is concluded that "the notion of Kan extensions subsumes all the other fundamental concepts of category theory". This definition was chosen over the other version in the commented out section due to its better reverse closure property. See df-lan 49596 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ran = (𝑝 ∈ (V × V), 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑐⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑑⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑑), 𝑥 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑒) ↦ (( oppFunc ‘(〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 −∘F 𝑓))((oppCat‘(𝑑 FuncCat 𝑒)) UP (oppCat‘(𝑐 FuncCat 𝑒)))𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | lanfn 49598 | Lan is a function on ((V × V) × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Lan Fn ((V × V) × V) | ||
| Theorem | ranfn 49599 | Ran is a function on ((V × V) × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ran Fn ((V × V) × V) | ||
| Theorem | reldmlan 49600 | The domain of Lan is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom Lan | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |