P. 500 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 49901-50000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	2arymptfv 49901*	The value of a binary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0, 1}) ↦ ((𝑥‘0)𝑂(𝑥‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐵⟩}) = (𝐴𝑂𝐵))
Theorem	2arymaptfv 49902*	The value of the mapping of binary (endo)functions. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) → (𝐻‘𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))
Theorem	2arymaptf 49903*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a function into the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)⟶(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptf1 49904*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function into the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–1-1→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptfo 49905*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a function onto the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–onto→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptf1o 49906*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function onto the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–1-1-onto→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2aryenef 49907	The set of binary (endo)functions and the set of binary operations are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (2-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋))
21.52.22.13  The Ackermann function According to Wikipedia ("Ackermann function", 8-May-2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ackermann_function): "In computability theory, the Ackermann function, named after Wilhelm Ackermann, is one of the simplest and earliest-discovered examples of a total computable function that is not primitive recursive. ... One common version is the two-argument Ackermann-Péter function developed by Rózsa Péter and Raphael Robinson. Its value grows very rapidly; for example, A(4,2) results in 2^65536-3 [see ackval42 49947)], an integer of 19,729 decimal digits." In the following, the Ackermann function is defined as iterated 1-ary function (also mentioned in Wikipedia), see df-ack 49911, based on a definition IterComp of "the n-th iterate of (a class/function) f", see df-itco 49910. As an illustration, we have ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) (see itcoval3 49916). The following recursive definition of the Ackermann function follows immediately from Definition df-ack 49911: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1)). That Definition df-ack 49911 is equivalent to Péter's definition is proven by the following three theorems: ackval0val 49937: ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1); ackvalsuc0val 49938: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1); ackvalsucsucval 49939: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁)). The initial values of the Ackermann function are calculated in the following four theorems: ackval0012 49940: 𝐴(0, 0) = 1, 𝐴(0, 1) = 2, 𝐴(0, 2) = 3; ackval1012 49941: 𝐴(1, 0) = 2, 𝐴(1, 1) = 3, 𝐴(1, 3) = 4; ackval2012 49942: 𝐴(2, 0) = 3, 𝐴(2, 1) = 5, 𝐴(2, 3) = 7; ackval3012 49943: 𝐴(3, 0) = 5, 𝐴(3, 1) = ;13, 𝐴(3, 3) = ;29.
Syntax	citco 49908	Extend the definition of a class to include iterated functions.
class IterComp
Syntax	cack 49909	Extend the definition of a class to include the Ackermann function operator.
class Ack
Definition	df-itco 49910*	Define a function (recursively) that returns the n-th iterate of a class (usually a function) with regard to composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ IterComp = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔)), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, ( I ↾ dom 𝑓), 𝑓))))
Definition	df-ack 49911*	Define the Ackermann function (recursively). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ Ack = seq0((𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘𝑓)‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1))), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1)), 𝑖)))
Theorem	itcoval 49912*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a class (usually a function) with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (IterComp‘𝐹) = seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔)), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, ( I ↾ dom 𝐹), 𝐹))))
Theorem	itcoval0 49913	A function iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = ( I ↾ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	itcoval1 49914	A function iterated once. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘1) = 𝐹)
Theorem	itcoval2 49915	A function iterated twice. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘2) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	itcoval3 49916	A function iterated three times. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)))
Theorem	itcoval0mpt 49917*	A mapping iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑛))
Theorem	itcovalsuc 49918*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐺(𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔))𝐹))
Theorem	itcovalsucov 49919	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))
Theorem	itcovalendof 49920	The n-th iterate of an endofunction is an endofunction. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑁):𝐴⟶𝐴)
Theorem	itcovalpclem1 49921*	Lemma 1 for itcovalpc 49923: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 0))))
Theorem	itcovalpclem2 49922*	Lemma 2 for itcovalpc 49923: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝑦))) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · (𝑦 + 1))))))
Theorem	itcovalpc 49923*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝐼))))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2lem1 49924	Lemma 1 for itcovalt2lem2 49927. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · 𝑌) − 𝐶) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2lem2 49925	Lemma 2 for itcovalt2lem2 49927. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2 · (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑌)) − 𝐶)) + 𝐶) = (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑌 + 1))) − 𝐶))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem1 49926*	Lemma 1 for itcovalt2 49928: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑0)) − 𝐶)))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2 49927*	Lemma 2 for itcovalt2 49928: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑦)) − 𝐶)) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑦 + 1))) − 𝐶))))
Theorem	itcovalt2 49928*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "times 2 plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝐼)) − 𝐶)))
Theorem	ackvalsuc1mpt 49929*	The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument as a mapping of the second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘(𝑀 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1)))
Theorem	ackvalsuc1 49930	The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument and an arbitrary second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1))
Theorem	ackval0 49931	The Ackermann function at 0. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1))
Theorem	ackval1 49932	The Ackermann function at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘1) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 2))
Theorem	ackval2 49933	The Ackermann function at 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘2) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 3))
Theorem	ackval3 49934	The Ackermann function at 3. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘3) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2↑(𝑛 + 3)) − 3))
Theorem	ackendofnn0 49935	The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is an endofunction on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀):ℕ0⟶ℕ0)
Theorem	ackfnnn0 49936	The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is a function on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀) Fn ℕ0)
Theorem	ackval0val 49937	The Ackermann function at 0 (for the first argument). This is the first equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1))
Theorem	ackvalsuc0val 49938	The Ackermann function at a successor (of the first argument). This is the second equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1))
Theorem	ackvalsucsucval 49939	The Ackermann function at the successors. This is the third equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ackval0012 49940	The Ackermann function at (0,0), (0,1), (0,2). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘0)‘0), ((Ack‘0)‘1), ((Ack‘0)‘2)⟩ = ⟨1, 2, 3⟩
Theorem	ackval1012 49941	The Ackermann function at (1,0), (1,1), (1,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘1)‘0), ((Ack‘1)‘1), ((Ack‘1)‘2)⟩ = ⟨2, 3, 4⟩
Theorem	ackval2012 49942	The Ackermann function at (2,0), (2,1), (2,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘2)‘0), ((Ack‘2)‘1), ((Ack‘2)‘2)⟩ = ⟨3, 5, 7⟩
Theorem	ackval3012 49943	The Ackermann function at (3,0), (3,1), (3,2). (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘3)‘0), ((Ack‘3)‘1), ((Ack‘3)‘2)⟩ = ⟨5, ;13, ;29⟩
Theorem	ackval40 49944	The Ackermann function at (4,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘0) = ;13
Theorem	ackval41a 49945	The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ((2↑;16) − 3)
Theorem	ackval41 49946	The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ;;;;65533
Theorem	ackval42 49947	The Ackermann function at (4,2). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑;;;;65536) − 3)
Theorem	ackval42a 49948	The Ackermann function at (4,2), expressed with powers of 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑(2↑(2↑(2↑2)))) − 3)
Theorem	ackval50 49949	The Ackermann function at (5,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘5)‘0) = ;;;;65533
21.52.23  Elementary geometry (extension)
21.52.23.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	fv1prop 49950	The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}‘1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	fv2prop 49951	The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}‘2) = 𝐵)
Theorem	submuladdmuld 49952	Transformation of a sum of a product of a difference and a product with the subtrahend of the difference. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · (𝐷 − 𝐶))))
Theorem	affinecomb1 49953*	Combination of two real affine combinations, one class variable resolved. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐺 − 𝐹) / (𝐶 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ 𝐸 = ((𝑆 · (𝐴 − 𝐵)) + 𝐹)))
Theorem	affinecomb2 49954*	Combination of two real affine combinations, presented without fraction. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · 𝐸) = (((𝐺 − 𝐹) · 𝐴) + ((𝐹 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐺)))))
Theorem	affineid 49955	Identity of an affine combination. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1subrec1sub 49956	Subtract the reciprocal of 1 minus a number from 1 results in the number divided by the number minus 1. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (1 − (1 / (1 − 𝐴))) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	resum2sqcl 49957	The sum of two squares of real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	resum2sqgt0 49958	The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is greater than zero. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 0 < 𝑄)
Theorem	resum2sqrp 49959	The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is a positive real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	resum2sqorgt0 49960	The sum of the square of two real numbers is greater than zero if at least one of the real numbers is nonzero. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → 0 < 𝑄)
Theorem	reorelicc 49961	Membership in and outside of a closed real interval. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐶))
21.52.23.2  Real euclidean space of dimension 2
Theorem	rrx2pxel 49962	The x-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘0) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rrx2pyel 49963	The y-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘1) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	prelrrx2 49964	A doubleton word of real numbers is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ⟨“𝐴𝐵”⟩ ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	prelrrx2bd 49965	Equivalent condition for 𝑍 being a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, determined by its coordinates. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Oct-2026.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵”⟩ ↔ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ((𝑍‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑍‘1) = 𝐵))))
Theorem	prelrrx2b 49966	Equivalent condition for being one of a pair of points in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, determined by its coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (((𝑍‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑍‘1) = 𝐵) ∨ ((𝑍‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑍‘1) = 𝑌))) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {⟨“𝐴𝐵”⟩, ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩}))
Theorem	rrx2pnecoorneor 49967	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then they are different at least at one coordinate. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑋‘0) ≠ (𝑌‘0) ∨ (𝑋‘1) ≠ (𝑌‘1)))
Theorem	rrx2pnedifcoorneor 49968	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘0) − (𝑋‘0))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0))
Theorem	rrx2pnedifcoorneorr 49969	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘0) − (𝑋‘0))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑋‘1) − (𝑌‘1))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0))
Theorem	rrx2xpref1o 49970*	There is a bijection between the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) and the set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane (represented as mappings from (0..^2) to the real numbers). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⟨“𝑥𝑦”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(ℝ × ℝ)–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	rrx2xpreen 49971	The set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane and the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 ≈ (ℝ × ℝ)
Theorem	rrx2plord 49972*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: a point is less than another point iff its first coordinate is less than the first coordinate of the other point, or the first coordinates of both points are equal and the second coordinate of the first point is less than the second coordinate of the other point: ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ≤ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ iff (𝑎 < 𝑥 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑦)). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘0) < (𝑦‘0) ∨ ((𝑥‘0) = (𝑦‘0) ∧ (𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋‘0) < (𝑌‘0) ∨ ((𝑋‘0) = (𝑌‘0) ∧ (𝑋‘1) < (𝑌‘1)))))
Theorem	rrx2plord1 49973*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: a point is less than another point if its first coordinate is less than the first coordinate of the other point. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘0) < (𝑦‘0) ∨ ((𝑥‘0) = (𝑦‘0) ∧ (𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑋‘0) < (𝑌‘0)) → 𝑋𝑂𝑌)
Theorem	rrx2plord2 49974*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: if the first coordinates of two points are equal, a point is less than another point iff the second coordinate of the point is less than the second coordinate of the other point. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘0) < (𝑦‘0) ∨ ((𝑥‘0) = (𝑦‘0) ∧ (𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑋‘0) = (𝑌‘0)) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌 ↔ (𝑋‘1) < (𝑌‘1)))
Theorem	rrx2plordisom 49975*	The set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane with the lexicographical ordering is isomorphic to the cartesian product of the real numbers with the lexicographical ordering implied by the ordering of the real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘0) < (𝑦‘0) ∨ ((𝑥‘0) = (𝑦‘0) ∧ (𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⟨“𝑥𝑦”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) < (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) < (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Isom 𝑇, 𝑂 ((ℝ × ℝ), 𝑅)
Theorem	rrx2plordso 49976*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane is a strict total ordering. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘0) < (𝑦‘0) ∨ ((𝑥‘0) = (𝑦‘0) ∧ (𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 Or 𝑅
Theorem	ehl2eudisval0 49977	The Euclidean distance of a point to the origin in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝔼hil‘2)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 0 = ((0..^2) × {0})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹𝐷 0 ) = (√‘(((𝐹‘0)↑2) + ((𝐹‘1)↑2))))
Theorem	ehl2eudis0lt 49978	An upper bound of the Euclidean distance of a point to the origin in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝔼hil‘2)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m (0..^2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 0 = ((0..^2) × {0})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) → ((𝐹𝐷 0 ) < 𝑅 ↔ (((𝐹‘0)↑2) + ((𝐹‘1)↑2)) < (𝑅↑2)))
21.52.23.3  Spheres and lines in real Euclidean spaces
Syntax	cline 49979	Declare the syntax for lines in generalized real Euclidean spaces.
class LineM
Syntax	csph 49980	Declare the syntax for spheres in generalized real Euclidean spaces.
class Sphere
Definition	df-line 49981*	Definition of lines passing through two different points in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ LineM = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤))𝑝 = ((((1r‘(Scalar‘𝑤))(-g‘(Scalar‘𝑤))𝑡)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑥)(+g‘𝑤)(𝑡( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑦))}))
Definition	df-sph 49982*	Definition of spheres for given centers and radii in a metric space (or more generally, in a distance space, see distspace 24647, or even in any extended structure having a base set and a distance function into the real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Sphere = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑟 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑝(dist‘𝑤)𝑥) = 𝑟}))
Theorem	lines 49983*	The lines passing through two different points in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐾 𝑝 = ((( 1 − 𝑡) · 𝑥) + (𝑡 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	line 49984*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐾 𝑝 = ((( 1 − 𝑡) · 𝑋) + (𝑡 · 𝑌))})
Theorem	rrxlines 49985*	Definition of lines passing through two different points in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ 𝑝 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑥) + (𝑡 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	rrxline 49986*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ 𝑝 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑋) + (𝑡 · 𝑌))})
Theorem	rrxlinesc 49987*	Definition of lines passing through two different points in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension, expressed by their coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖)))}))
Theorem	rrxlinec 49988*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension, expressed by its coordinates. Remark: This proof is shorter and requires less distinct variables than the proof using rrxlinesc 49987. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘𝑖)))})
Theorem	eenglngeehlnmlem1 49989*	Lemma 1 for - eenglngeehlnm . (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∖ {𝑥})) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁))) → ((∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖)))) → ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	eenglngeehlnmlem2 49990*	Lemma 2 for - eenglngeehlnm . (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∖ {𝑥})) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁))) → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) → (∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	rrx2line 49991*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ((𝑝‘0) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘0)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘0))) ∧ (𝑝‘1) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘1)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘1))))})
Theorem	rrx2vlinest 49992*	The vertical line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ((𝑋‘0) = (𝑌‘0) ∧ (𝑋‘1) ≠ (𝑌‘1))) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑋‘0)})
Theorem	rrx2linest 49993*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in "standard form". (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘0) − (𝑋‘0))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝑋‘1) · (𝑌‘0)) − ((𝑋‘0) · (𝑌‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝐴 · (𝑝‘1)) = ((𝐵 · (𝑝‘0)) + 𝐶)})
Theorem	rrx2linesl 49994*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, expressed by the slope 𝑆 between the two points ("point-slope form"), sometimes also written as ((𝑝‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) = (𝑆 · ((𝑝‘0) − (𝑋‘0))). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1)) / ((𝑌‘0) − (𝑋‘0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑋‘0) ≠ (𝑌‘0)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑝‘1) = ((𝑆 · ((𝑝‘0) − (𝑋‘0))) + (𝑋‘1))})
Theorem	rrx2linest2 49995*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in another "standard form" (usually with (𝑝‘1) = 𝑥 and (𝑝‘2) = 𝑦). (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑋‘1) − (𝑌‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘0) − (𝑋‘0))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝑋‘1) · (𝑌‘0)) − ((𝑋‘0) · (𝑌‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐴 · (𝑝‘0)) + (𝐵 · (𝑝‘1))) = 𝐶})
Theorem	elrrx2linest2 49996	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 in another "standard form" (usually with (𝑝‘0) = 𝑥 and (𝑝‘1) = 𝑦). (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑋‘1) − (𝑌‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘0) − (𝑋‘0))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝑋‘1) · (𝑌‘0)) − ((𝑋‘0) · (𝑌‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐺 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ((𝐴 · (𝐺‘0)) + (𝐵 · (𝐺‘1))) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	spheres 49997*	The spheres for given centers and radii in a metric space (or any extensible structure having a base set and a distance function). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑟 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑝𝐷𝑥) = 𝑟}))
Theorem	sphere 49998*	A sphere with center 𝑋 and radius 𝑅 in a metric space (or any extensible structure having a base set and a distance function). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → (𝑋𝑆𝑅) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑝𝐷𝑋) = 𝑅})
Theorem	rrxsphere 49999*	The sphere with center 𝑀 and radius 𝑅 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. Remark: this theorem holds also for the degenerate case 𝑅 < 0 (negative radius): in this case, (𝑀𝑆𝑅) is empty. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑀𝑆𝑅) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑝𝐷𝑀) = 𝑅})
Theorem	2sphere 50000*	The sphere with center 𝑀 and radius 𝑅 in a two dimensional Euclidean space is a circle. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^2)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sphere‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((((𝑝‘0) − (𝑀‘0))↑2) + (((𝑝‘1) − (𝑀‘1))↑2)) = (𝑅↑2)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) → (𝑀𝑆𝑅) = 𝐶)