HomeTheorem List (p. 504 of 512)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 504 of 512) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-31525) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(31526-33048) |
Users' Mathboxes
(33049-51158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | rescofuf 50301 | The restriction of functor composition is a function from product functor space to functor space. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ ( ∘func ↾ ((𝐷 Func 𝐸) × (𝐶 Func 𝐷))):((𝐷 Func 𝐸) × (𝐶 Func 𝐷))⟶(𝐶 Func 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | cofu1a 50302 | Value of the object part of the functor composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝑀‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | cofu2a 50303 | Value of the morphism part of the functor composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌))‘((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑅)) = ((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | cofucla 50304 | The composition of two functors is a functor. Proposition 3.23 of [Adamek] p. 33. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | cofu1stfix 50305 | Post-composition by an object-fixing functor preserves the entire object function, including its exact domain. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Sep-2026.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝐾) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐾 ∘func 𝐹)) = (1st ‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | funchomf 50306 | Source categories of a functor have the same set of objects and morphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idfurcl 50307 | Reverse closure for an identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((idfunc‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1stf1o 50308 | The identity functor/inclusion functor is bijective on objects. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (1st ‘𝐼):𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1stalem 50309 | Lemma for idfu1sta 50310. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1sta 50310 | Value of the object part of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝐼) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1a 50311 | Value of the object part of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐼)‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | idfu2nda 50312 | Value of the morphism part of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐷)𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(2nd ‘𝐼)𝑌) = ( I ↾ 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubclem1 50313* | Lemma for imasubc 50360. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) × (◡𝐺 “ 𝐵))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | imasubclem2 50314* | Lemma for imasubc 50360. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) × (◡𝐺 “ 𝐵))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 Fn (𝑋 × 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubclem3 50315* | Lemma for imasubc 50360. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐺 “ {𝑦}))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐾𝑌) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑋}) × (◡𝐺 “ {𝑌}))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1homlem 50316 | Lemma for imaf1hom 50317 and other theorems. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(◡𝐹‘𝑋)} = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑋}) ∧ (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ (◡𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1hom 50317* | The hom-set of an image of a functor injective on objects. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐾𝑌) = (((◡𝐹‘𝑋)𝐺(◡𝐹‘𝑌)) “ ((◡𝐹‘𝑋)𝐻(◡𝐹‘𝑌)))) | ||
| Theorem | imaidfu2lem 50318 | Lemma for imaidfu2 50320. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = (Base‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | imaidfu 50319* | The image of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((1st ‘𝐼) “ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | imaidfu2 50320* | The image of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | cofid1a 50321 | Express the object part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐺)‘((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cofid2a 50322 | Express the morphism part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌))‘((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cofid1 50323 | Express the object part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cofid2 50324 | Express the morphism part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌))‘((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cofidvala 50325* | The property "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe); expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1st ‘𝐺) ∘ (1st ‘𝐹)) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦))) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧))))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf2a 50326 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the morphism part of 𝐹 is injective, and the morphism part of 𝐺 is surjective in the image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1→(((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)):(((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌))–onto→(𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf1a 50327 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the object part of 𝐹 is injective, and the object part of 𝐺 is surjective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐹):𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ (1st ‘𝐺):𝐶–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cofidval 50328* | The property "⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is a section of ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ " in a category of small categories (in a universe); expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥𝐺𝑦))) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧))))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf2 50329 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the morphism part of 𝐹 is injective, and the morphism part of 𝐺 is surjective in the image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1→((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌)):((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))–onto→(𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf1 50330 | If "⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is a section of ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then 𝐹 is injective, and 𝐾 is surjective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐾:𝐶–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | coppf 50331 | Extend class notation with the operation generating opposite functors. |
| class oppFunc | ||
| Definition | df-oppf 50332* | Definition of the operation generating opposite functors. Definition 3.41 of [Adamek] p. 39. The object part of the functor is unchanged while the morphism part is transposed due to reversed direction of arrows in the opposite category. The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories (oppfoppc 50350). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) Better reverse closure. (Revised by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ oppFunc = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if((Rel 𝑔 ∧ Rel dom 𝑔), ⟨𝑓, tpos 𝑔⟩, ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | oppffn 50333 | oppFunc is a function on (V × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ oppFunc Fn (V × V) | ||
| Theorem | reldmoppf 50334 | The domain of oppFunc is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom oppFunc | ||
| Theorem | oppfvalg 50335 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcllem 50336 | Lemma for oppfrcl 50337. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcl 50337 | If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the original class must be an ordered pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcl2 50338 | If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the two components of the original class must be sets. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcl3 50339 | If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the second component of the original class must be a relation whose domain is a relation as well. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐵 ∧ Rel dom 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oppf1st2nd 50340 | Rewrite the opposite functor into its components (eqopi 8037). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐺) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐺) = tpos 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | 2oppf 50341 | The double opposite functor is the original functor. Remark 3.42 of [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐺) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | eloppf 50342 | The pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor is non-empty; and the second component of the pre-image is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | eloppf2 50343 | Both components of a pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor exist; and the second component is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | oppfvallem 50344 | Lemma for oppfval 50345. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfval 50345 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩) | ||
| Theorem | oppfval2 50346 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩) | ||
| Theorem | oppfval3 50347 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐺, 𝐾⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ⟨𝐺, tpos 𝐾⟩) | ||
| Theorem | oppf1 50348 | Value of the object part of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘( oppFunc ‘𝐹)) = (1st ‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | oppf2 50349 | Value of the morphism part of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀(2nd ‘( oppFunc ‘𝐹))𝑁) = (𝑁(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfoppc 50350 | The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfoppc2 50351 | The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc2 50352 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc4 50353 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc5 50354 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | 2oppffunc 50355 | The opposite functor of an opposite functor is a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) The functor in opposite categories does not have to be an opposite functor. (Revised by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc3 50356 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)tpos 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | oppff1 50357 | The operation generating opposite functors is injective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ( oppFunc ↾ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)):(𝐶 Func 𝐷)–1-1→(𝑂 Func 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | oppff1o 50358 | The operation generating opposite functors is bijective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ↾ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)):(𝐶 Func 𝐷)–1-1-onto→(𝑂 Func 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | cofuoppf 50359 | Composition of opposite functors. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( oppFunc ‘𝐺) ∘func ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)) = ( oppFunc ‘𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubc 50360* | An image of a full functor is a full subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Full 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐽 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) = 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubc2 50361* | An image of a full functor is a (full) subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Full 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | imassc 50362* | An image of a functor satisfies the subcategory subset relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆cat 𝐽) | ||
| Theorem | imaid 50363* | An image of a functor preserves the identity morphism. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1co 50364* | An image of a functor whose object part is injective preserves the composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)𝑀) ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubc3 50365* | An image of a functor injective on objects is a subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | fthcomf 50366* | Source categories of a faithful functor have the same base, hom-sets and composition operation if the composition is compatible in images of the functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐴)𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐴)𝑧))) → (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑔)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩(comp‘𝐶)(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑓)) = (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑔)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩(comp‘𝐷)(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idfth 50367 | The inclusion functor is a faithful functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | idemb 50368 | The inclusion functor is an embedding. Remark 4.4(1) in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸) ∧ Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼))) | ||
| Theorem | idsubc 50369 | The source category of an inclusion functor is a subcategory of the target category. See also Remark 4.4 in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | idfullsubc 50370 | The source category of an inclusion functor is a full subcategory of the target category if the inclusion functor is full. Remark 4.4(2) in [Adamek] p. 49. See also ressffth 18120. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Full 𝐸) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐽 ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | cofidfth 50371 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then 𝐹 is faithful. Combined with cofidf1 50330, this theorem proves that 𝐹 is an embedding (a faithful functor injective on objects, remark 3.28(1) of [Adamek] p. 34). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Faith 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fulloppf 50372 | The opposite functor of a full functor is also full. Proposition 3.43(d) in [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Full 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Full 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | fthoppf 50373 | The opposite functor of a faithful functor is also faithful. Proposition 3.43(c) in [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Faith 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Faith 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ffthoppf 50374 | The opposite functor of a fully faithful functor is also full and faithful. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝐷) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ ((𝑂 Full 𝑃) ∩ (𝑂 Faith 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem1 50375* | Lemma for upcic 50379, upeu 50380, and upeu2 50381. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑛 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem2 50376 | Lemma for upciclem3 50377 and upeu2 50381. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐿(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐾))(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))𝑀) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐿)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem3 50377* | Lemma for upciclem4 50378. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝐿)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑋))𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑋)𝐾) = ((Id‘𝐷)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem4 50378* | Lemma for upcic 50379 and upeu 50380. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐷)𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐷)𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | upcic 50379* | A universal property defines an object up to isomorphism given its existence. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐷)𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | upeu 50380* | A universal property defines an essentially unique (strong form) pair of object 𝑋 and morphism 𝑀 if it exists. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐷)𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | upeu2 50381* | Generate new universal morphism through isomorphism from existing universal object. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁))) | ||
| Syntax | cup 50382 | Extend class notation with the class of universal properties. |
| class UP | ||
| Definition | df-up 50383* |
Definition of the class of universal properties.
Given categories 𝐷 and 𝐸, if 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝐸 is a functor and 𝑊 an object of 𝐸, a universal pair from 𝑊 to 𝐹 is a pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ consisting of an object 𝑋 of 𝐷 and a morphism 𝑀:𝑊⟶𝐹𝑋 of 𝐸, such that to every pair ⟨𝑦, 𝑔⟩ with 𝑦 an object of 𝐷 and 𝑔:𝑊⟶𝐹𝑦 a morphism of 𝐸, there is a unique morphism 𝑘:𝑋⟶𝑦 of 𝐷 with 𝐹𝑘 ⚬ 𝑀 = 𝑔. Such property is commonly referred to as a universal property. In our definition, it is denoted as 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀. Note that the universal pair is termed differently as "universal arrow" in p. 55 of Mac Lane, Saunders, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf (retrieved 6 Oct 2025). Interestingly, the "universal arrow" is referring to the morphism 𝑀 instead of the pair near the end of the same piece of the text, causing name collision. The name "universal arrow" is also adopted in papers such as https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08981. Alternatively, the universal pair is called the "universal morphism" in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_property) as well as published works, e.g., https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.12179. But the pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ should be named differently as the morphism 𝑀, and thus we call 𝑋 the universal object, 𝑀 the universal morphism, and ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ the universal pair. Given its existence, such universal pair is essentially unique (upeu3 50404), and can be generated from an existing universal pair by isomorphisms (upeu4 50405). See also oppcup 50416 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ UP = (𝑑 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑑) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Base‘𝑒) / 𝑐⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑑) / ℎ⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑒) / 𝑗⦌⦋(comp‘𝑒) / 𝑜⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑑 Func 𝑒), 𝑤 ∈ 𝑐 ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑤𝑗((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑤𝑗((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑤, ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)⟩𝑜((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))𝑚))})) | ||
| Theorem | reldmup 50384 | The domain of UP is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom UP | ||
| Theorem | upfval 50385* | Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 12-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 UP 𝐸) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸), 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑤𝐽((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑤𝐽((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑤, ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)⟩𝑂((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))𝑚))}) | ||
| Theorem | upfval2 50386* | Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑊𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥)⟩𝑂((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦))𝑚))}) | ||
| Theorem | upfval3 50387* | Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑥)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑚))}) | ||
| Theorem | isuplem 50388* | Lemma for isup 50389 and other theorems. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | isup 50389* | The predicate "is a universal pair". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | uppropd 50390 | If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same universal pairs. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 UP 𝐶) = (𝐵 UP 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | reldmup2 50391 | The domain of (𝐷 UP 𝐸) is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom (𝐷 UP 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | relup 50392 | The set of universal pairs is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | uprcl 50393 | Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | up1st2nd 50394 | Rewrite the universal property predicate with separated parts. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | up1st2ndr 50395 | Combine separated parts in the universal property predicate. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | up1st2ndb 50396 | Combine/separate parts in the universal property predicate. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ 𝑋(⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | up1st2nd2 50397 | Rewrite the universal property predicate with separated parts. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝑋)(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)(2nd ‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | uprcl2 50398 | Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | uprcl3 50399 | Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | uprcl4 50400 | Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |