HomeTheorem List (p. 502 of 510)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 502 of 510) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-31439) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(31440-32962) |
Users' Mathboxes
(32963-50906) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | func1st 50101 | Extract the first member of a functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | func2nd 50102 | Extract the second member of a functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | funcrcl2 50103 | Reverse closure for a functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | funcrcl3 50104 | Reverse closure for a functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | funcf2lem 50105* | A utility theorem for proving equivalence of "is a functor". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 1-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | funcf2lem2 50106* | A utility theorem for proving equivalence of "is a functor". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐸‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ X𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵)(((𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑧))𝐽(𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑧))) ↑m (𝐻‘𝑧)) ↔ (𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐺𝑦):(𝑥𝐻𝑦)⟶((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | 0funcglem 50107 | Lemma for 0funcg 50109. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | 0funcg2 50108 | The functor from the empty category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹 = ∅ ∧ 𝐺 = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | 0funcg 50109 | The functor from the empty category. Corollary of Definition 3.47 of [Adamek] p. 40, Definition 7.1 of [Adamek] p. 101, Example 3.3(4.c) of [Adamek] p. 24, and Example 7.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 101. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 Func 𝐷) = {⟨∅, ∅⟩}) | ||
| Theorem | 0funclem 50110 | Lemma for 0funcALT 50112. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜁) & ⊢ 𝜏 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | 0func 50111 | The functor from the empty category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Oct-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 17-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ Func 𝐶) = {⟨∅, ∅⟩}) | ||
| Theorem | 0funcALT 50112 | Alternate proof of 0func 50111. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Oct-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ Func 𝐶) = {⟨∅, ∅⟩}) | ||
| Theorem | func0g 50113 | The source category of a functor to the empty category must be empty as well. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | func0g2 50114 | The source category of a functor to the empty category must be empty as well. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | initc 50115* | Sets with empty base are the only initial objects in the category of small categories. Example 7.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 101. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) ↔ ∀𝑑 ∈ Cat ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑑)) | ||
| Theorem | cofu1st2nd 50116 | Rewrite the functor composition with separated functor parts. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = (⟨(1st ‘𝐺), (2nd ‘𝐺)⟩ ∘func ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)) | ||
| Theorem | rescofuf 50117 | The restriction of functor composition is a function from product functor space to functor space. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ ( ∘func ↾ ((𝐷 Func 𝐸) × (𝐶 Func 𝐷))):((𝐷 Func 𝐸) × (𝐶 Func 𝐷))⟶(𝐶 Func 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | cofu1a 50118 | Value of the object part of the functor composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝑀‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | cofu2a 50119 | Value of the morphism part of the functor composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌))‘((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑅)) = ((𝑋𝑁𝑌)‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | cofucla 50120 | The composition of two functors is a functor. Proposition 3.23 of [Adamek] p. 33. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | funchomf 50121 | Source categories of a functor have the same set of objects and morphisms. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idfurcl 50122 | Reverse closure for an identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((idfunc‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1stf1o 50123 | The identity functor/inclusion functor is bijective on objects. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (1st ‘𝐼):𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1stalem 50124 | Lemma for idfu1sta 50125. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1sta 50125 | Value of the object part of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝐼) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idfu1a 50126 | Value of the object part of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐼)‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | idfu2nda 50127 | Value of the morphism part of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐷)𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(2nd ‘𝐼)𝑌) = ( I ↾ 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubclem1 50128* | Lemma for imasubc 50175. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) × (◡𝐺 “ 𝐵))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | imasubclem2 50129* | Lemma for imasubc 50175. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) × (◡𝐺 “ 𝐵))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 Fn (𝑋 × 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubclem3 50130* | Lemma for imasubc 50175. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐺 “ {𝑦}))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐾𝑌) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑋}) × (◡𝐺 “ {𝑌}))((𝐻‘𝐶) “ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1homlem 50131 | Lemma for imaf1hom 50132 and other theorems. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(◡𝐹‘𝑋)} = (◡𝐹 “ {𝑋}) ∧ (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ (◡𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1hom 50132* | The hom-set of an image of a functor injective on objects. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐾𝑌) = (((◡𝐹‘𝑋)𝐺(◡𝐹‘𝑌)) “ ((◡𝐹‘𝑋)𝐻(◡𝐹‘𝑌)))) | ||
| Theorem | imaidfu2lem 50133 | Lemma for imaidfu2 50135. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = (Base‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | imaidfu 50134* | The image of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((1st ‘𝐼) “ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | imaidfu2 50135* | The image of the identity functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | cofid1a 50136 | Express the object part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐺)‘((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cofid2a 50137 | Express the morphism part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌))‘((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cofid1 50138 | Express the object part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cofid2 50139 | Express the morphism part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌))‘((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cofidvala 50140* | The property "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe); expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1st ‘𝐺) ∘ (1st ‘𝐹)) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦))) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧))))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf2a 50141 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the morphism part of 𝐹 is injective, and the morphism part of 𝐺 is surjective in the image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1→(((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)):(((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌))–onto→(𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf1a 50142 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the object part of 𝐹 is injective, and the object part of 𝐺 is surjective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐹):𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ (1st ‘𝐺):𝐶–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cofidval 50143* | The property "⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is a section of ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ " in a category of small categories (in a universe); expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥𝐺𝑦))) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧))))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf2 50144 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the morphism part of 𝐹 is injective, and the morphism part of 𝐺 is surjective in the image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1→((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌)):((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))–onto→(𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cofidf1 50145 | If "⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is a section of ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then 𝐹 is injective, and 𝐾 is surjective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐾:𝐶–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | coppf 50146 | Extend class notation with the operation generating opposite functors. |
| class oppFunc | ||
| Definition | df-oppf 50147* | Definition of the operation generating opposite functors. Definition 3.41 of [Adamek] p. 39. The object part of the functor is unchanged while the morphism part is transposed due to reversed direction of arrows in the opposite category. The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories (oppfoppc 50165). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) Better reverse closure. (Revised by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ oppFunc = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if((Rel 𝑔 ∧ Rel dom 𝑔), ⟨𝑓, tpos 𝑔⟩, ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | oppffn 50148 | oppFunc is a function on (V × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ oppFunc Fn (V × V) | ||
| Theorem | reldmoppf 50149 | The domain of oppFunc is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom oppFunc | ||
| Theorem | oppfvalg 50150 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcllem 50151 | Lemma for oppfrcl 50152. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcl 50152 | If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the original class must be an ordered pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcl2 50153 | If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the two components of the original class must be sets. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfrcl3 50154 | If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the second component of the original class must be a relation whose domain is a relation as well. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐵 ∧ Rel dom 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oppf1st2nd 50155 | Rewrite the opposite functor into its components (eqopi 8021). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐺) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐺) = tpos 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | 2oppf 50156 | The double opposite functor is the original functor. Remark 3.42 of [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐺) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | eloppf 50157 | The pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor is non-empty; and the second component of the pre-image is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | eloppf2 50158 | Both components of a pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor exist; and the second component is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | oppfvallem 50159 | Lemma for oppfval 50160. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfval 50160 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩) | ||
| Theorem | oppfval2 50161 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩) | ||
| Theorem | oppfval3 50162 | Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐺, 𝐾⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ⟨𝐺, tpos 𝐾⟩) | ||
| Theorem | oppf1 50163 | Value of the object part of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘( oppFunc ‘𝐹)) = (1st ‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | oppf2 50164 | Value of the morphism part of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀(2nd ‘( oppFunc ‘𝐹))𝑁) = (𝑁(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfoppc 50165 | The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | oppfoppc2 50166 | The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc2 50167 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc4 50168 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc5 50169 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | 2oppffunc 50170 | The opposite functor of an opposite functor is a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) The functor in opposite categories does not have to be an opposite functor. (Revised by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | funcoppc3 50171 | A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)tpos 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | oppff1 50172 | The operation generating opposite functors is injective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ( oppFunc ↾ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)):(𝐶 Func 𝐷)–1-1→(𝑂 Func 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | oppff1o 50173 | The operation generating opposite functors is bijective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ↾ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)):(𝐶 Func 𝐷)–1-1-onto→(𝑂 Func 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | cofuoppf 50174 | Composition of opposite functors. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( oppFunc ‘𝐺) ∘func ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)) = ( oppFunc ‘𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubc 50175* | An image of a full functor is a full subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Full 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐽 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) = 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubc2 50176* | An image of a full functor is a (full) subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Full 𝐸)𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | imassc 50177* | An image of a functor satisfies the subcategory subset relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆cat 𝐽) | ||
| Theorem | imaid 50178* | An image of a functor preserves the identity morphism. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1co 50179* | An image of a functor whose object part is injective preserves the composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)𝑀) ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | imasubc3 50180* | An image of a functor injective on objects is a subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | fthcomf 50181* | Source categories of a faithful functor have the same base, hom-sets and composition operation if the composition is compatible in images of the functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝐺) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐴)𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐴)𝑧))) → (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑔)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩(comp‘𝐶)(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑓)) = (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑔)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩(comp‘𝐷)(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idfth 50182 | The inclusion functor is a faithful functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | idemb 50183 | The inclusion functor is an embedding. Remark 4.4(1) in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸) ∧ Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼))) | ||
| Theorem | idsubc 50184 | The source category of an inclusion functor is a subcategory of the target category. See also Remark 4.4 in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | idfullsubc 50185 | The source category of an inclusion functor is a full subcategory of the target category if the inclusion functor is full. Remark 4.4(2) in [Adamek] p. 49. See also ressffth 18062. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Full 𝐸) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐽 ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | cofidfth 50186 | If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then 𝐹 is faithful. Combined with cofidf1 50145, this theorem proves that 𝐹 is an embedding (a faithful functor injective on objects, remark 3.28(1) of [Adamek] p. 34). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Faith 𝐸)𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fulloppf 50187 | The opposite functor of a full functor is also full. Proposition 3.43(d) in [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Full 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Full 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | fthoppf 50188 | The opposite functor of a faithful functor is also faithful. Proposition 3.43(c) in [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Faith 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Faith 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ffthoppf 50189 | The opposite functor of a fully faithful functor is also full and faithful. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝐷) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ ((𝑂 Full 𝑃) ∩ (𝑂 Faith 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem1 50190* | Lemma for upcic 50194, upeu 50195, and upeu2 50196. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑛 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem2 50191 | Lemma for upciclem3 50192 and upeu2 50196. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐿(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐾))(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))𝑀) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐿)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem3 50192* | Lemma for upciclem4 50193. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝐿)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑋))𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑋)𝐾) = ((Id‘𝐷)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | upciclem4 50193* | Lemma for upcic 50194 and upeu 50195. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐷)𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐷)𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | upcic 50194* | A universal property defines an object up to isomorphism given its existence. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐷)𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | upeu 50195* | A universal property defines an essentially unique (strong form) pair of object 𝑋 and morphism 𝑀 if it exists. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐷)𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | upeu2 50196* | Generate new universal morphism through isomorphism from existing universal object. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁))) | ||
| Syntax | cup 50197 | Extend class notation with the class of universal properties. |
| class UP | ||
| Definition | df-up 50198* |
Definition of the class of universal properties.
Given categories 𝐷 and 𝐸, if 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝐸 is a functor and 𝑊 an object of 𝐸, a universal pair from 𝑊 to 𝐹 is a pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ consisting of an object 𝑋 of 𝐷 and a morphism 𝑀:𝑊⟶𝐹𝑋 of 𝐸, such that to every pair ⟨𝑦, 𝑔⟩ with 𝑦 an object of 𝐷 and 𝑔:𝑊⟶𝐹𝑦 a morphism of 𝐸, there is a unique morphism 𝑘:𝑋⟶𝑦 of 𝐷 with 𝐹𝑘 ⚬ 𝑀 = 𝑔. Such property is commonly referred to as a universal property. In our definition, it is denoted as 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀. Note that the universal pair is termed differently as "universal arrow" in p. 55 of Mac Lane, Saunders, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf (retrieved 6 Oct 2025). Interestingly, the "universal arrow" is referring to the morphism 𝑀 instead of the pair near the end of the same piece of the text, causing name collision. The name "universal arrow" is also adopted in papers such as https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08981. Alternatively, the universal pair is called the "universal morphism" in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_property) as well as published works, e.g., https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.12179. But the pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ should be named differently as the morphism 𝑀, and thus we call 𝑋 the universal object, 𝑀 the universal morphism, and ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ the universal pair. Given its existence, such universal pair is essentially unique (upeu3 50219), and can be generated from an existing universal pair by isomorphisms (upeu4 50220). See also oppcup 50231 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ UP = (𝑑 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑑) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Base‘𝑒) / 𝑐⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑑) / ℎ⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑒) / 𝑗⦌⦋(comp‘𝑒) / 𝑜⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑑 Func 𝑒), 𝑤 ∈ 𝑐 ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑤𝑗((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑤𝑗((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑤, ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)⟩𝑜((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))𝑚))})) | ||
| Theorem | reldmup 50199 | The domain of UP is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom UP | ||
| Theorem | upfval 50200* | Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 12-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 UP 𝐸) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸), 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑤𝐽((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑤𝐽((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑤, ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)⟩𝑂((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))𝑚))}) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |