P. 487 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

nn0enn0exALTV 48601*

For each even nonnegative integer there is a nonnegative integer which, multiplied by 2, results in the even nonnegative integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jun-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ₀ 𝑁 = (2 · 𝑚))

Theorem

nnennexALTV 48602*

For each even positive integer there is a positive integer which, multiplied by 2, results in the even positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ 𝑁 = (2 · 𝑚))

Theorem

nnpw2evenALTV 48603

2 to the power of a positive integer is even. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2020.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jun-2020.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (2↑𝑁) ∈ Even )

21.50.13.8  Additional theorems

Theorem

epoo 48604

The sum of an even and an odd is odd. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Even ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Odd ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ Odd )

Theorem

emoo 48605

The difference of an even and an odd is odd. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Even ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Odd ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ Odd )

Theorem

epee 48606

The sum of two even numbers is even. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Even ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Even ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ Even )

Theorem

emee 48607

The difference of two even numbers is even. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Even ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Even ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ Even )

Theorem

evensumeven 48608

If a summand is even, the other summand is even iff the sum is even. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Even ) → (𝐴 ∈ Even ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ Even ))

Theorem

3odd 48609

3 is an odd number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 3 ∈ Odd

Theorem

4even 48610

4 is an even number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 4 ∈ Even

Theorem

5odd 48611

5 is an odd number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 5 ∈ Odd

Theorem

6even 48612

6 is an even number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 6 ∈ Even

Theorem

7odd 48613

7 is an odd number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 7 ∈ Odd

Theorem

8even 48614

8 is an even number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 8 ∈ Even

Theorem

evenprm2 48615

A prime number is even iff it is 2. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (𝑃 ∈ Even ↔ 𝑃 = 2))

Theorem

oddprmne2 48616

Every prime number not being 2 is an odd prime number. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Odd ) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))

Theorem

oddprmuzge3 48617

A prime number which is odd is an integer greater than or equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Aug-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Odd ) → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3))

Theorem

evenltle 48618

If an even number is greater than another even number, then it is greater than or equal to the other even number plus 2. (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑀 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑀 < 𝑁) → (𝑀 + 2) ≤ 𝑁)

Theorem

odd2prm2 48619

If an odd number is the sum of two prime numbers, one of the prime numbers must be 2. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → (𝑃 = 2 ∨ 𝑄 = 2))

Theorem

even3prm2 48620

If an even number is the sum of three prime numbers, one of the prime numbers must be 2. (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℙ) ∧ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 + 𝑄) + 𝑅)) → (𝑃 = 2 ∨ 𝑄 = 2 ∨ 𝑅 = 2))

Theorem

mogoldbblem 48621*

Lemma for mogoldbb 48686. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℙ) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ (𝑁 + 2) = ((𝑃 + 𝑄) + 𝑅)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 = (𝑝 + 𝑞))

21.50.13.9  Perfect Number Theorem (revised)

Theorem

perfectALTVlem1 48622

Lemma for perfectALTV 48624. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Odd )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 σ ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)) = (2 · ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) ∈ ℕ ∧ ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) − 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐵 / ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) − 1)) ∈ ℕ))

Theorem

perfectALTVlem2 48623

Lemma for perfectALTV 48624. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Odd )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 σ ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)) = (2 · ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐵 = ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) − 1)))

Theorem

perfectALTV 48624*

The Euclid-Euler theorem, or Perfect Number theorem. A positive even integer 𝑁 is a perfect number (that is, its divisor sum is 2𝑁) if and only if it is of the form 2↑(𝑝 − 1) · (2↑𝑝 − 1), where 2↑𝑝 − 1 is prime (a Mersenne prime). (It follows from this that 𝑝 is also prime.) This is Metamath 100 proof #70. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ((1 σ 𝑁) = (2 · 𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℤ (((2↑𝑝) − 1) ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 = ((2↑(𝑝 − 1)) · ((2↑𝑝) − 1)))))

21.50.14  Number theory (extension 2)

21.50.14.1  Fermat pseudoprimes

"In number theory, the Fermat pseudoprimes make up the most important class of pseudoprimes that come from Fermat's little theorem ... [which] states that if p is prime and a is coprime to p, then a^(p-1)-1 is divisible by p [see fermltl 16877].

For an integer a > 1, if a composite integer x divides a^(x-1)-1, then x is called a Fermat pseudoprime to base a. In other words, a composite integer is a Fermat pseudoprime to base a if it successfully passes the Fermat primality test for the base a. The false statement [see nfermltl2rev 48644] that all numbers that pass the Fermat primality test for base 2, are prime, is called the Chinese hypothesis.", see Wikipedia "Fermat pseudoprime", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime 48644, 29-May-2023.

Syntax

cfppr 48625

Extend class notation with the Fermat pseudoprimes.

class FPPr

Definition

df-fppr 48626*

Define the function that maps a positive integer to the set of Fermat pseudoprimes to the base of this positive integer. Since Fermat pseudoprimes shall be composite (positive) integers, they must be nonprime integers greater than or equal to 4 (we cannot use 𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∉ ℙ because 𝑥 = 1 would fulfil this requirement, but should not be regarded as "composite" integer). (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2023.)

⊢ FPPr = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑥 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∣ (𝑥 ∉ ℙ ∧ 𝑥 ∥ ((𝑛↑(𝑥 − 1)) − 1))})

Theorem

fppr 48627*

The set of Fermat pseudoprimes to the base 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ( FPPr ‘𝑁) = {𝑥 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∣ (𝑥 ∉ ℙ ∧ 𝑥 ∥ ((𝑁↑(𝑥 − 1)) − 1))})

Theorem

fpprmod 48628*

The set of Fermat pseudoprimes to the base 𝑁, expressed by a modulo operation instead of the divisibility relation. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ( FPPr ‘𝑁) = {𝑥 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∣ (𝑥 ∉ ℙ ∧ ((𝑁↑(𝑥 − 1)) mod 𝑥) = 1)})

Theorem

fpprel 48629

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∧ 𝑋 ∉ ℙ ∧ ((𝑁↑(𝑋 − 1)) mod 𝑋) = 1)))

Theorem

fpprbasnn 48630

The base of a Fermat pseudoprime is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

fpprnn 48631

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

fppr2odd 48632

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 2 is odd. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘2) → 𝑋 ∈ Odd )

Theorem

11t31e341 48633

341 is the product of 11 and 31. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ (;11 · ;31) = ;;341

Theorem

2exp340mod341 48634

Eight to the eighth power modulo nine is one. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((2↑;;340) mod ;;341) = 1

Theorem

341fppr2 48635

341 is the (smallest) Poulet number (Fermat pseudoprime to the base 2). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ;;341 ∈ ( FPPr ‘2)

Theorem

4fppr1 48636

4 is the (smallest) Fermat pseudoprime to the base 1. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ 4 ∈ ( FPPr ‘1)

Theorem

8exp8mod9 48637

Eight to the eighth power modulo nine is one. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((8↑8) mod 9) = 1

Theorem

9fppr8 48638

9 is the (smallest) Fermat pseudoprime to the base 8. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2023.)

⊢ 9 ∈ ( FPPr ‘8)

Theorem

dfwppr 48639

Alternate definition of a weak pseudoprime 𝑋, which fulfils (𝑁↑𝑋)≡𝑁 (modulo 𝑋), see Wikipedia "Fermat pseudoprime", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime, 29-May-2023. (Contributed by AV, 31-May-2023.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝑁↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = (𝑁 mod 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 ∥ ((𝑁↑𝑋) − 𝑁)))

Theorem

fpprwppr 48640

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁 is a weak pseudoprime (see Wikipedia "Fermat pseudoprime", 29-May-2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime. (Contributed by AV, 31-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) → ((𝑁↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = (𝑁 mod 𝑋))

Theorem

fpprwpprb 48641

An integer 𝑋 which is coprime with an integer 𝑁 is a Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁 iff it is a weak pseudoprime to the base 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((𝑋 gcd 𝑁) = 1 → (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∧ 𝑋 ∉ ℙ) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝑁↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = (𝑁 mod 𝑋)))))

Theorem

fpprel2 48642

An alternate definition for a Fermat pseudoprime to the base 2. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘2) ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑋 ∉ ℙ) ∧ ((2↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = 2))

Theorem

nfermltl8rev 48643

Fermat's little theorem with base 8 reversed is not generally true: There is an integer 𝑝 (for example 9, see 9fppr8 48638) so that "𝑝 is prime" does not follow from 8↑𝑝≡8 (mod 𝑝). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ¬ (((8↑𝑝) mod 𝑝) = (8 mod 𝑝) → 𝑝 ∈ ℙ)

Theorem

nfermltl2rev 48644

Fermat's little theorem with base 2 reversed is not generally true: There is an integer 𝑝 (for example 341, see 341fppr2 48635) so that "𝑝 is prime" does not follow from 2↑𝑝≡2 (mod 𝑝). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ¬ (((2↑𝑝) mod 𝑝) = (2 mod 𝑝) → 𝑝 ∈ ℙ)

Theorem

nfermltlrev 48645*

Fermat's little theorem reversed is not generally true: There are integers 𝑎 and 𝑝 so that "𝑝 is prime" does not follow from 𝑎↑𝑝≡𝑎 (mod 𝑝). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ¬ (((𝑎↑𝑝) mod 𝑝) = (𝑎 mod 𝑝) → 𝑝 ∈ ℙ)

21.50.14.2  Goldbach's conjectures

According to Wikipedia ("Goldbach's conjecture", 20-Jul-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture) "Goldbach's conjecture ... states: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes." "It is also known as strong, even or binary Goldbach conjecture, to distinguish it from a weaker conjecture, known ... as the _Goldbach's weak conjecture_, the _odd Goldbach conjecture_, or the _ternary Goldbach conjecture_. This weak conjecture asserts that all odd numbers greater than 7 are the sum of three odd primes.". In the following, the terms "binary Goldbach conjecture" resp. "ternary Goldbach conjecture" will be used (following the terminology used in [Helfgott] p. 2), because there are a strong and a weak version of the ternary Goldbach conjecture. The term _Goldbach partition_ is used for a sum of two resp. three (odd) primes resulting in an even resp. odd number without further specialization.

Using the definition of a _Goldbach number_, which is "a positive even integer that can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes." (see df-gbe 48649), "another form of the statement of Goldbach's conjecture is that all even integers greater than 4 are Goldbach numbers.". 4 is not a Goldbach number, but it is the sum of two primes (2 and 2) nevertheless. sbgoldbalt 48682 shows that both forms are equivalent.

Hint (see Wikipedia, ("Goldbach's weak conjecture", 26-Jul-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 48682): "Some state the [weak] conjecture as 'Every odd number greater than 7 can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes.' This version excludes 7 = 2+2+3 because this requires the even prime 2. On odd numbers larger than 7 it is slightly stronger as it also excludes sums like 17 = 2+2+13, which are allowed in the other formulation. Helfgott's proof [see below] covers both versions of the conjecture. Like the other formulation, this one also immediately follows from Goldbach's strong conjecture." The definition of "weak odd Goldbach numbers", see df-gbow 48650, is the basis for "the other formulation", to formulate the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture. Alternately, df-gbo 48651 provides a definition of "(strong) odd Goldbach numbers" allowing for stating the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture. In literature, the term "Goldbach number" is used for "even Goldbach numbers" (according to definition df-gbe 48649), whereas there seems to be no explicit names and definitions for "odd Goldbach numbers". Since there are more theorems for "strong odd Goldbach numbers", "odd Goldbach numbers" refers to "strong odd Goldbach numbers" in the following. Otherwise, the term "weak odd Goldbach numbers" is explicitly used.

In contrast to the two versions of the binary Goldbach conjecture, the two versions of the ternary Goldbach conjecture are different not only for small numbers, but the strong version excludes cases like a=2+2+b in general, e.g., 23=2+2+19. Therefore, it seems to be more difficult to prove the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture than the weak version, because there are fewer possible partitions available.

Although the binary Goldbach conjecture is not proven yet, the ternary Goldbach conjecture was proven by Harald Helfgott in 2014 (the weak as well as the strong version, see Main theorem in [Helfgott] p. 2). It would be great if this proof can be formalized with Metamath (although it is not in the Metamath 100 list). This section should be a starting point for this.

The main problem will be to provide means to express the results from checking "small" numbers (performed with a computer): numbers up to about 4 x 10^18 for the binary Goldbach conjecture (see section 2 in [OeSilva] p. 2042, called "even Goldbach conjecture" here) resp. about 9 x 10^30 for the ternary Goldbach conjecture (see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4) or 8 x 10^26 (see theorem 2.1 in [OeSilva] p. 2057, called "odd Goldbach conjecture" here). Maybe each of the results must be provided as theorem, like 6gbe 48672, which would be quite a lot...

As proposed in the Google group discussion https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/DOXS4pg0h8w 48672, this problem could be solved by using a reflective verifier or adding a concept of verification certificates that can be added into the Metamath databases as a reference. To sidestep the computation problem for now, the corresponding theorems are temporarily provided as axioms, see ax-bgbltosilva 48711, ax-hgprmladder 48715 and ax-tgoldbachgt 48712.

Summary/glossary:

Term	Synonyms	Label fragment	Definition/Theorem	Remarks
binary Goldbach partition	simply "Goldbach partition"			A pair of primes (p,q) that sum to an even integer 2n=p+q	See https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachPartition.html 48712
weak Goldbach partition		gbpart		A sum of two resp. three primes resulting in an even resp. odd number without further specialization.
Goldbach partition		gbpart		A sum of two resp. three odd primes resulting in an even resp. odd number without further specialization.
even Goldbach number	simply "Goldbach number"	gbe	df-gbe 48649	A positive even integer that can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes.	See https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachNumber.html 48649
weak odd Goldbach number		gbow	df-gbow 48650	A positive odd integer that can be expressed as the sum of three primes.
odd Goldbach number	strong odd Goldbach number	gbo	df-gbo 48651	A positive odd integer that can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes.
strong binary Goldbach conjecture	"the" Goldbach conjecture" [*1], even Goldbach conjecture [*2]	sbgoldb		Every even integer greater than 4 can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes.	[*1] Equation (1) in [ApostolNT] p. 304 or [*2] introduction of [OeSilva] p. 2033.
binary Goldbach conjecture[*1][*3]	strong Goldbach conjecture [*1], even Goldbach conjecture [*1], or simply "the Goldbach conjecture" [*1][*2]	bgoldb, b	sbgoldbb 48683	Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.	See [*1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture 48683, [*2] statement in [ApostolNT] p. 9 or [*3] section 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 2.
weak ternary Goldbach conjecture	Goldbach's weak conjecture [*1], odd Goldbach conjecture [*1][*3], ternary Goldbach conjecture [*2], ternary Goldbach problem[*1], three-primes problem [*1][*2]	wtgoldb, wt	stgoldbwt 48677, sbgoldbwt 48678	Every odd number greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes.	See [*1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture, 48678 [*2] section 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 2 or [*3] section 2.4 in [OeSilva] p. 2057.
ternary Goldbach conjecture	strong ternary Goldbach conjecture, the "weak" Goldbach conjecture	tgoldb, stgoldb, st	sbgoldbst 48679	Every odd number greater than 7 can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes.	See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 48679, https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html 48679 or section 7.4 in [Helfgott] p. 71.
Goldbach's original conjecture (modern version)	the "ternary" Goldbach conjecture	mogoldb, m	sbgoldbm 48685	Every integer greater than 5 can be written as the sum of three primes.	See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 48685, and https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html 48685
Goldbach's original conjecture (original version)		ogoldb, o	sbgoldbo 48688	Every integer greater than 2 can be written as the sum of three "primes" (considered the number 1 to be a "prime").	See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 48688, and https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html 48688

Syntax

cgbe 48646

Extend the definition of a class to include the set of even numbers which have a Goldbach partition.

class GoldbachEven

Syntax

cgbow 48647

Extend the definition of a class to include the set of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three primes.

class GoldbachOddW

Syntax

cgbo 48648

Extend the definition of a class to include the set of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes.

class GoldbachOdd

Definition

df-gbe 48649*

Define the set of (even) Goldbach numbers, which are positive even integers that can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes. By this definition, the binary Goldbach conjecture can be expressed as ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)

⊢ GoldbachEven = {𝑧 ∈ Even ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑧 = (𝑝 + 𝑞))}

Definition

df-gbow 48650*

Define the set of weak odd Goldbach numbers, which are positive odd integers that can be expressed as the sum of three primes. By this definition, the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture can be expressed as ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)

⊢ GoldbachOddW = {𝑧 ∈ Odd ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)}

Definition

df-gbo 48651*

Define the set of (strong) odd Goldbach numbers, which are positive odd integers that can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes. By this definition, the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture can be expressed as ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ). (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ GoldbachOdd = {𝑧 ∈ Odd ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}

Theorem

isgbe 48652*

The predicate "is an even Goldbach number". An even Goldbach number is an even integer having a Goldbach partition, i.e. which can be written as a sum of two odd primes. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven ↔ (𝑍 ∈ Even ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑍 = (𝑝 + 𝑞))))

Theorem

isgbow 48653*

The predicate "is a weak odd Goldbach number". A weak odd Goldbach number is an odd integer having a Goldbach partition, i.e. which can be written as a sum of three primes. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW ↔ (𝑍 ∈ Odd ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑍 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)))

Theorem

isgbo 48654*

The predicate "is an odd Goldbach number". An odd Goldbach number is an odd integer having a Goldbach partition, i.e. which can be written as sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd ↔ (𝑍 ∈ Odd ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑍 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))))

Theorem

gbeeven 48655

An even Goldbach number is even. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 𝑍 ∈ Even )

Theorem

gbowodd 48656

A weak odd Goldbach number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 𝑍 ∈ Odd )

Theorem

gbogbow 48657

A (strong) odd Goldbach number is a weak Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW )

Theorem

gboodd 48658

An odd Goldbach number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 𝑍 ∈ Odd )

Theorem

gbepos 48659

Any even Goldbach number is positive. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 𝑍 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

gbowpos 48660

Any weak odd Goldbach number is positive. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 𝑍 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

gbopos 48661

Any odd Goldbach number is positive. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 𝑍 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

gbegt5 48662

Any even Goldbach number is greater than 5. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 5 < 𝑍)

Theorem

gbowgt5 48663

Any weak odd Goldbach number is greater than 5. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 5 < 𝑍)

Theorem

gbowge7 48664

Any weak odd Goldbach number is greater than or equal to 7. Because of 7gbow 48673, this bound is strict. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 7 ≤ 𝑍)

Theorem

gboge9 48665

Any odd Goldbach number is greater than or equal to 9. Because of 9gbo 48675, this bound is strict. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 9 ≤ 𝑍)

Theorem

gbege6 48666

Any even Goldbach number is greater than or equal to 6. Because of 6gbe 48672, this bound is strict. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 6 ≤ 𝑍)

Theorem

gbpart6 48667

The Goldbach partition of 6. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 6 = (3 + 3)

Theorem

gbpart7 48668

The (weak) Goldbach partition of 7. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 7 = ((2 + 2) + 3)

Theorem

gbpart8 48669

The Goldbach partition of 8. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 8 = (3 + 5)

Theorem

gbpart9 48670

The (strong) Goldbach partition of 9. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 9 = ((3 + 3) + 3)

Theorem

gbpart11 48671

The (strong) Goldbach partition of 11. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ;11 = ((3 + 3) + 5)

Theorem

6gbe 48672

6 is an even Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 6 ∈ GoldbachEven

Theorem

7gbow 48673

7 is a weak odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 7 ∈ GoldbachOddW

Theorem

8gbe 48674

8 is an even Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 8 ∈ GoldbachEven

Theorem

9gbo 48675

9 is an odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 9 ∈ GoldbachOdd

Theorem

11gbo 48676

11 is an odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ;11 ∈ GoldbachOdd

Theorem

stgoldbwt 48677

If the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))

Theorem

sbgoldbwt 48678*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))

Theorem

sbgoldbst 48679*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))

Theorem

sbgoldbaltlem1 48680

Lemma 1 for sbgoldbalt 48682: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, one of the prime summands must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ Odd ))

Theorem

sbgoldbaltlem2 48681

Lemma 2 for sbgoldbalt 48682: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, the primes must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑄 ∈ Odd )))

Theorem

sbgoldbalt 48682*

An alternate (related to the original) formulation of the binary Goldbach conjecture: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))

Theorem

sbgoldbb 48683*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))

Theorem

sgoldbeven3prm 48684*

If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then an even integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes: Since (𝑁 − 2) is even iff 𝑁 is even, there would be primes 𝑝 and 𝑞 with (𝑁 − 2) = (𝑝 + 𝑞), and therefore 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 2). (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 6 ≤ 𝑁) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)))

Theorem

sbgoldbm 48685*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))

Theorem

mogoldbb 48686*

If the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture is valid, the (weak) binary Goldbach conjecture also holds. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))

Theorem

sbgoldbmb 48687*

The strong binary Goldbach conjecture and the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))

Theorem

sbgoldbo 48688*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of three "primes" with regarding 1 to be a prime (as Goldbach did). Original text: "Es scheint wenigstens, dass eine jede Zahl, die groesser ist als 2, ein aggregatum trium numerorum primorum sey." (Goldbach, 1742). (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({1} ∪ ℙ)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3)∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑃 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))

Theorem

nnsum3primes4 48689*

4 is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))

Theorem

nnsum4primes4 48690*

4 is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))

Theorem

nnsum3primesprm 48691*

Every prime is "the sum of at most 3" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)

⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesprm 48692*

Every prime is "the sum of at most 4" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum3primesgbe 48693*

Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesgbe 48694*

Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum3primesle9 48695*

Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesle9 48696*

Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesodd 48697*

If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 5 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesoddALTV 48698*

If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 7 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘8) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

evengpop3 48699*

If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOddW 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))

Theorem

evengpoap3 48700*

If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOdd 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))