| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 498 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31270) |
(31271-32793) |
(32794-50672) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | opndisj 49701 | Two ways of saying that two open sets are disjoint, if 𝐽 is a topology and 𝑋 is an open set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 = (∪ 𝐽 ∖ 𝑋) → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐽 ∩ 𝒫 𝑍) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ (𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | clddisj 49702 | Two ways of saying that two closed sets are disjoint, if 𝐽 is a topology and 𝑋 is a closed set. An alternative proof is similar to that of opndisj 49701 with elssuni 4904 replaced by the combination of cldss 23186 and eqid 2763. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 = (∪ 𝐽 ∖ 𝑋) → (𝑌 ∈ ((Clsd‘𝐽) ∩ 𝒫 𝑍) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | neircl 49703 | Reverse closure of the neighborhood operation. (This theorem depends on a function's value being empty outside of its domain, but it will make later theorems simpler to state.) (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) → 𝐽 ∈ Top) | ||
| Theorem | opnneilem 49704* | Lemma factoring out common proof steps of opnneil 49708 and opnneirv 49706. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | opnneir 49705* | If something is true for an open neighborhood, it must be true for a neighborhood. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | opnneirv 49706* | A variant of opnneir 49705 with different dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | opnneilv 49707* | The converse of opnneir 49705 with different dummy variables. Note that the second hypothesis could be generalized by adding 𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 to the antecedent. See the proof for details. Although 𝐽 ∈ Top might be redundant here (see neircl 49703), it is listed for explicitness. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)𝜓 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | opnneil 49708* | A variant of opnneilv 49707. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | opnneieqv 49709* | The equivalence between neighborhood and open neighborhood. See opnneieqvv 49710 for different dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | opnneieqvv 49710* | The equivalence between neighborhood and open neighborhood. A variant of opnneieqv 49709 with two dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 31-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | restcls2lem 49711 | A closed set in a subspace topology is a subset of the subspace. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | restcls2 49712 | A closed set in a subspace topology is the closure in the original topology intersecting with the subspace. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | restclsseplem 49713 | Lemma for restclssep 49714. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | restclssep 49714 | Two disjoint closed sets in a subspace topology are separated in the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | cnneiima 49715 | Given a continuous function, the preimage of a neighborhood is a neighborhood. To be precise, the preimage of a neighborhood of a subset 𝑇 of the codomain of a continuous function is a neighborhood of any subset of the preimage of 𝑇. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐾)‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑁) ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | iooii 49716 | Open intervals are open sets of II. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 1) → (𝐴(,)𝐵) ∈ II) | ||
| Theorem | icccldii 49717 | Closed intervals are closed sets of II. Note that iccss 13436, iccordt 23371, and ordtresticc 23380 are proved from ixxss12 13387, ordtcld3 23356, and ordtrest2 23361, respectively. An alternate proof uses restcldi 23330, dfii2 25041, and icccld 24923. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 8-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 1) → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∈ (Clsd‘II)) | ||
| Theorem | i0oii 49718 | (0[,)𝐴) is open in II. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 1 → (0[,)𝐴) ∈ II) | ||
| Theorem | io1ii 49719 | (𝐴(,]1) is open in II. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (0 ≤ 𝐴 → (𝐴(,]1) ∈ II) | ||
| Theorem | sepnsepolem1 49720* | Lemma for sepnsepo 49722. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | sepnsepolem2 49721* | Open neighborhood and neighborhood is equivalent regarding disjointness. Lemma for sepnsepo 49722. Proof could be shortened by 1 step using ssdisjdr 49607. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | sepnsepo 49722* | Open neighborhood and neighborhood is equivalent regarding disjointness for both sides. Namely, separatedness by open neighborhoods is equivalent to separatedness by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐶)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝐷)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | sepdisj 49723 | Separated sets are disjoint. Note that in general separatedness also requires 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 and (𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ as well but they are unnecessary here. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | seposep 49724* | If two sets are separated by (open) neighborhoods, then they are separated subsets of the underlying set. Note that separatedness by open neighborhoods is equivalent to separatedness by neighborhoods. See sepnsepo 49722. The relationship between separatedness and closure is also seen in isnrm 23492, isnrm2 23515, isnrm3 23516. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) ∧ ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | sepcsepo 49725* | If two sets are separated by closed neighborhoods, then they are separated by (open) neighborhoods. See sepnsepo 49722 for the equivalence between separatedness by open neighborhoods and separatedness by neighborhoods. Although 𝐽 ∈ Top might be redundant here, it is listed for explicitness. 𝐽 ∈ Top can be obtained from neircl 49703, adantr 485, and rexlimiva 3158. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 8-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)∃𝑚 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑇)(𝑛 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | sepfsepc 49726* | If two sets are separated by a continuous function, then they are separated by closed neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {1}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)∃𝑚 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑇)(𝑛 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | seppsepf 49727 | If two sets are precisely separated by a continuous function, then they are separated by the continuous function. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 = (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 = (◡𝑓 “ {1}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {1}))) | ||
| Theorem | seppcld 49728* | If two sets are precisely separated by a continuous function, then they are closed. An alternate proof involves II ∈ Fre. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐽 Cn II)(𝑆 = (◡𝑓 “ {0}) ∧ 𝑇 = (◡𝑓 “ {1}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽))) | ||
| Theorem | isnrm4 49729* | A topological space is normal iff any two disjoint closed sets are separated by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Nrm ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑐)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑑)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | dfnrm2 49730* | A topological space is normal if any disjoint closed sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. An alternate definition of df-nrm 23474. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ Nrm = {𝑗 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑗 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑐 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))} | ||
| Theorem | dfnrm3 49731* | A topological space is normal if any disjoint closed sets can be separated by neighborhoods. An alternate definition of df-nrm 23474. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 2-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ Nrm = {𝑗 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑗)((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ((nei‘𝑗)‘𝑐)∃𝑦 ∈ ((nei‘𝑗)‘𝑑)(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)} | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3lem1 49732* | Lemma for iscnrm3 49750. Subspace topology is a topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐽 ↾t 𝑥) ∈ Top ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3lem2 49733* | Lemma for iscnrm3 49750 proving a biconditional on restricted universal quantifications. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐸) → 𝜒))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐸 𝜒 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐸 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3lem4 49734 | Lemma for iscnrm3lem5 49735 and iscnrm3r 49746. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜓 → 𝜁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜁 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3lem5 49735* | Lemma for iscnrm3l 49749. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑇) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑇) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝑊)) & ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜎)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜏 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → (𝜁 → 𝜎)))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3lem6 49736* | Lemma for iscnrm3lem7 49737. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3lem7 49737* | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 49745 and iscnrm3llem2 49748 involving restricted existential quantifications. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑍 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem1 49738 | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem2 49739. The hypothesis could be generalized to (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∖ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑋). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∖ 𝑇) = (𝑆 ∩ (𝑋 ∖ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇)))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem2 49739 | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem3 49740. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇))))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem3 49740 | Lemma for iscnrm3r 49746. The designed subspace is a subset of the original set; the two sets are closed sets in the subspace. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽)) → ((∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))) ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))) ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem4 49741 | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 49745. Given two disjoint subsets 𝑆 and 𝑇 of the underlying set of a topology 𝐽, if 𝑁 is a superset of (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇), then it is a superset of 𝑆. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem5 49742 | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem6 49743. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))) ∈ 𝐽) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem6 49743 | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem7 49744. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ⊆ (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)))) ↔ 𝑂 ∈ 𝐽)) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem7 49744 | Lemma for iscnrm3rlem8 49745. Open neighborhoods in the subspace topology are open neighborhoods in the original topology given that the subspace is an open set in the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐽) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3rlem8 49745* | Lemma for iscnrm3r 49746. Disjoint open neighborhoods in the subspace topology are disjoint open neighborhoods in the original topology given that the subspace is an open set in the original topology. Therefore, given any two sets separated in the original topology and separated by open neighborhoods in the subspace topology, they must be separated by open neighborhoods in the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽) ∧ ((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅)) → (∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t (∪ 𝐽 ∖ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇))))((((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇) ∖ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3r 49746* | Lemma for iscnrm3 49750. If all subspaces of a topology are normal, i.e., two disjoint closed sets can be separated by open neighborhoods, then in the original topology two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑐 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑧))∀𝑑 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑧))((𝑐 ∩ 𝑑) = ∅ → ∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑧)∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑧)(𝑐 ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅)) → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽) → (((𝑆 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑇)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∩ 𝑇) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅))))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3llem1 49747 | Lemma for iscnrm3l 49749. Closed sets in the subspace are subsets of the underlying set of the original topology. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍))) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐶 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽)) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3llem2 49748* | Lemma for iscnrm3l 49749. If there exist disjoint open neighborhoods in the original topology for two disjoint closed sets in a subspace, then they can be separated by open neighborhoods in the subspace topology. (Could shorten proof with ssin0 45795.) (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍))) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝐶 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅) → ∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)(𝐶 ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3l 49749* | Lemma for iscnrm3 49750. Given a topology 𝐽, if two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods, then all subspaces of the topology 𝐽 are normal, i.e., two disjoint closed sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑠 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑡 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)) → ((𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ↾t 𝑍))) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅ → ∃𝑙 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)∃𝑘 ∈ (𝐽 ↾t 𝑍)(𝐶 ⊆ 𝑙 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ (𝑙 ∩ 𝑘) = ∅))))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3 49750* | A completely normal topology is a topology in which two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ CNrm ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑠 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑡 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm3v 49751* | A topology is completely normal iff two separated sets can be separated by open neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (𝐽 ∈ CNrm ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑠 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑡 ⊆ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅)))) | ||
| Theorem | iscnrm4 49752* | A completely normal topology is a topology in which two separated sets can be separated by neighborhoods. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ CNrm ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐽(((𝑠 ∩ ((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (((cls‘𝐽)‘𝑠) ∩ 𝑡) = ∅) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑠)∃𝑚 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑡)(𝑛 ∩ 𝑚) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | isprsd 49753* | Property of being a preordered set (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Proset ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | lubeldm2 49754* | Member of the domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | glbeldm2 49755* | Member of the domain of the greatest lower bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | lubeldm2d 49756* | Member of the domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | glbeldm2d 49757* | Member of the domain of the greatest lower bound function of a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | lubsscl 49758 | If a subset of 𝑆 contains the LUB of 𝑆, then the two sets have the same LUB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ (𝑈‘𝑇) = (𝑈‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | glbsscl 49759 | If a subset of 𝑆 contains the GLB of 𝑆, then the two sets have the same GLB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑇) = (𝐺‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | lubprlem 49760 | Lemma for lubprdm 49761 and lubpr 49762. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lubprdm 49761 | The set of two comparable elements in a poset has LUB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | lubpr 49762 | The LUB of the set of two comparable elements in a poset is the greater one of the two. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | glbprlem 49763 | Lemma for glbprdm 49764 and glbpr 49765. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | glbprdm 49764 | The set of two comparable elements in a poset has GLB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | glbpr 49765 | The GLB of the set of two comparable elements in a poset is the less one of the two. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑋, 𝑌}) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | joindm2 49766* | The join of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have LUB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∨ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | joindm3 49767* | The join of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have LUB (expanded version). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∨ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑤) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | meetdm2 49768* | The meet of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have GLB. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∧ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | meetdm3 49769* | The meet of any two elements always exists iff all unordered pairs have GLB (expanded version). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom ∧ = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑤 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑤 ≤ 𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | posjidm 49770 | Poset join is idempotent. latjidm 18513 could be shortened by this. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | posmidm 49771 | Poset meet is idempotent. latmidm 18525 could be shortened by this. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | resiposbas 49772 | Construct a poset (resipos 49773) for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | resipos 49773 | A set equipped with an order where no distinct elements are comparable is a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) | ||
| Theorem | exbaspos 49774* | There exists a poset for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑘 ∈ Poset 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑘)) | ||
| Theorem | exbasprs 49775* | There exists a preordered set for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑘 ∈ Proset 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑘)) | ||
| Theorem | basresposfo 49776 | The base function restricted to the class of posets maps the class of posets onto the universal class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Base ↾ Poset):Poset–onto→V | ||
| Theorem | basresprsfo 49777 | The base function restricted to the class of preordered sets maps the class of preordered sets onto the universal class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Base ↾ Proset ): Proset –onto→V | ||
| Theorem | posnex 49778 | The class of posets is a proper class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ Poset ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | prsnex 49779 | The class of preordered sets is a proper class. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ Proset ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | toslat 49780 | A toset is a lattice. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
| Theorem | isclatd 49781* | The predicate "is a complete lattice" (deduction form). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑠 ∈ dom 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑠 ∈ dom 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CLat) | ||
| Theorem | intubeu 49782* | Existential uniqueness of the least upper bound. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝐶 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | unilbeu 49783* | Existential uniqueness of the greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝐶 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | ipolublem 49784* | Lemma for ipolubdm 49785 and ipolub 49786. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → ((∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | ipolubdm 49785* | The domain of the LUB of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ipolub 49786* | The LUB of the inclusion poset. (hypotheses "ipolub.s" and "ipolub.t" could be eliminated with 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈.) Could be significantly shortened if poslubdg 18463 is in quantified form. mrelatlub 18613 could potentially be shortened using this. See mrelatlubALT 49793. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ ∪ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | ipoglblem 49787* | Lemma for ipoglbdm 49788 and ipoglb 49789. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → ((𝑋 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑧 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆 → 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑋)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | ipoglbdm 49788* | The domain of the GLB of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ipoglb 49789* | The GLB of the inclusion poset. (hypotheses "ipolub.s" and "ipoglb.t" could be eliminated with 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺.) Could be significantly shortened if posglbdg 18464 is in quantified form. mrelatglb 18611 could potentially be shortened using this. See mrelatglbALT 49794. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ ∩ 𝑆}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | ipolub0 49790 | The LUB of the empty set is the intersection of the base. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘∅) = ∩ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | ipolub00 49791 | The LUB of the empty set is the empty set if it is contained. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘∅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ipoglb0 49792 | The GLB of the empty set is the union of the base. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘∅) = ∪ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | mrelatlubALT 49793 | Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mrelatglbALT 49794 | Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 29-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | mreclat 49795 | A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat) | ||
| Theorem | topclat 49796 | A topology is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝐼 ∈ CLat) | ||
| Theorem | toplatglb0 49797 | The empty intersection in a topology is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘∅) = ∪ 𝐽) | ||
| Theorem | toplatlub 49798 | Least upper bounds in a topology are realized by unions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = ∪ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | toplatglb 49799 | Greatest lower bounds in a topology are realized by the interior of the intersection. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ((int‘𝐽)‘∩ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | toplatjoin 49800 | Joins in a topology are realized by unions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Top) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐽) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∨ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |