| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 500 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31006) |
(31007-32529) |
(32530-50164) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | fucterm 49901 | The category of functors to a terminal category is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | 0fucterm 49902 | The category of functors from an initial category is terminal. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | termfucterm 49903 | All functors between two terminal categories are isomorphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 Func 𝑌) = (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cofuterm 49904 | Post-compose with a functor to a terminal category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | uobeqterm 49905 | Universal objects and terminal categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ TermCat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹(𝐶 UP 𝐷)𝑋) = dom (𝐺(𝐶 UP 𝐸)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | isinito4 49906 | The predicate "is an initial object" of a category, using universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘ 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 1 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐼 ∈ dom (𝐹(𝐶 UP 1 )𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | isinito4a 49907 | The predicate "is an initial object" of a category, using universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ TermCat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘ 1 )) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((1st ‘( 1 Δfunc𝐶))‘𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐼 ∈ dom (𝐹(𝐶 UP 1 )𝑋))) | ||
| Syntax | cprstc 49908 | Class function defining preordered sets as categories. |
| class ProsetToCat | ||
| Definition | df-prstc 49909 |
Definition of the function converting a preordered set to a category.
Justified by prsthinc 49823.
This definition is somewhat arbitrary. Example 3.3(4.d) of [Adamek] p. 24 demonstrates an alternate definition with pairwise disjoint hom-sets. The behavior of the function is defined entirely, up to isomorphism (thincciso 49812), by prstcnid 49912, prstchom 49921, and prstcthin 49920. Other important properties include prstcbas 49913, prstcleval 49914, prstcle 49915, prstcocval 49916, prstcoc 49917, prstchom2 49922, and prstcprs 49919. Use those instead. Note that the defining property prstchom 49921 is equivalent to prstchom2 49922 given prstcthin 49920. See thincn0eu 49790 for justification. "ProsetToCat" was taken instead of "ProsetCat" because the latter might mean the category of preordered sets (classes). However, "ProsetToCat" seems too long. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ProsetToCat = (𝑘 ∈ Proset ↦ ((𝑘 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ((le‘𝑘) × {1o})〉) sSet 〈(comp‘ndx), ∅〉)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcval 49910 | Lemma for prstcnidlem 49911 and prstcthin 49920. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((𝐾 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ((le‘𝐾) × {1o})〉) sSet 〈(comp‘ndx), ∅〉)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcnidlem 49911 | Lemma for prstcnid 49912 and prstchomval 49918. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (comp‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝐶) = (𝐸‘(𝐾 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), ((le‘𝐾) × {1o})〉))) | ||
| Theorem | prstcnid 49912 | Components other than Hom and comp are unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (comp‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Hom ‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝐾) = (𝐸‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcbas 49913 | The base set is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcleval 49914 | Value of the less-than-or-equal-to relation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcle 49915 | Value of the less-than-or-equal-to relation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋(le‘𝐶)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcocval 49916 | Orthocomplementation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥ = (oc‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcoc 49917 | Orthocomplementation is unchanged. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ((oc‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | prstchomval 49918 | Hom-sets of the constructed category which depend on an arbitrary definition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ≤ × {1o}) = (Hom ‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prstcprs 49919 | The category is a preordered set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Proset ) | ||
| Theorem | prstcthin 49920 | The preordered set is equipped with a thin category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ThinCat) | ||
| Theorem | prstchom 49921 |
Hom-sets of the constructed category are dependent on the preorder.
Note that prstchom.x and prstchom.y are redundant here due to our definition of ProsetToCat. However, this should not be assumed as it is definition-dependent. Therefore, the two hypotheses are added for explicitness. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | prstchom2 49922* |
Hom-sets of the constructed category are dependent on the preorder.
Note that prstchom.x and prstchom.y are redundant here due to our definition of ProsetToCat ( see prstchom2ALT 49923). However, this should not be assumed as it is definition-dependent. Therefore, the two hypotheses are added for explicitness. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | prstchom2ALT 49923* | Hom-sets of the constructed category are dependent on the preorder. This proof depends on the definition df-prstc 49909. See prstchom2 49922 for a version that does not depend on the definition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | oduoppcbas 49924 | The dual of a preordered set and the opposite category have the same set of objects. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (ProsetToCat‘(ODual‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐷) = (Base‘𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | oduoppcciso 49925 | The dual of a preordered set and the opposite category are category-isomorphic. Example 3.6(1) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (ProsetToCat‘(ODual‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷( ≃𝑐 ‘(CatCat‘𝑈))𝑂) | ||
| Theorem | postcpos 49926 | The converted category is a poset iff the original proset is a poset. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐶 ∈ Poset)) | ||
| Theorem | postcposALT 49927 | Alternate proof of postcpos 49926. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐶 ∈ Poset)) | ||
| Theorem | postc 49928* | The converted category is a poset iff no distinct objects are isomorphic. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Poset ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | discsntermlem 49929* | A singlegon is an element of the class of singlegons. The converse (basrestermcfolem 49930) also holds. This is trivial if 𝐵 is 𝑏 (abid 2719). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝐵 = {𝑥} → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑏 = {𝑥}}) | ||
| Theorem | basrestermcfolem 49930* | An element of the class of singlegons is a singlegon. The converse (discsntermlem 49929) also holds. This is trivial if 𝐵 is 𝑏 (abid 2719). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑏 = {𝑥}} → ∃𝑥 𝐵 = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | discbas 49931 | A discrete category (a category whose only morphisms are the identity morphisms) can be constructed for any base set. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | discthin 49932 | A discrete category (a category whose only morphisms are the identity morphisms) is thin. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ ThinCat) | ||
| Theorem | discsnterm 49933* | A discrete category (a category whose only morphisms are the identity morphisms) with a singlegon base is terminal. Corollary of example 3.3(4)(c) of [Adamek] p. 24 and example 3.26(1) of [Adamek] p. 33. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ( I ↾ 𝐵)〉} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ProsetToCat‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝐵 = {𝑥} → 𝐶 ∈ TermCat) | ||
| Theorem | basrestermcfo 49934* | The base function restricted to the class of terminal categories maps the class of terminal categories onto the class of singletons. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Base ↾ TermCat):TermCat–onto→{𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑏 = {𝑥}} | ||
| Theorem | termcnex 49935 | The class of all terminal categories is a proper class. Therefore both the class of all thin categories and the class of all categories are proper classes. Note that snnex 7713 is equivalent to sngl V ∉ V. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ TermCat ∉ V | ||
| Syntax | cmndtc 49936 | Class function defining monoids as categories. |
| class MndToCat | ||
| Definition | df-mndtc 49937 |
Definition of the function converting a monoid to a category. Example
3.3(4.e) of [Adamek] p. 24.
The definition of the base set is arbitrary. The whole extensible structure becomes the object here (see mndtcbasval 49939), instead of just the base set, as is the case in Example 3.3(4.e) of [Adamek] p. 24. The resulting category is defined entirely, up to isomorphism, by mndtcbas 49940, mndtchom 49943, mndtcco 49944. Use those instead. See example 3.26(3) of [Adamek] p. 33 for more on isomorphism. "MndToCat" was taken instead of "MndCat" because the latter might mean the category of monoids. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ MndToCat = (𝑚 ∈ Mnd ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑚}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈𝑚, 𝑚, (Base‘𝑚)〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈𝑚, 𝑚, 𝑚〉, (+g‘𝑚)〉}〉}) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcval 49938 | Value of the category built from a monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑀}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈𝑀, 𝑀, (Base‘𝑀)〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈𝑀, 𝑀, 𝑀〉, (+g‘𝑀)〉}〉}) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcbasval 49939 | The base set of the category built from a monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = {𝑀}) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcbas 49940* | The category built from a monoid contains precisely one object. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcob 49941 | Lemma for mndtchom 49943 and mndtcco 49944. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcbas2 49942 | Two objects in a category built from a monoid are identical. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | mndtchom 49943 | The only hom-set of the category built from a monoid is the base set of the monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 22-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (Base‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcco 49944 | The composition of the category built from a monoid is the monoid operation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) = (+g‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcco2 49945 | The composition of the category built from a monoid is the monoid operation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⚬ = (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ⚬ 𝐹) = (𝐺(+g‘𝑀)𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | mndtccatid 49946* | Lemma for mndtccat 49947 and mndtcid 49948. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ↦ (0g‘𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | mndtccat 49947 | The function value is a category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | mndtcid 49948 | The identity morphism, or identity arrow, of the category built from a monoid is the identity element of the monoid. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (Id‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = (0g‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | oppgoppchom 49949 | The converted opposite monoid has the same hom-set as that of the opposite category. Example 3.6(2) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (MndToCat‘(oppg‘𝑀))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝑂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = (𝑌𝐽𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | oppgoppcco 49950 | The converted opposite monoid has the same composition as that of the opposite category. Example 3.6(2) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (MndToCat‘(oppg‘𝑀))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∙ = (comp‘𝑂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) = (〈𝑌, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | oppgoppcid 49951 | The converted opposite monoid has the same identity morphism as that of the opposite category. Example 3.6(2) of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 22-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (MndToCat‘(oppg‘𝑀))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝑂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Id‘𝐷)‘𝑋) = ((Id‘𝑂)‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | grptcmon 49952 | All morphisms in a category converted from a group are monomorphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑀𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | grptcepi 49953 | All morphisms in a category converted from a group are epimorphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (MndToCat‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem1 49954 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49959. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = { 0 , 1 } ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑋) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑓 = 0 ∨ 𝑓 = 1 ) ∧ (𝑔 = 0 ∨ 𝑔 = 1 ) ∧ (𝑘 = 0 ∨ 𝑘 = 1 ))) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑋} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑋}) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑋} ∧ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑋}) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem2 49955 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49959. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 0 ∨ 𝐹 = 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 0 ) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 𝐶)𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem3 49956 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49959. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 0 ∨ 𝐹 = 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 𝐶) 1 ) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem4 49957 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49959. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = 0 ∨ 𝐹 = 1 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 1 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 0 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍) 0 ) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 = 0 ∨ 𝐺 = 1 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 𝐶)𝐹) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcatlem5 49958 | Lemma for 2arwcat 49959. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 · 0 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 · 1 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 · 0 ) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 0 · 0 ) · 0 ) = ( 0 · ( 0 · 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | 2arwcat 49959* | The condition for a structure with at most one object and at most two morphisms being a category. "2arwcat.2" to "2arwcat.5" are also necessary conditions if 𝑋, 0, and 1 are all sets, due to catlid 17618, catrid 17619, and catcocl 17620. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑋} = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑋) = { 0 , 1 } & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 1 ) = 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 0 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 1 ) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0 (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋) 0 ) ∈ { 0 , 1 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑋} ↦ 1 ))) | ||
| Theorem | incat 49960* | Constructing a category with at most one object and at most two morphisms. If 𝑋 is a set then 𝐶 is the category 𝐴 in Exercise 3G of [Adamek] p. 45. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑋}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈𝑋, 𝑋, 𝐻〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈𝑋, 𝑋〉, 𝑋, · 〉}〉} & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝐹, 𝐺} & ⊢ · = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑔)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑋} ↦ 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | setc1onsubc 49961* | Construct a category with one object and two morphisms and prove that category (SetCat‘1o) satisfies all conditions for a subcategory but the compatibility of identity morphisms, showing the necessity of the latter condition in defining a subcategory. Exercise 4A of [Adamek] p. 58. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {∅}〉, 〈(Hom ‘ndx), {〈∅, ∅, 2o〉}〉, 〈(comp‘ndx), {〈〈∅, ∅〉, ∅, · 〉}〉} & ⊢ · = (𝑓 ∈ 2o, 𝑔 ∈ 2o ↦ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑔)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (SetCat‘1o) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = 1o & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ (𝐽 ⊆cat 𝐻 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ( 1 ‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cat)) | ||
| Theorem | cnelsubclem 49962* | Lemma for cnelsubc 49963. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝐽 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ (𝐽 ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝐶) ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑥) ∧ (𝐶 ↾cat 𝐽) ∈ Cat)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat ∃𝑗∃𝑠(𝑗 Fn (𝑠 × 𝑠) ∧ (𝑗 ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝑐) ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑗𝑥) ∧ (𝑐 ↾cat 𝑗) ∈ Cat)) | ||
| Theorem | cnelsubc 49963* | Remark 4.2(2) of [Adamek] p. 48. There exists a category satisfying all conditions for a subcategory but the compatibility of identity morphisms. Therefore such condition in df-subc 17748 is necessary. A stronger statement than nelsubc3 49430. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat ∃𝑗∃𝑠(𝑗 Fn (𝑠 × 𝑠) ∧ (𝑗 ⊆cat (Homf ‘𝑐) ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑥𝑗𝑥) ∧ (𝑐 ↾cat 𝑗) ∈ Cat)) | ||
| Syntax | clan 49964 | Class function defining the (local) left Kan extension. |
| class Lan | ||
| Syntax | cran 49965 | Class function defining the (local) right Kan extension. |
| class Ran | ||
| Definition | df-lan 49966* |
Definition of the (local) left Kan extension. Given a functor
𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and a functor 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸, the set
(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) consists of left Kan extensions of
𝑋 along 𝐹, which are universal pairs from 𝑋 to the
pre-composition functor given by 𝐹 (lanval2 49986). See also
§
3 of Chapter X in p. 240 of Mac Lane, Saunders,
Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer
Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at
https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf 49986 (retrieved
3 Nov 2025).
A left Kan extension is in the form of 〈𝐿, 𝐴〉 where the first component is a functor 𝐿:𝐷⟶𝐸 (lanrcl4 49993) and the second component is a natural transformation 𝐴:𝑋⟶𝐿𝐹 (lanrcl5 49994) where 𝐿𝐹 is the composed functor. Intuitively, the first component 𝐿 can be regarded as the result of an "inverse" of pre-composition; the source category of 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸 is "extended" along 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷. The left Kan extension is a generalization of many categorical concepts such as colimit. In § 7 of Chapter X of Categories for the Working Mathematician, it is concluded that "the notion of Kan extensions subsumes all the other fundamental concepts of category theory". This definition was chosen over the other version in the commented out section due to its better reverse closure property. See df-ran 49967 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Lan = (𝑝 ∈ (V × V), 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑐⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑑⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑑), 𝑥 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑒) ↦ ((〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 −∘F 𝑓)((𝑑 FuncCat 𝑒) UP (𝑐 FuncCat 𝑒))𝑥))) | ||
| Definition | df-ran 49967* |
Definition of the (local) right Kan extension. Given a functor
𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and a functor 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸, the set
(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) consists of right Kan extensions of
𝑋 along 𝐹, which are universal pairs from the pre-composition
functor given by 𝐹 to 𝑋 (ranval2 49989). The definition in
§
3 of Chapter X in p. 236 of Mac Lane, Saunders,
Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer
Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at
https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf 49989 (retrieved
3 Nov 2025).
A right Kan extension is in the form of 〈𝐿, 𝐴〉 where the first component is a functor 𝐿:𝐷⟶𝐸 (ranrcl4 49998) and the second component is a natural transformation 𝐴:𝐿𝐹⟶𝑋 (ranrcl5 49999) where 𝐿𝐹 is the composed functor. Intuitively, the first component 𝐿 can be regarded as the result of an "inverse" of pre-composition; the source category of 𝑋:𝐶⟶𝐸 is "extended" along 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷. The right Kan extension is a generalization of many categorical concepts such as limit. In § 7 of Chapter X of Categories for the Working Mathematician, it is concluded that "the notion of Kan extensions subsumes all the other fundamental concepts of category theory". This definition was chosen over the other version in the commented out section due to its better reverse closure property. See df-lan 49966 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ran = (𝑝 ∈ (V × V), 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑐⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑑⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑑), 𝑥 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑒) ↦ (( oppFunc ‘(〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 −∘F 𝑓))((oppCat‘(𝑑 FuncCat 𝑒)) UP (oppCat‘(𝑐 FuncCat 𝑒)))𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | lanfn 49968 | Lan is a function on ((V × V) × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Lan Fn ((V × V) × V) | ||
| Theorem | ranfn 49969 | Ran is a function on ((V × V) × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ran Fn ((V × V) × V) | ||
| Theorem | reldmlan 49970 | The domain of Lan is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom Lan | ||
| Theorem | reldmran 49971 | The domain of Ran is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom Ran | ||
| Theorem | lanfval 49972* | Value of the function generating the set of left Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷), 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸) ↦ ((〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝑓)(𝑅 UP 𝑆)𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | ranfval 49973* | Value of the function generating the set of right Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷), 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸) ↦ (( oppFunc ‘(〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝑓))(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | lanpropd 49974 | If the categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same left Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐸) = (Homf ‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐸) = (compf‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 Lan 𝐸) = (〈𝐵, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ranpropd 49975 | If the categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same right Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐸) = (Homf ‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐸) = (compf‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 Ran 𝐸) = (〈𝐵, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | reldmlan2 49976 | The domain of (𝑃 Lan 𝐸) is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom (𝑃 Lan 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | reldmran2 49977 | The domain of (𝑃 Ran 𝐸) is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom (𝑃 Ran 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | lanval 49978 | Value of the set of left Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) = (𝐾(𝑅 UP 𝑆)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ranval 49979 | Value of the set of right Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) = 〈𝐽, 𝐾〉) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) = (〈𝐽, tpos 𝐾〉(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lanrcl 49980 | Reverse closure for left Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))) | ||
| Theorem | ranrcl 49981 | Reverse closure for right Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))) | ||
| Theorem | rellan 49982 | The set of left Kan extensions is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐹(𝑃 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | relran 49983 | The set of right Kan extensions is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐹(𝑃 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | islan 49984 | A left Kan extension is a universal pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐾(𝑅 UP 𝑆)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | islan2 49985 | A left Kan extension is a universal pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴 → 𝐿(𝐾(𝑅 UP 𝑆)𝑋)𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lanval2 49986 | The set of left Kan extensions is the set of universal pairs. Therefore, the explicit universal property can be recovered by isup2 49553 and upciclem1 49525. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) → (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋) = (𝐾(𝑅 UP 𝑆)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isran 49987 | A right Kan extension is a universal pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘(𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘(𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) = 〈𝐽, 𝐾〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (〈𝐽, tpos 𝐾〉(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isran2 49988 | A right Kan extension is a universal pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘(𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘(𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) = 〈𝐽, 𝐾〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(〈𝐽, tpos 𝐾〉(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑋)𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ranval2 49989 | The set of right Kan extensions is the set of universal pairs. Therefore, the explicit universal property can be recovered by oppcup2 49567 and oppcup3lem 49565. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘(𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘(𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) = 〈𝐽, 𝐾〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) = (〈𝐽, tpos 𝐾〉(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ranval3 49990 | The set of right Kan extensions is the set of universal pairs. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘(𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘(𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) → (𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋) = (( oppFunc ‘𝐾)(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lanrcl2 49991 | Reverse closure for left Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | lanrcl3 49992 | Reverse closure for left Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | lanrcl4 49993 | The first component of a left Kan extension is a functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | lanrcl5 49994 | The second component of a left Kan extension is a natural transformation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝑁(𝐿 ∘func 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | ranrcl2 49995 | Reverse closure for right Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ranrcl3 49996 | Reverse closure for right Kan extensions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | ranrcl4lem 49997 | Lemma for ranrcl4 49998 and ranrcl5 49999. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹) = 〈(1st ‘(〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹)), (2nd ‘(〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 −∘F 𝐹))〉) | ||
| Theorem | ranrcl4 49998 | The first component of a right Kan extension is a functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | ranrcl5 49999 | The second component of a right Kan extension is a natural transformation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Ran 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((𝐿 ∘func 𝐹)𝑁𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lanup 50000* | The universal property of the left Kan extension; expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐷 Nat 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐸) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝑁(𝐿 ∘func 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿(𝐹(〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Lan 𝐸)𝑋)𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑙 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)∀𝑎 ∈ (𝑋𝑁(𝑙 ∘func 𝐹))∃!𝑏 ∈ (𝐿𝑀𝑙)𝑎 = ((𝑏 ∘ (1st ‘𝐹))(〈𝑋, (𝐿 ∘func 𝐹)〉 ∙ (𝑙 ∘func 𝐹))𝐴))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |